Cisco ISE to jailbroken or android block specific versions

Similar Questions

• Press release cisco ISE 2.0

  Can someone please recommend a good book on ISE 2.0... again 2.0

  IMHO there is no good book on ISE 2.0 because there is no book of ISE 2.0 at all.

  IM aware of only three books on ISE:

  • CiscoPress: Unified Cisco ISE BYOD and blocked access
  • CiscoPress: CCNP security SISAS 300-208 official Cert Guide
  • Syngress: Practical deployment of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE): concrete examples of deployments AAA

  I did the first and also know each other. They n 't ISE 2.0 coverage. And looking at the table of contents of the third, it looks no better.

  Not a book at all, but the best documentation for ISE is ISE product page design guides: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/security/identity-services-engine/products-implementation-design-guides-list.html

• Cisco ISE 1.1.1 with Windows posturing

  Hello

  We tired for configured windows posturing here's the scenario

  We saw five ise boxes 3315 with version 1.1.1 off them 2 is admin, 2 is PS and 1 MNT

  and we have local Symantec and WSUS Server.

  We make posturing for Windows where I have a few questions

  (1) is there an integration here of the local WSUS server with Cisco ISE where Cisco ISE can automatically take all the mandatory WSUS update according to the crititcality of the WSUS server.

  (2) what is advised to set up the strategy of the Posture of the posture of windows in Cisco ISE and if manually configure windows political posture using specific KB and if there is an update available on Microsoft will we be able to configure the policy for the new update.

  (3) we have configured authentication dot1x in cisco ise and asked as well as on switch port where once the user must be connected to dot1x port of the switch it invites username and password dot1x and therefore, authorization policy, it gives vlan appropriate dynamics.

  But what are the ways where we can restrict the machine which is rather than the assets of the company and even if the user's user name and password in short any employee aware how we can restrict the user making the machine rather than the assets of the company?

  (4) can configure US policy posture for antivirus which will keep us in normal mode and at the same time, we can put posturing for windows which monioring mode which only monitor policy posture and reflected in the monitoring, log in which does not restrict the network for windows posturing

  That will be great if any one can please help me to get the issues

  Thank you

  Pranav

  What follows is under the POLICY-OF ELEMENTS of STRATEGY-POSTURE-> REQUIREMENTS > >

  

  What follows is located under

  POLICY OF-> ELEMENTS OF STRATEGY-> POSTURE->

  REPAIR-> WINDOWS SERVER UPDATE SERVICES REMEDIATION ACTIONS

  

  What follows is part POLICY-> POSTURE

  

  These settings work ALMOST flawlessly for me by forcing her we approved on our WSUS server for our group of workstations updated (all of our laptops are members of the) which meet the criteria of severity EXPRESS (critical and Important). Now, what I've discovered in the last few days is that... MS seems a bit random in their identification of what severity level they assign to their updates. For example... I think that a service pack of the operating system would be considered IMPORTANT if not CRITICAL... however... Look at this from the identification of the server WSUS from Windows 7 Service Pack 1:

  

  Thus, those who updates you deleted, I'd go throgh your WSUS server to identify how they are identified by gravity, then according to your needs set the parameters of the ISE accordingly to ensure that you get updates you plan.

  Hope this helps everyone out there who has similar problems.

  Thank you

  Dirk

• CIsco ISE with HP and Fortigate

  Hello

  I configured the switches HP 5820 X and 5130 for authentication radius AAA with Cisco ISE 2.0.0.306.

  The switch receives the response from authorization successful; but unable to connect. What are the Advanced profile Radius authorization attributes in

  ISE?

  In addition, ISE supports Fotigate firewall?

  Oh and Yes ISE supports any device using the RADIUS in accordance with rfc, it is usually only a question about this that av-pairs to send to that specific device, there is not really standard for this.

• How to block specific Web sites from my PC

  I have XP Pro SP3.  How to block specific Web sites to come on Internet Explorer?  Thank you!

  Yes my brother you can block specific Web site in your pc, I got a job for you

  visit-

  How to block specific Web sites from my PC http://www.technet2u.com/2012/09/how-to-block-any-websites-using-host.html

• Cisco Connect Express App 4 Android not available in France.

  Hello, I am a very happy user of a WRT54G Router, but I intend to buy an E4200 (v2) for 802.11n. I am very interested to install Cisco Connect Express on my android device, but this app seems to be unavailable in France/Europa? Someone outside of the United States has already managed to install? Thanks in advance for your answers. Vince

  Hello

  Cisco Connect Express for Android is now available in french Market(Google Play) Android since 04/06/2012.

  Thank you.

• block specific external ip address

  Hello

  Thanks to all those who can help you.

  I have a WAG160Nv2 and to block specific external ip addresses to try to get to our server that uses the WAG160Nv2 as an internet gateway. It is not immediately obvious if it is possible to look through the config pages.

  Is not possible.

  1. unless you transfer a port, the server is not accessible anyway.

  2. If you transfer a port for the server put the firewall on the server to filter that traffic.

• How to block specific sites from my computer?

  original title: program block

  How to block specific sites from my computer?

  Use a parential control program, or you can block your network using your router control panel.
  The parential controls Windows Vista: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-vista/Set-up-Parental-Controls
  K9: http://www1.k9webprotection.com/

  teengeek.freehostingcloud.com Microsoft community contributor

• Cisco ise license command

  I have a question

  1. is it possible to install the Cisco ISE software on the server machine to physical HP (without solution VMware or without the use of SNS-3415-k9 cisco device)?

  2. for 2500 users online, I'll order L-ISE-BSE-2550, L-ISE-PLS-S-2500 and L-ISE-APX-S-2500 of basis, more and apex licenses. My question is HA (primary and secondary) application I need 2 licenses for each? (2 * L - ISE - BSE - 2550, 2 * L - ISE - PLS - S - 2500 and 2 * L - ISE - APX - S - 2500)

  or just a license for each is enough?

  3. If I implement Cisco ISE and HA on VMware environment, can I 2 L-ISE-VM-K9 licenses for each VM machines? and also I need 2 licenses for each basic, plus, and at the apex?

  4. What is smart net Cisco and Cisco SASU? need to buy these for support and ticketing system?

  5. What is license for cisco anyconnect (L-AC-APX-1 year-G)?

  thnx in adv.

  You can install ISE on a HP ONLY Server if you are using software virtualization (VMware or KVM).

  The Guide of Installation of ISE sets out three options:

  1 hardware appliance from cisco SNS

  2. virtual machine VMware

  3 Linux KVM.

  The AnyConnect license is required to qualify with the features of the Apex. It is not installed on the ISE server, however.

• Cisco ISE with GANYMEDE + and RADIUS both?

  Hello

  I'm wired opening of authentication on a network using Cisco ISE. I studied the conditions for this. I know that I need to enable the RADIUS on the Cisco switches on the network. The switches in the network are already programmed to GANYMEDE +. Anyone know if they can both operate on the same network at the same time?

  Bob

  I suppose that Ganymede is configured (with ACS 4.x or 5.x) for the peripheral administration via telnet/ssh, and now you need the RADIUS (radius) to authenticate 802. 1 x. Yes they can both work on the same network at the same time.

  ~ BR
  Jatin kone

  * Does the rate of useful messages *.

• Cisco ISE 1.1.2.145 Admin authentication via the LDAP protocol

  I have configured the LDAP protocol and able to retrieve our LDAP directory structure. Now, I'm trying to point authentication "Admin Access" Source 'External identity', which is the new LDAP IS I created. But I couldn't find an option to authenticate locally if for some reason the LDAP configuration does not work. I learned that the ISE can automatically return to local auth as external sources Idenitity are inaccessible. How can I test the LDAP authentication with breaking them our Admin Access? I thought to open two parallel sessions, one with Super Admin account Local and one with the domain account. But I noticed that ISE communication is smart enough for the closing session/connection no matter what other sessions in different browsers so, basically, I can't open two parallel sessions the same machine to test. Suggestions? or am I missing something here?

  Thanks in advance.

  Hi Srinivas,

  Even if you configure LDAP as a source of external identity of admin access, you can always internal relief without having locked. According to the ISE user guide:

  During the operation, Cisco ISE is designed to "fall back" and try to perform the internal identity database authentication, if the communication with the external identity store has not been established, or if it fails. In addition, whenever an administrator for which you have configured external authentication launches a browser and initiates a logon session, the administrator must still the option authentication of demand through the local Cisco ISE database by choosing 'Internal' to the Selector drop-down storage of identity in the Connect dialog box.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1/user_guide/ise_man_identities.html#wp1351543

  Please see the attached screenshot by my lab ISE:

  

  I configured the admin authentication against AD, but I still see both 'Internal' and 'AD' at the time of the connection.

  I hope this helps.

  Thank you

  Aastha

• Cisco ISE

  Hi all

  I intend to implement cisco ISE in my network. I have 1000 endpoints and some mobile devices. I plan to use approach distributed and all licenses possible.

  It is: should I buy licenses for all nodes. For example 1000 for the head node, 1000 for high school, 1000 for surveillance and so forth?

  Or should I buy license only 1000 (I mean 1000 base + 1000 advances + 100 mobile) ones and apply them to all nodes?

  Concerning

  Max

  Hi Max.

  ISE is authorized by the deployment. So if you have a distributed with us deployment will tell ISE 10 nodes or servers you will always only the node main Administrator license.

  Now, if you plan to have two deployments (say a deployment for the EMEA region and the other for APAC) then you would need licenses for both deployments (you allow the node primary admin in each deployment).

  I hope this makes sense :)

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Cisco ISE and Meraki RADIUS

  I am very new to Cisco ISE and Meraki.  I try to get the Radius configuration for wireless authentication.  When I do a test of the Meraki to ISE, it passes.

  When I try to connect from my laptop, I look at the logs of the Radius and it passes; However, it does not connect me to good policy.  I keep hitting the default policy.  I have my Meraki police above the default policy in the strategy defined in article.  I have attached what looks like my strategy game.

  Devices does not really matter. Here is what I see when I create a device group (where you add the access point to this group), and then create the condition:

  networkdevicegroups.PNG

  

  And here is where I create the condition of strategy game and you should be able to select the Meraki access points:

  devicecondition.PNG

  

  This will give you the condition similar to what I posted above. This is perhaps why you aren't hit that is not matching the condition for this game.

• Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) - seeds SGA device?

  Hello

  We have a LAB with Cisco ISE, certificates and list DACL. Everything works fine with the 1.1.1 version but now we want to use the functionality of CMS - SGT instead of the ACL and we found that we need seed for this device and the only device that takes in charge the Nexus 7000 is. Is this true? What is the only way that we can use LMS - SGT? Are there plans that any other device will be used to seed device?

  BR, Marko

  The device of seed set as first device that communicates with the ISE. It must be a link.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/solutions/enterprise/security/TrustSec_2.0/trustsec_2.0_dig.PDF

  In addition the Nexus needs a license of Advanced Services installed in order to support the Trustsec.

  I can't comment on any future plans.

• Group of endpoint Cisco ISE 1.4 hotspot

  Patch 1.4 Cisco ISE 6

  Cisco WLC 8.0.121

  Setup

  the WLC has a named Hotspot SSID. It uses mac auth with radius of the NAC to redirect to the Hotspot portal of reviews on the ISE.

  drops flexconnect users in vlan 401 (with preAuthAcl), after the PSU, it is initially a COA to move users to VLANs 413 with permitInternetAcl

  Description of the problem:

  users connect to the SSID of the access point and get an IP address valid in vlan 401

  redirected to the page of the hotspot on the ISE with a PSU and the PIN code request.

  are they disconnect from the network and reconnect, the ISE sends a certificate of authenticity to move to 413 without the Hotspot portal.

  what I've noticed, is that as soon as users get the redirect of the original Web page, they are moved to the endpoint group defined in the hotspot portal.

  What I've read about this behavior makes me understand that it is a default behavior, but if that's the case then I'm not sure on how I can make my font to check if the PSU has been accepted.

  Thank you

  Maarten

  Portal.PNG

  

  Policy.PNG

  

  Profile.PNG

  

  Cisco WLC 8.2.100

  Patch 1.4 ISE 6

  Similar Hotspot ISE installation, of similar rules except change VLAN. I have observed the same behavior.

  This configuration was working on patch 5.

  Update:

  I found a solution based on the following bug. Use the following attribute in the authorization rule. The success page remains but no Instant Internet access is available using this workaround solution.

  https://Tools.Cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCux22558/?referring_site=bugquic...

  ' Workaround:
  "Use the LEAST 24 endpoints: LastAUPAcceptanceHours for example (means PUA agreed less than 24 hours ago).