What is cisco pix_access_list_elements

Similar Questions

• What VPN Cisco IOS VPN and RADIUS client?

  Hello community,

  My company are trying to set up the remote user VPN for all of our external collaborators to the help of our existing Cisco router and a RADIUS server in Active Directory.

  I did all the AAA config on the router and set up the RADIUS, but I do not know what customer buy Cisco Remote and how to set up.

  Anyone who knows this set upwards or it uses can be me help please we don't lose our money (and my boss time!)?

  Thanks in advance.

  Paul

  Paul,

  AnyConnect lets connect you using IKEv2/IPsec and SSLVPN for IOS network head.

  There are countless examples of configuration.

  Alternatively, some clients of IKEv1/IPsec 3rd party exists and are able to connect, however is those who are not TAC (Cisco) supported. You can check the feature called ezvpn

  M.

• DMVPN, PNDH: What certification cisco?

  Hi all

  I want to know that DMVPN and PNDH reports to which cisco certification?

  Eve.

  Hello

  It is the CCIE Security.

  https://learningnetwork.Cisco.com/docs/doc-5273

  There will be a link which gives the review program.

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards

  Anisha.

  P.S.: Please mark this thread as answered if you feel that your query is resolved. Note the useful messages.

• Site updated signature Cisco down?

  I just noticed that I was not doing my daily updates since Sunday.  I get the following error:

  Automatic download of work report:

  No file available for download.

  Error: Unable to communicate with the location service for recovering files available.

  Has anyone else seen elsewhere?

  This seems to be an intermittent problem, becomes more visible today (don't know if it took place before today). If you need emergency a signature update file, for now (as a solution), you can manually download the file here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/ipsmc-ips5-sigup

  And place it in the CSCOpx\MDC\ips\updates directory on your system (Cisco Security Manager) CSM.

  If you have time, if you could let us know what www.cisco.com decides on your CSM system. ? This can help to confirm/track down the source of the problem. You should be able to do this from a command prompt (cmd.exe) on the CSM system using the nslookup utility. Example:

  C:\nslookup www.cisco.com

• Table 20 Cisco TelePresence microphone

  Hello

  What is Cisco TelePresence Table microphone 20 cover?

  It is omnidirectional or unidirectional?

  Concerning

  Leonardo Santana

  It's an omnidirectional microphone.

  For your reference to the subject of the form:

  https://communities.Cisco.com/docs/doc-47216

  Kind regards

  Acevirgil

• EoS/EoL SCE 8000

  Hi guys,.

  What product Cisco will replace the CPE 8000? I have a client who control traffic by application in the frontier of the internet using these boxes and want to replace them. The ASR1K with STROKE would be a good choice?

  Thank you.

  Paulo Jr.

  HI Paulo,

  I could test the STROKE software and it does not come even close to granularity of information that makes the CPE. Unfortunately, it seems that the STROKE cannot be used in large environments because of this reason.

  RIP

  CES

  :-(

• I need VPN gateway to gateway with NAT for several subnets, RV082

  I have a pair of RV082 routers and I would like to configure a gateway to gateway VPN tunnel, as described in a book, "How to configure a VPN tunnel that routes all traffic to the remote gateway," (name of file Small_business_router_tunnel_Branch_to_Main.doc).  I followed this recipe book and found that my while the main office has internet connectivity, the branch subnet is not an internet connection.

  Routing behaves as advertised, where all traffic goes to the seat.  However, the 192.168.1.0 subnet in the branch receives no internet connectivity.  I read in other posts that the main router will provide only NAT for the local subnet, not the Management Office subnet.  Is it possible to configure the RV082 router to provide NAT for all subnets?

  If this is not the case, what product Cisco will provide connectivity VPN Tunnel as well as the NAT for all subnets?  The RV082 can be used as part of the final solution or are my RV082s a wasted expense?

  Here is the configuration that I had put in place, (real IP and IKE keys are false).

  Bridge to bridge

  Remote Head Office

  Add a new Tunnel

  No de tunnel                  1                                               2

  Name of the tunnel:, n1 n1-2122012_n2-1282012-2122012_n2-1282012

  Interface: WAN1 WAN1

  Enable :                   yes                                             yes

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Configuration of local groups

  Type of local security gateway: IP only IP only

  IP address: 10.10.10.123 10.10.10.50

  Local security group type: subnet subnet

  IP address: 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0

  Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Configuration of the remote control groups

  Remote security gateway type: IP only IP only

  IP address: 65.182.226.50 67.22.242.123

  Security remote control unit Type: subnet subnet

  IP address: 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.0

  Subnet mask: 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  IPSec configuration

  Input mode: IKE with preshared key IKE with preshared key

  Group of the phase 1 of DH: Group 5 - 1536 bit group 5 - 1536 bit

  Encryption of the phase 1: of THE

  The phase 1 authentication: MD5 MD5

  Step 1 time in HIS life: 2800 2800 seconds

  Perfect Forward Secrecy: Yes Yes

  Group of the phase 2 DH: Group 5 - 1536 bit group 5 - 1536 bit

  Encryption of the phase 2: of THE

  Phase 2 of authentication: MD5 MD5

  Time of the phase 2 of HIS life: 3600 seconds 3600 seconds

  Preshared key: MyKey MYKey

  Minimum complexity of pre-shared key: Enable Yes Enable

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  If you are running 4.x firmware on your RV082, you must add an additional Allow access rule for the Branch Office subnet (considered one of the multiple subnets in the main office) may have access to the internet. Note the firmware version has more details about it.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/routers/CSBR/rv0xx/release/rv0xx_rn_v4-1-1-01.PDF

• PoE on RV016

  I have looked on all technical and hunted around, don't seem to understand if the RV016 or RV082 support PoE.  Anyone know for sure one way or the other?  Assuming this isn't, what product Cisco would be preferable to inject PoE on a small business network.  I have 1 RV016 and am looking to deploy an RV082 and WAP4410N, the 4410 is the only device on my network that would need PoE, I prefer not having to buy a switch or a Hub dedicated just for a single device.  Thanks in advance.

  wjdenihan,

  Unfortunately, none of our Business Cisco routers small PoE power, or can be activated using PoE. If you're looking to connect a PoE device to one of our routers, yes you can use a power injector to do this, out bound to the device. for example WAP4410n you can use the WAPPOE12. You can find this information on the WAP4410n Access Point user's Guide

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/wireless/access_point/csbap/WAP4410N/Administration/Guide/WAP4410N_Admin_Guide.PDF http://www.Cisco.com/en/US/docs/Wireless/access_point/csbap/WAP4410N/Administration/Guide/WAP4410N_Admin_Guide.pdf http://www.Cisco.com/en/US/docs/Wireless/access_point/csbap/WAP4410N/Administration/Guide/WAP4410N_Admin_Guide.pdf

  I hope this will help.

• NAT on 8.3 and VPN tunnel with overlapping addresses

  Hi all

  I was looking at this document from Cisco and I think I understand how to convert the nat policy than the version 8.3 and later, but I was wondering what is happening to the acl crypto, you are always using the same as the older versions? As you know the 8.3 then NAT requires to use the original instead of the address translated to the ACL, but I don't know if this applies to crypto ACL as well. Pointers?

  Example from the link:

   access-list new extended permit ip 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 !--- This access list (new) is used with the crypto map (outside_map) !--- in order to determine which traffic should be encrypted !--- and sent across the tunnel. access-list policy-nat extended permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 !--- The policy-nat ACL is used with the static !--- command in order to match the VPN traffic for translation. 

   static (inside,outside) 192.168.2.0 access-list policy-nat !--- It is a Policy NAT statement. !--- The static command with the access list (policy-nat), !--- which matches the VPN traffic and translates the source (192.168.1.0) to !--- 192.168.2.0 for outbound VPN traffic.

   crypto map outside_map 20 match address new !--- Define which traffic should be sent to the IPsec peer with the !--- access list (new).

  Thank you

  V

  Hi rc001g0241,

  I posted your question for clarity sake along.

  "what happens to the crypto acl, always use you even as older versions?"

  As you can see, Cisco doc you posted shows that you need to target for crypto engine is what happens after the nat policy has succeeded, illustrated here: "address match map crypto outside_map 20 new".

  "As you know the 8.3 then NAT requires to use the original instead of the address translated to the ACL, but I don't know if this applies to crypto ACL as well. Pointers?

  There is no such requirement and ACL target you in the engine crytop for the tunnel bound traffic can be a natted post address, that's what shows Cisco Doc and it is correct.

  Hope that answers your questions.

  Thank you

  Rizwan James

• Where is this doc?

  Hi all

  It is always difficult to find great docs on ORC so when you find one, it's like

  pure gold

  For upgrades of the Manager of Communications and compatibility of the voice, this one was the

  "Mac Daddy";

  http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/compat/ccmcompmatr.html.

  It's complete, up-to-date and all encompassing. In fact, it is almost impossible to plan

  an upgrade without including in your project planning. So... what makes Cisco

  do than get rid of it and send you to a link which eventually will be the link between you and her, and then again on the link

  and so on and so forth. Why, why, why!

  In fact... this morning it gives me the famous Cisco

  The Page you requested is not available

  You know what I mean... the Cisco Disco.

  Please restore this doc as soon as POSSIBLE.

  See you soon!

  Rob

  I know! I just discovered it about 16:30 central yesterday. They even removed a link here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products_device_support_tables_list.html

  I'm guessing it's a bug or a new tool is coming.

• ASA5585x with fire SSP - unified Image

  Dear experts,

  What are Cisco plans with clients who are 5585 x with the power of fire SSP or unified image (be) taken in charge? How would manage us devices? It will be through a management like FP management console but for ASAs thus combined?

  Thank you

  Bilal

  Hello Bilal,

  Your understanding is good. From now on, you can manage the same way since the ASA hardware module and hardware appliance of firepower does not support the FTD.

  Note If this helps.

  Concerning

  Jetsy

• Problem IBM Lotus iNotes 8.5 ssl clientless web vpn - ASA5510 v.8.2(2) OS

  Hello

  I have problems to display Lotus iNotes through Domino 8.5 correctly a page Web the VPN without client in my Cisco ASA5510.

  One of our customers has implemented Lotus Domino 8.5 and have portals of the individual user so that the user can each access their e-mail, calendar, journals, debates, etc..  Everything works fine on the internal network, as well as on a real SSL VPN as Anyconnect client... it is the Web page of the VPN without client that gives me a problem.

  The occurrence of beginning of questions when I configure a VPN page without client for users first access, fill in a username/password general name, and then they are taken to their first iNotes login page.  The iNotes login page looks very good, and when they connect in iNotes everything seems fine.  However, when they start clicking around in different tabs or to open an email (all nested in the VPN page without customer), things don't arise, and error occurred on the page of iNotes as "a problem has occurred that may have caused the operation to fail.  When I click on "Show Console" to get more details, I'm presented with:

  -----------------------------------------

  Domino version 8.5.1FP3 (Windows NT/Intel)
  $HaikuForm - 304.5
  Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729 .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; InfoPath.2;. NET4.0C)

  2010-07-30 12:31:13 a problem has occurred that may have caused the operation to fail.
  2010-07-30 12:31:13 ' CSCO_Util.parse_url (...). path ' is null or not an object
  2010-07-30 12:31:13 https:/// + CSCOL + / cte.js: 9
  2010-07-30 12:31:13 [GBy]-[(token) {var c = HTMLParserUtils; if(this._cur_segment==null) {ADAPT] ([object Object])
  30/07/2010 12:32:08 [dojo - 1.3.2] failed to load http://mail1.fake.comdomjs/dojo-1.3.2/dojo/... /IBM/iNotes/widget/layout/DWASidebarContainer.js with error: [object Error]
  30/07/2010-12:32:08 a problem has occurred that may have caused the operation to fail.
  30/07/2010 12:32:08 failed to load "ibm.iNotes.widget.layout.DWASidebarContainer"; Finally tried '... ' /IBM/iNotes/widget/layout/DWASidebarContainer.js
  30/07/2010-12:32:08 https:/// CSCO + 00756767633A2F2F7A6E7679312E656E71706E616762612E70627A ++ / domjs/dojo-1.3.2/dojo/dojo.js: 20
  30/07/2010 12:32:08 [GBy] - [(_51,_52) {_52 = this ._global_omit_module_check: _52; var _53 = this. _}]("ibm.iNotes.widget.layout.DWASidebarContainer")

  -----------------------------------------

  Users cannot open emails or create new email, neither can they do a lot of other primary functions in iNotes through this VPN without client.  Looks like the redirection to URL of the ASA's corrupting what you looking for the Domino server.  It does not work very well unlike what documentation Cisco says is "optimized for Lotus iNotes.

  Does anyone have any suggestions? , I like to stay out of the way using a single SSL certificate (loser 2-factor of authentication, and must make an exception of firewall directly on the server on the network) and stay out of the way using Anyconnect if I can help it. I also want to emphasize the iNotes specifically that gives me this problem, not the Lotus Notes client part full I could do work using Smart Tunnels.
  

  Troubleshooting steps, I made:

  DNS servers appropriate 1.) are defined in the firewall

  2.) I tried both full / lite of iNotes and produce both the same mistakes.

  (3.) I tried Firefox 3.6.8 IE6, IE8 on Windows 7 and Windows XP.  I think I have slightly better results than other browsers Firefox, but it is not error-free.

  4.) I studied corruption cookie by removing all the stories and turn off any browser plugins and accelerators

  Thank you!

  Have you tried to use the smart tunnels for the DWA bookmark? Can u also try mode lite with the active smart tunnel?

  Also in the description of your problem, when you say produces better results than IE Firefox, this exactly what you get?

• Title TMS flextime?

  I use the TMS to schedule regular meetings which are also recorded.  For example, I have a title '1st Spanish hour'.  The question is to see the-n-part I will have 100 records titled "1st Spanish time.  I want to do is have it automatically have the date here and it would be so "1st time Spanish 11 22, 2013.  Is it possible to use variables in the title of TMS scheduling?  I tried something like that, but it did not work. "1st Spanish time DATE %courante%.

  Ideas?

  Good point, Yes, I see in this case.  Since it seems a recurring appointments are not created dynamically with these changes by recurrence.  Would be interested to hear what said Cisco.

• Cisco first Collaboration - what is free

  Hi guys,.

  What is the free version of privileged collaboration of Cisco? I have to deploy for a client and I saw the first Collab provisioning version available for download on Cisco, is it free?

  Can provide you any document that says the same thing. Also the special collaboration of Cisco can be deployed in HA mode using two virtual machines?

  The free versions are called Standard versions, rather than the paid versions, called advanced versions.  The law requires CUCM 10.x and later, using CUWL license and is covered in the commercial documentation of CUCM.

  There is not much difference between PCP standard and advanced design.  The main reasons to choose Advanced if you have a several cluster environment. Standard does support a call (CUCM editor) or GCE and a single message processor (CUC or CUE).  The most frequent reason is that in advanced you can delegate the management of orders for different groups of users (areas of the CFP) to different administrators.  Standard mode does not allow this. There are some additional differences as the API to the North is on in advanced as well as a workflow of order process sometimes required by large companies. Those are the main differences.

  HA is another story.  There is a general process of HA supported by the BU of PCP and PCA using VMWare HA.  HA in general was not popular with the CFP because most of the people do not believe it is necessary and choose instead a different path for the resilience. Most of the deployment in a way people distributed (app + database of VMs) and make the system of database as fault tolerant as possible/necessary using characteristic database process in the industry. The application server uses VMWare HA or FT to come up if the configuration hardware server dies for some reason any. Or is it just launched somewhere else.

  CFP has the ability to re-synchronization of network UC, UC network will continue to operate without running of PCP and the native interfaces of UC apps can still be used (PCP can catch up with the changes later), the need to spend more money and time to configure HA is difficult to justify in most cases.

  Concerning

• What are the options to enter multiple devices via the console? Are there Cisco access servers?

  We have a small network, 12 aircraft.  I would like to be able to console component snap for them all from down the Hall.  Cisco still makes these devices, and if not, what other options are there?

  Hello

  Product link can support your requirement.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/2600-series-multiservice-platforms/prod_bulletin0900aecd800f3524.html

  Number of art	Description
  CISCO2610XM-16TS	Cisco 2610XM Bundle of Terminal Server

  HTH

  Sandy