Advanced Routing - IP strange

Similar Questions

• WRT600N advanced routing problems / use as Access Point and switch

  Firmware 1.01.36 build 4 The WRT600N is connected to an existing LAN and is really only used as a Wireless N access point. There is nothing plugged into the WAN port; only the LAN port. I have NAT disabled. All traffic from a client connected to the WRT600N wireless going very well for the gateway and the Internet router. The customer experience is very good. However, there are a few minor issues as follows.

  1] Setup > Advanced Routing tab has only the following options; to do this, * not * have a picker 'Mode '. NAT, static routing and dynamic routing (RIP).    IS this NORMAL, OR should HAVE a MODE (e.g. switch) AS REFERRED to IN THE HELP FILES?

  [2] even if a connection wireless or wired to the WRT600N works very well, the WRT600N himself is unable to connect to the internet. It cannot connect to NTP to set the time and I can't ping past the gateway router using the ping of the WRT600N diagnostic utility. I ping the gateway 192.168.1.4 port inside, but I can't use the diagnostic the WRT600N ping ping utility something beyond this gateway port. The routing of the WRT600N table is below. THE GATEWAY SHOULD NOT BE 192/168.1.4? HOWEVER THE WRT600N DON'T ME LETS NOT CHANGE IT.

  Destination LAN IP Subnet Mask gateway interface

  192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.71 LAN & Wireless

  127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 * LAN & Wireless

  Topic 1. Linksys, used to have a mode option to switch between the modes 'Bridge' and 'router '. The latest routers call it now better NAT power. Gateway mode means THAT NAT is enabled. Router mode means THAT NAT is disabled. The help files are probably a little bit over. But the option is still the same.

  Re 2. It's normal if you use it as only access point (i.e. do not use the WAN port). The router always takes into account that the internet connection via the WAN port, i.e. it will always use the default gateway on the WAN port. If nothing is connected to the WAN port on the router itself has no default gateway and therefore has no access to the internet. Generally, you are not able to establish the default route in either advanced routing page. It is a known limit of these routers if you do not use as a router.

• E3000 Advanced routing

  I spent hours with support only to discover that the company will not support routing advanced on the E3000 even if I take my servers out of the equation.

  I have ATT Uverse VDSL and a public 5 IP block. I have 3 Web server behind the e3000 and I want to route the http request based on the IP that made the request.

  The offer to pay a Cisco partner to support their product was sitting well with me.

  Thank you

  Doug

  You do not have a subnet IP full routed to you. You can't move your LAN to public IP addresses. You can use only a single public IP address.

• E1700 advanced routing - need help

  I'm unable to create static routes through my Linksys E1700 (v1, f/w 1.0.02 Rev. I get errors on all roads, I try to enter. I receive a complaint that is not part of an IP address in the range 1-233 or I get the "Road of Invalid" error message when trying to save the road.

  Can someone show what restrictions are applied on the input static routes?

  Access to a DSL modem to which the router is attached is what I want to achieve. This means I have assigned the modem to an IP address that is not on the local network and the need for the router to pass this address via the WAN port, but not at the gateway of the ISP.

  Something along the lines of:

  Local address of the router and the IP address range used by DHCP from the router: 192.168.0.0/24

  Local address of the ADSL modem: 192.168.1.1/24

  I want the route: 192.168.1.1/32 via WLAN interface with gateway 0.0.0.0

  Any ideas why the router does not allow me to do this?

  Also, if I could get any type of road through the WLAN E1700 interface I could affect my modem must match (as long as it is not an IP address, I need to use :-)) but I was not able to set up a road to the WLAN interface with gateway 0.0.0.0.

  / Nils

  Unfortunately, the service VLAN on the routers of the series E is only for specialized ISP configurations and should not be confused with abilities VLAN typical.

  In most routers grade consumer the LAN\Switch Ports is a layer2 managed switch. Some such as OpenWRT and DD - WRT firmwares have the ability to independently assign tags VLAN to the LAN Ports. The switch may have that a single IP address assigned.

  I do not understand this correctly, that's all this so you can access the Modem since the E1700 LAN? So then try to configure the Modem in Bridge mode and configure the E1700 with the PPPoe ISP connection. Then the LAN E1700 you should be able to ping the Modem at the address 192.168.0.1, assuming that the E1700 router IP address is 192.168.1.1 subnet 255.255.255.0.

• Cannot begin a process advanced by a strange error message.

  Hey,.

  I'm working on a project where I need to build a simple approval-workflow(advanced process).

  I do a test to establish an advanced process with a PDF file on my LiveCycle Contentspace ES2 portal site.

  If you have had the experience of what I'm saying, you may know that he needs three steps to a process.

  1, download a file that you want to approval

  2, make an introduction on the file

  3, start the workflow

  It should be quite easy work, I thought. But when I press the Finish button, an error message appears on the screen. : Exception in the Transaction

  I don't know what that means. I googled the error, but have no answer for that problem.

  Could someone give me a tip or some advice about this?

  Concerning

  Tony

  You will get this error if there is no 'samples for Content Services' imported on your LC Server. For this "Advanced Process" to work, you must do this example THAT LCA imported into the LC Server.

  Download ACL from this location
  s http://help.Adobe.com/en_US/LiveCycle/9.0/samples/Adobe-samples-application-ContentService - ReviewAndApproval.zip

  Import it on /AdminUI and then try to start the advanced process.

  It should work after you import procedure.

  See you soon

  Vikas - Vijayrania

• Static routing LRT214 does not

  Hello

  I have a hard time with a static routing on LRT214.

  My configuration:

  * LRT214 (recently purchased), acting as a gateway to the internet, local subnet is 192.168.28.0/24

  * There is a local VPN (192.168.28.98) server on the local network, serving a LAN tunnel with subnet 192.168.29.0/24. on LRT214 port forwarding is configured

  I can connect to my VPN server on the internet, and I can access the machine running on the VPN server (for example via ssh).

  However, I can not connect to any other computer on my LAN, although I tried

  adding another subnet under Configuration > network > LAN settings

  * setting up a static route under Setup > Advanced Routing (kind of route add - net 192.168.29.0/24 gw 192.168.28.98)

  of course, when I add the itinerary of statitc over any computer on the local network, I can connect via VPN tunnel to the machine, so its clearly a problem of LRT214.

  Please help, how can I configure a static route for this scenario in the user Web interface?

  The SPI Firewall, intercept traffic.

  As far as I understand, it could be that when the VPN server sends data to another machine on the local network, this happens on layer 2 (where the SPI Firewall not listening), while the return on the VPN server traffic is routed higher up in the stack, where the SPI listening and intercept.

  So, I will use the above workarounds, or put the OpenVPN server on a different subnet or VLAN, which I do anyway. I tried a basic configuration of VLAN yesterday (just put the Server full VPN with all interfaces in one VLAN separated), with InterVLAN routing enabled, but there seems to be some particularities with it (like the ping works, but not ssh). In any case, it's another story. Thanks for you support.

• Use WAG54G2 as a router.

  I want to use WAG54G2 as a simple router. I happen to have 2 of them. If I can make one of these work as a wired router via ethernet cable or even wireless I can save money on the router. Is this possible?

  You don't need to change the settings under advanced routing that you use the type of LAN to LAN connection.

  Change the IP address of the router and disable the DHCP server on the second router. Connect the cable of the first router to the Ethernet port on the second router.

• As a simple router WRT610N

  Hi all...

  I just installed a new WRT610N to replace my old router + access point who died days ago.

  The Setup is simple enough:

  WAN interface with address static 192.168.0.2/24 GW 192.168.0.1 (my main firewall)

  LAN interface with 192.168.10.0/24 static address, DHCP enabled to assign addresses to 192.168.10.100 to 192.168.10.199

  Everything works from a computer connected to the WRT610N LAN subnet (wired or wireless)... I can ping 192.168.10 *, * 192.168.0, 192.168.2 * (the subnet connected to the firewall DMZ) and internet connection (also through the firewall) works as expected.

  But from a computer on the network * 192.168.0 (the subnet on which the WAN WRT610 interface is connector), there is no way to reach the machines that are on the LAN subnet. I created a static route in the main firewall, and to be sure, I also tried with a static route on a computer that is connected to the subnet 192.168.0 * (route add 192.168.10.0 mask 255.255.255.0 Gateway 192.168.0.2)... no way.

  SPI Firewall is disabled and also each of the filters.

  What I am doing wrong?

  Thank you in advance...

  CiaoCiaoSergio

  Your router should still active NAT. With NAT, the router only translation of IP addresses between the address LAN IP addresses as well as the WAN IP address. Because of this, the LAN is inaccessible. That's how any consumer type router protects the LAN from the internet.

  You must disable NAT. It is usually on the Advanced Routing page. It is call "NAT" or "Mode of operation".

  Bridge mode = active NAT.
  Router mode = disabled NAT.

  If you have configured the correct static route on your firewall, it should work then...

  Make sure that your firewall then, provides NAT for the subnet WRT. With disabled NAT IP addresses * 192.168.10 will get to the firewall. If your firewall is not configured to do NAT for 192.168.10. * He'll send those not changed in the internet where they will be discontinued.

  Of course, if you want a full interconnectivity between WRT LAN and WAN side then you should consider setting up as plain simple access point connecting it via a LAN port to your existing LAN. That would save all routing and NAT problems...

• WRT600N: How to switch mode to 'Bridge' to 'router '?

  I already posted a messageasking if the WRT600N could be wireless connected w / my new WRT610N. The answer I got was no, I had to wire up together. Well, fair enough - it's been a long shot. The person who answered referenced this set of instructions, I've read before, when I linked the WRT350N w / my previous 600N (cable).

  The problem now is that in these instructions, when he says to go the the "advanced routing" page and change the mode in the drop-down list of 'Gateway' to 'Router', the WRT600N does not have a drop down box - all there is "NAT", radio buttons marked "enable" or "disable." (I tried to insert a picture of the page, but cannot find a way to do that here.) Even the little "help...". "link out side says that there should be a drop-down list box, but there is not.

  I guess I should I put 'NAT' to people with disabilities, that would achieve the same thng than to change the 'Gateway' to 'Router' mode, but I wanted to check here first and see what the official word. So should I set 'NAT' to disable to move my 600N mode to the "router"?

  Thank you! This is good info to have. And looking at the "Advanced Routing" instructions, I notice now that they have dynamic RIP (Routing) active, but the "yellow flag" instructions don't say nothing about it, so I didn't change the disabled. The dangers to do these things later in nite!

• router wag200G as switch only?

  
  

  You are using a router other than WAG200G modem or wireless... If Yes, then, that connect to the WAG200 on the Ethernet Port (LAN)... Open the WAG and the sub-tab advanced routing configuration page, disable "NAT" and activate "RIPPER" and click on save settings... Also on the Configuration tab, change the IP address of the router from 192.168.1.1 to the range of the main modem/router... For example if the main router/modem ip address is 192.168.1.1, then change the ip address of the linksys WAG on 192.168.1.2 and click on save settings.

• Two router network installation

  I have two routers in my network, a Linksys WCG200 cable wireless router, and a router wireless broadband Linksys WRT54G3G-ST.  The latter is used in my motorhome in addition to providing backup/failover of the loss of cable service.  I want to configure them so (1) all the workstations can see the entire network no matter what router, they are connected, and (2) the cabability wireless on both routers must be active.  It would be preferred that the broadband router could be disconnected and the motorhome without reconfiguration - laptops that connect through the router might as well in the office and in the motorhome.

  The cable modem has a static IP wireless network printer configured in addition two VoIP adapters (both are DHCP).  I wish that they would continue to function normally when the router broadband is removed from the network (in collaboration with laptops).

  I tried the two routers in subnets in separate subnets, but cannot determine how to make all visible devices - the WRT54G3G-ST's advanced routing capabilities, but I have not determined a framework that will achieve the objectives.

  If anyone can help to direct me to a path to the solution, I would appreciate it a lot.

  Gandalf, thanks.  Both answers confirm that Linksys routers do not interconnect two subnets of a network, for this, the most advanced routers are necessary.

  Let's close this message as "resolved".  Thanks to these two respondents for their help.

• RV082 static routing

  I have a router RV082, and I added a route static (on the advanced routing section), but the screen "routing table" doesn't show the road, so obviously static routing does not work on the computers in my network. I tried to disable the DHCP server did not work. Can someone help me?

  Thank you

  PD. I enclose the screens.

  If the static route will not save in the routing table, it is possible, you have a defective unit.  If you add to the list and save it on the bottom of the screen and it will not be displayed on the routing table, then you need call the HWC to 1866-606-1866 and let them take a look at the router.

• I can mutually ping in router RVS4000 VLAN without another router

  One of our clients has RVS400 router with 4-port LAN VIRTUAL. We have recently added Crestron devices to our network and have some network problem. Search Google points to this page: Network slow question as discessed in this article: Troubleshooting network slow issues... There are two things happening with the Crestron system:... www.chicagotech.net/NetForums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=7737 It recommends to create a local network VIRTUAL for Crestron. However, the Cisco RVS400 manual States: "function VLANS at layer 2.» VLANS isolate traffic within the VIRTUAL LAN, router layer 3 functioning router is needed to allow traffic between the VLANS. Layer 3 routers identify segments and coordinate with local networks virtual. "If we create two VLANS on the router without another router, can access us each other in these two VLAN?

  Hi chicagotech.

  I implemented a RVS4000 in our laboratory and created 2 VLAN, VLAN 1 and VLAN 2. I connected two PCs, 1 on each VLAN and they were able to ping each other with Inter-VLAN routing active. Here are the steps I followed:

  1. Go to L2 Switch-> create a VLAN. I have added VLAN ID: 2 and click Add VLAN
  2. Go to membership to a VLAN and select VLAN 2 from the drop-down. In the table for Port 2, select the Untagged radio button and click on save at the bottom.
  3. Go to settings-> Advanced Routing and ensure that the Inter-VLAN routing is enabled. (It is enabled by default)
  4. Connect a PC to port 2 and make sure he gets an IP to VLAN 2. (in this case 192.168.2.100) Ping this address in VLAN 1 PC-> success. From VLAN 2 PC, ping 192.168.1.101 (VLAN 1 PC)-> success.
  5. As a test I gave then the PCs in each VLAN to an IP address static and turned off the DHCP server on the router. 192.168.1.102 was able to ping 192.168.2.102 and vice versa.
  6. I then disabled Inter-VLAN routing and the PC could ping is no longer among them. They still had full access to the internet.

  It seems that the devices connected to the RVS4000 in different VLANS have no trouble to access each other with Inter-VLAN routing active.

• With the help of RV016 with DSL modem/router/wireless

  I have a question of configuration that will probably seem obvious to many readers, please go easy on me: I'm new to this.  I used a RV016 because it will allow me to have the diversity and conservation of roads to the internet for our SMEs.  Since we are now counting on the insurance and processing of credit cards that is the Internet, I won't be down if the cable company fails, so I added the DSL service.  When DSL service arrived, the carrier provided a modem Motorola 3347 which includes the router, switch and wireless in one device.  Instead of installing a WAP browser, I would like to use the 3347 wireless.

  However, users on the wireless cannot print to printers on the RV016.  Is it possible that I can make visible printers to wireless users?

  Photo shows the problem...

  

  Yet once, guess I am missing the point and GENTLY try to educate myself.

  Thank you very much.

  Hi Cunnida56

  If I remember the RV016 is installed in what called default gateway mode and you will have to be in router mode.

  Gateway mode essentially allows NAT (NAT) services, so that the LAN is coordinated against the WAN IP address.

  You have an option under Setup > advanced routing to assign the RV016 router, mode option and save the settings.

  In router mode NAT is disabled, but you also have to disable the SPI Firewall options and block Wan requests, all of these options are found under the Firewall tab.

  Your next step is to add a static route in the motorola 3347 that points to the 192.168.2.0 network.

  This static route will allow wireless clients to know the WAN1 address the RV016, who will act as a gateway to the 192.168.2.0 network.

  Good luck.. and have fun, do not forget to save or to apply your chages as you go.

  Best regards, Dave

• Human workflow - rules based routing with Ad-Hoc routing and information request

  If business rules routing database ("Advanced Routing") is used for participant assignment to a human mission, how business rules are affected by actions requires information and Ad-Hoc routing of the participants?
  
  Ignore the rules during these special actions, or is there a way to access these special types participating in the RuleSet and react accordingly?

  Hello

  When "Advance routing" is used for the assignment of the task; the task service says the folllowing fact types: task, PreviousOutcome, and TaskAction to the rules engine. These facts give all the information required on the job (as a result of the participant, the task step.. etc)

  Now in the basis of rules defined; We have rules according to our condition that can extract information from types in fact invoked and entrust to the participant required/next.

  Also note that we write the rules in advance only in exceptional cases.

  For example; Let's say that all participants have 2 possible results [COMPLETE, recheck]. We have defined the ideal as task routing workflow:
  Participant A-> Participant B-> c Participant. This is the throughput when all participants selects "COMPLETE."

  Suppose now selects B result as "Double CHECK" then the task should return to. So for this case, we need to write a rule in advance.

  Pls refer to the code example in the: http://download.oracle.com/technology/sample_code/hwf/workflow-106-IterativeDesign.zip

  Dev also guide: refer to the section 28.3.7.2 http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/integration.1111/e10224/bp_hwfmodel.htm#BABBFEJJ

  Thank you

  Published by: Kania on May 19, 2010 02:41