Cisco 2811 compatibility for VPN

Hello

I have an existing direct router which is at present not manage the VPN.

It is necessary to add VPN service to it and I'm trying to find the match for her.

The router is

PID: CISCO2811

and the IOS operating system on it

c2800nm-spservicesk9 - mz.124 - 24.T3.bin

There not all DRY beams inside.

Can you please let me know if I need to Exchange on the router with one of those with the beams of SEC to establish a VPN on it?

Thank you very much

Kone

Hi, you will need to upgrade image to

c2800nm-adventerprisek9 or c2800nm-adsecurityk9

* Do note of useful messages *.

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Problem Cisco 2811 with L2TP IPsec VPN

    Hello. Sorry for my English. Help me please. I have problem with L2TP over IPsec VPN when I connect with Android phones. Even if I connect with laptop computers. I have Cisco 2811 - Cisco IOS software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4 (2) T2, (fc3) SOFTWARE VERSION. I configured on L2TP over IPsec VPN with Radius Authentication

    My config:

    !
    AAA new-model
    !
    !
    AAA authentication login default local
    Ray of AAA for authentication ppp default local group
    AAA authorization network default authenticated if
    start-stop radius group AAA accounting network L2TP_RADIUS

    !
    dhcp L2tp IP pool
    network 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0
    default router 192.168.100.1
    domain.local domain name
    192.168.101.12 DNS server
    18c0.a865.c0a8.6401 hexagonal option 121
    18c0.a865.c0a8.6401 hexagonal option 249

    VPDN enable
    !
    VPDN-group sec_groupe
    ! Default L2TP VPDN group
    accept-dialin
    L2tp Protocol
    virtual-model 1
    no authentication of l2tp tunnel

    session of crypto consignment
    !
    crypto ISAKMP policy 5
    BA 3des
    preshared authentication
    Group 2
    !
    crypto ISAKMP policy 55
    BA 3des
    md5 hash
    preshared authentication
    Group 2

    ISAKMP crypto key... address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
    invalid-spi-recovery crypto ISAKMP
    ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10 periodicals
    !
    life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28000
    !
    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac L2TP
    transport mode
    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac 3DESMD5
    need transport mode
    !

    !
    !
    crypto dynamic-map DYN - map 10
    Set nat demux
    game of transformation-L2TP
    !
    !
    Crypto map 10 L2TP-VPN ipsec-isakmp dynamic DYN-map

    interface Loopback1
    Description * L2TP GateWay *.
    IP 192.168.100.1 address 255.255.255.255

    interface FastEthernet0/0
    Description * Internet *.
    address IP 95.6... 255.255.255.248
    IP access-group allow-in-of-wan in
    IP access-group allows-off-of-wan on
    no ip redirection
    no ip unreachable
    no ip proxy-arp
    NAT outside IP
    IP virtual-reassembly
    IP route cache policy
    automatic duplex
    automatic speed
    L2TP-VPN crypto card
    !

    interface virtual-Template1
    Description * PPTP *.
    IP unnumbered Loopback1
    IP access-group L2TP_VPN_IN in
    AutoDetect encapsulation ppp
    default IP address dhcp-pool L2tp peer
    No keepalive
    PPP mtu Adaptive
    PPP encryption mppe auto
    PPP authentication ms-chap-v2 callin
    PPP accounting L2TP_RADIUS

    L2TP_VPN_IN extended IP access list
    permit any any icmp echo
    IP 192.168.100.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.101.0 0.0.0.255
    IP 192.168.100.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
    allow udp any any eq bootps
    allow udp any any eq bootpc
    deny ip any any journal entry

    RADIUS-server host 192.168.101.15 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813
    RADIUS server retry method reorganize
    RADIUS server retransmit 2
    Server RADIUS 7 key...

    Debugging shows me

    234195: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP (0:0): received 93.73.161.229 packet dport 500 sport 500 SA NEW Global (N)
    234196: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: created a struct peer 93.73.161.229, peer port 500
    234197: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: new position created post = 0x47D305BC peer_handle = 0x80007C5F
    234198: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: lock struct 0x47D305BC, refcount 1 to peer crypto_isakmp_process_block
    234199: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: 500 local port, remote port 500
    234200: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: insert his with his 480CFF64 = success
    234201: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
    234202: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_READY = IKE_R_MM1
    234203: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): treatment ITS payload. Message ID = 0
    234204: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
    234205: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 69
    234206: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
    234207: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 164
    234208: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
    234209: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 123
    234210: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is NAT - T v2
    234211: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
    234212: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 221
    234213: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
    234214: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 194
    234215: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
    234216: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is DPD
    234217: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): looking for a key corresponding to 93.73.161.229 in default
    234218: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): success
    234219: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 93.73.161.229
    234220: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): pre-shared key local found
    234221: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: analysis of the profiles for xauth...
    234222: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): audit ISAKMP transform 1 against policy priority 5
    234223: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
    234224: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: life (basic) of 28800
    234225: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: 3DES-CBC encryption
    234226: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth
    234227: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: SHA hash
    234228: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: group by default 2
    234229: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): atts are acceptable. Next payload is 3
    234230: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
    234231: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 69
    234232: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
    234233: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 164
    234234: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
    234235: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 123
    234236: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is NAT - T v2
    234237: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
    234238: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 221
    234239: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
    234240: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 194
    234241: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
    234242: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is DPD
    234243: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
    234244: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM1 = IKE_R_MM1

    234245: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-02 ID NAT - t
    234246: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): lot of 93.73.161.229 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (R) MM_SA_SETUP
    234247: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
    234248: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM1 = IKE_R_MM2

    234249: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP (0:0): received 93.73.161.229 packet 500 Global 500 (R) sport dport MM_SA_SETUP
    234250: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
    234251: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM2 = IKE_R_MM3

    234252: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): processing KE payload. Message ID = 0
    234253: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: crypto_engine: create DH shared secret
    234254: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_DH_SHARE_SECRET (hw) (ipsec)
    234255: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): processing NONCE payload. Message ID = 0
    234256: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): looking for a key corresponding to 93.73.161.229 in default
    234257: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): success
    234258: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 93.73.161.229
    234259: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: crypto_engine: create IKE SA
    234260: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_SA_CREATE (hw) (ipsec)
    234261: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: receives the payload type 20
    234262: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: receives the payload type 20
    234263: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP (0:5912): NAT found, the node outside NAT
    234264: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
    234265: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): former State = new State IKE_R_MM3 = IKE_R_MM3

    234266: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): lot of 93.73.161.229 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (R) MM_KEY_EXCH
    234267: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
    234268: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): former State = new State IKE_R_MM3 = IKE_R_MM4

    234269: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP (0:5912): received 93.73.161.229 packet dport 4500 4500 Global (R) MM_KEY_EXCH sport
    234270: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: crypto_engine: package to decipher IKE
    234271: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_IKE_DECRYPT (hw) (ipsec)
    234272: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
    234273: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): former State = new State IKE_R_MM4 = IKE_R_MM5

    234274: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): payload ID for treatment. Message ID = 0
    234275: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP (0:5912): payload ID
    next payload: 8
    type: 1
    address: 192.168.1.218
    Protocol: 17
    Port: 500
    Length: 12
    234276: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): peer games * no * profiles
    234277: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): HASH payload processing. Message ID = 0
    234278: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: crypto_engine: hash generate IKE
    234279: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_IKE_HMAC (hw) (ipsec)
    234280: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): SA authentication status:
    authenticated
    234281: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): SA has been authenticated with 93.73.161.229
    234282: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): port detected floating port = 4500
    234283: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: attempts to insert a peer and inserted 95.6.../93.73.161.229/4500/ 47D305BC successfully.
    234284: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): IKE_DPD is enabled, the initialization of timers
    234285: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
    234286: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): former State = new State IKE_R_MM5 = IKE_R_MM5

    234287: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): ITS been pre-shared key, using id ID_IPV4_ADDR type authentication
    234288: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP (0:5912): payload ID
    next payload: 8
    type: 1
    address: 95.6...
    Protocol: 17
    Port: 0
    Length: 12
    234289: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): the total payload length: 12
    234290: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: crypto_engine: hash generate IKE
    234291: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_IKE_HMAC (hw) (ipsec)
    234292: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: crypto_engine: package to encrypt IKE
    routerindc #.
    234293: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_IKE_ENCRYPT (hw) (ipsec)
    234294: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): lot of 93.73.161.229 sending peer_port my_port 4500 4500 (R) MM_KEY_EXCH
    234295: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
    234296: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): former State = new State IKE_R_MM5 = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

    234297: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_COMPLETE
    234298: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

    234299: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP (0:5912): received 93.73.161.229 packet dport 4500 4500 Global (R) QM_IDLE sport
    234300: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: node set-893966165 to QM_IDLE
    234301: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: crypto_engine: package to decipher IKE
    234302: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_IKE_DECRYPT (hw) (ipsec)
    234303: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: crypto_engine: hash generate IKE
    234304: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_IKE_HMAC (hw) (ipsec)
    234305: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): HASH payload processing. Message ID =-893966165
    234306: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): treatment protocol NOTIFIER INITIAL_CONTACT 1
    SPI 0, message ID =-893966165, his 480CFF64 =
    234307: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): SA authentication status:
    authenticated
    234308: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): process of first contact.
    dropping existing phase 1 and 2 with 95.6 local... 93.73.161.229 remote remote port 4500
    234309: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): node-893966165 error suppression FALSE reason 'informational (en) State 1.
    234310: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_INFO_NOTIFY
    234311: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: ISAKMP: (5912): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

    234312: * 3 Feb 18:53:38: IPSEC (key_engine): had an event of the queue with 1 KMI message (s)
    234313: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: % s-6-IPACCESSLOGRL: registration of limited or missed rates 150 packages of access list
    234314: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP (0:5912): received 93.73.161.229 packet dport 4500 4500 Global (R) QM_IDLE sport
    234315: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: node set-1224389198 to QM_IDLE
    234316: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: crypto_engine: package to decipher IKE
    234317: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_IKE_DECRYPT (hw) (ipsec)
    234318: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: crypto_engine: hash generate IKE
    234319: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_IKE_HMAC (hw) (ipsec)
    234320: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): HASH payload processing. Message ID =-1224389198
    234321: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): treatment ITS payload. Message ID =-1224389198
    234322: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): proposal of IPSec checking 1
    234323: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: turn 1, ESP_3DES
    234324: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: attributes of transformation:
    234325: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
    234326: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: life of HIS (basic) of 28800
    234327: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: program is 61444 (Transport-UDP)
    234328: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: authenticator is HMAC-SHA
    234329: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: CryptoEngine0: validate the proposal
    234330: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): atts are acceptable.
    234331: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: IPSEC (validate_proposal_request): part #1 of the proposal
    (Eng. msg key.) Local INCOMING = 95.6..., distance = 93.73.161.229,.
    local_proxy = 95.6.../255.255.255.255/17/1701 (type = 1),
    remote_proxy = 93.73.161.229/255.255.255.255/17/0 (type = 1),
    Protocol = ESP, transform = esp-3des esp-sha-hmac (UDP Transport),
    lifedur = 0 and 0kb in
    SPI = 0 x 0 (0), id_conn = 0, keysize = 0, flags = 0 x 0
    234332: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: map_db_find_best found no corresponding card
    234333: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): processing NONCE payload. Message ID =-1224389198
    234334: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): payload ID for treatment. Message ID =-1224389198
    234335: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): payload ID for treatment. Message ID =-1224389198
    234336: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): ask 1 spis of ipsec
    234337: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): entrance, node-1224389198 = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_QM_EXCH
    234338: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): former State = new State IKE_QM_READY = IKE_QM_SPI_STARVE
    234339: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: IPSEC (key_engine): had an event of the queue with 1 KMI message (s)
    234340: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: IPSEC (spi_response): spi getting 834762579 for SA
    of 95.6... to 93.73.161.229 for prot 3
    234341: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: crypto_engine: hash generate IKE
    234342: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_IKE_HMAC (hw) (ipsec)
    234343: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: crypto_engine: create Security Association IPSec (by QM)
    routerindc #.
    234344: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_IPSEC_KEY_CREATE (hw) (ipsec)
    234345: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: crypto_engine: create Security Association IPSec (by QM)
    234346: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_IPSEC_KEY_CREATE (hw) (ipsec)
    234347: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): establishing IPSec security associations
    234348: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: from 93.73.161.229 to 95.6 SA... (f / i) 0 / 0
    (93.73.161.229 to 95.6 proxy...)
    234349: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: spi 0x31C17753 and id_conn a 0
    234350: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: life of 28800 seconds
    234351: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ITS 95.6 outgoing... to 93.73.161.229 (f / i) 0/0
    (proxy 95.6... to 93.73.161.229)
    234352: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: spi 0x495A4BD and id_conn a 0
    234353: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: life of 28800 seconds
    234354: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: crypto_engine: package to encrypt IKE
    234355: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_IKE_ENCRYPT (hw) (ipsec)
    234356: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: IPSEC (key_engine): had an event of the queue with 1 KMI message (s)
    234357: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: map_db_find_best found no corresponding card
    234358: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: IPSec: rate allocated for brother 80000273 Flow_switching
    234359: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: IPSEC (policy_db_add_ident): 95.6..., src dest 93.73.161.229, dest_port 4500

    234360: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: IPSEC (create_sa): its created.
    (his) sa_dest = 95.6..., sa_proto = 50.
    sa_spi = 0x31C17753 (834762579).
    sa_trans = sa_conn_id of hmac-sha-esp, esp-3des = 1165
    234361: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: IPSEC (create_sa): its created.
    (his) sa_dest = 93.73.161.229, sa_proto = 50,.
    sa_spi = 0x495A4BD (76915901).
    sa_trans = sa_conn_id of hmac-sha-esp, esp-3des = 1166
    234362: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): lot of 93.73.161.229 sending peer_port my_port 4500 4500 (R) QM_IDLE
    234363: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): entrance, node-1224389198 = IKE_MESG_FROM_IPSEC, IKE_SPI_REPLY
    234364: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): former State = new State IKE_QM_SPI_STARVE = IKE_QM_R_QM2
    234365: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP (0:5912): received 93.73.161.229 packet dport 4500 4500 Global (R) QM_IDLE sport
    234366: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: crypto_engine: package to decipher IKE
    234367: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_IKE_DECRYPT (hw) (ipsec)
    234368: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: crypto_engine: hash generate IKE
    234369: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: CryptoEngine0: CRYPTO_ISA_IKE_HMAC (hw) (ipsec)
    routerindc #.
    234370: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): node-1224389198 error suppression FALSE reason 'QM (wait).
    234371: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): entrance, node-1224389198 = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_QM_EXCH
    234372: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: ISAKMP: (5912): former State = new State IKE_QM_R_QM2 = IKE_QM_PHASE2_COMPLETE
    234373: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: IPSEC (key_engine): had an event of the queue with 1 KMI message (s)
    234374: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: IPSEC (key_engine_enable_outbound): rec would notify of ISAKMP
    234375: * 3 Feb 18:53:39: IPSEC (key_engine_enable_outbound): select SA with spinnaker 76915901/50
    234376: * 3 Feb 18:53:40: IPSEC (epa_des_crypt): decrypted packet has no control of her identity
    routerindc #.
    234377: * 3 Feb 18:53:42: IPSEC (epa_des_crypt): decrypted packet has no control of her identity
    routerindc #.
    234378: * 3 Feb 18:53:44: IPSEC (epa_des_crypt): decrypted packet has no control of her identity

    Also when I connect with the phone, I see HIS Active and IPsec tunnel is mounted, but the wire of time tunnel is down and phone connects.

    I hope that you will help me. Thank you.

    Hi dvecherkin1,

    Who IOS you're running, you could hit the next default.

    https://Tools.Cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCsg34166/?reffering_site=dumpcr

    It may be useful

    -Randy-

    Evaluate the ticket to help others find the answer quickly.

  • What clients VPN Cisco 2811 supports?

    Is the solution of VPN Cisco 2811 locked customers cisco or that market with other brands too?

    Best regards Tommy Svensson

    Hello

    With the correct IOS feature set, it will support IPsec VPN clients. This includes not only the Cisco VPN client but almost any standard IPsec client.

    In addition, if on the 2811 can accept any browser SSL VPN connections, or even use the AnyConnect SSL client.

    It will be useful.

    Federico.

  • I forgot the password for VPN record how I opened

    First I have to buy the phone add password for VPN and I forgot how I fix this

    You can try to perform a repair of the system as it will be your phone factory reset or below, try to perform a factory reset, but in order to achieve a system repair

    Turn off your phone and unplug the PC (Hold to increase the volume and power for 10 seconds)
    Start PC Companion and select the area of support then updated my phone/Tablet then blue fix my phone/Tablet and follow the instructions on the screen - when you are prompted, always connect your phone off press and hold volume or back button - this should begin the process of repair or reformatting

    If you use Windows 8/8.1 or a 64-bit operating system and then adjust the settings for PC Companion and run in compatibility mode and choose Windows 7 or XP

  • VWIC3-1MFT-T1/E1 on Cisco 2811

    Hello community,

    VWIC3- 1MFT-T1/E1 is compatible with router Cisco 2811 (revision 53.51)?

    Currently, I get the following error:

    WIC Slot 0:

    Daughter unknown WAN card

    Module WIC unsupported / disabled this slot machine

    Hardware revision: 1.0

    Number of albums part together: 800-34657-01

    Part number: 73-13419-01

    Review on board: B0

    Deviation number: 0

    Version of fab: 05

    Serial number of PCB: FOC1624628F

    Version identifier: V01

    Product number (FRU): VWIC3-1MFT-T1/E1

    CLEI Code: COUIA7PCAA

    History of the RMA tests: 00

    RMA number: 0-0-0-0

    RMA history: 00

    EEPROM 4 format version

    Table of contents EEPROM (hex):

    0 X 00:04 FF 40 06 00 01 41 46 03 20 00 87 61 01 C0 ED

    0 X 10: 82 49 34 6 B 01 42 42 30 88 00 00 00 00 02 05 C1

    0 X 20: 8B 4F 46 43 31 36 32 34 36 32 38 46 89 56 30 31

    0X20 30: 2D CB 90 56 57 49 43 33 31 4 46 54 54 31 2D

    0X40: 2F 45 31 C6 8 A 43 55 49 41 37 50 43 41 41 03 4F

    0 X 50: 00 81 00 00 00 00 04 00 03 40 C1 CB FF FF FF D9

    0 X 60 : FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF

    0 X 70 : FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF #

    Thank you very much in advance for your quick responses.

    George

    Hi George,.

    Unfortunately not supported on any series 2800

    The Cisco® third generation-1, 2 or 4-channel T1/E1 Multiflex Trunk voice/WAN (MFT VWIC3s) support voice and data applications Interface on the Cisco 1921, 1941 and 1941W (data only) and the Cisco 2901 2911 2921, 2951, 3925, 3945, routers to Services integrated 3925th and 3945TH.

    Table 1. Supported Cisco MFT VWIC3 platforms and Cisco IOS Software Release requirements minimum

    VWIC3-1MFT-T1/E1

    VWIC3-2MFT-T1/E1

    VWIC3-1MFT-G703

    VWIC3-2MFT-G703

    VWIC3-4MFT-T1/E1

    Slot machines Cisco 1900 chassis EHWIC

    (1) M3 15.0, 15.1 (1) T1, 15.1 (2) T

    (1) M3 15.0, 15.1 (1) T1, 15.1 (2) T

    (1) M3 15.0, 15.1 (1) T1, 15.1 (2) T

    (1) M3 15.0, 15.1 (1) T1, 15.1 (2) T

    N/A *.

    Slot machines Cisco 2900 chassis EHWIC

    (1) M3 15.0, 15.1 (1) T1, 15.1 (2) T

    (1) M3 15.0, 15.1 (1) T1, 15.1 (2) T

    (1) M3 15.0, 15.1 (1) T1, 15.1 (2) T

    (1) M3 15.0, 15.1 (1) T1, 15.1 (2) T

    15.1 (3) T *.

    Slot machines Cisco 3900 chassis EHWIC

    (1) M3 15.0, 15.1 (1) T1, 15.1 (2) T

    (1) M3 15.0, 15.1 (1) T1, 15.1 (2) T

    (1) M3 15.0, 15.1 (1) T1, 15.1 (2) T

    (1) M3 15.0, 15.1 (1) T1, 15.1 (2) T

    15.1 (3) T

    * VWIC3-4MFT-T1/E1is supported by Cisco 2911 2921 2951 and, routers Cisco 3900 Series

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/routers/ps5855/data_sheet_c36-609138.html

    See you soon!

    Rob

    "Why don't the best things always go away."

    -The band

  • ASA - several IPS for VPN

    I'll put up Anyconnect to replace our customers of Cisco IPsec VPN, since it is end of life. A part of the process is to get an SSL certificate and a FULL domain name to use for this. I've got that and it is applied to the ASA very well. Now we don't get these warnings to the subject it is not not sure and such.

    The problem is that we use a non-standard port for the SSL VPN from 443 is already sent to an internal device. I have unused public addresses to the external interface of the ASA, but I don't know how I could use them. I would like to have a different IP address for SSL VPN, so I don't have to mess with the port forward that is currently in place. I read on proxy arp, but that looks like it could be a problem. I could have someone connect another cable to a different interface on the ASA (5512-X) and assign this static interface I want for the VPN, but I'm not sure it will work well. We have connections VPN site to site in place as well. Can I have the ASA listening on two different interfaces at the same time?

    Recap:

    IP 1 - address primary NAT, Site at tunnels put end here, some Cisco IPsec VPN terminate customer

    IP 2 - want to have all customers of Anyconnect connect here, to migrate all legacy Cissco IPsec clients until they are all over Anyconnect.

    Key is that I can not stop listening on IP 1 for site-to-site connections.

    Thoughts?

    Thank you!

    On the SAA, you cannot use the additional IPS for VPN.

    If tcp/443 is already used for an external server, then I would reconfigure the DNS entry for it to use the second IP address that must be sent to the internal server. You can then use the IP interface of the ASA for AnyConnect.

  • ASA for vpn only

    Hello

    I would like to configure the ASA for vpn only. By default, ASA allows traffic from the interface of high security to low security interface. I want to stop it. Is it possible to do without resorting to access lists.

    Thank you

    John

    Define interfaces for the same level of security and make sure that you do not have same-security-traffic permits inter-interface enabled.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807fc191.shtml

    Hope that helps.

  • Cisco 877 as a VPN server

    Hello

    I try to configure my router ADSL cisco 877 as a vpn server, so that multiple site can connect to the ADSL cisco 877 router. Is it possible to achieve this goal. If yes what is the procedure and if possible, please copy the URL for documentation here.

    Thank you

    Siva.

    Here is the sample configuration for the client in network Extension mode and IOS Easy VPN server:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080808395.shtml

    The sample configuration uses local authentication, you can always change it to use radius authentication.

  • Using Cisco Client to site VPN on a behind a NAT ASA 5520

    I apologize if this has been asked and we answered in the forums.  I looked, and while I found a large number of entries that were dancing all around this question, I never found nothing which addressed this specific issue.   We currently use an ASA 5520 as the head end of a relatively large customer to site IPSEC VPN (approximately 240 users, not consecutively).   This ASA is currently sitting behind a Checkpoint firewall with a real publicly addressable IP address on its public interface.  All of our customers use the legacy Cisco VPN (not the one anyconnect) client.  We plan to a few controllers F5 link set up between ISPS and firewalls.   For VPN connectivity F5 recommends that we NAT IP address (called a broad IP) to point back to a private IP address on the ASA and F5.  My question is, will this work?   I've always heard say that the head of line needed to have a public IP address on this subject because this is what will be placed in packages for the client to respond to.

    For further information, here's what we have now and what we are invited to attend.

    Current

    ISP - router - firewall-fire - ASA (public IP address as endpoint)

    Proposed

    ISP - router - F5 (public IP address as endpoint using a NAT to ASA) - Firewall - ASA (10.X.X.X as its external interface)

    Proposed alternative

    ISP - router - F5 (public IP address as endpoint using a NAT to ASA) - ASA (10.X.X.X as its external interface)

    All thoughts at this moment would be greatly appreciated.   Thank you!

    Hello

    If there is a static NAT one by one on F5 to the external interface of the ASA, then I don't think they would be any problems.
    Because when the client will attempt to connect to IKE to the translated public IP, F5 will redirect the request to ASA outside interface that is configured for the VPN.

    In addition, to ensure the udp500, 4500 and esp is allowed and then you should be good to go.

    HTH

    Concerning
    Mohit

  • Traffic permitted only one-way for VPN-connected computers

    Hello

    I currently have an ASA 5505.  I put up as a remote SSL VPN access. My computers can connect to the VPN very well.  They just cannot access the internal network (192.168.250.0).  They cannot ping the inside interface of the ASA, nor any of the machines.  It seems that all traffic is blocked for them.  The strange thing is that when someone is connected to the VPN, I can ping this ASA VPN connection machine and other machines inside the LAN.  It seems that the traffic allows only one way.  I messed up with ACL with nothing doesn't.  Any suggestions please?

    Pool DHCP-192.168.250.20 - 50--> for LAN

    Pool VPN: 192.168.250.100 and 192.168.250.101

    Outside interface to get the modem DHCP

    The inside interface: 192.168.1.1

    Courses Running Config:

    : Saved

    :

    ASA Version 8.2 (5)

    !

    hostname HardmanASA

    activate the password # encrypted

    passwd # encrypted

    names of

    !

    interface Ethernet0/0

    switchport access vlan 20

    !

    interface Ethernet0/1

    switchport access vlan 10

    !

    interface Ethernet0/2

    switchport access vlan 10

    !

    interface Ethernet0/3

    Shutdown

    !

    interface Ethernet0/4

    Shutdown

    !

    interface Ethernet0/5

    Shutdown

    !

    interface Ethernet0/6

    Shutdown

    !

    interface Ethernet0/7

    switchport access vlan 10

    !

    interface Vlan1

    No nameif

    no level of security

    no ip address

    !

    interface Vlan10

    nameif inside

    security-level 100

    IP 192.168.250.1 255.255.255.0

    !

    interface Vlan20

    nameif outside

    security-level 0

    IP address dhcp setroute

    !

    passive FTP mode

    DNS lookup field inside

    DNS domain-lookup outside

    pager lines 24

    Within 1500 MTU

    Outside 1500 MTU

    mask 192.168.250.100 - 192.168.250.101 255.255.255.0 IP local pool VPN_Pool

    ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1

    don't allow no asdm history

    ARP timeout 14400

    Global interface 10 (external)

    NAT (inside) 10 192.168.250.0 255.255.255.0

    Timeout xlate 03:00

    Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02

    Sunrpc timeout 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 mgcp from 01:00 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00

    Sip timeout 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00 sip - disconnect 0:02:00

    Timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute

    timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00

    Floating conn timeout 0:00:00

    dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy

    the ssh LOCAL console AAA authentication

    Enable http server

    http 192.168.250.0 255.255.255.0 inside

    No snmp server location

    No snmp Server contact

    Server enable SNMP traps snmp authentication linkup, linkdown cold start

    life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800

    Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association

    Telnet timeout 5

    SSH 192.168.250.0 255.255.255.0 inside

    SSH timeout 5

    SSH version 2

    Console timeout 0

    dhcpd dns 8.8.8.8

    !

    dhcpd address 192.168.250.20 - 192.168.250.50 inside

    dhcpd allow inside

    !

    a basic threat threat detection

    Statistics-list of access threat detection

    no statistical threat detection tcp-interception

    WebVPN

    allow outside

    SVC disk0:/anyconnect-win-2.5.2014-k9.pkg 1 image

    SVC disk0:/anyconnect-macosx-i386-2.5.2014-k9.pkg 2 image

    Picture disk0:/anyconnect-linux-2.5.2014-k9.pkg 3 SVC

    enable SVC

    tunnel-group-list activate

    attributes of Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy

    value of server DNS 8.8.8.8

    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec svc webvpn

    tunnel-group AnyConnect type remote access

    tunnel-group AnyConnect General attributes

    address pool VPN_Pool

    tunnel-group AnyConnect webvpn-attributes

    enable AnyConnect group-alias

    !

    class-map inspection_default

    match default-inspection-traffic

    !

    !

    type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map

    parameters

    maximum message length automatic of customer

    message-length maximum 512

    Policy-map global_policy

    class inspection_default

    inspect the preset_dns_map dns

    inspect the ftp

    inspect h323 h225

    inspect the h323 ras

    Review the ip options

    inspect the netbios

    inspect the rsh

    inspect the rtsp

    inspect the skinny

    inspect esmtp

    inspect sqlnet

    inspect sunrpc

    inspect the tftp

    inspect the sip

    inspect xdmcp

    !

    global service-policy global_policy

    context of prompt hostname

    no remote anonymous reporting call

    call-home

    Profile of CiscoTAC-1

    no active account

    http https://tools.cisco.com/its/service/oddce/services/DDCEService destination address

    email address of destination [email protected] / * /

    destination-mode http transport

    Subscribe to alert-group diagnosis

    Subscribe to alert-group environment

    Subscribe to alert-group monthly periodic inventory

    monthly periodicals to subscribe to alert-group configuration

    daily periodic subscribe to alert-group telemetry

    Cryptochecksum:30fadff4b400e42e73e17167828e046f

    : end

    Hello

    No worries

    As we change the config I would do as well as possible.

    First, it is strongly recommended to use a different range of IP addresses for VPN clients and the internal network

    No VPN_Pool 192.168.250.100 - 192.168.250.101 255.255.255.0 ip local pool mask

    mask 192.168.251.100 - 192.168.251.101 255.255.255.0 IP local pool VPN_Pool

    NAT_0 ip 192.168.250.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.251.0 255.255.255.0

    NAT (inside) 0-list of access NAT_0

    Then give it a try and it work note this post hehe

  • Limit bandwidth for VPN users

    Hi guys,.

    I use ASA Version 8.2 (1), I want to limit vpn users to use less bandwidth of my Interlink to access something on the inside of the network

    example: source vpn pool

    Destn: inside the network

    Please let me know how to achieve this with QOS config.

    Hello

    Probably the best would be to match groups of tunnel.

    class-map TG1-best-effort 
    match tunnel-group Tunnel-Group-1 
    match flow ip destination-address 

    Then this traffic in police policy-map and apply the service policy to the external interface (since you want to traffic police from your home). You can also use the pool for vpn access lists.

    For more details, please see:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/configuration/guide/QoS.html

  • EasyVPN for VPN phones?

    Can I use a router 2911 like EasyVPN server for VPN phones or EasyVPN is only for the router-to-router VPN?

    EasyVPN server can stop sessions IPSec client.  I know not at all with native features of IPSec Cisco phones. There is version phone Cisco AnyConnect SSL VPN support including a 2911 can be dismissed to support.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/customer/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/Admin/Configuration/Guide/cmevpn.html#wp1019169

    Todd

  • What is the function of the IOS minimum set required for VPN site-to-site software?

    Hi guys,.

    I have a Cisco 1841 router to do a VPN site-to site. I would like to know what is the function of the IOS minimum set required for VPN site-to-site software?

    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Ja,

    Advanced security or more should do it. The version of the IOS, you can try later 12.4 T which is c1841-advsecurityk9 - mz.124 - 24.T5.bin, in which case you don't want to go to 15.1 still.

    I hope this helps.

    Raga

  • is it possible to load and execute space cadets in windows 7 on a Windows XP disk. then running in a mode of compatibility for Windows XP or 95

    original title: Space cadet 3D pinball

    Pinball Space cadet is not not available for windows 7. is it possible to load and execute space cadets in windows 7 on a Windows XP disk. then running in a mode of compatibility for Windows XP or 95. I have a relevant disc that I purchased when using XP (and seriouly consider replace Windowsd 7 with). If it is possible, are there problems to download it.

    Try this: http://mspinball.weebly.com/download.html. He was installing a short test, and it works (download and installation may alert you to "Unknown Publisher", but various analyses did not find anything harmful). "192GO should be enough for everyone." (of the miniseries "Next generation jokes")

  • Configure the router Cisco E2000 wireless for my laptop HP with Vista, I can't work.

    Configure the router Cisco E2000 wireless for my laptop HP with Vista, I can't work.  I spoke with Cisco and they said that my Atheros AR5007 adapter does not work with Cisco E2000 and contact my computer vendor

    Hello

    HM... I guess that the Cisco people know what they're taking everything. The AR5005 is a b/g card and there should be a good reason to not work with a router that is able (the E2000 is able g) g.

    This is HP drivers for the card, http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/softwareDownloadIndex?cc=us&lc=en&dlc=en&softwareitem=ob-55737-1

    If you can't make it work, you must decide between a new card or another router.

    Personally, if it's new and I could return it, I'd get a different router model. But YMMV

    ------------

    My posts reflect my understanding and experience. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion or the vision of Microsoft, or anyone else.

    Jack-MVP Windows Networking. WWW.EZLAN.NET

Maybe you are looking for