RV Support VLAN Tagging on WAN Port?

Similar Questions

• The switch SLM224G does support VLAN per port?

  I'm looking for a simple solution create two LAN. One for my own and the other for my clients, who will be able to use the desktop computer with internet access. I only have one internet connection (ADSL over ISDN) and wil not get another just for my clients.

  My own network should not be accessible or visible to users who use the PC clients. The other way around is authorized, but not really necessary. My setup requires me to connect to the switch to the (ISP) router, and the router has a LAN port not able to do anything related to VIRTUAL networks.

  I read on the VLAN port to put here, where it is stated that creating separate LAN is just the ports in VLANS on the switch, nothing else to do... However, they used a NetGear smart switch.

  I checked SLM224G of Cisco because it is affordable, has 24 ports (instead of 8 for the NetGear) and must support of VLAN. I read a lot about VIRTUAL networks, including:

  «- Means the VLAN per port that you can reconfigure the ports to be in different VLANS.» VLAN per port does not confirm the 802. 1 q supported VLANS.

  -802. 1 q VLAN means you can mark the VLANS with 802. 1 q headers to create a trunk between two devices carrying frames for several VLAN. 802 1 q VLAN confirms that there are also supported VLAN per Port. »

  I knew by the sheets that the SLM224G supports 802. 1 q (tagged) trunking. So it should be, given the text above, also supports VLAN per port.

  My question is if it indeed will support VLAN per port?

  I am able to use it directly behind the router of my ISP and create two separate LAN?

  If so, a supplementary question: how are the PC behind the switch (inside the two VLAN) removes the ISP router IP addresses? It will serve only of the two LAN or do I have to install a DHCP server in the other LAN?

  Any information is welcome!

  Thank you.

  Mr. Bertrand,

  
  

  I read what you posted and I don't think the slm224g will do what your configuration you want to.  The reason behind all this, if you have installed 2 VLAN you will need 2 gateways for each network.  Since then just the ISP router and a network.  I'd get a router capable of VLANs and plug it into the router of the Internet service provider and then you can have up to 4 networks behind your router.  The rvs4000 is a router excellent gigabits, which supports up to 4 VLANS.  So if you need additional ports, you can get unmanaged switches and plug it into the router for added ports.

• PowerConnect 5448, how all the trunk of physical ports and allow all the VLAN tags to pass transparently

  I would like to achieve such a goal, do all acts of switch ports 5448 as 'trunk', that is, just as an entry-level switch. Yes, I want all the tags VLAN through seamlessly.

  Let me explain more clearly. If

  • With MAC1 PC1 is connected to switch port 1 (port 1) in short, PC2 with MAC2 is connected to port 2.
  • PC1 sends a packet with vlanid = 30 ethernet VLAN tag,.

  I want the ethernet packet must be SENT to port 2 without modification, i.e. 2 PC will receive the package with exactly the same byte packets that PC1 sends.

  Currently, I want to configure all ports from the switch to act like this, but how to do this? Can someone tell me the more concise CLI commands to achieve? Alternatively, it is possible via the web interface?

  I must again complain the poor manual, which talks about this concept and this notion over and over again (both of ambiguous statements that the author of manual does not), BUT doesn't explain them not at the level of the content of the packages, so I'm totally at a loss.

  I tried the web interface. Simply together port 1 and 2 for access mode or general mode does not work.

  Please help me. Thank you in advance.

  Thank you, Josh, you begin to point me in the right direction.

  Now, I know just affecting a Trunk port, or general mode is NOT sufficient.  I have to give what kind of package VLAN (i.e. what VLAN ID) are allowed to pass through.

  To do this assignment, I have to take 2 steps. say first of all, the database "vlan" to recognize a VLAN ID in the world, then say that some specific port is allowed to pass through with this VLAN ID specific packages.

  Thus, in order to pass packets VLAN with VLAN ID 18-25 no modified (marked packets in packages marked on) g7 to the g8 to port port, I have to do:

  Console # config
  Console (config) # vlan database
  Console(config-VLAN) # vlan 18-25
  Console(config-VLAN) # exit

  Console (config) # interface ethernet g7
  Console # switchport general mode
  Console # switchport General allowed vlan add the tag of 18-25

  and again for the g8. And if I want to 48 ports to act like that, I have to write this kind of order 48 times right? All the shortcuts?

  Some useful links for me: http://hasanmansur.com/2012/10/14/powerconnect-switchport-modes/

• What measures are necessary for UNTAG vlan by default to port gigabit on SRW208P

  We have 1 VLAN disabled on our standard Cisco Catalyst switches and use our default VLAN 11.  We have recently added some 221 VLAN for voice while implementing a new Cisco UC system.  I can't disable VLAN1, however, I made the default VLAN 11 and 221 VLAN voice.  In management of VLANS, I can UNTAG 11 (VLAN PVID) on all ports but the connection to the Cisco 6506/port Gigabit.  The port still tags VLAN 11 and 221 and removes the brand VLAN (PVID) 1.

  I tried to make changes to the switch when you are connected to the switch and when I do the setting, the switch loses the connection to the 6506.  If I make the appropriate changes to GI (1) when you are connected to GI (2), the change takes effect, however, when I move the connection to GI (1) cable, the port and VLAN 11 configuration changes becomes identified and VLAN1 becomes marked.

  What is needed to prevent this?

  Hello Mike,.

  The roles of smartport negotiated links and seem to have resolved to manually set the port configurations.

  In addition, SX300 series does not support the SPAN distance, therfore silent monitoring does not work between the UCCX and phones when you plug into the switch (s).

• VLAN tagging on VIC 1225

  Hi community

  We are currently developing a standalone Server, installed c240 with a vic1225 (connected to a pair of vpc 5500 nexus).

  We have bare metal windows 2008 R2 os installed and active nic teaming ((802.3ad) with the enictool.)

  Now we want to Setup vlan tag NICs in windows, but there is no way to do...

  This is usually possible in windows 2008 Server?

  THX in advance for advice.

  Hello

  ENIC pilot for W2K8 does not support feature of 1 q VLAN dot.

  With W2K12, the grouping of the characteristic marking windows native driver.

  Alternative options are

  (1) implement adapter FEX

  (2) If you plan to run Hyper-V on the host, it can mark the VLAN.

  (3) implement individual vNIC for each VIRTUAL LAN and configure the host of active transmission load balancing / active. In addition, configure links on the individual switch ports allowing to the VLAN needed and have them not as a port-channel / vPC

  I recommend you to upgrade the firmware and drivers to the latest version to eliminate known issues.

  Padma

• LAN/WAN ports not supposed to be Gigabit? Capped at 250Mbps, NOT because of the ISP LAN devices.

  Hi all

  Have a bit of a problem here. I have Internet Fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) with Bell Canada and have their Fibe Gigabit service which is 940/120 speeds up and down, respectively. I was able to bypass his combo modem/router using a switch connected to the optical network terminal (HAVE) where the fiber cable enters the House (which serves mainly my base modem) and using custom settings of VLAN and DNS in ports specific for my fiber IPTV service Bell and receivers work together through my router.

  So, I have a few routers that I tried this with to try to solve my problem. My Asus RT-AC5300 and others have no problem with having me my subscribed speed - certainly through devices connected to gigabit LAN and also via WiFi on compatible devices. But I'm not concerned about WiFi - it is specifically wired ethernet devices that are the cause. I use CAT5e and CAT6 cables only because he is a Gigabit connection. The issue I have with my Time Capsule (3 to, latest model AC) is that, literally, speeds for gigabit wired devices will not exceed 250Mbps downstream. Download speeds can hit 125Mbps without problem. Why is this? Is there something my Time Capsule prevents leave the LAN ports operating at gigabit full transfer speed? It is not only a device - I have multiple gigabit devices I tested, on all three of the TC ports, and none of them exceed 250Mbps. Yet when I connect them to another router gigabit, such as the Asus I've described but also others, they have no problem hitting 900 + Mbps downstream on the exact same network configuration and Setup at home.

  Thanks for any ideas, comments or suggestions. Y at - it a setting I have accidentally enabled that is the cause? I had much rather use the TC of the most convenient airport for my network I was planning on getting multiple Airport extreme to position around the House to cover literally home WiFi and LAN bridges through the simple installation of these devices, but I do if I can't use my fiber subscribed speed.

  OR maybe I have a defective unit. Thanks again for the help!

  See you soon

  The issue I have with my Time Capsule (3 to, latest model AC) is that, literally, speeds for gigabit wired devices will not exceed 250Mbps downstream. Download speeds can hit 125Mbps without problem. Why is this?

  Apple AirPort routers have been designed to work with the cable standard and DSL connections.  The fiber is the new ball game, and Apple knows yet how to play the game, let alone to understand the rules.

  Most of the problems associated with connections to high speed on airports is a result of the decision of Apple to eliminate any kind of manual settings to manually adjust the speed of the WAN port on the router... and are based rather on an "Auto" setting.  Automatic adjustment seems to work pretty well on the fiber up to approximately 100 Mbps connections, but the WAN port is struggling to negotiate with high-speed connections when it is connected directly to the fiber. LAN ports can also be affected.

  Some users have reported that insert a Gigabit switch between the connection of the fiber and the Time Capsule or AirPort Extreme has helped with speeds. The theory here is that the switch can negotiate with the fiber connection much better than the WAN port on the Apple device.  If you have a handy Gigabit Ethernet switch, that it could not hurt to try this "Workaround".  Other users report no benefit when they try it.

  Yet when I connect them to another router gigabit, such as the Asus I've described but also others, they have no problem hitting 900 + Mbps downstream on the exact same network configuration and Setup at home.

  The time Capsule is not directly connected to the fiber connection, so it OK to talk and negotiate with what he sees as a 'normal' a conventional router connection.

  Don't forget also that the 802.11ac products were designed before 2013. Current products have not changed since their introduction in June 2013.

  The bottom line... Apple needs to decide whether it wants to be an actor, or leave the routing other players company established. Such what, Apple is far behind the curve... my opinion.

  While it might not hurt to take the time Capsule to an Apple Store to check over the machine, you might want to ensure that they have in fact a fiber connection high speed to test.

• HELP: What router supports VLAN? -I wish both groups cannot communicate with each other.

  Hi all

  I have 5 wireless devices must connect to the router.

  I want to divide it into 2 groups:

  That is to say, 1, device A, B, C, group 2, device D, E.

  I would like two groups cannot communicate with each other.

  I've heard, it can be done by VLAN, is e2500 can adapt to what I need?

  What about EA3500 and EA4500?

  I use G wireless, is what it means that ea4500 is out of choice even if it supports VLAN?

  Thank you all!

  Evil

  Thanks for the clarification for the OP

  FWIW

  is this an alternative to routers that do not support of VLAN, to do what you want

  http://www.SmallNetBuilder.com/lanwan/lanwan-HOWTO/32486-how-to-segment-a-small-LAN-using-tagged-VLA...

• WAN port mini error 31

  WAN port mini error 31

  Hi Cooljoe613,

  I would like to gather more information about the issue.

  ؠ What edition of vista are you helping?

  ؠ Is your computer connected to a domain or a workgroup?

  ؠ How do you get this error?

  ؠ you make changes to the computer?

  If your computer is on a domain please visit the link http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/category/windowsvistaitpro

  Thank you and best regards,

  Bindu S - MICROSOFT SUPPORT
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Removal of VLAN Tag on SG300.

  Hi all, tried searching but I am unable to find a specific answer to my question.

  I'm testing some equipment at the present time, the basic configuration is a software tester on laptop connects via ethernet on Board of our HAD. Some data must pass through our ESE and reach a second device. Tagged data flows from the laptop to the ESA. I have two switches SG300-10 which is given to me.

  These tests require test data to be S - tag only; 802.1ad 0x88A8 Ethertype with my choice of VID (100). There is no C - Tag (0 x 8100), unusual, I know! However my second device cannot manage the VLAN, so I need to remove the label.

  Previous test required only the C - tag data, and I managed to remove the labels quite easily by connecting the DUT for the switch port 10, second device with port 10 bridge interface and tagged VLAN 100 the value member and port 9 and 10 port access VLAN 100 interface.

  I tried different combinations of setting port 10 customer/general/trunk interfaces but were unable to remove the tags out of port 9. I was able to capture the images desired on port 9 straight, but they are of course marked. I'm working on the presumption that the SG300 can remove S - Tags on output.

  The device to port 9 has need of answering queries ARP with a specific MAC address and the response on the same VLAN, which would switch to add to the ARP response. I don't know if this is possible, but perhaps I could replace this device with the second switch if it would respond to ARP on one VLAN only S-Tag.

  I would appreciate any pointers that everyone has!

  An access port on the SG300 facing the marked port of the remote site has to accomplish this. Handling tag always happens generally during penetration.

• VLAN Tagging (VST) and VLAN native on the same vswitch

  I'm trying to figure out if its possible to put running the VLAN tagging for a vswitch if our virtual machines are currently in the vlan 1 (vlan native) on our cisco switches. I don't know why it's set up this way, but change is not an option at this time.

  Ultimately what I'm trying to accomplish is setting up a group of servers that differ on one VLAN, but under the same vswitch. I'm assuming that VST is what I need, but I don't know if I can simply specify how vlan 1 as the vlan 1 is not marked on cisco switches and my understanding is that VST requires to carry a label.

  Your help is greatly appreciated.

  NuRD.

  With the vSwitch connected to a trunk on the physical switch port, create the port groups and you need only configure the ID then VLAN for the port groups that do not use of VLAN native. See for example http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1004074

  André

• VLAN tagging without trade?

  Is it possible to VLAN tag a port vSwitch without using a GROUP of ports using PowerCLI?  Similar to how would tag a port on a physical switch.

  OK, you use dvSwitches!

  I understand now what you want to achieve, even if with the help of exchanges has more advantages then the VLAN ID only.

  Of course, that this can be accomplished by using PowerCLI too.

  Try something like this:

  $dvSwitchName = "dvSwitch0"
  $dvPortId = "100"
  $VLAN = 220
  
  $portSpec = New-Object VMware.Vim.DVPortConfigSpec
  $portSpec.operation = "edit"
  $portSpec.key = $dvPortId
  $portSpec.setting = New-Object VMware.Vim.VMwareDVSPortSetting
  $portSpec.setting.vlan = New-Object VMware.Vim.VmwareDistributedVirtualSwitchVlanIdSpec
  $portSpec.setting.vlan.inherited = $false
  $portSpec.setting.vlan.vlanId = $VLAN
  
  $dvSwitch = Get-View -ViewType 'VmwareDistributedVirtualSwitch' -Filter @{'Name'=$dvSwitchName}
  $dvSwitch.ReconfigureDVPort_Task($portSpec)
  

• Windows 7/vista and VLAN Tagging (802. 1 q) on VMWare Workstation 7?

  Hello

  It is possible to activate the tagging VLAN in a virtual machine running Windows 7/Vista on VMWare WorkSation 7?

  I have which must be executed in a VLAN from diferent VM. In my case I use 802. 1 q in a bridged interface.

  Thank you

  Pato

  Perhaps.  If you configure your client to use a virtual Intel e1000 NETWORK card, then you could install the Intel NIC drivers within your comments... I think that the drivers Intel supports VLANS.  But I have not tested it myself.

• Configuration of VLAN Tagging

  I'm pretty new to VSphere, go to the install/configure in November class but had a consultant come do a show dog & Pony and he said we could do VLAN tagging to allow all our VLAN's communicate via a single distributed switch connected to a physical switch port 1. I can't get to work - can I get some advice on what I'm wrong? Attached screenshot - any help is appreciated

  Yes - 8 trade and assign each of them a single VLAN and then give them your virtual machines the portgroup appropriate.

• Cable modem has no WAN port

  I have XFinity for my cable and internet services.  We just moved into a house built in 1850 and due to the size of the House and horse hair plaster, upstairs gets very little signal WiFi.  I want to extend the reach of WiFi and intended to do with a couple of Airport extreme.  The only problem is, every tutorial I watch shows the first Airport Extreme being plugged into the WAN port on the modem cable suppliers.  My router/modem, made by Cisco, has no port Ethernet WAN port only 4.  Can I connect the Airport Extreme on port 1 and then put in place using the Airport according to normal or need a WAN port?

  If you have a modem/router, then you would connect an Ethernet cable from one of the four ports Ethernet LAN <>-... choose any you want, they are all the same... to the "O" on the AirPort Extreme WAN port.

  Then use Configuration utility of Apple AirPort "Wizard" to configure AirPort Extreme to create a wireless network that uses the same exact wireless network and the same password that the wireless Cisco uses.

  The wizard will apply automatically other correct parameters... Mode Bridge, by example... so you don't have to worry about things like that.

• The WAN Port is communicating with the Ethernet switch?

  I have a Comcast gateway that the router is disabled in so it acts only as a modem. This is related to an Airport Extreme, which serves as my router via the WAN on the AE port. I created a different WAP with a Capsule temporal from the airport, located downstairs with an Ethernet cable from one of the Ethernet ports on the AE to the WAN on the TC port. I think it's what we call a 'roaming network.

  My question is, can I connect my switch Gigabit 8 ports in one of the Ethernet ports on the TC to complete connections wired to all devices connected on it, or should I first connect EI to the switch 8 ports and then connect the switch to the port WAN TC to complete my network "roaming"? In other words, plug it into the port WAN AE or TC still allows you to use other Ethernet ports as a switch?

  Thank you!

  can I plug my Gigabit 8 ports switch in one of the ports Ethernet on the TC to complete wired connections to all devices connected on it

  Yes, assuming that the TC has been configured to run in Bridge Mode, which would be normal.

  or should I first connect EI to the switch 8 ports and then connect the switch to the TC WAN port to complete my network "roaming"?

  It would be considered preferable to wiring, if it is convenient to do so.  For example, in the configuration of the wiring in the previous example just above... If there is a problem with the time Capsule, then all devices connected to the switch to the time Capsule would have a problem as well.

  If the switch is connected to the AirPort Extreme, and the TC is then connected to the switch... If the TC has a problem, the other devices connected to the switch of will not be affected.