RT FIFO results in 100% of cpu load?

Similar Questions

• BT stack file TosBTMng.Exe generates 100% of CPU load

  I am also facing the problem that the Toshiba Bluetooth Manager (TosBtMng.exe) very often starts a loop and causes a 100% CPU load.

  This has happened with older versions of the Toshiba Bluetooth stack and the current version (5.1.0.12).

  The affected system is a Tecra S1, BT-Modul and Windows XP SP2.

  BT battery installation went well and the laptop starts succesfull while BT is enabled. I also checked for hidden COM-Ports and other tips in this forum, without success.

  Blocking seems to occur at different times. Sometimes just after are restarted, by clicking on the tray icon of BT with the right button of the mouse. Then the context menu is shown all too the white box, no entries. He can also try to connect to a device already associated. If I kill the process with the Task Manager, I can restart and he continues to work for a while.

  As found in another thread here, I enabled the registration of the API of the Bluetooth Manager and found the following when connecting with the Nokia PC Suite for my mobile phone:

  Call the 00042519 21:55:05 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042520 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042521 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BtCreateCOMM2: InitCOMPort = COM6, CreateCOMPort = COM23
  00042522 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall: send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000036 (54)
  00042523 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
  00042524 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000028 (40)
  00042525 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
  00042526 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetLocalInfo()
  00042527 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BtGetLocalInfo2: entry Paramers / pLocalBtDeviceInfo = 00D9FE8C, plStatus = 00D9FE84
  00042528 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall: send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00001000 (4096), Size = 00000030 (48)
  00042529 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
  00042530 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00001000 (4096), Size = 0000003F (63)
  00042531 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
  00042532 21:56:17 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetRemoteDeviceList2()

  A new COM port is created successfully (COM23) and a few seconds later the CPU of TosBtMng load goes up to 100%, but no API calls are made. And if you wait long enough the phone are connected and data can be transferred. However, very slowly.

  Probably because of the high CPU load a next port COM (COM24) will be created some time later and this process is then repeated once again:

  00042740 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
  00042741 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008007 (32775), Size = 00000041 (65)
  00042742 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
  Call the 00042743 21:56:47 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042744 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042745 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BtCreateCOMM2: InitCOMPort = COM6, CreateCOMPort = COM24
  00042746 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall: send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000036 (54)
  00042747 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
  00042748 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000028 (40)
  00042749 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
  00042750 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetCOMMInfoList2()
  Call the 00042751 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042752 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  Call the 00042753 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042754 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  Call the 00042755 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042756 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  Call the 00042757 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042758 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  Call the 00042759 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042760 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042761 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetLocalInfo()
  00042762 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetLocalInfo()

  Maybe this allows to locate the origin of the problem CPU load of the Bluetooth Manager.

  Thank you
  Gerhard

  How your com port configuration look like?
  Please compare with the DeviceManager screenshot from the following Web site:
  http://APS2.toshiba-tro.de/Bluetooth/?page=FAQ/bluetoothnotworking

• 100% high CPU load and memory usage

  Hi all

  My company bought a new appliance IPS 4510 and after initial installation, I see that the CPU load and memory is 100%. The device is not in a production network. Is this normal or there is a hardware problem? Enjoy a Counselor about it.

  Concerning

  Christine

  Hi Damien,.

  It is actually normal behavior for an IPS sensor.

  To measure the actual load of an IPS sensor, you will want to monitor the "percentage load treatment" of the analytical engine that processes all inspection processing for the sensor.

  You can view these statistics by using the command 'display the scan statistics-engine '.

  Also, the sensor running version 7.0000 E4 5,0000 E4 (or later version), you can check the load percentage value Inspection displayed by the command "Display inspection-load" in its place.

  Hope that answers your query.

  Cyril Shankar

• Ghostery addon causes 100% CPU load on a carrot for a few seconds for each hyperlink that you clicked.

  For many months now and with several versions of Firefox and firefox profiles, turning the Ghostery add-on causes each hyperlink clicked to have 2 second break. In the Task Manager, I see 25% cpu usage, which equals 100% of CPU on my Quad Core cpu load.

  If I disable Ghostery and restart Firefox, all problems disappear. So I have either the choice between a slow browser, or privacy-enabled navigation. Both are unacceptable.

  I can't find anyone with this problem; is it me?

  I did not use of Ghostery but I guess it could be the preload page and inspect and possibly break URLS to protect you before posting. Maybe if you set the settings so that it does less, allows you to balance the objectives of performance and privacy?

  I noticed this on their support site today: https://getsatisfaction.com/ghostery/topics/your_script_becomes_unresponsive_raising_hell_with_firefox

• COM Bluetooth port 90-100% CPU load

  I ' am running a PC application via a COM port normal, nothing complicated 38 kbaud. The CPU load is about 4%.
  Then I try to do without this thread, that oops the CPU rises to 96% of the load.

  I use a different computer manufacturers with Toshiba stack and module internal BT. Win XP SP2. Yes I have updated to the last stack of Toshiba.

  The same problem on my second computer (since it is a dual core I get 50% CPU) also with Toshiba stack.

  If use an external RS232 Bluetooth adapter everythings works fine at 4% of CPU load. I have however to connect a USB Bluetooth, same problem 96% CPU adapter.

  I'm doing something obviously wrong?

  / B

  Each laptop manufacturer typically feature test prior to the distribution of laptops. Have you tried to know what say the support from the manufacturer of this problem?

  I use for Toshiba laptop and BT works well and something like that doesn't happen to me.

• In the latest version of Skype's huge CPU load

  I have installed Skype on 2 different PC running Windows (freshly installed) 8. When using Skype in combination with Chrome CPU load goes up to 100% of all the minutes or more for a few seconds. It's really irritating and my not-so-rare configuration tells me that more people should have this huge problem.

  The only way to stop this behavior must close Skype. I read the topics (from 2012 and 2013) on how you can disable interaction web browser in the Skype settings, but it does not work (or more).

  Development of Skype in recent years is just tragic

  As of October 15, 2014, with the last update of Skype these amazing huge bugs seem to have been fixed after many, many months (years?). After you install the update and change nothing else on my system, Skype seems fine now. No freezes, no more huge processor and the burden of memory, leaks memory is no longer. Amazing that it took so long to get it, but hey, Microsoft can't complain now that it works.

• Idle CC 2015 apps using 100% of CPU (1 core)

  Hello

  I noticed on CC 2015 apps, Photoshop & Illustrator, when the application is open and completely inactive. No documents are open to all, it is a power of 100% of one of my cores of the processor.

  Does anyone else have this problem?

  Not occur with 2014 apps it seems, like I always run AE 2014.

  MacBook runs very hot with high fans because of this constant CPU load.

  MacBook pro retina 2012 - Mac OSX 10.11.3. All software up-to-date and fresh install from the end of February 2016.

  Please check if that helps. Basic systems of choking synchronization process

  Concerning

  Stéphane

• setInterval - CPU loading problem

  I have a Flash application to completion, I am about to enter its first pilot site - then do the test alpha with a few members of the family...
  
  Everything works fine but my son tests threw upward a CPU loadind weird question - I'll try to explain...
  
  In the part of my Ap I use lineto to draw shapes on the screen with sets of coordinates, pre loaded into tables. I charge setInterval with a different millisecond value to change the speed of drawing of such forms and then whenever it is called, he picks up a new coordinate in the table and the lines to that. Once an incremented counter reaches the end of the table, I erase the current setInterval and pick up a new set of coords and begine. Each set of coords is about 100 pairs of value to ._x, ._y
  
  The issue is that on long distances, more than 5 or 6 sets of coordinates, with values of low millisecond in setInterval (say 10-15) the CPU loading people gets more along the sequence, effectively limiting the animation once the download on the CPU gets higher than 80%
  
  In my eyes - the effort to draw the shape 8 in a sequence must be the same as that necessary to attract the first - but is clearly not what happens in practice, I also checked CPU loading with the highest values of millisecond by slower speeds - and here also the CPU load increases, but not as dramatically.
  
  Memory usage doesn't just increase CPU are so clearly there thing being left running - all pointers to where I should look at to solve this, would be very welcome...
  
  TIA
  
  Nigel

  Guys - I just put a clooge in my code to break down 10 movieclips instead of a big easy coz a drawing - I already had movieclips on the stage in places - right and on my DELL 5 year, the animation runs at a constant speed and is never above 8% CPU load!

  So I call it fixed - well, when I sort out all the other consiquences of change - might even be able to get out in the garden on Sunday now!

  Thanks for poking me in the right direction

  Nigel

• Powerd in Activity Monitor uses 100% of CPU, MacBook sounds like a jet taking

  Since I upgraded from Cougar to El Capitan on my MacBook in Late 2009, powerd in Activity Monitor often using 100% of CPU for more than 5 minutes.

  Activity Monitor to stop smoking allows, until I opened AM again, I opened all the time. Allows you to restart, but it happens again and again, especially running iTunes.

  I recently installed a 1 TB OWC SSD and installed clean El Capitan with the Migration Wizard. I've never used my own Mac App. I read something about Nap App causes this problem.

  Any thoughts anyone?

  Turn off the NAP. Most likely you don't need it.

  Try each of them in order. A test to see if the computer works properly:

  1. Reset the PRAM
  2. Reset the controller (SMC) system management
  3. Start the computer in Safe Mode, and then restart normally. It's slower than a standard home.
  4. Repair the disk by booting to the HD recovery immediately after that the chime press the command and R keys until the Utility Menu appears. Choose disk utility and click on the continue button. Select the withdrawal (usually Macintosh HD) volume entry of the list to one side.  Click first aid button in the toolbar. Wait the fact button appear. Disk utility and return in the Utility Menu. Restart the computer from the Apple Menu.
  5. Reinstall OS X by booting from the Recovery HD using the command and R keys. When the Utility Menu appears, select reinstall OS X and then click on the continue button.
  6. Download and install the update of OS X El Capitan 10.11.5 Combo.

  [Permission to use any part of the foregoing has been granted by khati, exclusively, to theratter.]

• Satellite L50 - B fan works even if the CPU load is very low

  I recently bought a Satellite L50 - B and I made a Windows 10 updated. The problem is that the fan works even if the CPU load is very low and the noise bothers me a lot.
  I ordered the video card driver and the system tells methat driver is updated to the latest version.
  I don't know what I can do to change this sad situation.
  Please, please, could you help me solve the problem?
  Thank you very much for your support and understanding.
  I await your quick response.
  Thank you.
  Giovanni Spina

  What CPU temp? Probably overheating?
  Try to replace the thermal interface on the CPU. ;-)

• Satellite P300-212 - system causes the periodic high CPU load

  Windows Vista Edition Home Premium (OEM) on the Toshiba Satellite P300-212

  Even on a system Windows freshly installed (from recovery DVDs), the system process (PID 4, NT Kernel & System) causes on a regular basis (every five minutes) a CPU load high for a few seconds, during which the system hangs, not even the mouse pointer can be moved.
  Sysinternals Process Explorer identifies the thread of high load as "ntkrnlpa.exe! ExfTryAcquirePushLockShared + 0 x 15 2 "with the thread ID 20 or 24.

  Does anyone have an explanation for this behavior or a solution to the problem?

  Hey,.

  If you have installed Windows recovery disk Toshiba but still high CPU usage? Hmm that's strange because this image is tested by Toshiba

  Have you installed or uninstalled any software or tools?
  I uninstall the current antivirus and disable some start up programs you n t need in msconfig. Usually, this should work.

• Firefox 3.6.3 &.4 uses 100% of CPU and not will not always open or close

  Firefox intermittently uses 100% of CPU and I have to manually turn off the computer. Firefox starts or finiosh correctly, the process is alive and that I have to use the Task Manager to end the process until I installed IE7, as I can not access banking by internet with Firefox. Very disappointing as I have ben an enthusiastic user and promoter of FF.

  This has happened

  Each time Firefox opened

  == After upgrade to 3.6.3 and isn't better with 3.6.4, despite the removal of all add-ons

  I have exactly the same problem. FF stay below 50% CPU.

• New DVD on Satellite M40-193 burner uses 100% of CPU

  Hello everyone,

  recently, I replaced my DVD burner with a new. My laptop is a Satellite M40-193 (PSM40E-06M026IT) and the original drive is a carpet * a UJ - 831B. I replaced it with a Sony-Nec Optiarc AD - 7633A because I like the slit in the feature and the Labelflash feature.

  Unfortunately, it's a problem. Whenever I use it, it will use 100% of CPU. I can't understand the problem. Is there anyone who can help me? It is a software or hardware problem?

  Thank you.

  Before we start the discussion please can you me if this optical disk drive is compatible with your laptop model? Did you even check this? Please be honest.

• VI causes CPU load after several days of running

  Hello

  I have a strange problem. I have craeted a control test VI bench and it runs on five computers, five test of control systems. All PCs have almost the same hardware, same card mother, same processor, etc.

  Normally the CPU load is around 50% when I run the VI, but to a PC, CPU load goes up to 85% after several days (maybe a week) market continues and the PC is almost tied up - VI execution becomes very slow (10 times slower) and the mouse moves only very slowly.

  I have first thought that the PC has a problem, but the problem disappears as soon as I stop and restart the VI!

  I don't even have to put an end to LabVIEW - only my VI and then all is well again.

  The problem does not occur in the other four PC, but I can't say for sure.

  The Task Manager indicates that LabVIEW causes CPU - use swap file load is small.

  Is it possible to analyse the causes of high CPU load?

  I use LabVIEW 7.1 Professional

  Operating system: Win XP (SP 2 or 3 that I can't remember)

  P.S. I have no loops without waiting-functions.

  johanneshoer wrote:

  ...

  the PC where the problem is occurring only 2 x 512 GB RAM, others have 2 x 1 GB. Maybe I have the upgrade of RAM would be my first action...

  ...

  Assuming that it's a typo problem, is you have run out of memory physics and are returning to the virtual (which is 1000 X) slower than real memory.

  Christian has nailed.

  Ben

• Strange behavior of "RT Get CPU Loads.vi"; first call lasts a very long time!

  I spent a considerable time of debugging a new application, after that we decided to migrate to the new architecture. When a more common coding errors where eliminated, the application started running smoothly for short periods before suddenly freezing until the moment where the connection to the target RT has been lost.

  I finally understood as a Subvi, which returns the data to the system (use of memory, the cpu load, etc.) lasted if long run than the queue to feed this consumer loop filled with tasks causing eventually the memory fills. I have done some testing of the Subvi separately and noticed that "CPU Get RT Loads.vi" takes forever to run the first time, it is called after a target restart and then quickly runs during subsequent calls.

  Is this known behaviour? Other ways to solve this, except 'RT Get CPU Loads.vi' call during initialization?

  The VI has an entry "session in? If she uses the system of screw configuration, he may have to create a session on the first call you can do outside of your loop. If not and you have installed system configuration tool, you can try to use the nodes property to get the CPU - in more recent versions of RT, I think that the function you are using is obsolete.

  Can you post a snippet of your code / the VI?