VSwitch routing: private VLAN to make public, communicate

Similar Questions

• Migrate to vSphere/ESX4 host of the no routed private network to the public network mgmt mgmt

  Hello

  I'm looking for advice on the best method to move guests to U2 ESX4.0 of a private network that is not routed on one vlan routed public. It is complicated by the requirement to keep all the VMs on the server farm running with no downtime / failure. Is this possible?

  Our farm config is:

  1 x VM VC4 (32 bit) with two network adapters:

  -1st NETWORK adapter connected to the vlan routed public (193.x.x.x)

  -2nd NETWORK card that is connected to the private network not routed for mgmt/service console all ESX hosts. (10.0.0.x)

  -Files local host on the vCenter server for DNS resolution of the ESX hosts on private non-routed network mgmt

  10 + ESX 4.0 U2, console svc host 1, console svc 2 and all about vmotion network private not routed.

  -The local Hosts file on each ESX host facilitates DNS on the network of mgmt ESX host.

  * We intend to keep the vmotion/vmkernel on the private vlan not routed

  Here are the steps that I have written so far:

  1 Vmotion all VMs off ESX host and switch to Maintenance Mode

  2. unplug and remove host ESX VC

  3. use VMware KB Article: 1022078 to change the address on the service console

  4 update the hosts file on the VC and all ESX hosts with this ESX host's new public address

  5 re - add a host to the CR

  Q: I would be then able to vmotion between virtual private machines NET ESX host on this new net public ESX host?

  All suggestions welcome.

  Hello

  To be honest, I have not fallen on this article before, except to say that a number of occasions I've reviewed or renamed hosts. When I do, it always works.

  I usually restart the agents with the order you suggest just to feel safe.

• RV042G router - Inter VLAN

  RV042G router - Inter VLAN:

  Is this router supports 802. 1 q? Or do I have to connect to a router port by VLAN?

  for example. If I have 2 VLANS configured on a SINGLE SWITCH, do:

  (a) TRUNK VLAN switch and plug a port on the ROUTER?

  (b) connect a port on the ROUTER to VLAN1 and another port to VLAN2?

  Thank you

  Henrique

  Hello Henrique,

  The RV042G is not compatible 802. 1 q Trunking, so you would need a VIRTUAL local network connection.

  According to the switch, you may need to disable the tree covering both to make multiple connections to the same router work.

  Hope that helps,

  Christopher Ebert - Advanced Network Support Engineer

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

  * Please note the useful messages *.

• No SG300-52 routing inter - VLAN

  Hello

  I have a base on this SG300-52 configuration:

  • L3 is enabled
  • Latest Firmware is installed (1.4.0.88)
  • Vlan1 IP is 10.0.0.1/24
  • A PC is connected to port 1 (with IP 10.0.0.3)
  • VLAN99 IP is 192.168.0.2/29
  • A router is connected to the 49 port (with the 192.168.0.1 IP address and Internet access to the router is OK)
  • On SG300-52 default gateway is 192.168.0.1

  The SG-300:

  • I can ping the default gateway (192.168.0.1) and any Internet address, using 192.168.0.2 as address IP Source
  • I can't ping the default gateway (192.168.0.1) or any Internet address, using 10.0.0.1 as address IP Source
  • I can ping my PC (10.0.0.3), using 10.0.0.1 as the IP Source address
  • I can't ping my PC (10.0.0.3), using 192.168.0.2 as address IP Source

  There is no routing inter - VLAN, but I can't find how to activate...

  The complete configuration is the following:

  #show run SG300-52
  config-file-header
  SG300-52
  v1.4.0.88 / R800_NIK_1_4_194_194
  CLI v1.0
  router adjustment system mode

  SSD of encrypted file indicator
  @
  SSD-control-start
  config of SSD
  control of password file unrestricted SSD
  no control of the integrity of the file ssd
  SSD-control-end cb0a3fdb1f3a1af4e4430033719968c0
  !
  database of VLAN
  VLAN 99
  output
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 0001e3 Siemens_AG_phone___
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00036 b Cisco_phone___
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00096e Avaya___
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 000fe2 H3C_Aolynk___
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 0060 b 9 Philips_and_NEC_AG_phone
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00d01e Pingtel_phone___
  VLAN voice Yes-table add Polycom/Veritel_phone___ 00e075
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00e0bb 3Com_phone___
  Hello interface range vlan 1
  hostname SG300-52
  username privilege 15 c464af817287343305cbd6493c593885695df531 encrypted password cisco
  property intellectual ssh server
  Server SNMP Server
  The telnet server IP
  !
  interface vlan 1
  the IP 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
  no ip address dhcp
  !
  interface vlan 99
  name WAN
  IP 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.248
  !
  interface gigabitethernet49
  switchport mode general
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 99 unidentified
  switchport General pvid 99
  !
  output
  Default IP gateway 192.168.0.1

  You have an idea on the issue?

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Hi Anthena1390

  My email is [email protected] / * /. When you reply to the email can let me know which devices need to communicate on VLAN 99. Is there a major reason for SG300 happen DHCP assumes that your router? Well I would like to add a few screenshots, they will show you how to properly set up a P2p link, assign DHCP pools, how to correctly add default routes. Send an email and lets get your problem is resolved.

• "make public" when sharing pdf via email.

  On the sharing of a PDF by e-mail... When you click on the 'make public', you say that anyone with the url can see. Do you hear, ONLY the person that I am emailing to? Or is it literally visible to everything and everyone? And if so, how can it be removed from public view?

  It is public to any who have the url, in the same way to transform it in public, you can make it private.

  

• VMotion: A large private VLAN or several small VLAN for each cluster?

  Our production of VMware ESX 3.5 environment begins to develop very quickly and since we have different subnets 1,000001 million (bad network design), but all our esxHost Service Console is on the same subnet for accessibility, it would make sense to have VMotion all the different of the pole on a large local network separate VIRTUAL private or private VLAN?

  We currently have 3 clusters running in our production environment, with each cluster serving a different subnet for connections to data and mgmt VMs.  These 3 groups all are currently 3 separate private LAN of VMotion.

  Over the next month we will add an extra 2 groups serving two different subnets.

  So my question is, how is another to tackle this task?  You create a new VLAN separate private for each cluster (which is what we are doing now)?  Or you have created a large private VLAN for VMotion?  If you have created a large private VLAN, what problems met?  Performance problems?  Networking issues?  Collisions of data?  All esxHost panic?  SMV panic?

  Your comments on your experience would be greatly

  appreciated!

  Hello

  I did have problems with a large network of VMotion. Or with cluster of specific networks of VMotion. Note that with VLAN possible external of attacks using the VLAN is a matter of trust as the VLAN do not guaranttee security.

  Best regards
  Edward L. Haletky
  VMware communities user moderator, VMware vExpert 2009
  ====
  Author of the book ' VMWare ESX Server in the enterprise: planning and securing virtualization servers, Copyright 2008 Pearson Education.
  Blue gears and SearchVMware Pro items - top of page links of security virtualization - Security Virtualization Round Table Podcast

• RVS4000 routing between VLAN static?

  Hello

  I was wondering if the RVS4000 allows a static routing between the VLANS.  I would like to have three VLANS, one for my cable system, one for my wireless network and one for my print server.  I want the two VLAN Wi - Fi and to be able to get to the virtual LAN print server, but do not want the Wi - Fi and VLAN to react reciprocally.  Is it possible to put up with this router without the need of additional routers or a layer 3 switch.  Thanks in advance for any advice that anyone can give.

  By default, the VLAN is entirely routed. You do not have to configure routing between VLANs. What to put in place the filter. You must filter the traffic, which you don't want to pass between the VLANS. Set up the ACL according to the needs.

• Issue of private VLAN

  Hello

  I want to configure private VLANs on cisco switch science I write this command (host of the private vlan switchport mode) on the interface automatically interface to go down, please help me

  I'm not sure that the 3560 supports VLAN private dashboard, but it supports the ports protected with "protected" switchport mode

  Here is the guide on this feature.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/LAN/catalyst3560/software/release/12-2_52_se/configuration/guide/3560scg/swtrafc.html#wp1175133

• Problem with routing inter - VLAN... How to solve it?

  Hi all.

  I have a WRVS4400N in my office to have a VPN with our main customer and also to manage the entire network of small size.

  In two weeks, more or less we will change our office somewhere else, merge two in one.

  At its new location, we will have two different ADSL connections, and we will keep our separate LAN to the other LAN.

  The goal is to interconnect the two local networks in order to 'see' the machines on one local network to another, but keep the two local networks with their current configuration, subnet, etc..

  To achieve this, I created a new VLAN on the router and I have attached only port4 to this VLAN.

  

  

  As you can see, VLAN main has its own/24 subnet (10.148.145.0/24) and dhcp enabled (for addresses on my LAN) while the new VIRTUAL local network has its own 24 subnet too (10.0.0.0/24) but with the disabled dhcp (is a different LAN with its own DHCP server).

  

  

  

  

  VLAN 1 use ports 1-3 and VLAN 2 use the single port 4.

  Of course, I enabled routing inter - VLAN:

  

  To emulate the future scenario, I connected a router with an Internet port 4 with IP:10.0.0.2, and I therefore two different local networks.

  Well, the reality is this:

  -From my PC connected to the VLAN1 I have an IP address (assigned by my Cisco) and I see all my VLAN and I see 10.0.0.1 too (IP of the router on VLAN2), but I don't see any more (pings to 10.0.0.2 didn't answer). I can access Cisco router to 10.0.0.1 and 10.148.145.97.

  -My PC connected to the VLAN2 I have an IP address (assigned by the other router on 10.0.0.2), I see only my VLAN (10.0.0.0/24 IPs). I can access only Cisco router to 10.0.0.1.

  How can I do to enable these two VLANS to 'see' each other?

  How can I control access to the WAN port? I don't want machines to VLAN2 accessing internet through our router.

  Thank you and best regards!

  Hello Francisco,.

  In router mode gateway mode switch will turn off the NAT on the router. Which will allow to the vlan 2 does not to get out to the internet but also vlan 1 and which is not what you want. You may be able to create access rules and deny rules for not being able to get out of the internet... may create some default of the rules of the road as 0.0.0.0. Also, you may be able to create internet air to stop a certain subnet that it is able to get out of the internet as well.

  Regarding the VLAN talk to each other, everything looks good, routing inter - vlan, it is allowing the two VLAN to talk to each other and which is activated. What your default gateways are installed on devices you are testing? As long as default gateways on your PC and devices are pointing to the routers ip/gateway address, you should be good to go at this point.

  VLAN 1: default gateway should be 10.148.145.97

  VLAN 2: default gateway must be 10.0.0.1

  Other than that everything seems to be implemented correctly based on the images. The VLANs that you put in place on the ports are correct.

  Let me know your devices are configured on the rise and will go from there.

  Hope this helps,

  Thank you

  Clayton Sill

• Routing between VLANS in one direction

  OK... so I don't know if I can do this, but I'd like some input cases possible.

  Network equipment - RV120W, SF300-24

  VLAN10--> switch in VLAN, internet access - preferably just 3 addresses

  VLAN20--> switch in VLAN, initiate connection with VLAN10, VLAN30, access internet (I realize that there is a risk to security, but inevitable)

  VLAN30--> switch in VLAN can access internet

  VLAN40--> Internet access only, can not pass

  I the installation of circuits between the devices and assigns him VLAN quite easily, I'm not sure how (or if its possible) to create routing tables / settings to accomplish.  I am not able to do this on a SF300, but some tips you would know - even if I accomplish only part of what would be ideal.

  Hello Smith,

  I suggest the creation of access list (ACL based IPv4) for your configuration (assuming you do your routing inter - VLAN on the switch). If you are routing inter - VLAN on the RV120W, you may need to create the list of access on the router instead.

  See the article on more details on the ACL on SF300:

  Configure lists of access based on IPv4 on the 200/300 series managed switches

  Thank you

  Vijay

  Please note the answers.

• Switches 2950 with private - vlan

  Hello experts!

  Do you know if switches 2950 private vlan suport? I have updated to IOS and try to configure PVLAN, but this model of switch is not the interface mode command "switchport private - vlan".

  Best regards

  Rodrigo has.

  2950 supports onboard PVLAN don't, which differs from the private VLAN.

  The following link has the support matrix for pvlan on all Cisco switches.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_tech_note09186a0080094830.shtml

• Lightroom Mobile make Public

  A vision for Lightroom Mobile is to make a Studio Shoot teathered and send the selected images to a client using 'Make Public' which provides a unique URL which can be sent to a customer for its display on his own computer, laptop or Tablet and comment.  The process works perfectly until the client wants to comment on one or more images.  When the customer clicks the 'comment' or 'Like' icons, he is immediately asked his Adobe ID and password, or sign up for the Adobe I identification code can't imagine a customer willing to do that, unless he has already an Adobe customer in all probability identification code is even aware of Adobe.  The only justification that I see to ask an Adobe ID must indicate which returns the comment.  Why don't you just ask the customer name and email address (you know since you sent the link to him by emil), which should be sufficient to identify it.  Without this change, I discovered this vision for Lightroom Mobile as a failure.

  Can it be implemented in a future update?

  Kent Messamore

  [email protected]

  Hello Kent, make you a perfectly reasonable suggestion. Others have raised similar questions. Add your vote, where the Adobe staff is more likely to see here:

  Lightroom: Support comments and in everyone, publish services | Community customer Photoshop family

• HELP: What router supports VLAN? -I wish both groups cannot communicate with each other.

  Hi all

  I have 5 wireless devices must connect to the router.

  I want to divide it into 2 groups:

  That is to say, 1, device A, B, C, group 2, device D, E.

  I would like two groups cannot communicate with each other.

  I've heard, it can be done by VLAN, is e2500 can adapt to what I need?

  What about EA3500 and EA4500?

  I use G wireless, is what it means that ea4500 is out of choice even if it supports VLAN?

  Thank you all!

  Evil

  Thanks for the clarification for the OP

  FWIW

  is this an alternative to routers that do not support of VLAN, to do what you want

  http://www.SmallNetBuilder.com/lanwan/lanwan-HOWTO/32486-how-to-segment-a-small-LAN-using-tagged-VLA...

• Routing inter - vlan Sg300-28

  Hello

  Thank you and thank you in advance if you can help with this simple configuration

  SG300, how can mode layer 3, you make 2 VLAN see each other?

  In my lab at home:

  Default Vlan1 (GE1: access mode) 192,168,2.254

  Static VLAN10 (GE24: access mode) 192.168.10.1

  Town of Port GE25: Trunk Mode directly connected to interface my router 192.168.2.1)

  Vlan1 can communicate with the outside world and the internet, for example, to a different subnet: 192.168.1.0

  VLAN10 is not visible from the outside and from VLAN1

  How can I allow traffic from VLAN10 through the commune GE25 Port to the outside world?

  The router config says: VLAN10 is diretly connected to 192.168.2.1, but I can't ping. I wonder why?

  Concerning

  Minh

  --------------------------------------------------

  VLAN #show SG300

  Created by: D-default, S-Static, G-GVRP, R-radius assigned VLAN

  Ports created by virtual local network name

  ---- ----------------- --------------------------- ----------------

  1 1 article gi1-23, gi25-28, D m 1-8

  10 gi24 S VLAN10

  Ip #show SG300 road

  Maximum parallel paths: 1 (1 after reset)

  IP routing: enabled

  Codes: > - best, C - connected, S - static

  S 0.0.0.0/0 [1/1] via 192.168.2.1, 36:24:22, vlan 1

  C 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, vlan 1

  S 192.168.10.0/24 [1/1] via 192.168.2.1, 27:23:12, vlan 1

  He had to set the default gateway on the switch to 192.168.2.1

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Deployment of ISE in network routing and Vlan

  Hello world

  New bee to ISE. I want to help/suggestions on how to deploy ise in my network or comment if my plan is working

  Machines to ISE, Servers (ALL) and Corporate (Dot1x and field) in vlan 10

  Comments should be in the vlan separate 20

  By default that all switch ports must be in the vlan 30 having nothing but only to DHCP.

  Each endpoint must come through vlan30 and then pushed to vlan respective IE 10 if corp (Dot1x) PC and comments vlan 20 if mab and do not appear in the endpoints.

  What is a successful deployment?

  Secondly the fact inter - vlan routing is required in this scenario for the endpoints to be controlled properly.

  ISE are able to communicate and of endpoints that are not in the VLAN of the police.

  Hello

  Deployment of the ISE requires a lot of consideration in many aspects. Suggest you read the cisco documentation carefully to become familiar.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/solutions/enterprise/security/T...

  Node ISE Cisco plays many roles; Admin, monitor & Service policy. The crux of the political service (PSN) is one who plays the role of RADIUS (RADIUS of tip to be precise) server to handle requests from the AAA.

  For authentication dot1x internal hosts, you can have a PSN ISE in-house LAN (VLAN even as servers) or users. Whereas, for wireless clients, you can use a dedicated NHP or share the PSN according to safety requirements.

  See you soon,.

  Vidy

  Please don't forget to rate this post so useful.