Traffic RV016

Similar Questions

• Connect the 2 locations using RV016 router to fill 2 different networks.

  I have a RV016 connected to a comcast cable modem to slot 1 with IP 192.168.6.1

  I have a RV016 connected to a comcast cable modem at the 2 with 192.168.10.1 IP location

  I installed a VPN tunnel from gateway to gateway between 2 routers RV016.

  I have a LAN in slot 1 with the IP 192.168.1.1, which connects to the internet through an Adtran router with 4 lines of T1 servile.

  I have a LAN with IP 192.168.5.1 2 location that connects to the internet through an Adtran router with 3 T1 lines servile.

  I like a computer to location 2 to connect to the RV016 in the local Comcast modem to the Comcast modem at location 1 in the RV016 to slot 1 then go out to the local network at location 1 and communicate with an application server on LAN 1.

  Help, please.

  You can't do that with a RV016. The RV016 only supports layer 3 tunnel. This means that the two ends are different networks with different subnets. The traffic between them is not filled.

  If you want to really two bridged networks, i.e. join in a single LAN with a single IP subnet and a single broadcast domain you need a layer 2 tunnel, for example a tunnel L2TPv3. That works on layer 2, which is on the MAC addresses inside your networks. In this way, you can use the same IP subnet at both ends and on each side, it seems that the other side is connected to the same ethernet network.

  The RV016 does not support the tunneling of layer 2. You can create an IPSec tunnel, which is layer 3. If there is really a need for a tunnel layer 2, you get different devices. I recommend that you evaluate if a layer 2 connection is really necessary or not.

• Cisco RV016 failover & load balance Multi WAN question

  Hello

  I think the RV016 is the camera to buy for our small building, but I'm a bit confused in the manual if my scheduled configuration is possible, so if you could confirm if this is possible I would appreciate it.

  We have a leased line as our main connection (lets call him WAN1). If this connection is not available, I don't want to load balance to any other network WAN.

  We have 2 netgear 4G devices identical (we'll call WAN 2 and 3 WAN). If the leased line is not available, I would like to then load balance these two WAN connections.

  Then I have a final connection, WAN4 as a slow adsl line. I don't know right now if I want to load balance this WAN1 or just have it as a backup to WAN2 and WAN3 failure (WAN2 and WAN3 have a 20 GB data limit each on their monthly allowance of the contract, if the leased line is down for more than a couple of days, what is unfortunately already happened) (then we reached this limit and then there is charged with extremely expensive data or just use the only ADSL)

  In any case, it's normal, I want to balance the load. I want to only load balance WAN3 and WAN2 WAN1 fails.

  Anyone know if this is possible? If not, is there any other similar device which would be appropriate?

  Thank you

  Ben

  Hi Bencarroll01,

  With RV016 you can get what you need.

  RV016 supports up to 7 WAN connection, and there are two mode of operation

  • Swing smart (Auto Mode): This option allows you to balance traffic between all interfaces increase the available bandwidth. The router balance traffic between the weighted alternating interfaces.
  • Group of IP (by users): Select this option for trafficking group on each WAN interface by levels of priority or classes of service (CoS). With this feature, you can ensure the bandwidth and a more high priority for specified services and users. All traffic that is not added to the IP group uses Intelligent balancing mode. To specify the services and users, click modify for the WAN interface and then add the entries of binding protocol for each service, IP address or IP address range.

  For our case, we must have RV016 configured with IP Group(By User), so in this case, we can configure binding protocol that we can specify and force all traffic from any IP address of the local network outside through WAN1. and any other WAN connection they always towards the TOP but not the traffic passing through them

  Now if WAN1 is down, immediately the rule to redirect traffic WAN 1 will be disabled and all traffic will pass through the rest of the WAN connection

  After that if the WAN1 is once again the binding protocol rule will be active again and again all the traffic will be done by WAN 1

  Please let me know if you have any other questions

  Please rate this post or marked as replied to help other customers of Cisco

  Greetings

  Mehdi

• RV016 and WAP321 with a network of comments

  I have two Cisco WAP321 AP and Cisco RV016 router.

  I use the RV016 as the DHCP server for the network.

  I would like to use the guest SSID mapped to a VLAN to issolate it the rest of the network.

  How can I configure the RV016 to carry the traffic of the customer both VLANS and VLAN internal internet while using it as a DHCP server.

  Thanks for any help.

  John McArthur

  Hey, it's essentially a non supported configuration. RV016 port supports only function VLAN and 1 single DHCP scope. If you want a staggered VLAN comments with the router something like a layer 3 switch must be put in place between the router and the AP to accommodate this configuration.

• RV016 referral of these two networks

  I've got configuration of port forwarding on a RV016, but it works only WAN2.  All incoming traffic on WAN1 have passed.  I had the impression that the transfer rules apply to both WAN ports?  Several subnets are enabled, WAN2 is allocated a subnet (ironically) the transmission is not in.  I also tried UPnP (for port forwarding, with UPnP disabled), but not joy.  Anyone got any ideas?

  Hi Tony,.

  Reverse the connections WAN 1 and 2, and then see if the problem follows the ISP or WAN ports. If it follows the ISP, you will need to contact for assistance. If it is the router, I would recommend that you contact the technical support and an engineer take a look at your settings.

  www.Cisco.com/go/SBSC

  -Marty

• RV016 - Dual WAN & Secure connection problem

  I have settings wrong my RV016 upward to allow connections secured on our server. I have searched the forums and read a lot of posts and it seems that the protocol binding is the answer, but I can't make it work.

  We have a static double-WAN with 5 IPs configuration on our slow connection (a cable modem, 1 WAN) and a dynamic IP address on our fast (FIOS, 2 WAN). I use special NAT to send all incoming traffic on a static (on WAN 1) to static IP internal IP of our server. We use intelligent load balancing and (by a message I read) I turned off the detection of Network Service on the two networks.

  When I try to SSH from outside the server, I get through: I get a password and, if I get the wrong password I'm re - you are prompted for the password. But when I enter the password of the connection hangs. When I unplug WAN 2 I can connect on SSH without problem.

  I tried implementing binding protocol as follows: I created a service for SSH (TCP/22 ~ 22) and added to WAN 1. I remembered to turn it on. I played with a different IP address ranges, but nothing works (it is where I am a little out of my League). Here is what I tried:

  • Internal IP of the server at all: 10.10.10.10 ~ 10.10.10.10(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)
  • internal subnet at all: 10.10.10.2 ~ 10.10.10.254(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)

  In a lot of posts I read that binding protocol has solved bad people to a connection secure. What I am doing wrong?

  Thank you

  Alex

  Hi Alex, I think one thing that you should really consider is the DMZ to see if it localized to a problem of double-WAN or not. If the problem follows with two WAN upward in the DMZ, I agree there is something which perhaps does not properly.

  Another argument may be, if you are the type of thinking somehow that load balancing is messing things up, link ALL SERVICE for the server to a specific WAN, don't let not limited just a port. That can also give an idea, especially if the server works as expected.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Cisco RV016 not so Intelligent Balancer

  Hi all

  We have a problem with our routers of Cisco RV016 (we have 12 of them).

  Somehow the routers keep switching randomly between internet connections. (2-3 connections per router)

  We want to completely disable the load balancing and just use the internet connection from 2nd to 3rd as a failover (when the 1st connection is down)

  Load balancing breaks the session clients because the Middle session IP switch.

  Does anyone have a solution to this problem?

  We cannot deploy them like this and our distributor does not resume the boxes unopened with routers.

  We use:

  Firmware version: v4.2.2.08 (April 26, 2013 19:12:26)

  Kind regards

  Hi Wouter,

  We had the same problem. What I have done, is to create a rule in [System Management] - [Dual WAN] - [WAN 1--> configuration].

  The following rules are in my system:

  All traffic [TCP & UDP/1 ~ 65535]-> 192.168.1.1 ~ 192.168.1.254(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0) [active] WAN1

  All traffic [TCP & UDP/1 ~ 65535]-> 192.168.1.1 ~ 192.168.1.254(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0) [active] WAN2

  The rest of the settings:

  Enable Network Service detection: Yes

  Number of retries: 5

  Retry timeout: 30 seconds

  Case of failure: keep the system log and remove the connection

  Only [remote-host] checked with value 8.8.8.8

  Especially the setting with the remote host, the value 8.8.8.8 is important.

  Of course, it is possible to adjust it to the IP address of the modem, but this only works if the complete modem is turned off. For failover when the internet connection is down, assigning 8.8.8.8 works.

  Hope this helps you.

• RV016 split support VPN tunnel?

  I read a rumor that the RV016 does not support split VPN tunnels.

  See here:

  http://www.SmallNetBuilder.com/lanwan/lanwan-reviews/31525-Cisco-RV082-and-RV016-v3-VPN-routers-reviewed

  My understanding is that on my router RV042 VPN tunnels will send internet traffic to the local gateway and send the traffic through the VPN tunnel only if they are intended for the remote subnet.  It is my understanding of the "split tunnel".

  Is it not true with the RV016?

  Your understanding on split tunnel is correct. RV016 behaves like RV042 in this regard.

• RV016 routing

  Hi all

  I just bought a new brilliant RV016 router. I have a connection to the Internet at xxx.200.139.197; a single IP connection. However, I have a routed subnet of 204.174.204.0/23 through that IP connection. In other words, for 204.174.204.0/23 traffic is routed to xxx.200.139.197.

  Now I want to configure my router RV016 to manage traffic for 204.174.204.0/23 (or I can set it up in two class C subnets if required, or more small subnets if necessary or desirable). In the 'old days' when I did it in the command line, I would simply have two IP addresses to a single interface, and that's the road would exist.

  How can I configure this range with the RV016?

  Thank you

  Richard

  Hello Richard,.

  I think I understand what you're trying to do.

  If you go to---> NETWORK SETTINGS, then go down to LAN settings, it will give you the option to add a different subnet. Just add the subnet of 204.174.204.0/23. I don't know if you've tried or not. Just give it a try and see if this resolves your first question.

  I hope this helps.

• How can I calculate the amount of download and upload traffic within a single session?

  Hi, I would like to calculate how much the traffic of data (in bytes) that I use a session (time).
  Mind you, I speak not of connection speed.
  I guess I have sum download traffic to forward traffic, but I don't know where I can find it in my Firefox or my OS, and Linux.
  Can you help me?

  This is due to the use of a provider with a download bandwidth limits?

  There is an Extension Point called 'Net use'
  https://addons.Mozilla.org/firefox/addon/NET-usage-item/
  http://netusage.iau5.com/

• How stop imagies to record traffic.

  How stop imagies to record traffic. I have only 200 MB per month. This is 38.0.1 version.
  Sorry for my languige? I'm not American.

  • Image block: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/image-block/
  • ImgLikeOpera: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/imglikeopera/

• Turning on links sends the traffic to the address

  OS Mavericks, 38.0.1 Firefox.

  When I roll over any link on a page Web Little Snitch throws an alert that Firefox attempts to send traffic to the address associated with the link. This is the new behavior in the last month.

  I don't have this problem with the Safari browser.

  Hello, please see the section "read-ahead" How to stop Firefox to make automatic connections

• outbrain on ios traffic

  All the world began to see traffic outbrain appearing in Safari on their iPhone? When I click a link on a site of newspapers I see momentarily otraffic outbrain are contained in the URL. What I've read, I don't want it on my phone and discussed ways to eliminate, but nothing is there for phones. Any thoughts?

  Try resetting Safari. Close Safari completely from the window of the selector app by double clicking the Home button and slide up the preview pane of Safari until it disappears from the display. Then go to settings > Safari > clear the history and data from the Web site. Then perform a forced reboot. Hold down the home and Sleep/Wake buttons simultaneously for about 15-20 seconds , until the Apple logo appears.

• BitDefender traffic light not working not not in the Firefox browser

  I just started using the Firefox browser and have noticed that my Bitdefender traffic light function no longer works (it worked with I.E. and Opera browsers). This function checks Web sites when you perform a search and displays a green checkmark if Bitdefender thinks that the site is safe to access. I really like it and would like to know how to run in Firefox or Firefox does not support this?

  Download and use Bitdefender fires Addon

  • https://addons.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/addon/TrafficLight/

• Unable to access SSL Web site when company proxy use man-in-the-middle attack to scan SSL traffic

  Our company uses a proxy server that analyzes the SSL traffic on web sites. This is done via man-in-the-middle attack. The proxy generates a new certificate on the fly that it sends to the client, impersonate a secure server.
  After upgrading from Firefox 10.0, I always get error:
  Error HTTP Status: 400 Bad Request
  After the confirmation of a security exception.

  Maybe this is related to the difficulties of the attack of the BEAST bug (browser exploit against SSL/TLS)

  • bug 702111 - intolerant servers to record split of 1: n-1. "The connection was reset" (see also the comment 60)