ASA VPN configuration

Similar Questions

• New ASA/VPN configuration

  So, I am looking to add one of my spare 5510 firewall to my secondary network as a vpn connection.

  All I want this new ASA to do is handle my site anyconnect VPN connections.  I'm pretty new to ASAs if any help would be great.  I know how to create a new access VPN on my ASA and I added a NAT for my inside and outside traffic to my new Pool of IP VPN.

  My question is, since it's only for the VPN and I want all my current internal traffic to continue to the asa 5510 existing routing, do I have to enter the ACL to my new single AAS of VPN?  ACLs are used for VPN traffic and do I need them to traffic the route via VPN?

  I'll put up inside interface of connection to one of my main Cisco switches and the outside interface connects to my DMZ switch on the new ASA only VPN.

  Thank you

  I don't know if I am how you connect to the external interface of single ASA VPN. Normally, in this type of installation, we would see the ASA VPN "in parallel" with the perimeter firewall.

  You mention the DMZ switch that threw me a little. If you are in France through your main firewall and go to single ASA VPN via the DMZ then Yes you will need to allow several open ports (protocol 50, udp/500, tcp/443 among others) and may have to do some other techniques (NAT - T, etc.) depending on the type of remote you are implementing. That's why we rarely see this configuration used - it adds a good dose of complexity without significant benefit.

  When the old facility is used, you need to switch internal to know to route traffic to the pool VPN through the only ASA VPN inside the interface. A static route is more often used, although you can use OSPF or EIGRP if you wanted to.

  Should generally not be any access list that VPN traffic around the Bank access lists incoming interface. Back to remote clients traffic is coming from inside and out through (and is usually part of anestablished connection) so no access list is necessary inside.

• ASA VPN - allow user based on LDAP Group

  Hello friends

  I have create a configuration to allow connection based on LDAP Group.

  I m not specialize in the firewall and I tried to follow the links above, but both seem old, commanded several is not available.

  http://www.tunnelsup.com/Cisco-ASA-VPN-authorize-user-based-on-LDAP-group

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-NEX...

  Anyone know how I can do?

  Thank you

  Marcio

  I like to use the Protocol DAP (dynamic access policies) to control this.  Follow this guide:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/7691/ASA-8X-dynamic-access-policies-DAP-deployment-guide

• Data capture ASA VPN

  Hello

  We have an asa 5585 on the network and it is configured for remote access VPN with RSA.

  When a VPN user connects to their VPN, he is invited for a PIN followed their secure ID token code.

  We want to simplify our VPN configuration if we starting from a perspective of support and management, users use a hard chips. Currently, many lose their chips or have a connection problem, so I would like to know what simple VPN solution, we have in place.

  Then is it possible on the ASA when I check my VPN traffic to determine what users are using the VPN for, since the purpose is if they only use it for email, so we can advise them to use webmail rather and can disable VPN access.

  With respect to the VPN, I see only two options; you either empty tokens to make life easier or you keep them and put up with it.

• ASA: VPN IPSEC Tunnel from 5505(ver=8.47) to 5512 (ver = 9.23)

  Hi-

  We have connected tunnel / VPN configuration between an ASA 5505 - worm = 8.4 (7) and 5512 - worm = 9.2 (3).
  We can only ping in a sense - 5505 to the 5512, but not of vice-versa(5512 to 5505).

  Networks:

  Local: 192.168.1.0 (answering machine)
  Distance: 192.168.54.0 (initiator)

  See details below on our config:

  SH run card cry

  card crypto outside_map 2 match address outside_cryptomap_ibfw
  card crypto outside_map 2 pfs set group5
  outside_map 2 peer XX crypto card game. XX.XXX.XXX
  card crypto outside_map 2 set transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA ikev1
  crypto map outside_map 2 set ikev2 AES256 ipsec-proposal

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  Note:
  Getting to hit numbers below on rules/ACL...

  SH-access list. I have 54.0

  permit for access list 6 outside_access_out line scope ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.54.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 15931) 0x01aecbcc
  permit for access list 1 outside_cryptomap_ibfw line extended ip object NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.1.0_24 object NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.54.0_24 (hitcnt = 3) 0xa75f0671
  access-list 1 permit line outside_cryptomap_ibfw extended ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.54.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 3) 0xa75f0671

  SH run | I have access-group
  Access-group outside_access_out outside interface

  NOTE:
  WE have another working on the 5512 - VPN tunnel we use IKE peer #2 below (in BOLD)...

  HS cry his ikev1

  IKEv1 SAs:

  HIS active: 2
  Generate a new key SA: 0 (a tunnel report Active 1 and 1 to generate a new key during the generate a new key)
  Total SA IKE: 2

  1 peer IKE: XX. XX.XXX.XXX
  Type: L2L role: answering machine
  Generate a new key: no State: MM_ACTIVE
  2 IKE peers: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
  Type: L2L role: answering machine
  Generate a new key: no State: MM_ACTIVE

  SH run tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX
  tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX type ipsec-l2l
  tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX General-attributes
  Group - default policy - GroupPolicy_XX.XXX.XXX.XXX
  tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX ipsec-attributes
  IKEv1 pre-shared-key *.
  remote control-IKEv2 pre-shared-key authentication *.

  SH run | I have political ikev1

  ikev1 160 crypto policy
  preshared authentication
  aes-256 encryption
  Group 5
  life 86400

  SH run | I Dynamics
  NAT interface dynamic obj - 0.0.0.0 source (indoor, outdoor)
  NAT source auto after (indoor, outdoor) dynamic one interface

  NOTE:
  To from 5512 at 5505-, we can ping a host on the remote network of ASA local

  # ping inside the 192.168.54.20
  Type to abort escape sequence.
  Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 192.168.54.20, wait time is 2 seconds:
  !!!!!
  Success rate is 100 per cent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 30/32/40 ms

  Determination of 192.168.1.79 - local host route to 192.168.54.20 - remote host - derivation tunnel?

  The IPSEC tunnel check - seems OK?

  SH crypto ipsec his
  Interface: outside
  Tag crypto map: outside_map, seq num: 2, local addr: XX.XXX.XXX.XXX

  outside_cryptomap_ibfw to access ip 192.168.1.0 scope list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.54.0 255.255.255.0
  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (192.168.54.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  current_peer: XX. XX.XXX.XXX

  #pkts program: 4609, #pkts encrypt: 4609, #pkts digest: 4609
  #pkts decaps: 3851, #pkts decrypt: 3851, #pkts check: 3851
  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
  #pkts uncompressed: 4609, model of #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0
  success #frag before: 0, failures before #frag: 0, #fragments created: 0
  Sent #PMTUs: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, reassembly: 20th century / of frgs #decapsulated: 0
  #TFC rcvd: 0, #TFC sent: 0
  #Valid errors ICMP rcvd: 0, #Invalid ICMP errors received: 0
  #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0

  local crypto endpt. : XX.XXX.XXX.XXX/0, remote Start crypto. : XX. XX.XXX.XXX/0
  Path mtu 1500, ipsec 74 (44) generals, media, mtu 1500
  PMTU time remaining: 0, political of DF: copy / df
  Validation of ICMP error: disabled, TFC packets: disabled
  current outbound SPI: CDC99C9F
  current inbound SPI: 06821CBB

  SAS of the esp on arrival:
  SPI: 0x06821CBB (109190331)
  transform: aes-256-esp esp-sha-hmac no compression
  running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel, group 5 PFS, IKEv1}
  slot: 0, id_conn: 339968, crypto-card: outside_map
  calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (3914789/25743)
  Size IV: 16 bytes
  support for replay detection: Y
  Anti-replay bitmap:
  0xFFFFFFFF to 0xFFFFFFFF
  outgoing esp sas:
  SPI: 0xCDC99C9F (3452542111)
  transform: aes-256-esp esp-sha-hmac no compression
  running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel, group 5 PFS, IKEv1}
  slot: 0, id_conn: 339968, crypto-card: outside_map
  calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (3913553/25743)
  Size IV: 16 bytes
  support for replay detection: Y
  Anti-replay bitmap:
  0x00000000 0x00000001

  --> The local ASA 5512 - where we have questions - tried Packet Tracer... seems we receive requests/responses...

  SH cap CAP

  34 packets captured

  1: 16:41:08.120477 192.168.1.79 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo request
  2: 16:41:08.278138 192.168.54.20 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
  3: 16:41:08.278427 192.168.1.79 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
  4: 16:41:09.291992 192.168.54.20 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
  5: 16:41:09.292282 192.168.1.79 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply

  --> On the ASA 5505 distance - we can ping through the 5512 to the local host (192.168.1.79)

  SH cap A2

  42 packets captured

  1: 16:56:16.136559 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
  2: 16:56:16.168860 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.1.79 #1 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
  3: 16:56:17.140434 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
  4: 16:56:17.171652 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.1.79 #1 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
  5: 16:56:18.154426 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
  6: 16:56:18.186178 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.1.79 #1 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
  7: 16:56:19.168417 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request

  --> Package trace on 5512 does no problem... but we cannot ping from host to host?

  entry Packet-trace within the icmp 192.168.1.79 8 0 detailed 192.168.54.20

  Phase: 4
  Type: CONN-SETTINGS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  class-map default class
  match any
  Policy-map global_policy
  class class by default
  Decrement-ttl connection set
  global service-policy global_policy
  Additional information:
  Direct flow from returns search rule:
  ID = 0x7fffa2d0ba90, priority = 7, area = conn-set, deny = false
  hits = 4417526, user_data = 0x7fffa2d09040, cs_id = 0 x 0, use_real_addr, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol
  IP/ID=0.0.0.0 SRC, mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, = 0 tag
  IP/ID=0.0.0.0 DST, mask is 0.0.0.0, port = 0, tag = 0, dscp = 0 x 0
  input_ifc = output_ifc = any to inside,

  Phase: 5
  Type: NAT
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  NAT interface dynamic obj - 0.0.0.0 source (indoor, outdoor)
  Additional information:
  Definition of dynamic 192.168.1.79/0 to XX.XXX.XXX.XXX/43904
  Direct flow from returns search rule:
  ID = 0x7fffa222d130, priority = 6, area = nat, deny = false
  hits = 4341877, user_data = 0x7fffa222b970, cs_id = 0 x 0, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol
  IP/ID=0.0.0.0 SRC, mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, = 0 tag
  IP/ID=0.0.0.0 DST, mask is 0.0.0.0, port = 0, tag = 0, dscp = 0 x 0
  input_ifc = inside, outside = output_ifc

  ...

  Phase: 14
  Type: CREATING STREAMS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  New workflow created with the 7422689 id, package sent to the next module
  Information module for forward flow...
  snp_fp_tracer_drop
  snp_fp_inspect_ip_options
  snp_fp_inspect_icmp
  snp_fp_translate
  snp_fp_adjacency
  snp_fp_fragment
  snp_ifc_stat

  Information for reverse flow...
  snp_fp_tracer_drop
  snp_fp_inspect_ip_options
  snp_fp_translate
  snp_fp_inspect_icmp
  snp_fp_adjacency
  snp_fp_fragment
  snp_ifc_stat

  Result:
  input interface: inside
  entry status: to the top
  entry-line-status: to the top
  output interface: outside
  the status of the output: to the top
  output-line-status: to the top
  Action: allow

  --> On remote ASA 5505 - Packet track is good and we can ping remote host very well... dunno why he "of Nations United-NAT?

  Destination - initiator:
   
  entry Packet-trace within the icmp 192.168.54.20 8 0 detailed 192.168.1.79
   
  ...
  Phase: 4
  Type: UN - NAT
  Subtype: static
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  NAT (inside, outside) static source NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.54.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.54.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.1.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.1.0_24 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination
  Additional information:
  NAT divert on exit to the outside interface
  Untranslate 192.168.1.79/0 to 192.168.1.79/0
  ...

  Summary:
  We "don't" ping from a host (192,168.1.79) on 5512 - within the network of the 5505 - inside the network host (192.168.54.20).
  But we can ping the 5505 - inside the network host (192.168.54.20) 5512 - inside the network host (192.168.1.79).

  Please let us know what other details we can provide to help solve, thanks for any help in advance.

  -SP

  Well, I think it is a NAT ordering the issue.

  Basically as static and this NAT rule-

  NAT interface dynamic obj - 0.0.0.0 source (indoor, outdoor)

  are both in article 1 and in this article, it is done on the order of the rules so it does match the dynamic NAT rule rather than static because that seems to be higher in the order.

  To check just run a 'sh nat"and this will show you what order everthing is in.

  The ASA is working its way through the sections.

  You also have this-

  NAT source auto after (indoor, outdoor) dynamic one interface

  which does the same thing as first statement but is in section 3, it is never used.

  If you do one of two things-

  (1) configure the static NAT statement is above the dynamic NAT in section 1 that is to say. You can specify the command line

  or

  (2) remove the dynamic NAT of section 1 and then your ASA will use the entry in section 3.

  There is a very good document on this site for NAT and it is recommended to use section 3 for your general purpose NAT dynamic due precisely these questions.

  It is interesting on your ASA 5505 you duplicated your instructions of dynamic NAT again but this time with article 2 and the instructions in section 3 that is why your static NAT works because he's put in correspondence before all your dynamic rules.

  The only thing I'm not sure of is you remove the dynamic NAT statement in article 1 and rely on the statement in section 3, if she tears the current connections (sorry can't remember).

  Then you can simply try to rearrange so your static NAT is above it just to see if it works.

  Just in case you want to see the document here is the link-

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/132066/ASA-NAT-83-NAT-operation-and-configuration-format-CLI

  Jon

• the Cisco asa vpn processing error payload: payload ID: 1

  Hello

  I set up vpn L2TP by using ASDM and now I am not able to connect my Cisco ASA 5505.

  It is showing the error message

  3

  July 7, 2011

  18:57:38

  IP = *. *. *. *, payload processing error: ID payload: 1

  Please suggest me how to solve this problem (by using ASDM)

  Thank you

  Hi Nikhil,

  Your config seems incomplete, command 'IPSec l2tp ipsec vpn-tunnel-Protocol' is missing, what is needed to connect L2tp try to reconfigure your firewall using the link:-

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/customer/docs/security/ASA/asa80/configuration/guide/l2tp_ips.html

  Hope this helps,

  Parminder Sian

• Device behind a Firewall other, ASA VPN

  I have a client who wants to put their VPN / behind the ASA ASA main connected to the Internet.  Both devices have an inside leg for the internal network, but the ASA VPN connects directly to the Internet ASA.

  Topology:

  Outisde FW: Internet transfer Procedure > ASA/FW > leg DMZ to ASA/VPN

  ASA VPN: Outside the L3 Interface interface DMZ of ASA/FW link

  On the outside NAT FW I would be the external address of the VPN / ASA outside the public IP address is available and I have a rule that allows all IP from outside to outside the private IP VPN.  Inside = 192.168.254.1 outside = public IP address.

  Configured on the VPN / ASA, ASA standard SSL Remote Access.

  When I hit the NAT public IP address, nothing happens.  I've run packet - trace on the FW outside, and everything seems good.

  Someone at - it a sampling plan / config for a similar topology?     Internet > ASA/FW > dmz-leg > ASA/VPN

  Thanks in advance,
  Bob

  Can share you your NAT and routing configuration? Of these two ASAs

• ASA VPN with ISE and different backends WBS for authentication

  Hello

  I have an AAA-problem I hope to have a few problems help.

  The problem ultimately is: how the ASA via ISE send Radius Access requests to different given OTP backends provided a connection to a certain group of Tunnel.

  BACKGROUND:

  I'll try to give you a brief picture of the scenario, this is what I currently have.

  A VPN system (ASA 8.4 (4)) where I let my users to choose among 3 different methods of authentication being

  (1) certificate (on chip card)

  (2) token - token of the OTP (One Time Password provided via the smartphone application: using pledge of Nordic OTP-Edge transport server)

  (3) SMS - OTP token (Nordic OTP - Edge transport server SMS OTP)

  The choice corresponds to different groups of profiles/Tunnel connection.

  Today, all authentication requests go directly to the OTP server and authorization goes directly to the AD via LDAP.

  THE PROBLEM:

  The problem occurs when I try to put in the ISE in the mixture.

  What I obviously (?) would like to do is have all the network authentication/authorization to go through my ISE platform to take advantage of a centralized administration, monitoring etc.

  Again I would need to use data bases different backend such as AD and Nordic OTP - Edge server, but then mandated by ISE.

  For me to be able to know what back-end AAA to the proxy system, to somehow be able to distinguish the incoming Radius Access-requests.

  WHAT WE CALL:

  At the time of the ASA 8.4.3 Radius access request contains 2 new attributes, the name of Group of Tunnel and the Type of customer, when a VPN user connects.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/ref_extserver.html#wp1802187

  QUESTION:

  The seams, that I can achieve what I want by looking at the access request attribute Radius "Tunnel Group Name" and forward my request to different backends OTP for the authentication part therefore in theory. But, how do I actually go ahead and set that up in ISE?

  I don't see this attribute when I look at the details of Radius Authentication for an authentication AAA of the ASA at the ISE.

  Best regards

  / Mattias

  I think you can hit the following problem:

  CSCtz49846: ISE does not match the condition with VPN 146 Tunnel-Group-Name attribute

  This issue is not specific to this attribute, as shown in the solution shown in the accompanying note

  Workaround

  Ensure that the attribute name does not include a '.' character. This also applies to some of the existing attributes in the dictionary of Cisco-VPN300. Attribute names should be changed so that they do not include a "." character.

• l2l ASA vpn issues

  Hi all

  I have two firewalls that I'm trying to implement VPNs l2l between them. Once of them is an old wall of sonic and the other 5505.

  I put in all and ends the phase 1/2 and the tunnel rises however no traffic passes through

  Here is my configuration

  ASA (outside, 192.168.30.1) asa internal 192.168.10.0/25

  (Outside 192.168.30.2) SonicWALL sonicwall 192.168.20.0/24

  I have an accesslist that is configured on the asa and applied to the cypto card using card crypto XXXX 1, atch address YYY

  However when I watch the news ebugging on the console it says: "cannot locate the output for UDP of XXXX interface: 192.168.10.10/1 to 192.178.20.1/0.

  any ideas why this is?

  I just need a static route to say all traffic on asa with 192 source... 10.0 should go through 192.168.30.2?

  I guess it's the work of crypto card

  Am I wrong?

  Hello

  Begins to seems to me you have a filter ACL configured for your L2L VPN VPN and also the ACL filter of VPN and Crypto ACLs are the same things, which means you use a simple both ACL.

  Why I think it's like this is the fact that you say that your VPN L2L cross trading in the "packet-tracer" VPN Phase means Crypto VPN L2L ACL was correct. At the same time say you that the connection was stopped to the Phase of the VPN USER. He points to a VPN filter ACL being configured.

  In view of the foregoing, I also know that the ACL of filter for the L2L VPN behave with a logic different than typical ACL interface. In VPN L2L the ACL filter ALWAYS mention the remote network as the source ALWAYS and your Local network as the destination.

  If add you an ACL rule with order switched networks appears this fixes the VPN filter ACL problems and finally allowed traffic. Naturally I can only guess that I saw actual configurations at this point (which, usually with release "packet - trace", help to solve a problem faster just guessing)

  If you indeed filter VPN, you may be able to track him down with the following commands

  See the tunnel-group race

  Check if a "group policy" is defined then the command

  See establishing group policy enforcement

  This output should list the name of the ACL filter VPN if its game

  Regarding the installantion auto road. The default setting for ASA, is that it will create NO static routes automatically depending on the VPN configurations. This must be enabled manually in "crypto map" configurations, or you can configure static routes manually.

  ASA tracking to default TCP and UDP connections. ICMP is inspected only if his permit. By default, it is NOT inspected.

  Hope this helps

  Remember to mark a reply as the answer if it answered your question.

  Feel free to ask more if necessary.

  -Jouni

• ASA Vpn load balancing and failover

  Hi all.

  We have two asa5520 configured as main unit and emergency in failover configuration, and everything works fine.

  Is it possible with this configuration (switch), configure the vpn load balancing/grouping?

  Thank you

  Daniele

  Hi Daniele,

  You cannot run two of them on two firewalls ASA, VPN feature load balancing or failover functionality.

  Where you need to use the two feature, you must use more than three ASA firewall, two first ASAs will work as the failover and the ASA third will work as cluster VPN for them, the following example uses four firewalls:

  ASA1 (active FO) - ASA2 (TF Standby)

  (VPN virtual master)

  |

  |

  |

  |

  (Backup VPN device)

  ASA3 (active FO) - ASA4 (TF Standby)

  Kind regards

  Wajih

• Unlikely VPN configuration

  Hello

  one of our partners, had asked us a strange VPN configuration. I'm not a specialist of the ASA and I want to assure you that it is really impossible.

  We already have a VPN tunnel to the TOP. For example:

  Peer1: 1.1.1.1/32 (my company)

  Peer2: 2.2.2.2/32 (partner)

  EncryptionDomain1: 10.10.10.10/32 (our field of encryption)

  EncryptionDomain2: 20.20.20.20/24 (field of the partner encryption)

  Thus, the partner we asked to install a second tunnel with exactly the same configuration. (Homologous domain and encryptio).

  I don't think it is possible, for the reason of the match seemingly obvious to access list. In this way, I think that the ASA will get confused on which traffic corresponds to which access to the tunnel to the circulation list. It's quite a superposition of access list.

  Am I wrong?

  There might be an ASA feature that makes this possible?

  Best regards

  Fabiano Martins

  Hi, Fabiano,.

  As you rightly pointed out, it is not possible to create 2 tunnels for the same source and destination, between the same two peers.

  As a single card encryption can be applied to an interface, the different tunnels that put an end to this topic are configured with line numbers.

  When traffic is matched with the card encryption, for that, a descendant of the correspondence. And when two tunnels with the same crypto-list access are configured, then always match the first condition in the card encryption, and so the second tunnel will never come to the top.

  The most interesting question here would be, as to why your client wishes to set up such a facility.

  He may be trying to achieve something that can be done without the need for the two tunnels.

  -Shrikant

  P.S.: Please check the question as answered, if it has been resolved. Note the useful messages. Thank you.

• ASA vpn client

  Hello world

  I would like to ask for help in order to correct a customer vpn tunnel. I'm not familiar with the AAS, so please do not laugh if I write something stupid

  So I inherit one asa, which has two interface used physical and vlan more. Outdoors, office, management and management. I use my computer on the vlan management, and I can reach the computers on the desktop (192.168.12.0/24) and the branch (192.168.10.0/24). I would realize that I connect to thrught houses a vpn, and I should reach the 12.x and 10.x network as I was in these networks (due to the microsoft allowed wirewall to the local network traffic).

  I inherited a vpn configuration which I added my user.

  I'm trying to cite only the relevant portion of config:

  SSH 192.168.99.0 255.255.255.0 management

  access extensive list ip 192.168.99.0 nonat_management allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.99.0 255.255.255.0

  access extensive list ip 192.168.99.0 nat_management_branch allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
  access extensive list ip 192.168.99.0 nat_management_office allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0

  IP local pool ippool 192.168.99.100 - 192.168.99.200

  NAT-control
  Global 1 interface (outside)

  NAT (management) - access list 0 nonat_management
  nat_management_office list of access 5 NAT (management)
  nat_management_branch list of Access 10 NAT (management)

  192.168.99.50 management - dhcpd addresses 192.168.99.79
  enable dhcpd management

  L2TP strategy of Group internal
  monty password username * == encrypted nt
  monty username attributes
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN l2tp ipsec
  VPN-framed-ip-address 192.168.99.99 255.255.255.0
  attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup
  ippool address pool
  Group Policy - by default-l2tp
  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup
  pre-shared key *.
  tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup ppp-attributes
  ms-chap-v2 authentication

  I quote the encryption settings, because I can connect to asa, I think that I have problems with the nat or access rules.

  I have an ip local pool 192.168.99.100 - 192.168.99.200, but I have the fixed ip with the vpn-framed-ip-address 192.168.99.99 255.255.255.0

  Happened when I connect and try to reach the following computers:

  I can reach only a freenas 192.168.12.2, and I see in his journal that I have connected with 192.168.99.99 (vpn-framed-ip-address)

  I can't reach the computers on networks, however I have two nat rules, working when I'm in the office network 99.0

  access extensive list ip 192.168.99.0 nat_management_branch allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
  access extensive list ip 192.168.99.0 nat_management_office allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0

  It seems that these two nat rules do not work with my vpn client.

  And it is very important to arrive at the asa with ssh through the tunnel, but I can't.

  I don't know if that is the ip address of the vpn client is in the management network, perhaps one should change to another network:

  for example 192.168.95.0/24

  A vpn asa for Dummies or any help is appreciated.

  Thank you very much

  Hi Chris,

  The following should help:

  access-list allowed 192.168.12.0 nonat_office 255.255.255.0 192.168.90.0 255.255.255.0

  In this way, returning office subnet pool VPN traffic is exempt from nat. And so you will not get the failure of RPF checking.

  In addition, you must change this:

  nat_vpn_office to access extended list ip 10.10.10.0 allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0

  (incoming traffic on the VPN remote access would come from the VPN pool.) Not your home network.)

  You must have:

  No nat_vpn_office access list extended ip 10.10.10.0 allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0

  access extensive list ip 192.168.90.0 nat_vpn_office allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (outside) 5 nat_vpn_office list of outdoor access

  Hope this helps, and sorry for the delay.

  -Shrikant

  P.S.: Please check the question as answered if it was resolved. Do rates all useful messages. Thank you.

• VPN configuration blocking Internet connectivity

  I own an iPhone6 (bought in November 14 and another iPad4 (bought in early 2014) - I face a problem even in both devices.)

  Whenever I'm trying to be devices connecting to the Internet (this either through Mobile or wireless data, I have to take concrete steps to start-up the VPN setting without which the device connect to the Internet. However sometimes (although not very often) the VPN configuration gets turned on by itself without manual intervention (on start-up or mobile data or WiFi on the device). So there is always some delay time in the connection to the Internet whenever I want to use the device.

  I would be grateful for suggestions from the community in order to overcome the problem.

  You have installed VPN software or you have configured in your VPN settings? If you have a VPN configuration, then check its configuration. If you do not have a VPN configuration or a VPN software installed, then the VPN switch in settings should not illuminate.

• ASA VPN with Fortgate

  Hello people!

  I still have the problem with VPN... Laughing out loud

  I have to create a new VPN site to site between ASA 5510 (8.42 IOS) and Fortgate, but something is very strange, Don t VPN came and I see in the debug crypto 10 ikev1 the newspaper to follow:

  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Cfg 1 group would be: Group 2

  But if I ask the other peer to change in Group 2, the msg in the SAA is:

  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Group 2 GCF: Group 1

  Fortgate is possible to activate the two specific groups of VPN 1 and 2, and I would ask the other peer left this way and the ASA show:

  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Group 2 GCF: Group 1
  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Cfg 1 group would be: Group 2

  The show isakmp his:

  9 counterpart IKE: 179.124.32.181
  Type: user role: answering machine
  Generate a new key: no State: MM_WAIT_MSG3

  I have delete and creat VPN 3 x and the same error occurs.

  Everyone has seen this kind of problem?

  Is it using Fortigate version 5 by chance?

  I saw Cisco ASA VPN problems repeatedly with this code Fortigate, but above all it has been a problem of Phase 2 and defining KB life maximally on the side of the ASA has solved it... However this seems not to be your problem here.

  The first thing in your config I see you have PFS enabled - have you insured it is located on the side of Fortinet or tried to turn it off on the side of Cisco to see if it happens?

  Be stuck at MM_WAIT_MSG3 means that you sent your return policy, but then you have not received the third package in the ISAKMP riding so either the Fortigate is unhappy with something or there's a routing problem (however unlikely given that you have already had communication)

  Try on the side of the ASA:

  debug crypto isakmp 7

  You can also confrm your external interface is 'outside1 '? You can see this "see intellectual property."

• Assign the static IP address by ISE, ASA VPN clients

  We will integrate the remote access ASA VPN service with a new 1.2 ISE.

  Authentication is performed in Active directory. After authentication, can address assigned to a specific user of VPN by ISE IP?

  This means that the same VPN user will always get the same IP address. Thank you.

  Daniel,

  You can override the IETF-RADIUS-Framed-IP-Address in the authorization policy.

  However if I may make a suggestion:

  Unless you have only a handful of users to do so, it may be appropriate to assign the address of ISE pool or perform the mapping of LDAP attributes on ASA itself.

  In the latter case, the IP addresses are kept on the server as LDAP attributes and ASA will map the IP address. You don't want to keep address IP DB in several places.

  M.