TMS and AVAYA scopia endpoint interoperability

Similar Questions

• schedule meetings with the TMS and CTManager on the same endpoint

  Hello everyone

  I explain my problem, we have a CUCM with CTManager to plan meetings of the CTS, we have 2 VCS with a TMS to plan meetings of TC endpoints also.
  Our TC end points are saved in venture capital using H323, recorded in CUCM using SIP and exchange of email to can program using the CTManager. And TC endpoints are supplied by our TMS.

  As endpoints of TC may appeal to the endpoints CTS sometimes we have meetings planned between TC and CTS endpoints in the CTManager, but if schedule us a meeting by using the TMS, meetings of CTManager disappear and endpoint show TMS meetings, if we do a resynchronization of the electronic mail room in the CTManager We can see again in the meetings of CTManager in the touchscreen.

  We tried not to allow bookings for this endpoint of TC in the TMS, but later there is no way to schedule a meeting for this endpoint, even using the external call.

  You know any workaround solution to activate the two calendar options running on the same endpoint without removing the CTManager meetings? We don't need the BBFRR for the TMS meetings, only for meetings of the MLC.

  Best regards

  Hello

  Disabling power of the TMS write calendars 'Meetings' on managed systems is not supported. If an endpoint is added to the TMS, TMS assumed that endpoint is not used in another system of planning (such as CTS - man) and could replace any parameter that depends on the other system of planning.

  Kind regards
  Kjetil

• TMS connects to the endpoints, but is not able to update

  Hi all

  I added our Tandberg profile on the MSDS management server endpoint and inserted the address of MSDS in the menus of the endpoint.

  In TMS I can view all the endpoints and their parameters, but when you change these settings I get the following error message: "could not update all the parameters. Details: hostAddress: [ip endpoint], description: GetDocument Failed. URL: http://[parameter] / putxml, base exception: the remote server returned an error: (417) Expectation Failed. »

  I tried several ways of connections and also did not find any solution on Cisco's Web site, so I hope you can help me. All devices, TMS and endpoints are in the same network.

  Thank you

  Ben

  First advice would be to upgrade your video network components... TMS12.1 and TC2.1.1 are quite old now! But if you want to try the solution I gave you, add the block at the end of the file, before in order to get something like this:

  ...

  ...

  ...

  Then, save the web.config file and a control box, run iisreset to restart the web server.

  And as said above, save a backup first!

• TMS and SQL 2008 R2

  Hi all

  We plan to spend our SQL 2005 a 2008R2 server. In the Installation of TMS and Quick Start Guide (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/telepresence/infrastructure/tms/install_guide/Cisco_TMS_Install_Getting_Started_Guide_13-1.pdf , page 6), they say that all versions of SQL 2008 are supported, but we must be sure that this includes the SQL 2008R2. Are there restrictions or considerations?

  Thank you!

  I seem to TMS doesn't run well with SQL 2008 R2 no problem

• Question TMS and conductor - conferences to improve safety by using conference

  Hi people,

  Currently, I implement some projects involving Cisco Telepresence conductor and I was wondering the benefits that conductor brings to the video network, it's really a great solution!

  Discover the benefits of the conductor, I created the following deployment:

  

  It works very well! The customer is very satisfied with the level of security when using this deployment. Their multi-point conferences is safer now.

  Well, when I created this topology I considered not how the environment would work when planning conferences, with TMS and conductor because this client has yet to TMS. Then, I was just shocked when I opened the TMS deployment guide e conductor and find the following statement:

  Note: The exposed conductor TelePresence conference type is not supported in Cisco TMS. Only models conference using the conference meeting type are supported.

  Page 13 - http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/telepresence/infrastructure/tms/config_guide/TelePresence_Conductor_with_Cisco_TMS_Deployment_Guide_XC1-2_TMS14-1.pdf

  I almost jumped the bridge... Now, I know that my great topology no longer works with TMS.

  Well, here are my questions:

  Why do we have this limit?

  That Cisco plans to fix this?

  The guide is related to the conductor XC1-2 and 14-1 TMS, something has changed in TMS 14.2.2 and XC2.1?

  I'd appreciate any help really, really!

  Thanks in advance.

  Paulo Souza

  Please note the answers and mark it as "answered" as appropriate.

  Paulo Souza wrote:
  [...] I am wondered the benefits that Conductor brings to the video network, it is really a great solution!

  Agreed! The driver of the telepresence really is a great product.

  Why do we have this limitation?

  Because the feature was never implemented on the side TMS. It was decided that the other characteristics are more important and should be a priority. There is nothing on the type of conference 'Read' which is inherently incompatible with the TMS, but work needs to be done first.

  Examples:

  • The control of conference centre: you will probably see the entries in double Conference if you are using a 'read' conference
  • TMS does not differentiate between the presidents and guests during the creation of scheduled conferences 'Conference' on the conductor.

  None of them are very difficult to solve from a development point of view, but they are not trivial to apply or test either.

  Does Cisco have plans to fix that?
  

  Nothing specific is planned, don't. As always: if it is a problem to your customer, make a request to feature through your account manager or another Cisco point of contact.

  The guide is related to Conductor XC1-2 and TMS 14-1, has any thing been changed  in TMS 14.2.2 and XC2.1?
  

  Conductor XC 2.1 and TMS 14.2.2 is a combination not supported, but nothing has been changed to

  2.2 XC and 14.3 TMS: types of conference 'Read' are not yet supported.

  Best regards

  Kjetil

• TMS and registered CUCM phones (endpoint No. TC points)

  Hello

  A customer has a lot of 9971 series and other video capable ip saved in CUCM phones which are obviously not the criteria of TC.

  How can I go to add to TMS? Are they added only as unmanaged endpoints?

  Is it possible that I can force the TMS or the conductor also to call them so that they can join a conference?

  We have some use VIP users who want to call rather than compose themselves at the Conference and they have no endpoint of TC.

  Thanks in advance for the help!

  You probably don't have to add CUCM in TMS, unless you want to add any endpoints mentioned some of my first answer in TMS, although it wouldn't hurt to add it anyway.

  You can add IP phones as unmanaged endpoint points, although this will consume a TMS system for each license added.  If you have plenty of endpoints that you want to add and you do not have enough licenses, you can use a directory phone, as mentioned earlier, see the "Manage Sources of phonebook" on pg 187 for more details.  You can schedule video conferences using two methods, but Smart Scheduler is unable to add participating telephone directories, so the TMS advanced scheduler should be used if you add participants from telephone directories.

  What you do above in the TMS for the planning of endpoints has no impact on its PMF, you can add endpoints you want logged in as a favorite yourself in your TMS user portal.

• TMS and Polycom VSX

  Hello

  One of our customers uses some VSXes Polycom and Cisco VC systems. They have created a directory on Cisco TMS. This directory includes also a few records. C20s, they can see the files on the phone book. But on the Polycom VSXes, they can not see the records. They see all the addresses in the same directory in order from A to Z. Don't you know that it is possible to separate with VSX records or not? If so, how?

  Best regards

  Chambers oumar

  Hello

  Polycom units does not support this unless they were included in a new software at least they did not support this before. Only a directory flat as we see. Use cisco endpoints

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

• Question of EX60 with TMS and Callmanager.

  Hi all

  I have a saved on my MSD EX60 and works very well. But I need to make phone calls of this endpoint.

  The device is registered on MSDS which is another country (DE) and therefore on another call manager using his background and rules.

  The point is: is possible to keep the record of TMS to videocalls and register my callmanger to make phone calls?

  I tried to make the deployment process on the device... To receive phone calls from my callmanager works very well. Just phone calls. Outgoing calls continue smoothly in TO callmanager.

  I think it's possible to do. But I can't imagine how...

  Thanks in advance.

  Hi Daron,

  I think you take on commissioning.

  You must be commissioned with TMS for the phone book. at present on TC 6.3, you get so stocked TMS directory by CUCM.

  However, on the next version 7 TC, a device for CUCM pack will be necessary to specify the TMS as a source directory for the endpoints CUCM provisoned.

  at this point, you can either put into service with TMS or CUCM both.

  in case you need to call to SIP, this need to go through CUCM in sip and h323 default then Protocol should be h323.

• Cisco TMS - custom with MXP endpoint command problem

  Hi all

  I have try to disable the RCDO H264 with the TMS custom custom on all the endpoints (to solve a customer problem with lync2013)

  It works for the endpoint of C SERIES but does not work for the MXP endpoint.

  I have try it with this command:

  You have already encountered this problem?

  Do you know a solution?

  Thank you in advance

  Samy

  What version of TMS are you currently using?

  I have TMS 14.3.1, and if you are looking for in models of configuration in TMS under MXP, you should see the configuration item to disable this option for you.

  In any case...

  Off

  May be easier to use the TMS configuration, but the string above should work.

  I hope this helps.

  VR

  Patrick

• TMS - add some unmanaged endpoints

  Hello

  If I add a phone 9951 as unmanaged in TMS endpoint (there is no other way I can tell) if it also nourishes a system license? I have 25 total

  Kind regards

  Yes, they do.

  They will be listed under "Rooms," or "Material", according to your choice, but they will appear in the total number of licenses of system being used.

  /Jens

  Please note the answers and score the questions as "answered" as appropriate.

• VCS and design of Microsoft Interoperability

  Hi guys,.

  need help from collective intelligence again.

  I've got VCS and Microsoft Interoperability key installed and correctly deployed interop with Lync - audio and videocalls. Lync federated domains and successfully can call for their users. I have configured the search rules in certain areas (for example, Microsoft.com) neighbor B2B Microsoft box. call begins, but at time of pick up at the bottom it is declining.

  is it possible to appeal to domains Federated Lync via Internet of the endpoint TC recorded on VCS?

  You try to call the Lync federated users from your Cisco VCS registered endpoint? Have you configured the settings of the ROUND and for VCS configuration on the Edge transport server?

• Problems with FVS336GV2 and AVAYA 9620L VPN

  Hello

  I have Avaya 9620 L is currently working and all the settings successfully with netgear FVS336gv3. My problem is, when the phone is turned off at the remote site in the afternoon and return the morning that he fails to connect via VPN. Just told IKE Phase 1 error. In my VPN log it says "cannot find the file configuration xx.xx.xx.xx. Now this configuration worked the previous day.

  When I go to the netgear and change "encryption algorithm" or 'Authentication algorithm' (no matter what) that the newspaper says that it does not. I have change it back to what it was before and how you know he is running like a charm. In the course of the day, no matter how many times the phone or the netgear feeding cycle, it always connects. Only when he is off all nite, the next day, the netgear let the phone not connect unless I have change a setting and than back to his original one. If I change a setting on the Avaya netgear and it works.

  Does anyone have any ideas as to why the netgear blocks VPN until I have change the setting?

  Hi Moussa,.

  The firmware 3.1.1 - 08 seems to be more stable than version 4.3.3 - 6 at least for my setup here. Last week I had no problems and it works every morning when powered. For now I'll stick to firmware V3.1.1-08.

• integration of TMS and Exchange

  Hi all

  I had planned to integrate Exchange with tms instead of ctsman.

  Could you help me on an integration guide, as well as with your advice.

  Thank you.

  We have a white paper that helps guide you in the management of expectations and planning of such failover.  See https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-40301

  For more details on how to proceed with the installation, make sure you please to refer to documents TMSXE and TMS installation.  Material above is a supplement to the people and does not duplicate the information contained in the classic installation documents.

  Materials TMSXE - http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/conferencing/telepresence-managemen...

• TMS and virtual VCS

  Hello

  I know that the VCS and TMS can be virtualized.

  On the documentation, I found that the VCS can be deployed on the same host as the other virtual machines (cohabitation) following some guidelines for sizing (resourses must be allocated 1:1, it means that there is no excess applications).

  I also read that MSDS can also be virtualized, following the same guidelines of resources:

  "Cisco TMS can be installed in a virtualized server environment as long as the virtual machine by a Cisco TMS is allocated sufficient resources dedicated to meet the requirements of server and hardware for installation. The resources allocated to the Cisco TMS server instance must be dedicated and not shared with other instances of server. ""

  What I do not know if the TMS accepst co-residensy with other applications. Which makes me doubt is:

  "Cisco TMS is resource intensive with specific server requirements, which increase with the level of activity and the size of the managed network video. With the help of a server that hosts other applications or Web sites for accommodation Cisco TMS is therefore not supported. "

  I don't know if this means that non-corresidensy is supported or that no other application in addition to TMS must be deployed on the same OS.

  What I really want to accomplish with it is to virtualize the TMS, the VCS Highway and control of the VCS on the same server of UCS. Would it be supported by TAC?

  Kind regards

  Hi, this means that the TMS server should be dedicated to the application of TMS. No other hosted applications should be present on the same OS.

  Hope that helps.

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

• TMS and improved security server TCS

  Hey there everyone!

  On the Tandberg Web site, there is a page that contains updates for the OS that have been tested for use with the administration server and content server security.  However, the last update was 9/2010.  Is there a comparable download page here on the Cisco site, with versions I hope more up-to-date?  I have looked, but could not find.

  Thank you!

  I asked one of the ancient engineers TANDBERG, who is now with Cisco, just on this subject, and he indicated that he had used the Windows Update normak, even for the TCS, feature and if there is a problem, he would just roll back this particular update.

  I did exactly that with our TMS server and have not had a problem yet.

  The second generation servers TCS are not devices and doesn't look anything like first generation servers, so I'll start doing the same thing with the TCS as soon as the remaining 2 were replaced by more recent, industrial research material.

  Cisco had a contract to upgrade in place for some time, maybe even the case, that they are eager to get rid of the old boxes of TANDBERG TCS - well, it's the impression that I myself still.

  Bravo jens