Someone at - it Temp vi for LabView 8.5 Simulator?

Similar Questions

• Hi, can someone give me some ideas on what type/brand of usb cameras are not suitable for labview? I need to use with labview and IMAQ Cheers acquisition image vision module

  Hi, can someone give me some ideas on what type/brand of usb cameras are not suitable for labview? I need to use with labview and image acquisition IMAQCheers vision module

  Hi, I use a 1.4MP USB camera with LabView. The brand is ID - a German company.

• Support for LabVIEW 2016

  Can someone tell me what VirtualBench drivers will be available for LabVIEW 2016?

  Release date is... right now! NOR-VirtualBench 16.0, with the help of LabVIEW 2016, is available here:

  • Driver 16.0.0 and NOR-VirtualBench Application

  (My apologies for yesterday, does not but it takes a little while to download pages to go live.)

• Hioki 3193 driver for LabVIEW 2010

  I found a LabVIEW driver for our Hioki 3193 wattmeter but he says that the vi is too old to be converted into LabVIEW 2010. Someone at - it a driver for the Hioki 3193 which is already updated for 2010, or who would be willing to upgrade the version of the driver for me?

  In the future, you can post upconvert queries in Upconvert requests Thread

• Implement the Std::Vector < < Point2i > > Std::Vector in dll wrapper for LabVIEW

  Hi, I'm writing a wrapper dll that using OpenCV function. I had been sucessfully implement Std::Vector by referring to "An array of clusters to a dll C sending".

  And now, I want to implement the Std::Vector<>> who is a lot like table 2D but each line items may be different.

  In LabVIEW, I attribute a range of cluster of the dashboard cluster of 2 I32 elements, structure which is shown below:

  

  I think it has the same functionality as Std::Vector<>> in C++.

  So I plug this data on the "Call library function node" structure and generate C code that indicated below:

  /* Call Library source file */
  
  #include "extcode.h"
  
  /* lv_prolog.h and lv_epilog.h set up the correct alignment for LabVIEW data. */
  #include "lv_prolog.h"
  
  /* Typedefs */
  
  typedef struct {
      int32_t elt1;
      int32_t elt2;
      } TD4;
  
  typedef struct {
      int32_t dimSize;
      TD4 elt[1];
      } TD3;
  typedef TD3 **TD3Hdl;
  
  typedef struct {
      TD3Hdl elt1;
      } TD2;
  
  typedef struct {
      int32_t dimSize;
      TD2 elt[1];
      } TD1;
  typedef TD1 **TD1Hdl;
  
  #include "lv_epilog.h"
  
  void funcName(TD1Hdl arg1);
  
  void funcName(TD1Hdl arg1)
  {
  
      /* Insert code here */
  
  }
  

  Then, I write this code show below in dll wrapper:

  void funcName(TD1Hdl Blobs)
  {
      vector < vector > blobs;
  
      // Distribute contents of blobs to Blobs from LabVIEW
      MgErr err = mgNoErr;
      size_t arraySizeInBytes = Offset(TD1, elt1) + sizeof(TD2)*blobs.size();     // Determine row size
      err = DSSetHSzClr(Blobs, arraySizeInBytes);
  
      if (err != mgNoErr)
          return;
  
      (*Blobs)->dimSize = blobs.size();
  
      for (size_t i = 0; i < blobs.size(); i++) {
          arraySizeInBytes = Offset(TD3, elt) + sizeof(TD4)*blobs[i].size();  // Determine col size of each row
          err = DSSetHSzClr((*Blobs)->elt[i].elt1, arraySizeInBytes);
  
          if (err != mgNoErr)
              return;
  
                  /*......................*/
          }
  }
  

  When I call LabVIEW dll, the program get interuption(i.e shutdown) on line where I want to determine the size of each row.

  Could someone give me some suggestions on this subject or promote another application of this requirement?
  Thank you very much.

  MgErr funcName(TD1Hdl Blobs)
  {
      vector < vector > blobs;
  
          Labeling(image_binary, blobs);         // the prototype of this function is: Labeling(Mat &binary, Vector> &blobs)
  
      // Distribute contents of blobs to Blobs from LabVIEW
      MgErr err = mgNoErr;
      size_t arraySizeInBytes = Offset(TD1, elt) + sizeof(TD2)*blobs.size();      // Determine row size
  
          if (contours == NULL)        {                Blobs = (TD1Hdl)DSNewHClr(arraySizeInBytes);                if (Blobs == NULL)                         err = mFullErr;        }        else                err = DSSetHSzClr(Blobs, arraySizeInBytes);
          if (err != mgNoErr)                return err;    for (size_t i = 0; err == mgNoEerr && i < blobs.size(); i++) {
          arraySizeInBytes = Offset(TD3, elt) + sizeof(TD4)*blobs[i].size();  // Determine col size of each row
  
                  if ((*Blobs)->elt[i].elt1 == NULL)                {                        (*Blobs)->elt[i].elt1 = (TD3Hdl)DSNewHClr(arraySizeInBytes);                        if ((*Blobs)->elt[i].elt1 == NULL)                                    err = mFullErr;                }                else               err = DSSetHSzClr((*Blobs)->elt[i].elt1, arraySizeInBytes);
                  if (err == mgNoErr)                {                        (*((*Blobs)->elt[i].elt1))->dimSize = blobs[i].size();
  
                          /*......................*/
  
                  }
          }
          (*Blobs)->dimSize = i;        return err;}
  

  Personaally I've usually done like this. Already, the tar of DSSetHSzClr() indicates if there was something wrong and that the handle cannot really become NULL to call this function.

  To be entirely correct and safety integrated, you must do more than that. But as long as you assume that the incoming picture is always smaller that the outgoing Board will be (usually it be 0 items when you enter this function, but if you reuse sort table in the diagram, by storing it in a registry change for example, this may not be true more) this will be enough.

• Problem setting Legacy DAQ board using NOR-DAQ 6.1 for Labview

  I know that the Board of Directors is an old legacy product not supported by NEITHER, however for a low-budget project, I have 3 of these AT-MIO-16 x cards and the need to use them.

  I know I got this job in the past not distant os, however, for the life of me can't get things sorted and work.

  You use a NT box, in which this configuration used to work... uninstalled and started fees for other reasons, and I can not get the NOR-DAQ 6.1 to support LAbview 6.1 or 7.1.

  Of course, I understand the OR-DAQ 6.1 should be used for Labview 5 and older, but also know this has been successfully done in the past.

  I downloaded all knowledge base articles dozed or both support and remember to use successfully the last time that I set up so I know not somehow it works.

  My configuration is: AT-MIO-16 X to the bus combo board (called work)

  NT PC

  LabVIEW 6.1 or 7.1

  NOR-DAQ 6.1 is the most recent to support this card.

  However, it will not install its support to its latest versions of Labview and I get errors, crashing, or missing files, when I followed various circumvention of knowledge base solutions.

  I was hoping that someone has a documentation somewhere how to handle this, because it really is a matrix of spaghetti.

  I can get NOR-DAQ support files installed, and Configuration Manager works well, finds the map and allows its parameters to be defined.

  But when I load the DAQ vi of any type, Labview accidents and the wizard of data acquisition channel does not work at all (no error).

  Thank you

  Yes, the installation program from the folder of disks for NOR-DAQ 6.1 on the ftp site has worked well.

  Workaround. Thank you

• Is there a decompiler for LABView v4 - v6

  Hello

  One of our customers (pharmaceutical industry) has a LABView application compiled on Win98 + 10 years. The source code is not available, and it seems that no one knows what is under the hood. According to the dates of Win98, I expect to run a version of LABView between v4 and v6.

  Is there a decompiler software, ways to look at the source code or to retrieve information of bases to start reverse engineering.

  Thanks for you answers!

  Alex

  [email protected]

  The whole issue is a bit more complicated. Prior to LabVIEW 8.6 the internal resources of the executable was indeed an archive VI LabVIEW (LLB) and since LLBs didn't have a single hierarchy depth that is somewhat like a single directory. This caused trouble with the latest library LV based instruments as well as classes LVOOP drivers that uses the same name of VI, but with another library prefix each, so that LabVIEW had to move these files to directories external during the generation of executable files, to avoid name collisions.

  In all new versions of LabVIEW, the internal executable resource in which the screws are stored is actually a default ZIP file. You can always force LabVIEW use a LLB format to store files, options by checking the 'use LabVIEW 8.x file layout' in the advanced compile options. Now the ZIP resource was initially stored as a simple ZIP to the format of data resources, and that caused some problems because most ZIP utilities simply analyzes a file for the header of the ZIP file and open it as such, even if the ZIP file resource is anywhere within the file, so that almost all ZIP tools could open an executable of LabVIEW. NEITHER changed this format: ZIP tools can recognize him either.

  Now, yes you can look in the resource LLB and ZIP in the past (and still with a little extra effort) but before everyone screams oh "My precious IP is in the street" Please be aware that the only thing you can do for this resource is to obtain the names of VI and if you manage to load in the fall version of LabVIEW exactly just generic icons on a diagram to see the component connector. Unless of course you also check the "enable debugging" checkbox in the advanced build options, that leaves patterns and the frontpanels in the VIs and actually create something similar to a source distribution packaged.

  So without activate debug compilation option, someone is actually not much more than what he can do by opening any binary DLL created from C, C++, or any public compiler with the tool of Microsoft dependence and MUCH MUCH less than what you can get in any just put such DLL through a disassembler.

  And to my knowledge there isn't a disassembler as tool for LabVIEW VIs to date, and I would consider about 1 billion things more interesting to do than to try to create such a thing.

• LabVIEW: The file is not a resource file. The file is not a valid file for LabVIEW

  Hello.

  I used labview to make an assignment of the University. As part of the im supposed to transfer the .vi file to my teacher, but all .vi files sent using the e-mail system are corrupt. When I try to open mine it gives this error

  LabVIEW: The file is not a resource file. The file is not a valid file for LabVIEW

  Unfortunately, I also lost my backup as I was working on a lab computer and didn't upload my files on the storage server.

  So I was wondering if someone can help out me. Thank you very much.

  The problem is that the email system dealt with the file as a text file. All thesequences have been replaced as . You can see this opening of VI in a hexeditor. Each VI begins with "RSRC".". Your VI begins with "RSRC.

  I replaced the two occurrences of "RSRC"with "RSRC"."and he opened in LV 8.6. Missing just a few controls and subVIs.

  I did this on Windows.

• Internet Toolkit for LabVIEW 2012 64-bit

  I have an application which is currently written in LabVIEW 2009. It requires the Internet. I try to open it in 2012 of LabVIEW (64-bit) (using Windows 7 64-bit). LabVIEW 2012 does not find the box at Internet tools since he has been deprecated in LabVIEW 2012, so LabVIEW complains.

  So I downloaded the toolkit LabVIEW 2012 Internet and tried to install it. When the Setup program tries to run, it stops with an error message that says:

  "NEITHER LabVIEW 2012 (32-bit) or more must be installed before installing OR.
  2012 Internet Toolkit LabVIEW. »

  Can someone tell me where I can find the Internet Toolkit for LabVIEW 2012
  (64 bit)?

  Thank you

  -Ray

  Since you seem to understand that the Internet Toolkit has been deprecated, I do not understand your question. There is no 64-bit version of the tool. In fact, it has very few tools that do not have a 64-bit version. In order to use the old, 32-bit version, you must use it with the version 32-bit LabVIEW, as said the message.

• Xantrex HPD for LabVIEW 2009 pilot

  I saw there are other products OR with drivers for Xantrex HPD feeds.

  Someone at - it one that works for LabVIEW 2009 (or earlier)?

  Ok.  I have it.

  HyperTerminal has worked.

  He checked that port settings and command syntax is correct.

  ALL programs in LabVIEW examples do not have the function of VC to food.  When I hard coded the CR function after the order (also preprogrammed) it worked.  Xantrex (now Sorensen) manual do include SOME simple examples - you just know by experience (catch 22) how do.

  Also be noted that we need to send both a voltage and current definition commands because both are zero by default.  (If you send one, nothing SEEMS to happen because the other is 0).  That could also have been included in an example of beginning.

  THANKS for your help!

• Support of NOR-DNET for LabVIEW 2013

  We currently use OR DNET 1.6.6 with LabVIEW 2011. I installed LabVIEW 2013 now also on my computer and tried to synchronize all of the drivers with my installation of LabVIEW 2011.

  Well, it seems that NEITHER-DNET does not support LabVIEW 2013, at least officially. compatibility of Version of LabVIEW and NOR-DNET indicates that NEITHER-DNET 1.6.6 supports 2011 NOR-DNET 1.6.7 2012 LabVIEW and LabVIEW.

  The list NOR system driver November 2013 set OR DNET 1.6.7 defined pilot. When I try to install it, there is no support for LabVIEW 2013.

  My question is, if there is a plan to include support OR DNET for LabVIEW 2013 or later in the game to pilot?

  I copied the directories vi.lib\DeviceNet and vi.lib\nidnet of LabVIEW 2011-2013 and I can load my programs without any problems. I always did not build an executable and does not run on the test set-up, but projects can be loaded in LabVIEW 2013 without any screws of brocken. should I expect any problems running LabVIEW 2013 with the NOR-DNET to 1.6.6 and 1.6.7 driver?

  Nick

  There should not be problems but it is a former pilot, we will not be updated for the future version of labview.

• Is there a Module NXT for LabVIEW 2010

  Is there a Module NXT for LabVIEW 2010?  If not, are there plans to bring a available and if so, when?

  Hello

  I found a link to a download for the module 2010 here.

  I hope this helps.

• How to convert the file with VI for LabView .lib to CVI?

  Hello

  I have the .lib file for my lock in the amplifier. The lib file is written for labView and already contains a visual interface (like ActiveX). The point is that I need this file for programming in CVI (8.5). How can I convert a LabView ICB .lib?

  Thank you.

  Denis.

  You said that you had a .lib file and in fact you have an llb file. There is a huge difference between an "i" (eye) and a 'l' (ell).

  There is a LabVIEW Instrument Driver Export Wizard but it's only for new pilots of project lifestyle and you need LabVIEW. There is no other way to convert a LabVIEW driver to a driver of the CVI. If the LabVIEW driver uses methods and properties of the ActiveX, you will need to write the same thing in CVI.

• What type of support for labview usb protocols?

  Hello guys I want to connect a device to your pc via a usb port and I want to use labview to analyze the data.

  But first of all, I would like to know what usb protocols support for labview.

  USB, USB CDC and other TMC?

  I ve read labview recognizes a raw device to the usb, but what is? Is it VI to read and send data, or I have to do? If these VI exists, they do the handshake? flow control?

  Thank you.

  Please read the chips and have a look at the USB specification (it is linked to in the nuggets).

  TMC, CDC, MAss Storage are all built on the basic USB protocols.

  LabVIEW has no built-in support for one of these classes of devices except Test and measurement.

  Shane

• Entry value change when he went from teststand for labview.

  Hi all

  I try to spend my labview VI value hexadecimal teststand. When I run the VI independently giving the value as 00000010 I get the expected results of the VI.  But even when value is passed through local variable teststand, when it reached VI of entry it was conerted to 000000 A 0 and so I'm getting wrong output.

  I am not able to understand how the value goes to the value of the input parameter when she went from teststand for labview.

  Any ideas?

  I discovered the error.  I was entering the value in the wrong format in teststand... instead of 0 x 10 I've entered only 010 and was therefore is converted to A.