Patch Version Question

Hello

Yesterday I installed a small OPatch on our Oracle 10 g Server

We were on Oracle 10.2.0.5.0 and I installed O Patch 10.2 .0.5.6

All installed successfully, but it seems that we are always on 10.2.0.5.0? Unless it's the expected behavior? I get the version v $version and v$ instance views (see below)


SYS@STATDW > select version from v$ instance;

Version
-----------------
10.2.0.5.0


SYS@STATDW > select * from v version $;

Oracle Database 10 g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - 64 bit
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production
CORE Production 10.2.0.5.0
AMT for Linux: Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production


Does anyone know how to check 100% okay?

1. you updated OPatch and not the database
2. its planned, patchsets won't affect the 5th section of the version number in the database views (so after installation for example 10.2.0.5.2, the database will always show 10.2.0.5.0)

to check

opatch version:
$ORACLE_HOME/OPatch/opatch version

patches installed:
$ORACLE_HOME/OPatch/opatch lsinventory

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • VMware ESXi4.1 Patch version ESXi410 - 201204001 Missing (KB2013058)

    Eeveryone salvation,

    I have a stand-alone ESXi host that is missing "VMware ESXi4.1 Patch version ESXi410 - 201204001 (KB2013058) Missing" according to the security team. Let em know how to install this patch after downloading. All Cli to install? Any help will be much appreciated.

    The ESXi version is 4.1U2

    Thank you

    vmguy

    Use rcli:

    vihostupdate - Server - u root - bundle update

    If you want to use esxupdate:

    check kb.vmware.com/kb/1016209.

  • HP Pavilion p6733w: BIOS version question

    HP experts out there or anyone with better information resources?  I'm looking for what type of BIOS initially provided with my computer, a HP Pavilion p6733w with a motherboard RS880 H-Alvorix.

    Hi there @chocolatejeebus,

    Welcome to the Forums of HP Support! I understand that you are looking for more information on the original BIOS installed on your system. I'm happy to help you with this.

    If you've never updated the BIOS on your system, or if you have updated once, then the original BIOS must always be available on your computer. This is your current BIOS or you can eat to help: desktop HP - BIOS recovery.

    The support page for your system, HP Pavilion p6733w Desktop PC, the BIOS for the Board you describe is: N-Alvorix-RS880 motherboard BIOS Update Rev A 6.07. There is no earlier version described at all.

    Please let me know if that answers your question, and if so, please mark this message as a solution. Bravo would be appreciated as well.

  • WRT54G (version 2) Firmware Version Question

    Hello

    Beautiful room here. I'm glad that this facility exists.

    I have the router WRT54G version 2. Finally, I upgraded the version of firmware years before Cisco Linksys bought.

    A recent announcement by the people of Black Hat (treaties in this article of TechSpot) about their intention to publish a validation tool to exploit a vulnerability of DNS rebinding on a great many routers SOHO forced me to check for the latest update of firmware for my router.

    The interesting thing is that my router's Web interface lists the current version of the firmware as 4.30.12, but the latest version of the downloadable firmware that I see listed on the support site is 4.21.1. I'm not very surprised by this apparent anomaly. If I remember correctly, that firmware version 4.30.12 download is a beta that was supposed to fix a problem connecting WiFi to a certain type. If this version of the firmware was still considered a beta at the time of the acquisition of Linksys by Cisco - or a 'stable' later firmware version incorporating the same or better fixes for the issues addressed by 4.30.12 that had been produced at that time-so maybe 4.30.12 was ruled out.

    If you read the article of TechSpot and the associated table of preliminary vulnerability, test reports, you'll see that router WRT54G version 2 is not specifically listed. Version 3 of the router is listed as vulnerable, and version 5 of the router is not.

    So, my questions are:

    Everyone here is aware of information indicating whether or not the problem of DNS Rebinding vulnerability affects the WRT54G version 2 with the last registered (4.21.1) router firmware version?

    If so, does anyone know if yes or no Cisco plans to release an update for this old router?

    If the router is vulnerable and will not be solved with a firmware update I'll probably have myself a new LInksys router which is not listed as vulnerable. (Believe me, I'm not leaving this thread to bash Linksys. This router ran like a train of 24 hours a day for years without a single hiccup that was not directly attributable to the problems of the ISP. For the price, it's one of the best purchases of equipment I've ever done calculation. And I have done this since the beginning of the 80s when I was using a CP/M system and an Apple / / e.)

    If the 4.21.1 version firmware for WRT54G version 2 is not affected, I wonder if anyone knows if yes or no 'downgrading' of 4.30.12 to 4.21.1 is likely to lead to a failure of the router. (I'll probably try it anyway. If it brick the router I'll just go ahead and get a new one.)

    BTW, I use this router with the ease of remote administration and UPnP off and strong admin password that is changed each week. (When I always used wireless I used WPA2 AES with strong password, but I am all wired now with the systems running Debian testing).

    Forgive me for talking to myself. I decided to just go ahead and "downgrade" of the 4.30.12 firmware 4.21.1 version - just because I prefer to use a version of firmware known and supported for this material. The downgrade has gone well, so no worries about this.

    I'll look for news on whether or not this version of the firmware on this particular router is vulnerable to the flaw in DNS rebinding and acts accordingly.

    Sorry for the noise.

  • 7130e upgrade OS version question

    Hi guys.

    Can you give the link to upgrade version OS 4.2.1 or 4.2.2?

    My BB model is 7130e.

    Thanks in advance.

    Visit this link for more information on the update of device OS: http://tinyurl.com/y8qs5s

    You can install software from another operator wireless device if there is any software device for your operator.

    It's an off-topic here.

    After these questions in this section of the forum:

    http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/Rim/Board?Board.ID=Other_devices

    or here:

    http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/Rim/Board?Board.ID=BlackBerryDeviceSoftware

  • Media Center Extender and xbox - version question

    I've been recently using WMC TV recording, but I can't get the message to my TV. I think of buying any old Xbox console to get the Extender. -I really hate on the games-just the Extender. Is there a certain version of the Xbox that I have Extender? Thank you.

    Hi Dean,

    Thanks for posting this question in the Microsoft Community.

    You can go through the article to learn more about setting up a Windows Media Center.

    If you have an Extender that worked with Windows Vista, it should work with Windows 7. For example, the Xbox 360, which includes the built-in Media Center Extender functionality will work with Windows 7.

    Former dilution models that have been developed for use with Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005 do not work with Windows 7. I suggest you to be sure to read the fine print on the expansion box before you buy.

    Hope this information was helpful and let us know if you need assistance in the future. We will be happy to help you.

  • GoldenGate software version question

    Hello

    We are working on the transfer of our application/db between AIX and Linux x86_64.

    Our application uses goldengate software. Our installed software version GG 11.2.1.0.3 SDBA.

    But we want software version greater than 11.2.1.0.25 GG.

    Our sdba says that 11.2.1.0.3 is the same as 11.2.1.0.30 and 11.2.1.0.3 are the newer version than 11.2.1.0.25

    I don't agree with this information.

    Can someone confirm if below are true?

    (1) GG version 11.2.1.0.3 is not the same as 11.2.1.0.30

    (2) GG 11.2.1.0.25 version is newer than 11.2.1.0.3


    Thank you

    Ashish

    Can someone confirm if below are true?

    (1) GG version 11.2.1.0.3 is not the same as 11.2.1.0.30 to---> > true, check the release notes when downloading MOS to see what all the bugs are fixed in it.

    (2) GG 11.2.1.0.25 version is newer 11.2.1.0.3---> > true

    You can see the "patches and updates"-> product or family of-> select product, version, version Platform that will list you the latest OGG versions available.

    Concerning

    Vivek

  • Patch #14123312 question in R12

    Hi, experts:

    I am applying patch #14123312 in 12.1.3 and database 11.2.0.3 on Linux. Got errors as blew. This script is the doc patch?

    $opatch apply jdk - /ap10/immted/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk - jre Oracle /ap10/immted/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre interim Patch Installer version 1.0.0.0.64 Copyright (c) 2011 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved... Oracle you recommend using the latest version of OPatch and read the available in the directory docs/OPatch OPatch documentation for its use. For more information on the last OPatch and other support-related issues, please refer to document ID 293369.1 available on My Oracle Support (https://myoraclesupport.oracle.com) Oracle Home: /ap10/immted/apps/tech_st/10.1.3 Oracle Home stock: /ap10/immted/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/inventory inventory Central: / ots/oracle/oraInventory_immted of: YES /etc/oraInst.loc location: /ap10/immted/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui YES a shared library    : /ap10/immted/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/lib/linux/liboraInstaller.so location of Java: /ap10/immted/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/appsutil/jdk/jre location of the log file: /ap10/immted/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/.patch_storage//*.log Please specify - jre or jdk - but not both. ERROR: OPatch failed because the cmd. args. problem.

    Thanks and regards.

    If you are using the jdk - only or jre - only or two errors to give then I would suggest that you connect a SR.

    Thank you

    Hussein

  • Adobe Bridge CS 5.1 version question process

    I currently use Adobe Bridge CS5.1 to process my raw files.  I started to send my post production and I seeing questions or tweeking corrections other companies (they use LR5.7).  They send me to xmp... I can see the corrected image in bridge when I place their xmp in my image folder.  But I do not see real adjustments... exhibition, black, etc... That's why I can't just tweek their adjustments...

    I get a message;   The selected image uses the 2012 process.  Convert in 2010 process to set the... Convert to the 2012 process

    When I do go to the default settings.

    Can I apply a camera Raw process 2012 as my default process in Adobe Bridge CS5.1?

    If so, how?

    Thanks in advance for your help.

    Hi NiPhoto,

    > I get a message;   The selected image uses the 2012 process.  Convert in 2010 process to set the... Convert to the 2012 process >

    I can't find how you can apply a process appeared in Camera Raw v7 when your version can support up to v6.7 of Camera Raw.

    I think you will spend to CS6 at least to be able to work with files of your colleagues as editable Camera Raw files. The interface used by the process of 2012 substantially changed from the interface in 2010.

  • need advice on PSU 11.2.0.2 patch version db

    We have oracle database specifications:

    DB version: 11.2.0.2
    OS: Redhat Linux 5

    Our management wants us to apply the latest patches of power supply.

    I think 11.2.0.2 is the latest version of 11.2, and I have the patch to upgrade to 11.2.0.3 then apply latest patch PSU.

    I am here? The steps and procedures I should follow?

    Thanks in advance.

    Yes 11.2.0.3 is the latest version - 11.2.0.3 go 11.2.0.2 is an upgrade, not a patch.

    You will need to install 11.2.0.3 in another ORACLE_HOME, apply the latest patch of power supply to the 11.2.0.3 HOME (see this Doc MOS - quick reference to Patch numbers for power SUPPLY of database, SPU (CPU), Bundle Patches and Patchsets [1454618.1 ID]), then follow the steps in the upgrade doc

    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e23633/TOC.htm

    HTH
    Srini

  • buy the new iphone and IOS version questions

    Hello

    am about to buy a new iphone and you're wondering how to find which exact version of IOS a. sellers say its IOS is 9, well no, I want to know the version of it as if its 9.0.2 or 9.1 something like that. is it far from finding in his series on the box? I don't want to buy the iphone and do not know how to check. Help, please.

    Hello

    don't worry abt the IOS version, after having bought the phone, you can update to the latest IOS 9.3 by yourself... See you soon.

  • Sansa Fuze Rockbox. Version question.

    Hey guys and girls, I need help desiphering if it is possible to install Rockbox on my Sansa Fuze special. My version is listed in my info like: V01.02.28a

    It's an old Sansa, but I've updated fairly regularly. Countless FAQ told me that the Sansa fuze V2 is incompatible with Rockbox. and if I would try to apply it on the wrong version, I want to brick my machine. But as says the version, version 01.Intro, so I ask someone here who has more experience with this sort of thing to help me.

    Thank you.

    BigBootyHoes wrote:

    Hey guys and girls, I need help desiphering if it is possible to install Rockbox on my Sansa Fuze special. My version is listed in my info like: V01.02.28a

    It's an old Sansa, but I've updated fairly regularly. Countless FAQ told me that the Sansa fuze V2 is incompatible with Rockbox. and if I would try to apply it on the wrong version, I want to brick my machine. But as says the version, version 01.Intro, so I ask someone here who has more experience with this sort of thing to help me.

    Thank you.

    Yes, it is possible.

  • DBMS_DB_VERSION + version question

    Hi all

    The DBMS_DB_VERSION package provides version and the version constant. By example, if my database of version 11.2.0.1.0, then dbms_db_version.version = 11 & dbms_db_version.release = 2.

    But need the number else also, IE 0.1.0.

    It is stored AS a CONSTANT in the oracle please?

    I don't want to create another package that I'll need to maintain. (I am aware that there are product_component_version and v$ version)

    Happy if you could help me.

    Thank you

    Michael.

    Thank you for your answers...

    As a solution, I created a capable package unfortunately I'll have to maintain.

  • Patch #9593176 question for R12.1.3, 11.2.0.3 Linux

    Hello:

    When I apply 9593176 on the screen there are messages like the breath.

    =======

    Patches 7229760, collide with the patch currently

    being installed (9593176)

    If you continue, all patches will be restored back and the new patch

    (9593176) will be installed.

    Note: If the hotfix being installed (9593176) is restored.

    It is recommended to put patches in place to come back here (6857221, 4407272, 4526825, 7329300, 7229760,) are resettled.

    Merge the new patch (9593176) and the patches in a conflict in the case

    7229760, is required, contact Support Services Oracle and demand

    a patch: fusion.

    You want to STOP?

    Please answer Y. N >

    THERE

    Bug or conflict files, applying the patch stopped on user request

    ERROR: OPatch failed due to conflict of file/bug

    ========

    Please tell me what I need to do?

    Thank you!

    Sorry, I meant "N".

    Thank you

    Hussein

  • Patch # 9371120 question in R12.1.3, 10.1.3.5, 11.2.0.3 DB

    HI: I was read the readme for Patch # 9371120, but do not understand what follows: = 9.  Apply for prior updates.   Excerpt (jar xvf) the new $SRCHOME/webservices/lib/orasaaj.jar update the orasaaj.jar with the 2 new class order of uvf jar files oracle/j2ee/ws/saaj/util/NamespaceStack.class oracle/j2ee/ws/saaj/util/XMLWriter.class use = we don't have $SRCHOME you get a lot for your help.

    We are not the ones got confused of the readme!

    Before you answer just thought that this patch is to confirm, so clicking on the patch took me to the patch download page where I noticed this discussion (can be found in readme and download buttons) on same "confusion".

    How we apply the sine qua non for Patch 9371120 (Web Service infrastructure takes more time to give the answer) as mentioned in Note 556540.1? (Doc ID 1333789.1)

    Just Hope and my explanation is not necessary

Maybe you are looking for