Lens EF-S 18-55mm 1: 3. 5 - 5.6 IS STM will not mount on camera 6 d

Similar Questions

• Lens barrel will not focus?

  Hi all

  I have an a6000 and recently bought a Canon EF 50mm f1.8 STM lens and an adapter Fotasy EOS - NEX.

  Everything fits together ok, but the ring on the lens will not work (it's brand new)

  is there some settings I need to adjust to get this working correctly?

  (already provided without active goal still does not seem to work)

  Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  The focus ring rotates when the lens is NOT attached to the adapter?

  ... when it is attached to the map is NOT attached to the camera?

• a lens EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5. 6. IS STM will work on a powershot sx500?

  a lens EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5. 6. IS STM will work on a powershot sx500?

  Yes, it looks like one of my chipmonks lol

  You can see how it performs your depth of field considerably long distances. Youshouln can't still need in most cases with this power zoom. You might need a tripod unless your super stable.

  It is a generic TV converter I don't see any listed for your model, I have the similar to your SX50HS. I use adapters to mount a 2 X tele-converter that Ive had for a former model Powershot to mine, but only on close shots with zoom, very little.

  I found with 50 X zoom that I don't need.

• Focus problems with Rebel T3i. It will not be in manual or auto focus point. It's not about camera lens

  My camera will not focus. Not only the autofocus. I can't he focus even if I put manual focus.

  The image is still blurry.

  First I thought it was the lens I had but I tried with several, and the problem is the same.

  Any ideas what could be the problem?

  Thank you

  Have you checked the viewfinder diopter?  , It will be not clear even on the manual focus, and it happens with all your lenses makes me think that it is possible that the dial tiny bit right there on the eyepiece was implemented accidental market. The dial control what you see in the viewfinder, not something to do with the focus lens. The diopter is adjustable so that those who need glasses can see things through the viewfinder.  If everything still seems blurry even when the camera thinks he's focused it is generally just that little diopter got hit accidentally.

  IFIT is not this, then perhaps your screen focus got shifted.

• My Minolta Maxxum AF 70-210 lens and the AF 28-80 (from 35 mm) lens will work on Sony cameras?

  I have a 35mm Minolta Maxxum HT TR and it has two lenses, the AF 70-210 and the AF 28-80 lens, and I would like to know if they would work on the all new cameras as they are still excellent lenses. Just hate buy new if I can buy a camera that is good who can use these lenses too. Thank you

  Here is a list of supported lenses:

  https://us.en.KB.Sony.com/app/answers/detail/A_ID/30086

  Hope that helps, and that your lenses are

• 3 X TC will not work with Tamron lens

  I need help, I bought a Soligor 3 X Converter TV for use with my Tamron 150 ~ 600 mm lens, the body is a 60 d. The problem is when I try to take a shot I get an error message "Err 01 communication between the camera and lens is faulty. Clean the contacts of the lens. "If I try a Canon 50 mm f/1.4 with the Soligor 3 X tele-converter & works very well. Any suggestions to why this TV converter does not work with my Tamron? I thought that it has just a Ribbon inside the TC to establish a connection.

  PS. I also tried the Tamron 150 ~ 600mm & TC with my girlfriends rebel and I get the same message. I have a 1. 4 X and a 2.0 X TC and Tamron 150 ~ 600 mm lens works very well. Also I clean the contacts from each end of the TC X 3. Thank you, Blair

  I assume that the error message is pretty generic and applies to any type of communication error, including incorrect data.  The incorrect data, which I think would be f/stop, which in this case would be higher to f/16 reports ot the camera...  The camera that rejects a number as being of bad data, out of range, etc.

• The EFM 22 mm f/2 lens STM will work with my Canon eos Rebel t5?

  I'm looking at the lens Canon EFM 22 mm f/2 STM and I wonder if it will work for my Canon eos Rebel t5. I need to know as soon as possible. I searched other places online and cannot find something that answers my question. If anyone knows and could tell me I would really appreciate it.
  Thank you!

  EF lenses - M fit not rebel or any Canon DSLRS. They are for the M series cameras.

• LENS WILL NOT RETRACT

  Sony Cybershot DSC-S750
  Lens came out, does not power up, checked battery with meter it is fully charged. Framework "Cybershot" lights up briefly when you press the power button / stop, but then camera. NA not let fall or something, just happened suddenly. Any ideas?

  Sony Cybershot DSC-S750
  Lens came out, does not power up, checked battery with meter it is fully charged. Framework "Cybershot" lights up briefly when you press the power button / stop, but then camera. NA not let fall or something, just happened suddenly. Any ideas?

• I seem to have a problem with the accessibility, the start-up wizard he show s up and the lens will not close

  I can't stop the Accessibility Wizard, it starts at the start, I don't know how turn off I tried, but always there especially the Magnifier start it will be not just off until she start. I have not need it.how I keep them to start at startup?

  Hello

  I suggest you to see link below and check if it helps.

  Disable accessibility options: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-xp/help/turn-off-accessibility-options

  Hope this information is useful.

• Canon EF-S 18-55mm 3.5-5.6 no larger than 4.5

  I have a strange question if anyone has any input. I use the lens EF-S 18-55mm 3.5-5.6 STM IS on a rebellious SL1, and it does not allow me to go wider than 4.5. I removed the lens back on and managed to get to 3.5 for a few seconds before he returned to 4.5 as widest. If the lens is broken, or is there something that I am missing?

  I tried some of my other lenses on the camera and do not have this problem.

  

  

  

  Your goal is only at 18mm f3.5.  It is no longer possible to move out of him and F3.5.

• Lens STM on the 60 d?

  Very new to DSLR Canon, have a new 60 d body and he would buy STM 18-55 lens but camera store guy says that it does not work with the 60 d. What goals are correct for the camera. I want to start with 18-55, until I'm finding things. I've worked with big cameras HD docs, but I have not touched a SLR or DSLR for years.

  Hi, jaymack!

  The Canon EOS 60 d is compatible with all EF-S Canon EF lenses.  This means that the camera will indeed use the lens EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 STM IS lens, right out of the box.

  We hope this helps!

• Canon 18-200mm zoom lens

  I'm new here.  I have a Canon T3i.  Two kit lenses came with it in a bundle... 18-55mm, 55-250mm.  I am considering getting the Canon 18-200mm.  Would be the Canon 18-200mm is a good choice to replace the two lenses, or are there better choices to replace them with and keep the 18-200mm too?

  I wouldn't buy one for several reasons.  The one above all, it is more difficult to zoom, when the zoom range becomes very extreme.  18-200 is a 11 x scope and very ambitious to say the least. Not only in mind but in build quality, too. It will be in the same level of quality that the two glasses, the only advantage is to have just a lens so you.  Is that what you need? The superior advantage of a digital SLR is the possibility of having the right lens for the good work.  This implies usually several different lenses.  So you will be defeated this concept a little!

  I'd rather see you get a different level of lens for example IS the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 USM Lens.  Directly by replacing your 18-55mm kit lens. Of course, it is in the case where you have does not work for you. But this approach is better built, better optics and a little more quickly the objective that can be very useful.  Don't get me wrong the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM lens is a very good lens and offers a constant aperture.  A great plus in my book.

  Unfortunately these lens upgrades are expensive and replacing the 55-250mm is going to be even more.

• Lens sizes / use / meaning

  I currently have the lens EF-S 18-55mm and EF 75-300mm lens for my Canon Rebel T3i. I was graciously endowed with a 40mm lens for Christmas with the option to exchange it for another purpose. We'd like to think that the 40mm is covered by the 18-55mm lens, but I'm not completely sure how it works so any assistance with suggestions, meanings of size and/or what they do greatly would be greatly appreciated! Thank you in advance!

  Caroline_7 wrote:

  I currently have the lens EF-S 18-55mm and EF 75-300mm lens for my Canon Rebel T3i. I was graciously endowed with a 40mm lens for Christmas with the option to exchange it for another purpose. We'd like to think that the 40mm is covered by the 18-55mm lens, but I'm not completely sure how it works so any assistance with suggestions, meanings of size and/or what they do greatly would be greatly appreciated! Thank you in advance!

  Yes, the 18-55mm lens can capture the same field of view as the 40mm lens.  The difference is that the 40mm can do to a greater opening (allows more light in and allows a smaller depth of field for that look "background blur").  It will also produce images sharper than the 18-55.  How much sharper depends on how to use it.

  Prime lenses (no zoom) are not for everyone.  You must use your feet instead of zoom in and out.  In addition, they (generally) don't have image stabilizer, which has your 18-55.  The compromise is that they can produce extremely sharp images and allow you to shoot in dim light situations.

  I tend to like them, so maybe I'm not the best person to comment on.  But one of the main advantages of the lenses privileged is a very wide opening.  The 40mm "pancake" lens is actually not all that wide at f/2.8.  It's better than your zoom, but not as wide as something like the 50mm 1.8 "nifty fifty".  The main advantage of the pancake lens is just that it is very thin, for those who want a small lens.  Personally I would recommend the 50mm lens on the 40mm, because it has greater openness.  But I have never used the 40mm - there are many people who love him.

  Be that as it may, I do not recommend trying a first goal.  As I said, they are not for everyone.  But you won't know until you try.  And what better way to try to donate.

• Should I spend an EFS 18-55mm on a Canon EF 17-40mm f / 4L USM for landscapes? With the help of a Rebel T3i

  Only done photography for about a year. Wife bought me a Rebel T3i Kit with two Lenes. I'm really into photography outdoor. I installed myEFS 55-250 in a series of 100-400mm L I was going to buy a better lens for landscape and try to keep less than $1000. I think EF 17-40mm f / 4L USM. Better landscapes or is there a better choce range of price thanks

  I would not recommend the EF 17-40mm for your T3i. The EF 17-40mm is really designed to be used as a goal of the ultra wide angle on Full Frame cameras. One of the major is the lack of IS. (Image stabilization)

  For a camera of culture as the T3i, I recommend:

  Lens EF - S 18-55mm IS STM (very good upgrade to the 18-55 kit lens)

  Lens EF - S 18-135mm IS STM

  EF-S 15-85mm IS lens

  EF-S 17-55mm 2.8 IS lens

  EF-S 10-22mm (without IS, but Ultra-Wide) lens

• Canon, in the face of fast moving subjects 18-55 kit lens?

  Hi everyone, I'm new here.

  I was doing one shoot the other day on very fast subjects that changed a lot of direction (dogs). Got some good shots but the vast majority were evil out of the home, which was a real shame. I want to know if it's the lens, the body or my technique that does not reach me.

  I'm relatively new to photography, so maybe it's that my settings are wrong or my technique is bad. I'm using the lens wide open, not mode live view with servo AF on a 600 d body. Usually when I focus I pan just the camera turn to follow the subject, sometimes pressing down when I want to shoot.

  I plan the upgrade to the 17-55 f2.8 because it is sharp wide open and has a constant and fast opening and USM and full-time manual focus with a correct focus ring.

  Thank you.

  Your problems are probably due to a combination of factors. IMO, auto focus performance is determined by three things...

  1. camera AF capabilities. Your 600 d has 9 AF points system. Only one of these points - the center one - is the "best" type of cross that is more responsive and follows the movement better. When shooting moving subjects with your camera, it would be useful to limit yourself to using only the central point. (Note: other Canon cameras have more advanced systems of the AF.) T4i, T5i, 60 d, 50 d and 40 d has 9 AF points that looks like, but all nine points are the cross-type sesnors 'better '. The 7 d and 70 d AF 19 points, with all of the nineteen cut type. 5DIII and 1DX 61 points AF with up to 41 Cup type, depending on the lens used.)

  Some cameras are also optimized for performance development. For example, the models of the series 1 d and 7 d have a separate chip driving AF... While most (maybe all?) other models share the tasks of AF by the same processor that handles images.

  2 capacity autofocus lens: Yes, a reader of "USM" (Ultrasonic Motor) objective as the EF-S 17 - 55 / 2.8 would be an improvement on your kit lens. It is faster, less hunting and is quieter than a 'micro' such as is used in the cheaper kit lens. (Note: there is a version a bit more of the 18-55mm with drive focus "STM" or "Stepper motor", which is better than the micro motor version, but still not as fast as USM.) STM lenses are running silent and particularly well suited for video.)

  A larger aperture, like the 17-55 / 2.8 (as opposed to your 18-55/3.5-5.6), offers more light to the camera AF sensors, allowing for faster and better follow-up.

  No, forget all the EF 50/1.8... Of course, he got more openness, but it uses a micro motor and is widely known to be developed slower, less accurate and likely to hunt more than a USM lens. If you want a quick and of course focusing in short and medium telephoto, look to the EF 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100/2 or L-135/2 lenses. These all use USM drive and are much faster and more accurate than the EF 50/1.8. They have also one or two larger max aperture stop that even the 17-55 / 2.8 (or any other zoom lens), provide more light for the camera to work with. Using a f2.8 lens or "faster" will give optimal performance on your camera, with the centre of focus.

  A few drinks simply are not designed to be developed fast, even if they have more large openings and USM focus. Macro lenses, for example, have to move their focus group a long, long way to go from infinity to 1:1 magnification tends to be slower. In addition, very large aperture lenses such as the 85 / 1.2 L are generally slower... Design. Very large aperture lenses and macro focus on precision, to deal with the shallow depth of the effects on the ground, rather than speed.

  Other objectives are designed to the very fast development. All 70-200, the 100-400 and all the first 300mm lenses and more, are quite fast focusing. Extreme telephotos such as 500 and 600 mm can be difficult to get and keep on target, however.

  Some third-party lenses also make use of similar to Canon's USM development drive, to help the performance of the update. Sigma HSM and Tamron lenses USD are examples.

  3. skills of the user is the third key factor making the update performance... that is, your technique.

  You mention servos 'AF '...  Just to clarify, yourcamera has three focus modes: one-shot, HAVE Focus and AI Servo... There is no "Servo AF. The correct mode to use with moving subjects is AI Servo. Perhaps what you are already doing. In any case, One Shot is almost only used with stationary subjects (there are techniques of 'pre-focus' where it can be used with moving subjects, but those who are rarely used). I Focus is not really a foucs mode at all... It is supposed to decide for you, if the subject is moving, then change to use the correct mode. I have not tested on a recent, but older model where I tried, I found a slight delay that causes a lot of discussion missed shots. He also simply chose the wrong mode sometimes. It might be interesting to note that Canon more pro-oriented models have same AI Focus... they offer only One Shot or AI Servo.

  So, make sure that you are using AI Servo to maximize performance when shooting moving subjects.

  You also use a slow shutter speed. I inflate the ISO and try to use 1/500 or faster shutter speeds. 1/320 or 1/400 is very marginal, trying to stop the movement of the subject with something as fast as the dogs in action. In fact, more you are close to the subject, shutter speed more fast you will really need to freeze movement.

  Cannon also noted that the 18MP models are a little prone to blur shake camera - probably because of the high density of pixels on the sensor sites - and recommends keeping shutter speeds upwards to be sure to get a sharp shot, even with IS lenses. There was a white paper on this subject, on the Canon website. I don't know if it is still available online.

  You should be able to get nice images, specific to ISO 1600... a complete stop of two higher and you to use much faster shutter speed. However, if the indoor shooting it may be areas that are not as well informed and are hard to get a sharp shot.

  You can shoot RAW files, so that you can more fully control noise reduction and factors in post-processing exposure when using high ISO.

  A popular technique among photographers of sports/action is back button to the point. See this article online, on this subject: http://www.learn.usa.canon.com/resources/articles/2011/backbutton_af_article.shtml

  BBF separates the function of the development of the trigger. You use rather your thumb on one of the rear camera buttons to start and stop the development. Many users feel that this allows more safe and followed acquistion with moving subjects. You can configure your camera for BBF and give it a try. It is possible for action/sport/HAVE Servo shooting, it's actually usable once, too... I used it enough only for a few years now.

  With the help of BBF, I start AF well before that I want to take the picture, then focus on the maintenance of the area to focus on the right of the subject where I want the lens to focus continuing to follow and maintain the emphasis... then take pictures along the way. I use the Center Focus point alone, much of the time. This could lead to too centered images, so I try to fit a little loose from time to time, allowing cropping to make that fewer centered images. I sometimes use other than the Center AF point... but who wouldn't recommend with action shot on a camera that does not have the type sensors crossed to peripheral issues, such as your 600 d.

  I use a pair of 7Ds and a number of USM lenses fast development of shoot a lot of sports. With a few years of practice under my belt, on avearage I nail focus on 95 to 98 on 100 shots using this type of gear with the above techniques. I turned to 4000 images at an event recent and marked about 30 people like "rejected" to missed focus problems (and I bet at least half of those who are my fault... not the machine). There may be a few others that are marginally acceptable (i.e., can make an 8 x 10 beautiful print, but seem not good any more greater than). Yet, even if there are 80 or 120 spleen focus, it is only 2 or 3%... much better than only 10% in short.

  I would say that qualities of objective performance and user techniques generally count more than the camera well, or at least can largely compensate for any camera shortcomings. I got results almost as good 50 d and 30 d before it (which were similar to your 600 d AF system) and even with 10 days earlier ("lower" than your AF system). Although I'm a bit away, I didn't like good luck shooting moving subjects using 5 d Mark II (I mostly just use it for stationary subjects)... the 5 d Mark III has a much better AF system and follows the movement much better.

  I hope this helps!

  ***********
  Alan Myers

  San Jose, California, USA.
  «Market softly and carry a great lens.»
  MATERIAL: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses & accessories
  FLICKR & REPROGRAPHY