VLAN Trunking, Link Aggregation Teaming e

Hello to all,

avrei need some delucidazione in merito ad una configurazione di vsphere tipo di.

VI spiego in brief:

2 vSphere host (host a host B e) con Nic 4 x host

1 Swicth (by manage Vlan [LAN, WAN, DMZ, vMotion, FT, iSCSI, etc...])

UNA configurazione base pensavo di implementare e configurazione di che a vSwicth0 con 4 Nic teamwork by every host.

1 configurated it grouping schede di 4, sul mio spend devo configurare Illinois Link Aggregation o mi not serve? (Su Che HP e called trunk mi pare) in terms static pole e Unico supportato da vmware. IO ho noticed no configurando sullo switch funziona tutto e nulla che to provo a uno dei 2 cavi dictionary alla volta no capacity it marked.

In più is configurated the vlan lato vmware e lato switch it tutto funziona a meraviglia.

Ho cercato della menus in merito e mi sono imbattuto knew menus che strategies come collegare una a nodo con ESX 2 schede di rete grouping known uno switch HP 1820 - 24G switch trunk spiega di configurare lato Dove he terms static e change policy Exceptions led on the way teamwork based on hashing IP!

Ho seguito guida (penso alla lettera!) my con mi ritrovo a problema e cioè che non raggiungo più he nodo ESX... create Reed is raggiungo all the macchine all'interno delle vlan!

Part menus seguita indicarmi could be wrong something particular? Qual'e un'approccio by una configurazione del genere?

Grazie!

Ciao,.

He port group management che ESXi default crea sommergibili durante ha UN override sulle di teaming dello switch che lo contains rules, pertanto is configuri ip hash sullo switch devi premurarti di farlo Reed dichiaratamente anche sul port group, altrimenti lo lost cosi come indichi! By Miss instradamento e momentaneamente entrare ESXi stacca chest he oppure altre tre at door

By the configurazione, funziona tutto anche senza trunk perch it grouping nativo port id che fa e agli switch, solo devi overlooks VMware verificare che gli convenctions delle tabelle di ARP siano veloci, o nel caso di più presenti, che sia abilitato switch it quick dello tree covering weight, my con i modelli HP come he tuo o superiore usually queste cose funziona nativamente.

Ciao,.

Luca.

Tags: VMware

Similar Questions

  • Start a Discussion on vSphere / VLAN Trunking in ESXi

    This is my first post to this community of VMware, so please bear with me if I'm missing something simple. I went to a discussion to ask this question under vSphere, but for some reason that I'm not able. I chose to follow the community of vSphere, but for some reason it is grey when I try to choose to start a discussion. Thoughts and guidance?

    The real question, I would like to ask on vSphere is how to configure trunking VLAN on a single host (no vCenter) using the vswitch standard. I find a lot of links like this one http://www.rustyhann.com/ESXi-06-Create-vLAN.pdf that describe the process of setting up a trunk on the switch port, then assign a VLAN ID to the ports on the ESXi host groups. When I change the switch to a trunk port, I lose conductivity to the host, so I can manage it is no longer. In addition, on the host, I see no VLAN ID and I don't see any configuration which leads me to believe that the switch is inform the host (thru VLAN Trunking Protocol or any other means) which have the VLAN. I might be able to answer this question for my part, I can bypass the first issue. Thoughts and guidance?

    Thank you. Best.

    Hello

    You are on the appropriate tab, just type 100 or 200 should you able to type value. Check out the screenshots below.

  • VLAN Trunking between 6248 and 2848

    Hello

    I have a Powerconnect 6248 switch connected to a 2848 and I try to get a VLAN on the 2848.

    VLAN working and properly receive DHCP addresses, traffic lanes and DNS runs on the 6248.

    The Protocol DHCP, DNS server is connected to port 1 on the 6248.

    When I create a Trunk port on 3 the 6248 Port, allow all VLANS through it, creating a trunk on port 1 of the 2848 on VLAN10 and try to plug in devices inside, they can see all other devices connected to the L3 switch.

    The two switches are running the latest firmware and the L3 on his own works as expected. I can't get any kind of circuits working at L2, tried with normal cable and crossover switch.

    Here is the config of the L3 6248. Switch 2848 L2 has a blank canvas with 10 VLANS created on ports 1,2,3,4 with port 1 as the trunk port installation.

    Any ideas pleeease? Anyone? It drives me crazy.

    ************************

    ! Current configuration:
    ! Description of the system "Powerconnect 6248, 3.2.0.7, VxWorks 6.5.
    ! Version of the software system 3.2.0.7
    ! Passage mode is configured as disabled
    !
    Configure
    database of VLAN
    VLAN 10,20,30
    VLAN 10 1 routing
    VLAN 20 2 routing
    VLAN 30 3 routing

    output
    battery
    1 2 Member
    output
    the IP 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
    field of IP domain name
    name-server IP 192.168.1.10
    IP routing
    interface vlan 10
    Routing
    IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
    output
    interface vlan 20
    Routing
    address 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0
    IP helper-address is 192.168.1.10
    output
    interface vlan 30
    Routing
    192.168.30.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
    IP helper-address is 192.168.1.10
    output
    level password user name 'administrator' encrypted 15 5f4dcc3b5aa765d61d8327deb882cf99
    l2relay DHCP
    DHCP l2relay vlan 10-90
    !
    interface ethernet 1/g1
    switchport mode general
    pvid switchport General 10
    No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
    VLAN allowed switchport General add 10,20,30
    output
    !
    interface ethernet 1/g2
    switchport mode general
    pvid switchport General 10
    No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
    VLAN allowed switchport General add 10
    output
    !
    interface ethernet 1/g3
    switchport mode trunk
    switchport trunk allowed vlan add 10.20
    output
    !
    interface ethernet 1/g4
    switchport mode general
    pvid switchport General 10
    No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
    VLAN allowed switchport General add 10
    output
    !
    interface ethernet 1/g5
    switchport mode general
    pvid switchport General 10
    No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
    VLAN allowed switchport General add 10
    output
    !
    interface ethernet 1/g6
    switchport mode general
    switchport General pvid 20
    No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
    VLAN allowed switchport General add 20
    output
    !
    interface ethernet 1/g7
    switchport mode general
    switchport General pvid 20
    No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
    VLAN allowed switchport General add 20
    output
    !
    interface ethernet 1/g8
    switchport mode general
    switchport General pvid 20
    No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
    VLAN allowed switchport General add 20
    output
    !
    interface ethernet 1/g9
    switchport mode general
    switchport General pvid 30
    No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
    VLAN allowed switchport General add 30
    output
    !
    interface ethernet 1/g10
    switchport mode general
    switchport General pvid 30
    No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
    VLAN allowed switchport General add 30
    output

    After turning off spanning tree on the 2848, all works now.

    VLAN, trunking everything.

    Thanks for the help! :)

    I hope that if someone else can use what it took me ages to develop. I plugged on Netgear switches etc and they seem to work.

    The issue was going on between the dell 6248 and 2848, Spanning tree is enabled on the default 2848. If I was going to the Netgear via the 6248, then at the 2848 switches worked.

    My config on the l3 also works very well if someone would use :)

  • A group of link aggregated traffic mirroring

    Hello. I would like to mirror traffic entry and exit of a group of aggregation of link on my Dell PowerConnect 7024. By looking at the http under switching configuration page > Ports > traffic Mirroring > Port Mirroring > add, it doesn't seem to be an option for traffic a single port and not a link aggregated mirror group.

    Can someone help me to check if this is doable? If so, how?

    Your results are correct. Associate connection ports are not able to participate in the port mirroring.

  • Router Cisco Small business with the functionality of the link aggregation

    Hi all!

    can someone tell me if there is a router from Cisco Small business with the functionality of the link aggregation? (I want to connect two 4 Mbps SDSL for flow)  The RV082 can do?

    Best regards

    You would need a RV016, who takes in charge up to 7 WAN ports. RV082 has only two WAN ports.

  • Cisco SLM224G VLAN Trunk Help! -> Problem solved!

    Hi, I have a few difficulties of implementation of the switch, I can't understand how to configure the network for VLANs created port. I have configured under management of VLANS, VLAN 10 and 20, I asigned ports e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6 with 10 PVID and e7, e8, e9, e10, e11, e12 with 20 PVID and the rest to defaul 1 PVID, frame SD = All + infiltration on filtering. Under port to VLAN-> VLAN10-> ports e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6 Tagged + e24 tag (I want this to be the trunk) and the tag VLAN20-> e7, e8, e9, e10, e11, e12 Tagged + e24. Theats all that I set up according to the SLM_Admin_Guide.pdf and I have connected the e24 (trunk port) to a Pf meaning Server (the server is configured with the same VLAN ID as on the switch), please someone tell me how to set up the trunk? I know that there is no option in the Port settings to define 'Access' or 'Trunk'... until this means? that the SLM224G does not support the VLAN Trunk? I saw some screenshots with the Linksys SLM224G and he had 'Access' or 'Trunk' setting... and Cisco does NOT work.  Help!

    Hello

    Interesting, I see two different GUIs in your screen capture, it looks like two different computers. :-)

    But the big brother of the SLM, the series SRW and I am about what follows to the SRW series, because I do not have a SLM in front of me, I had put;

    Step 1. the port settings interface return, leaving the PVID to 1 then do scroll down and save the option.

    Step 2.  On this "ports setting photo GUI, you have, I would put the switch ports to shared resources in mode Trunk. If the port must not be tagged in the VLAN 1 only, then I leave the setting the port mode 'access '.

    (Access mode allows a port belong only to one VLAN no marked only).

    (shared mode allows the switch port belong to several VLANs marked, but still unmarked in one vlan only usually the vlan by default)

    Step 3.  So I goto the "Vlan to the port' tab, Tagged for ports beloning to vlan 10 then do scroll down and save the option."

    step 4   So I goto the "Vlan to the port' tab, Tagged for ports beloning to vlan 20 then do scroll down and save the option."

    By default vlan1 in most SRW series brother would then be not identified on all ports and vlan10 and vlan 20 could be labelled on the appropriate ports.

  • Possible to enable link aggregation

    Hello would like to know if link aggregation is possible on vswitch currently I a vswitch connected to 2 portion of separate physical switch the same network traffic is properly configured as failover in vswitch mode how to configure this vswitch to perform link aggregation mode instead of the failover mode to achieve higher bandwidth or is such possible configuration is dvswitch support such config as well?

    Thanks for any info

    Check if this help http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1001938 Ko

  • Problem of BladeCenter ESX Server Vlan trunking

    VLAN for the ESX BladeCenter server problem

    http://http.cdnlayer.com/itke/images/icons/icon_tag.gif

    ESX, Bladecenter, VLAN

    Hello

    The bladecenter was initially setup by a company and only allows me

    create a VM from Vlan 2. The problem is that I'm out of intellectual property that

    VLAN and I wanted the ability to use another address space for the

    VM I have already created a new vlan 20.

    This is the current configuration of the switch.  Everything I have added to these configurations to before was sw trunk allowed vlan add 20

    Switch CISCO 4500

    Interface Port - Channel 1

    switchport

    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

    switchport vlan trunk native 3

    switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

    !

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet5/39

    Description Port Trunk BLADECENTER-sw2-p17

    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

    switchport vlan trunk native 3

    switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

    channel-group mode 1 on

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet6/2

    Truck BLADECENTER-sw2-p17 Port Description

    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

    switchport vlan trunk native 3

    switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

    channel-group mode 1 on

    !

    Config - sw1 Bladecenter switch

    VLAN 2

    Server

    VLAN 3

    WAN

    VLAN 20

    Server2

    Interface Port - Channel 1

    switchport vlan trunk native 3

    switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

    interface GigabitEthernet0/17

    switchport vlan trunk native 3

    switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

    Cisco-switch macro description

    channel-group mode 1 on

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0/18

    switchport vlan trunk native 3

    switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

    Cisco-switch macro description

    channel-group mode 1 on

    Blade switchport where the host is contained

    interface GigabitEthernet0/9

    Description blade9

    switchport vlan trunk native 2

    switchport trunk allowed vlan 2.20

    switchport mode trunk.

    The host ESX IP is in Vlan 2

    End result is that I can't use any VLANS in this new range.  There is no Vlan ID or installation marking.

    Thanks in advance.

    Grand...

    Don't forget to assign points for correct or helpful answers

  • 802 1 q VLAN Trunking pilot

    Hello

    Refer to VMware ESX Server 3 802. 1 q VLAN Solutions (http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx3_vlan_wp.pdf), the marking of comments of the VM mode (VGT), the document said about 802. 1 q VLAN trunking pilot use for the virtual machine. Can we know what it is and where to download?

    Kind regards

    Teeravee Sirinapasawasdee

    Never done it myself. Maybe this will help you

    http://www.lanarchitect.NET/articles/VLANTrunking/implementation/

  • Aggregation of links and VLAN Trunking

    I configured 2 switches with aggregates of connection between them.  Access ports are part of VLAN 10, but no longer communicate through the NEWLY created GAL.  LAG only pass a single VLAN or is there something that I am missing in the LAG config?

    After creating the LAG you must then configure the LAG entering the port-channel interface and put to general/Trunk mode. Updated general/trunk mode allows multiple VLANs on the connection.

    Example:

    Console (config) # interface port-channel 1

    mode console # switchport general

    Console # switchport General allowed vlan add 2,3,4,5 tag

  • Trunking ports (aggregation of links) does not

    Hello

    I have a single server ESX 4 (hp dl380g5), with 2 natachasery connected to a switch hp 2510 - 48g GB. I created a trunk on the switch ports 1 and 2 and they hooked up to two natachasery ESX.

    I have only 1 vSwitch in ESX and storage space (no VMkernel) that has the Service Console and the network of the VM. I activated this vSwitch (vSwitch0) on IP Hash load balancing to create a theoretical trunk on my 2 GB cards. The two NICA belong to vSwitch0

    When I read/write data to the virtual machine only on trunk ports now seems to manage the data and not both at the same time and with the same flow of data or usage that I expect.

    Is this expected behavior? I have something wrong or bad understand something here?

    Thank you

    Pascale

    I guess you are aware that the mechanism of hash IP packets with an IP - X to another IP - there are always transmitted only a single port physical thorugh, but never through multiple ports at the same time? Therefore, you will never get an increase in throughput for a single "conversation" between IP - X and IP - Y, no matter how much rising physical your chest has. This is due to potential for learning MAC layer 2 and other issues.

    Have you tested with a number of different source/destination IPs connections?

    If you have tested only a small number of connections, you could be 'unlucky' that the hash produced the same uplink of Teddy for all connections.

    Alternatively, you can view the network esxtop notice to see what Teddy what kind/loads of traffic.

  • What are the bare minimum commands to get a stack of PC6825 3 - switch with inter switch Link Aggregation?

    I am brand new to PowerConnect switches, even though I am familiar with the concepts of VLANS, aggregation of links and spanning tree.

    I am on a deadline to get some new ones installed 6248 in our baskets and get them functioning as a stack. What are the bare minimum commands for:

    • Three switches in a stack (master/Eve/member)
    • 2 ports grouped between each (total redundancy) switch with loops WITHOUT switching

    All the switches are running firmware v3.3.9.1 (January 2014).

    Thank you

    The range of interface Ethernet 1/g1-1 / g2 allows you to select the ports you want in the channel of the port. Page 293

    Channel-group 1 Auto mode to create 440 lacp lag page

    Select the Group of channels with interface port-channel 1

    Switchport page 601 in trunk mode

    Switchport trunk allowed vlan [VLAN you use]

    http://FTP.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/PowerConnect-6248_Reference%20Guide_en-us.PDF

  • VMotion traffic isolation, vlan trunking

    We have 2 full length M910 blade servers sitting in the dell blade enclosure. Installed esxi 5.0 on the two blades and joined them to the cluster.

    Each server blade full length a 8 network cards.  2 ports double aboard the card NETWORK and 2-port Ethernet mezzanine card.  All are connected to the internal cisco switch 3130 installed on the module e/s A1, A2, B1 and B2. all the internal switches are stacked together by the network team. and there is a link to internal switch (uplink) and an external switch (ports) that are on the vlan 137

    All the ports that are connected to the esxi host are configured as trunk on the switches of internal physical cisco blade by the network team. in our total case 16 ports (8 cards x 2 servers) are fixed to the internal trunk on cisco switch and there is internal cisco switch uplink and our external switch (located on vlan 137)

    On esxi5.0, we set up a big flat switch affecting all physical network cards to Vswitch 0.
    Please refer page for groups of ports configured.

    To isolate the vmotion traffic, we have configured tag (150) vlan different for vmotion. but vmotion does not work. Unable to ping of vmotion ips with each other.  But if I change brand VLAN to 137. vmkping works on the other and work of vmotion.

    If I change brand VLAN other than 137 to any group of ports (for example, management or virtual machine), I'm losing connection to the corresponding port group.


    I think that missing configure something on the blade switches internal cisco (3130). Please advise on what needs to be configured. I know that kind of why trunking is required. If you could explain the exact purpose of why the necessary circuits for esx would be great.

    What is advised to configure a virtual switch, such as a large flat switch or multiple switches
    Assigning to each switch port group. recommended configuration to enable balancing the increased load of incoming and outgoing and fail over.  detailed explanation would be really useful for non admins networks

    I will try to describe one of the possible configurations.

    First some facts/support:

    • 2 ESXi hosts
    • 4 blade switches
    • 1 external switch
    • 8 NICs in each server Blade (2 NICs for each of the switches)
    • vmnic0 and vmnic4 are connected to two different switches
    • different subnets / VLAN for vMotion (100), management (101) and VM networks (102,...)
    • all VLANS represent them different IP subnets

    Virtual network configuration:

    • 2 vSwitches: 1 for management, 1 for VM networks and vMotion
    • vSwitch0 for management and vMotion (vmnic0 + vmnic4)
      --> Management ports (VLAN 101) Group: vmnic0 (active), vmnic4 (at rest)
      -> vMotion Port Group: (VLAN 100): vmnic4 (active), vmnic0 (at rest)
    • vSwitch1: VM networks (vmnic1.. 3 + vmnic5...) 7)
      -> VM 1 (VLAN 101) port group
      -> Port VM 2 (VLAN 102) group
      -> ...

    Blade switches:

    • all the VLANS configured in the virtual network are present
    • all ports of downlink to the ESXi hosts are configured to trunk mode, all the VLANS allowed
    • at least 2 uplinks and the external switch configured as a trunk, EtherChannel (LACP)
    • ports of rising and descending liaison (on each of the switches) are a group of track link state

    External switch:

    • all the VLANS configured in the virtual network are present
    • four channels of Port/EtherChannels (LACP), one to each switch blade

    You can configure the VLANS on switches separately or by VTP. In any case, all the VLANS should be present on the switches of. If you need to route traffic between some VLANs, you must either set up a router on your network, or - in the case where the switches support and are properly authorized - configure routing ip (Inter VLAN routing).

    André

  • N3048 vlan trunk band guaranteed bandwidth

    Hello

    Ive got 2 batteries of n3048 which will be connected by a link of fiber shds 1 Gbps, there are several local networks virtual on each stack and some of them I want trunk on the binding fiber.

    an of vlan is for a balanced load diversely routed internet connection, there is a router on each site with 100 Mbps bandwidth, but also firewalls at each site that will be in the same vlan.

    I don't want no internet to run slow because something is hogging the bandwidth on the shds, so the question is how can I guarantee 100 Mbps of traffic for vlan 10 through the shds with us other traffic crossing of vlan?

    I have install other powerconnect switches and switches cisco with trunking VLANs between switches but I've ever done where I need to ensure a slice of bandwidth with QOS?

    I'd appreciate any help or advice to achieve this

    Thank you very much

    Hi Daniel,.

    Sorry for the late reply its been a bit choppy on other projects so just had time to test this out.

    Here's what I ended up using in the config:

    Console (config) # class - match-all card VLAN_10_MATCH
    Console (config-WCPA) # match vlan 10

    Console (config) # VLAN_10_MARK policy-map on
    class console(config-Policy-classmap) # VLAN_10_MATCH
    Console(config-Policy-classmap) # brand cos 5

    Console (config) # int item in gi1/0/48
    Console (Config-if-X/Y/Z) # classofservice trust dot1p
    Console (Config-if-X/Y/Z) # classofservice dot1p-mapping 5 3
    Console (Config-if-X/Y/Z) # cos - min - bandwidth tail 0 0 10 0 0 0 0
    Console (Config-if-X/Y/Z) # cos - queue strict
    Console (Config-if-X/Y/Z) # - political service on VLAN_10_MARK

    I applied the same configuration for the trunk on two piles of switch port

    Thanks for your help in pointing me in the right direction

    I used jperf on 2 laptops in VLAN 10, 1 in each switch then your laptop on the other switch into a vlan with jperf mode server and 3 computers, send traffic using jperf him around the trunk and which seems to work well. ive tried run qos traffic vlan first and then maxing the bandwidth through the traffic trunk vlan qos not and then vice versa with traffic vlan qos to a already maxxed bandwidth through the trunk and he still gave him its bandwidth of 100 Mbps in both scenarios.

     

    concerning

  • Configuration of VLAN 6248 - link IP subnet to the VLAN

    We have 200 node network with no VLAN (small private company that developed quickly)

    All nodes / devices / etc. of PCs spread evenly over 6 Dell 5448 switches with no regard for the Department, location or usage.

    (1) L3 is 6248 - we've added 6248 route VLANs (everything is on VLAN 1 still - i.e. without marking)

    (2) L2 several VLANS by switch - the best of cases, 2 VLANS by 5448

    (3) trunk / general uplink L2 s 5448 using LAG (44, 45 ports) - should be labelled all traffic, but since it will be a conversion / migration on an e-commerce network 24 x 7, we thought that we would have to do uplink between 5548 s and 6248 General and changes to the trunk later

    (4) for the conversion, all uplinks of trunk/general will have several VLANs marked as vlan1 untagged traffic

    (5) we know fixed us every VLAN gateway IP to the IP address of 6248 maintenance the VLAN, but can't decide how to proceed with no one-to-one correspondence of VLAN LAG uplink

    Questions on 6248

    Q1: we would use "bind the IP subnet to the VLAN ' the 6248 to configure routing between VLANS or do we define the belonging to a VLAN by LAG?

    Q2: would we be able to ping the IP of the bridge VLAN configured in the 6248 a down host link / node / PC marked for the same VLAN?

    Any suggestions would be most appreciated.

    On the 6248 allowing to the VLAN routing you must just ensure each VLAN has an IP address assigned to it:

    Console (config) #interface vlan 5

    Console (config - vlan) #ip address 192.105.1.1 255.255.255.0

    Then enable routing on the switch:

    Console (config) #ip Routing

    That's all that needs to be configured on the 6248 for VLAN routing to work. One thing to take steps, is that on the 6248 the management VLAN is not routable. By default, the management VLAN is VLAN 1. Two options are to move the management VLAN a VLAN different:

    Console # configure

    Console (config) #ip address vlan 99

    Or not use VLAN 1 at all. Place traffic on other VLANs.

    The answer to your second question is Yes. With the VLAN routing enabled a customer to any what VLAN should be able to ping the gateway of the 6248.

    When it comes to generals and trunk mode. General mode is like a combination of access and trunk, you can send several VLANS not identified. General mode is most commonly used on the 6200 switches when connecting with the new switches, trunk sometimes doesn't connect when it is connected to a most recent switch. I suggest using the general mode on the 6248 and if it works, leave it in general mode.

    Here is a list of various white papers which all have some good info to have.

    http://en.community.Dell.com/TechCenter/networking/w/wiki/2580.networking-whitepapers.aspx

    6248 user's Guide

    FTP://FTP.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/PowerConnect-6248_User%27s%20Guide2_en-us.PDF

    6248 cli guide

    FTP://FTP.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/PowerConnect-6248_Reference%20Guide_en-us.PDF

    5548 user's Guide

    FTP://FTP.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/PowerConnect-5524p_User%27s%20Guide_en-us.PDF

    5548 cli guide

    FTP://FTP.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/PowerConnect-5524_Reference%20Guide_en-us.PDF

    Having to update firmware of the switch can help with interoperability.

    6248

    http://www.Dell.com/support/home/us/en/04/product-support/product/PowerConnect-6248/drivers

    5548

    http://www.Dell.com/support/home/us/en/04/product-support/product/PowerConnect-5548/drivers

    See you soon

Maybe you are looking for