Strange behavior MXP-6000... calling themselves?

Similar Questions

• Strange behavior of edge 95 MXP endpoint

  Hi Experts,

  I have a Codec on the client side (Germany), it's an edge 95 MXP with software version F9.3.1 PAL. Every time when I call from my 150 MXP, video calling is disconnected by this Code after 58 seconds. When I make the call of this Codec to my 150 MXP, it's fine. Everyone knows that kind of situation before?

  Thank you

  Jerry

  The difference between incoming and outgoing is usually a firewall - a dynamic firewall will allow the movement of return for outbound connections, but an incoming connection will have specific rules created to allow traffic to the inside.

• Does anyone know why an edge 95 MXP will call himself?

  I have an Edge 95 MXP and call himself all the time... the call is a SIP call of [email protected] / * /a call of 64K and the IP address. I don't have the power off because it's in the ceiling.  The unit is also recorded as a 3rd party endpoint call Manager 10.5... The unit can make calls at our other fine video devices. I had to set the unit to auto-answer, so it does not sound at all times.

  Usually, it is because your getting analyzed by applications such as SIPVicous tent identify opportunities for exploitation of circuits on UDP SIP PSTN.

  In general, this risk is mitigated by closing the firewall ports for the endpoint or by making a few changes to its configuration.  On a codec of series C, EX, SX, MX running TC software that is easy, but I do not know the equivalent commands (if there is) for a codec MXP.  However, you should be able to block the scans that cause this by closing the port UDP 5060 if the codec is open on your firewall.  If she goes by a gatekeeper as a VCS server you could disable UDP, I do not know CUCM.

  This has been asked several times, do a search in the forums for "100 @" found the following results, although they all have to do with a series C or VCS codec, but it's all the same question.  The unit is publicly accessible via the internet, it's just a matter of closing or adjustment of the endpoint configuration or call control server.

  lot-Calls-Numbers-100-and-101-looks-Self-Calls

  strange-appeal-loop-c40

  Cisco-VCS-Alarm-Call-License-Limit-Reached

  C20-phantom-appellants

• strange behavior

  Hello

  I have a strange behavior on the main screen of my application.

  My screen looks like this:

  1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are bitmap with navigation button, click scope.

  I have a separate Thread for processing and this X thread updates the content of the label and label B.

  Whenever the thread call X function is update the function labels are running label.setText (newtext) on both labels.

  Stange behavior:

  When the x thread updated, the text of the labels (via the function Y) the emphasis is on button bitmap 1,2,3 or 4, the text of labels disappears and the screen looks like this:

  

  If we move to the development for bitmap button 5 or ListField labels updated successfully and the screen looks like this:

  

  I checked on debug only when the labels are updated that the text is not null.

  You have some ideas on what is the cause?

  Best regards

  Hello

  I found the solution for the strange behavior. I added a "HFMst.ivalidate ()"; on the function Y and that fixed the strange behavior.

  Thks simon_hain and arkadyz for your help.

• Strange behavior with postGlobalEvent and eventOccurred()...

  Hello world

  I have a browser plugin for my application that will do two things:

  Firstly, when the BlackBerry browser is forwarded to a Web page with a particular MIME type, the browser plugin will say my application to go to the foreground. It works without any problem.

  Secondly, the browser plugin will display a global event at my request. My request, making use of eventOccurred(), will look for this event and the EC type-approval, it will execute an authorize() method that I have. This also works. However, I notice some strange behavior:

  The first time my application launches the BlackBerry browser and goes to the page specified (with a custom MIME type), everything works fine. If I had while my application to launch the browser and do it AGAIN, my authorize() method is running TWICE. If I open the browser of my application for the third time, so my authorize() method is started THREE times. See the model?

  .. .This is all this without leaving my application. If I had to leave and then start my application again, the 'sequence' prior would begin again. Thus, it seems that whenever x times that I repeat this process, the eventOccurred() method will receive x events.

  Here are a few snippets:

  public class Events {
      final public static int EVENT_AUTHORIZE = 1;
      final public static int EVENT_OTHER = 2;
  }
  

  manager.postGlobalEvent(pid, 0xCAFEBABE, 1, 0, null, null);
  

  public void eventOccurred(long guid, int event_type, int arg2, Object arg3,
              Object arg4) {
          if (guid == 0xCAFEBABE) {
              switch (event_type) {
              case Events.EVENT_AUTHORIZE:
                  authorize();
                  System.out.println("EVENT EXECUTION");
                  break;
              case Events.EVENT_OTHER:
                  break;
              }
          }
  
      }
  

  Can we see what is happening here? I've been "racking my brain" on this one for a while now...

  Thank you!

  "Thus, this can work any time the class is instantiated." The class is instantiated just before I open my browser".

  Application.getApplication().addGlobalEventListener(this);
  

  If you call the above (by instantiating your class) every time that you open the browser, applications to register this event listener again and again.

  If you're going to do it this way, make sure removeGlobalListener you when your application is done processing.

  "Can I make addGlobalListener when my application starts even if this class does not implement GlobalEventListener?"

  You can always have your UiApplication implement GlobalEventListener or just instantiate a new object that implements it in the constructor of your UiApplication.

• Strange behavior of Tomcat

  Hi all
  I'm working on an application that sends HTTP requests that have XML RPC and then receives the response and analysis. It worked great, except for the newly added application which gives an incomplete response from the server. The strange thing is that the response is finished when I send the application for the first time after deployment (e.g. restart tomcat), otherwise, the answer is always incomplete.
  Here is the method that send readings in the response (called in doGet (HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response)):
  
  public String sendUCIPRequest (String xmlRequest) throws IOException {}
  DataOutputStream out = null;
  InputStream inputStream = null;
  Servleturl URL = new URL (UCIPConstants.airUrl);
  URLConnection servletconnection = servleturl.openConnection ();
  servletconnection.setDoInput (true);
  servletconnection.setDoOutput (true);
  servletconnection.setUseCaches (false);
  servletconnection.setDefaultUseCaches (false);
  servletconnection
  .setRequestProperty ("user-Agent", "UGw Server/3.1/1.0");
  servletconnection.setRequestProperty ("Host", "hqminsatAuth");
  servletconnection.setRequestProperty ("Content-Type", "text/xml");
  servletconnection.setRequestProperty ("Content-length", String
  .valueOf (xmlRequest.length () + 4)
  + " ");
  System.out.println("length:"+String.valueOf(xmlRequest.length() + 4));
  servletconnection.setRequestProperty ('permission',
  "Basic U3lzQWRtOlN5c0FkbQ =="); "
  out = new DataOutputStream (servletconnection.getOutputStream ());
  out.writeBytes (xmlRequest);
  out. Flush();
  out. Close();
  inputStream = servletconnection.getInputStream ();
  Byte [] bf = new ubyte [9100]; a 9004
  inputStream.read (bf);
  Response string = new String (bf);
  Return response.toString (); THIS IS WHERE THE PROBLEMS BEGIN
  }
  
  When I System.out.println (sendUCIPRequest (xmlRequest)); The result is an XML file that is incomplete.
  
  Note: xmlRequset = ' <? XML version=\"1.0\"? " ' > ' +.
  "< methodCall > +.
  ' < methodName > GetAccountDetails < / methodName > ' +.
  "< params > +.
  "< param > +.
  '< value > ' +.
  "< struct > +.
  "< member > +.
  "< name > originNodeType < / name > ' +.
  "< String > < value > EXT < / string > < / value > +.
  "< / member > +.
  "< member > +.
  "< name > originHostName < / name > ' +.
  "< String > < value > IVR < / string > < / value > +.
  "< / member > +.
  "< member > +.
  "< name > originTransactionID < / name > ' +.
  "< value > < String > 32 < / string > < / value > +.
  "< / member > +.
  "< member > +.
  "< name > originTimeStamp < / name > ' +.
  simpleDateFormat.format (new Date()) + "<>< dateTime.iso8601 > value" + "< dateTime.iso8601 > < / value >" +.
  "< / member > +.
  "< member > +.
  "< Name > Numeroabonne < / name > ' +.
  "value < string > <>' + Numeroabonne [0] +" "< / string > < / value >" + //argument "
  "< / member > +.
  "< member > +.
  "< name > messageCapabilityFlag < / name > ' +.
  '< value > ' +.
  "< struct > +.
  "< member > +.
  "< name > accountActivationFlag < / name > ' +.
  "< value > < boolean > 1 < / Boolean > < / value > +.
  "< / member > +.
  "< member > +.
  "< name > firstIVRCallSetFlag < / name > ' +.
  "< value > < boolean > 1 < / Boolean > < / value > +.
  "< / member > +.
  "< / struct > +.
  "< / value > +.
  "< / member > +.
  "< / struct > +.
  "< / value > +.
  "< / param > +.
  "< / params > +.
  "< / methodCall > ';
  
  I tried to use buffer but it's the same thing!
  
  Help, please. I want to know if there is a bug in this code, or it is the server that is causing this strange behavior. Why exactly it runs successfully the first time. I use java 1.5 and tomcat 6. Thanks in advance.

  Read the input stream, taking note of the return value. For each reading that doesn't return - 1, add the bytes returned to a StringBuilder or StringBuffer, again taking into account the actual return value, without so far assume each reading fills the buffer. When you get - 1, convert the SB to a string. It comes in the same way as all other i/o in Java, nothing special, no magic.

• Has anyone ever met a strange behavior layer blend modes?

  I use a little photoshop for retouching and photo compositing. Tonight, I met a strange problem. I tried create a vintage photo look and had a number of adjustment layers, including a curves, levels, fill color and there was also that some layers of texture and noise all the value of the different opacities. To the top of all of this I had a layer of tile that was black on the edges and white in the Center, on the mode of multiplication of mixture. Well, when I was clicking on and turned off, I realize that this layer of the tile was certainly lighten the central part of the whole image a little (the part which is white on the layer of the tile), almost like a screen. So I hit the thumbnail by different modes of opacity layer and saw that there was no change in his behavior, each mode has screening white, darker color and multiply. I thought that perhaps he was interacting in a weird way with an other diapers so I have not disabled all the others except the back ground - still no change. Then I dropped the layer to the bottom of the after another until it was less than the background. When I started back up again, he behaved normally for a while until that I moved it to the top of some levels in the stacking order, and then he returned to the behavior of the screen. Anyway, I mixed it autour a bit but there was no thick when it would appear correct opacity and when he wouldn't, so it doesn't seem to be any specific layer interaction. I don't know, but I don't see really no case where white multiply together should produce a lighter result even if it were interacting with a different opacity. In any case it seems to me that there is something to do with the overall calculation of the opacities. I tried to create a new layer black and white and it was also do the same, strange behavior and do not correct opacity.

  I'm tired, so I'm going to bed. I'll turn off the computer and hope it goes further when I reboot, but if it isn't, doesn't that sound familiar to anyone? I'm not a regular visitor to this forum, but I thought I'd put it out there in case someone else has experienced something like this. I did that 5 gigabytes of ram on this computer and I worked there for a while... maybe that photoshop could not keep just up (?) I use Photoshop CS5, space colorimetric RGB Adobe 1998.  I never had something like this happen in the past eleven years, I've been using photoshop. Hmmm... hope I don't have to reinstall or call support or worse. I cross my fingers.

  The layer is in a group of layers have an other than to pass through blending Mode?

• Firefox crashes (and other strange behaviors) due to gifs

  From a recent update Firefox displayed a strange behavior that surrounds the gifs. Sometimes, after viewing pages with a large number of gifs or several very large gifs, Firefox will do things like not animate gifs, or even do not load the images at all, an and will not stop until I have restart Firefox. What's more concerning is that sometimes in these situations, Firefox will simply hang and stop responding, forcing me to kill the process.
  This page shows the behavior of hanging fairly regularly: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1021843 & page = 21
  It seems more likely to happen when I scroll the page quickly. The behavior persists when I restart Firefox mode without failure.

  39 of Firefox seems to have solved the problem.

• I get a strange behavior of the bar tabs and the address bar in Firefox 29,0 for Mac.

  I just installed Firefox 29,0 for Mac.
  I have a strange behavior of the bar tabs and the address bar with this new version.
  Instead of the address bar, I get two rows of symbols. And it is impossible to write anything in the address bar.
  (I add a screenshot, but I can't find a way to do it).

  Firefox has an RSS icon in the palette of the toolbar that you can drag a toolbar (but not on the location bar container).

  • Firefox menu button > Options/Preferences > toolbars
  • View > toolbars > customize

• Strange behavior USB Flash Drive Satellite A100-626

  Hello

  I did install Windows Vista Business Edition on my Satellite A100-626 (PSAA9) following the instructions provided in the Web page of drivers.

  So far, everything works as expected, except for one little (or no) question.

  When I ask Vista to 'Remove hardware safely' my USB Flash drive, a Popup appears telling me to remove it. So far, so good :D

  The only thing is that the flash player is not put out as could be expected and and yellow question mark appears in Device Manager.

  Opening of the question mark can read what follows:

  "Windows cannot use this hardware device because it has been developed to remove safely, but it has not been removed from the computer. (Code 47) To resolve this issue, disconnect the device from your computer and plug it in again. »

  Following the instructions above, the light turns off, lol...

  Someone else met this strange behavior? If so, any solution?

  I tried a few USB flashes that run well on XP and they both do the same thing.

  Thank you, Nuno!

  Hi Nuno

  It's very strange. I have the Satellite A100-504 (comes with Windows XP Home edition). Last week, I installed Vista and all the stuff followed Toshiba document instructions facilities. I use the mouse wireless, external HDD USB web cam. With the help of these external devices together I never noticed a similar behavior.

  You have the same situation with all the USB ports?

• redeclenchables strange behavior digital output

  I created a redeclenchables digital dashboard task (finished) digital output as follows: (in DAQmx C)

  DAQmxCreateTask("",&_taskHandle);
  DAQmxCreateDOChan(_taskHandle,"/Dev2/port0/line6","",DAQmx_Val_ChanPerLine);
  DAQmxCfgSampClkTiming (_taskHandle, "" / Dev2/Ctr0InternalOutput ", _clockRate, DAQmx_Val_Rising, DAQmx_Val_FiniteSamps, static_cast (_sampleCount)");
  DAQmxCfgOutputBuffer (_taskHandle, static_cast (_sampleCount));
  DAQmxCfgDigEdgeStartTrig (_taskHandle, "/ Dev2/PFI4", DAQmx_Val_Rising ");
  DAQmxSetStartTrigRetriggerable (_taskHandle, true);
  DAQmxWriteDigitalLines (_taskHandle, static_cast(_sampleCount), FALSE,-1, DAQmx_Val_GroupByChannel, _pDigital, NULL, NULL);
  DAQmxStartTask (_taskHandle);

  sample clock:

  DAQmxCreateTask ("", & _taskHandleCO);
  DAQmxCreateCOPulseChanFreq (_taskHandleCO, "/ Dev2/ctr0","", DAQmx_Val_Hz, DAQmx_Val_Low, 0,0, _clockRate, 0.5 "");
  DAQmxCfgImplicitTiming (_taskHandleCO, DAQmx_Val_ContSamps, _numSamples);
  DAQmxStartTask (_taskHandleCO);

  When I run the task without redeclenchables parameter, it output a correct signal. However, if I run with redeclenchables it out almost exactly 2 times faster than normal. For example, a pulse whose width of 10 ms became 5 ms and repeats again to be 2 pulses of 5 ms. This is repeatable, no matter how much or how fast triggers provided.

  My card is PCIe-6363. I do not know what causes this strange behavior, and I hope someone can help on this.

  Thank you.

  It disappears after reset configuration. Might be interesting for future reviews.

• Strange behavior with the function «Help in command line»

  So I do a little playing with the opening of the files compiled help (.chm) with the command-line help feature, and I saw a strange behavior when trying to index multi-level access keywords. According to the documentation, if you set the 'Key' operation, you can enter a value for ' string to search for "to access this section. The more precise help that:

  If this string contains a keyword index, the string must match the key of the index as it appears in the help index file. To access a topic with a multilevel index keyword, enter the keyword of the top-level index, a colon and the keyword of the second level index. Do not separate the elements with spaces. For example, a chain of error codes: GPIB jumps about a subject with a keyword of top-level index of error codes and a second level keyword index of GPIB.

  All right, seems simple enough. Except that when I tried, I couldn't work, even with the example provided. I tried the following simple test:

  

  Opens the help file, but it opens to this page, not to the page ' error codes: GPIB "non-descript. I saw this in 8.2 and 8.6. Anyone have any success with access to a multi-level keyword?

  Note - side

  Curiously, the Index for the help lvconcepts.chm file looks like this:

  

  In other words, the input index text is just "GPIB", but the text that appears in the keyword field is "codes error, GPIB. I'm curious to know how this was accomplished. I decompiled the lvconcepts.chm file and watched the .hhk file, and it is not immediately obvious to me. (By the way, if you try to use "error codes, GPIB" it does not either).

  Hello

  Please contact National Instruments!
  It is a very strange behavior.  I tested out and seen the exact
  same results you are experiencing.  This was reported to R & D (AUTO ID # 130246) for further investigations.
  From what I can tell the a possible workaround solution that we have documented
  in the post of root Canal.  I can't continue to look into this in order
  to see if there is no other workaround solution or a reason why it is
  run in this way.  Thanks much for the feedback!  If
  you have any other questions on this subject please post them here.
  Have a great day!

• Strange behavior file open/create/replace

  Hi all

  I will make my question as broad as possible because I think someone must have met this behavior before. I use the function open/create/replace file to programmatically open a file, giving a path entry created in an earlier vi. Strange behavior, I see, is that although Labview returns 1 error when I give my file programmatically, it reads the file OK if I give as a constant. The constant path that I give is exactly the same as one I am tryinng to programmatically.

  Any suggestions? Is it to do with a string formatting problem? I enclose my portion of treated VI the path_in section.

  Thanks for your time,

  Kind regards

  Harry

  Wild guess: you must use 'build path' instead of 'concatenate strings' build path.

  (Also use a constant of diagram of the path (not a string!) to "c:\ni-rt\" and get rid of the "trim whitespace' and the 'chain of path")

  See if that makes a difference. (build path is OS independent, while the operations of independent channels are not).

  Never use the paths as strings. There are very few cases where this would be appropriate.

• Issues coming out of "sleep mode" and strange behavior when restarting with GPU

  I use a desktop computer HP P7-1240 completely stock except for a GPU EVGA GeForce GTX 750 TI SC. The GPU works well when the computer is running (which is strange because the forums have several other discussions mentioning the 700 series must be incompatible with my BIOS).

  However, there are two main strange problems that have arisen since the installation of the GPU. One is that, every time that the computer enters mode "sleep", he refuses to wake back up correctly. It seems to me that the computer active but sends all the signals back panel (at the very least, no video because my monitors remain blank). On rare occasions, he wakes back correctly, but at least 90% of the time, it must be restarted. Upon reboot, the same problem sometimes (not), and the computer must be rebooted a second time until it will start again.

  This leads to the second problem. During startup, the computer goes to a black screen, listing the specifications of basic computer skills (see attached photo. In this screen, the computer does not meet any entry.  He proceeds to beep 3 times, all the same length and height spaced about 30 seconds of gap. After the third beep, the screen goes black and then the computer starts normally with no other strange behavior.

  Without the GPU, none of these problems occur. At the very least, not regularly.

  I saw another thread mentioned that, while the HP support for my office page lists not her, there is an update of the BIOS for my motherboard which has fixed issues related to the GPU more modern. By nature it is an update of the BIOS that does not (seem to) officially support Windows 7, I am reluctant to go forward with this potential solution.

  Although I intend to build myself a new computer from scratch at a certain point, I was hoping to get at least another year out of this machine, if not 2.  While this question does not seem to be immediately threatening the stability of the computer, I can't help but think that it is a question should I go quickly to avoid future problems (not to mention it would save me a good amount of electricity to be able to enter the mode 'sleep' on a regular basis).

  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

  

  Problem has been solved!

  For those of you who have trouble sleeping with the p7-1240 or computers with a card mother identical (MSI Jasmine Ms 7778 ver 1.0), I suggest that you follow this thread:

  http://h30434.www3.HP.com/T5/desktop-hardware/unable-to-boot-with-new-graphics-card/TD-p/3930544/highlight/true

  It is to use an update for your BIOS that is intended only for PC under Windows 8, but that seems to work perfectly well with Windows 7 PC. It solved my problems of sleep and makes the computer to behave at least semi normally while restarting.

  However, as indicated in the wire, an update of the BIOS should be a last resort because it can turn your machine into a very heavy and expensive paperweight if something does not work. Do not forget that you have the worm 1.0 card mother MSI Ms 7778 Jasmine and remember that you update the BIOS version 8.18.

  As I am looking for 2aeo on HP.com currently (according to the thread leading up to), I'm not find the same links I found last week when I went through the update. However, you can find elsewhere.

• Just had a phone call from a person calling themselves PC Tech and must stop their go more away

  Just had a phone call from a person calling themselves PC Tech Support, acting on behalf of BT, Virgin, AOL, etc. informing me that my computer was infected by a virus, and tells me to download Teamviewer.com so that they could report all files on my computer that have been contaminated. Now, I am very concerned that it is a scam and I finished the call, as they were eager to get paid £144 for 10years security coverage. I was told that my current security system was not compatible with my server. Please I left some scammers in my computer and how do I ensure them go further?

  On Saturday, February 4, 2012 12:15:49 + 0000, Jean Bell wrote:

  Just had a phone call from a person calling themselves PC Tech Support, acting on behalf of BT, Virgin, AOL, etc. informing me that my computer was infected by a virus, and tells me to download Teamviewer.com so that they could report all files on my computer that have been contaminated. Now, I am very concerned that it is a scam and I finished the call, as they were eager to get paid? 144 for 10years security coverage. I was told that my current security system was not compatible with my server. Please I left some scammers in my computer and how do I ensure them go further?

  This is a scam and that is becoming more and more common lately. But
  worse, if you leave them in your computer, which knows what losses are that they
  done there, or what confidential information they stole.
  So, if you did. I highly recommend that you do both of the following
  immediately:

  1 do a clean reinstall of Windows.
  2. change all of your passwords, especially banks or other
  financial sites.

  Ken Blake