Tandberg Multi Point called endpoints

Similar Questions

• Allowing endpoints make multi-point on Cisco 4505 MCU calls

  Hello

  I have a Cisco 4505 MCU and several endpoints.  Is there a way to allow that my end point called multipoint adhoc using MCU 4505?  For example, I would say that dial site1 using mcu, then dial site2 help mcu or call a group (site 1 and site1...) using mcu and it would know that it is supposed to use the 4505.

  Thank you

  Ravi

  Of course, you can configure (a few 100) static, meeting rooms, auto create conferences on the fly, based on a model or have the means put in place and there is even an on screen menu allows users to create or join conferences.

  Check out the example (page 37ff) Administrator's guide

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/Telepresence/infrastructure/MCU/admin_guide/Cisco_TelePresence_MCU_4-4_Product_administration_guide.PDF

• Can we call a point of endpoint not registered by IP without MCU

  Hello

  We have several items endpoint with CUCM 9.5. We also have a legacy Tandberg, probably aged 7 years located on one of our sites WAN (connected via leased line) that we want to call and receive calls through IP. We do not have any microcontroller or other products of voice, only CUCM.

  I've been looking for examples, but since I am brand new to this subject I'd like help experienced forum members. From what I understood, to call an end point recorded since that not saved, we have to deal the [email protected] / * /, is - that correct? What is dial the IP of the endpoint not inherited of the registered endpoint?

  Any help is appreciated.

  Concerning

  MOE Shea

  You need Expressway-C/E to call endpoint.  CUCM does not support the IP numbering, but using a channel Express-C/E, you can see the Dial IP addresses for endpoints registered to CUCM VCS / example Configuration of the highway.

• Video point-to-point call - SX20

  All,

  If I have 2 end points x SX20 registered in the same cluster of UCM and accessible via the internal network with no crossing of firewall, should I additional permit (they all have two licenses of room) to make a video call from point to point?

  The licenses around that are a bit of a headache! :/

  Thank you

  D

  Hello

  Room for your CUCM licenses just save your endpoint SX20 points and make a point to video call within your network.

  Kind regards

  Acevirgil

• vRA 7 - points of endpoint - reference vRA

  Is there a documentation on the new endpoint reference vRA?

  In the console of vRA 7, Infrastructure-> settings-> new-> Orchestration, there is a new type of endpoint called 'vRA' repository, but I can't find any info about it. What is of this endpoint for?

  Thank you very much

  D.

  Yes, what Alex said. Is not available for anything at this point. Likely to be used in 7.1.

  Grant

• CTI Route Point Call Forwarding

  Hi all

  I'm running 10.5 CM and wanted to know if it was possible before/road called of a Point of ITC road to another CTI Route Point AND at the same time fighter pilot.

  We have just received a new switchboard console and it does not support the Points of CTI road instead, use groups of hunting/line to ring the DNs directly. We wanted to keep our old switchboard console along side again until we're done installation/check the other.

  One of my colleagues mentioned put the driver of hunting and the CTI Route Point in a hunt group and then reference the CTI route Point to that. Would this work?

  Please do not hesitate to provide alternatives that you think will work.

  Thank you

  Matt

  Hmm - you can't have a fighter pilot in the Group of the line.

  There are two options I can think.

  (1) first of all is to have your old extension of CTI - RP and new extensions of the monitoring console in a group of curves. You can then select the algorithm broadcast under fighter pilot group, if you want to send the call for both consoles.

  So you will have a new CTI - RP with call your everything to a fighter pilot. This fighter pilot will be a group of line containing all the extensions for the old and the new console monitoring

  But the downside will be to ring all extensions in the line fighter pilot group at the same time - which means both the old SIC - RP and all extensions for the new console at the same time.

  (2) the second option is to use number SNU. You can add the driver of hunting like the remote destination for the main extension. This will send the call to the old switchboard console and the fighter pilot at the same time - fighter pilot will then hunt for extensions according to the configuration (it will not be broadcast, can be circular, top-down etc. According to your needs). Drawback here is THAT SNR also feeds a license essential or fundamental.

  Others will also be consistent with more options I hope.

  -Terry

  Please note all useful posts

• Control point for endpoint connect is compatible with Windows 8.1?

  Original title: CheckPoint endpoint connect

  Hello

  I'll do the upgrade of Windows 8 Pro for Windows Pro 8.1.

  By choosing the upgrade path that allows me to keep all the files, settings and applications, it shows that the only application that I have to uninstall will be Checkpoint Endpoint Connect (which currently runs under Windows 8 Pro).

  At all known installation CheckPoint EndPoint Connect on Windows Pro 8.1 and installed successfully?

  Thanks for the reply.

  I've went ahead with the installation of Windows RTM 8.1 and took the risk that Checkpoint would not be compatible.

  I was able to uninstall Checkpoint, as part of the upgrade of Windows 8.1 window and subsequently install Checkpoint endpoint connect successfully.

  Therefore, I am happy to say that for our Organization and our version of the control point, it is looking like it is fully compatible with Windows 8.1.

• Custom multi TP call via a screen layout

  Hello

  First of all, I'd like apologize if my query was answered before, I tried to get a similar scenario, but nothing helps.

  We have an inplace SX80 running TC 6.3.3 hooked up to a projector on 'a' screen. As you know, once we're on a telepresence call with there will be two windows split the screen. Now the question we have is when many participants join the call, the telepresence window remains the same new addition to the appellants of this window, resulting in two small windows of telepresence in the single window. Subsiqnectley that the more people join more the window is.

  The ideal scenario we are looking for, is the presentation in the middle and have participants fill around the screen (a bit like the old T3 calls).

  We have not been able to do this via the options in the foreground on the touch screen. is there a way to get around this?

  P.S us also will be upgrading to CE8 shortly if the firmware has a limitation.

  Please see the attachment for better undrestanding.

  Farid

  First of all, the SX80 came out with TC7.1, you sure have a SX80 or the correct version of software?

  CE8 with multistreaming would be a good option, but the Conference will then be hosted on a telepresence server and will need you either CUCM or VCS, you can learn more on this subject in the Téléprésence Server 4.1 Release Notes.

  If the upgrade of this software is not an option, you can use the feature video TC Console to change the patterns seen on your SX80 composer.  The only drawback to the use of TC Console you then must stay on TC software because the composer video function is removed in the CE software.

• Oracle 11g mediator WebService security problem-cannot call endpoint URI "" successfully due to: javax.xml.soap.SOAPException: javax.xml.soap.SOAPException: bad response: 401 Unauthorized

  Hi all

  I have a RS of mediator who invokes an external secure Web service. Despite I put the username and password values, I get HTTP 401 error.

  Here is my source of mp plan.  Any comment or help is appreciated.

  <? XML version = "1.0" encoding = "UTF - 8"? >

  < mediator name = "AIASystem.OSM.ProcessSalesOrderFulfillmentOSMCFSCommsWSProducer_RS" wsdlTargetNamespace =" " http://Oracle.com/ESB/namespaces/AIASystem_OSM "xmlns =" " http://xmlns.Oracle.com/SCA/1.0/mediator "> "

  < name of operation = "run" >

  <>switch

  < name = "ProcessSalesOrderFulfillmentOSMCFSCommsWSProducer.CreateOrderBySpecification - case" executionType 'direct' = > "

  < action >

  < transform >

  < name of part = "$out.» CreateOrderBySpecificationRequest ".

  function = ' xslt (xsl/ProcessSalesOrderFulfillmentEBM_To_CreateOrderBySpecification.xsl $in.). ProcessSalesOrderFulfillmentEBM) "/ >"

  < / transform >

  < assign >

  < copy value = "admin".

  ' xmlns:wsse1 = ' http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd "

  target = "$out." Header.wsse1_Security/wsse1:Security/wsse1:UsernameToken/wsse1:username"/ >

  < copy value = "Data1234".

  ' xmlns:wsse1 = ' http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd "

  target = "$out." Header.wsse1_Security/wsse1:Security/wsse1:UsernameToken/wsse1:password"/ >

  < / assign >

  < invoke reference = "ProcessSalesOrderFulfillmentOSMCFSCommsWSProducer."

  operation = "CreateOrderBySpecification" >

  < onReply >

  < transform >

  < name of part = "$out.» ProcessSalesOrderFulfillmentResponseEBM ".

  function = ' xslt (xsl/CreateOrderBySpecificationResponse_To_ProcessSalesOrderFulfillmentResponseEBM.xsl $in.). CreateOrderBySpecificationResponse) "/ >"

  < / transform >

  < response / >

  < / onReply >

  < onFault type = "InvalidOrderDataFault" >

  < transform >

  < name of part = "$out.» OrderFault ".

  function = ' xslt (xsl/InvalidOrderDataFault_To_OrderFault.xsl $in.). InvalidOrderDataFault) "/ >"

  < / transform >

  < fault type = "OrderFault" / >

  < / onFault >

  < / call >

  < / action >

  < / Body >

  < / switch >

  < / operation >

  < / Ombudsman >

  Hi all

  The problem is solved by adding the three properties below to the definition of the external service in composite.xml.

  Best regards

  Override = "may" > true

             

  Override = "may" > username

             

  Override = "may" > password

• Single Vs Multi point

  Hello everyone.

  Another issue here.

  If I deploy a version ipad and iphone of my application, I need to create an application with the app generator multi-probleme?  Is this correct?

  I also read that this single issue, apps, are made for ipad only devices.  Is that also correct?

  What if I wanted to add android devices? IM assuming that this would be different because your don't back to apple.

  Thanks in advance.

  Ryan.

  Simple editing applications are only supported on iPad devices. If you target iPhone and/or Android devices, you must make a request of several question.

  Neil

• simple question and Multi point question

  Hello

  We have a publication which is published every 3 weeks. (17 times per year)  If anyone knows what kind of version of the app, we should use?

  Multi-Folio

  Integrated unique Edition App

  Multi-Folio with itunes subscription

  any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you!

  Ryan.

  You definitely want one of the variants of the multi-folio. As you publish all the 3 weeks is probably a good idea to offer an iTunes subscription, it's a great way for customers to purchase access to your questions. We see the vast majority of magazine revenue came from subscription in iTunes purchases, not single issue purchases.

  Neil

• DMVPN/IPSEC, GRE and IPSEC Multi Point

  Hi all

  I have a project of construction of 50 locations connectivity to my data center 2. Each location has Internet with router 877 with image dry.

  my DC has 1900 router. Now I want what tunnel I go with. DMVPN IPSEC or IPSEC GRE.

  The data will come from DC locations only. No inter connections location. I want to know the pros and cons as well as any change of required equipment.

  Kind regards

  Satya.M

  Given your criteria, I would say THAT DMVPN would be best suited

  Cisco - Configuration dynamic Multipoint Virtual Private Networks DMVPN

  Implementation in DMVPN GDOI

  Pete

• What is the difference between Mutipoint and Multiway video calls?

  What is the difference between Mutipoint and Multiway video calls?

  They are both multi-point calls, however, Multiway is a feature that you can activate with the correct infrastructure and MCU in place, which will allow the ends without a telepresence MCU Office and integrated JabberVideo customers of degenerate transparently a point-to-point call in a multipoint call on the relevant MCU.

  See the relevant Multiway Deployment Guide corresponding to the version of software that you run on your VCS - C for more information; http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/unified-communications/Telepresence-video-communication-server-VCs/products-installation-and-configuration-guides-list.html

  /Jens

  Please note the answers and score the questions as "answered" as appropriate.

• What is the difference bewteen MCU, VCS, and SRI (DSP-3)

  Hi all

  We lack CUCM 9.X. I want to integrate Cisco 9971, 8945 with TP Endpoint (EX60 and Tandberg C40). I read this wonderful document (https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-30750), but I still have some doubts.

  What is the difference bewteen MCU, VCS, and SRI (DSP-3). For all I know, ISR running DSP3 is the chepaiest option but I don't know if the HD video is supported.

  Thanks regarding

  Remember messages useful rate by clicking on the stars below.
  Favor calificar todos las responses useful dando click in las estrellas mas abajo.
  ___________________________________________
  LinkedIn profile: do.linkedin.com/in/leosalcie

  Hello

  According to the document, you are referring to which I posted previously

  VCS is a call control system call manager but for video end points only, then CUCM is for voice and video, and now it becomes control system of very mature appeal for video communications with native support for video of many recordings of points

  MCU is a material that can be used to host the multi point/party video calls that can be registered to CUCM or VCS according to design

  SRI with DSP/PVDM 3 is the concept of the MCU, but can be used for small multi-point calls and normally remote sites that need local accommodation to a call to reduce the load on the WAN link when most of the participant in the same place for example! and it dose taken support HD but limited features compared to MCU

  for example PVDM3 doe does not support HD when participants are expected to use different video formats

  hope this helps

• TP license

  Hi all

  We have C60 and Profile55 installed everywhere internally in our campus, there are 10 points for endpoints registered with VCS. None of the endpoints a licence Multisite, multi point calls are performed using MCU.

  Since we have only 10 courses license and Management intends to have more endpoints, do we need to buy several license courses?

  We have only internal calls within the network.

  TNX

  Bobby

  Hi Bobby,.

  Each call point to consume a call single license.

  Regarding the multi-point calls (two third-party or not), the concept is simple, each participant connected to the MCU (or endpoint compatible multisite) will consume a call single license. Therefore, if you have 5 endpoints connected to the MCU (assuming that the call was made through VCS), it will consume 5 licenses of the call.

  Concerning

  Paulo Souza

  Please note the answers and mark it as "answered" as appropriate.