WinXPx64 6core i7 machine running a single processor. Is winXPx64 a multiprocessor system?

Similar Questions

• Always a single processor, processor two core stays at or near 100%

  Always a single processor, a two processor core stays at or near 100% with no application and only MS services has helped start. The visuals attached to performance. Clean install of Win 7 Pro less than a month ago. 4 GB of RAM. Resources, illustrated with the system/NT kernel using 50% of the capacity of the CPU (or 78% + CPU).

  Lot of window dressing (pun intended) answers, but no reason for the problem and how to fix actually.

  Hi JS Carey,.

  Thanks for posting your question in the Microsoft Community forum. I understand that a CPU remains at 100%. I would like to help solve you the problem.

  1. What is the brand and model of the computer?

  2. what security software is installed?

  3. is the computer connected to a network domain?

  To resolve this issue, follow these methods:

  Method 1.

  Execute this resolution of performance problems and check the status.

  Difficulty of Windows system performance slow computer problems: http://support.microsoft.com/mats/slow_windows_performance/en-us

  Method 2

  Start the computer in safe mode and check the status.

  Advanced startup options (including safe mode): http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/Advanced-startup-options-including-safe-mode

  Method 3.

  Run a full scan of the computer with the Microsoft Safety Scanner to make sure that the computer is virus-free.

  Microsoft safety scanner: http://www.microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx

  Warning of Security Scanner: there could be a loss of data while performing an analysis using the Microsoft safety scanner to eliminate viruses as appropriate.

  Method 4.

  I suggest that you can exercise SFC scan and check if that helps. The SFC/SCANNOW command analyzes all protected system files and replaces incorrect versions with appropriate Microsoft versions.

  For more information how to make SFC / scan, please follow this link: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/929833

  Additional information.

  Optimize Windows 7 for better performance: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/optimize-windows-7-for-better-performance

  For any question related to Windows, please do not hesitate to contact us and we will be happy to help you.

• Running the Single Instance and RAC on the same server of different homes.

  Hi guys,.

  I already have 4 node RAC12c installed on OLE 6.

  I'm planing on some of my other 12 single instance databases on other migration for RAC nodes.

  Please correct me here if I am wrong...

  My understanding is that, to be able to use DBCA or rconfig for conversion of database instance RAC, the only instance and RAC cluster must run on the same server or machine node.

  Thanks to this understanding... Am planing on the installation of a binary single instance on one of my cluster node node1 say and then use RMAN to duplicate the single instance or just an RMAN restore from the node of the instance that is unique to this node1. Am capable of this plan must then use DBCA or rconfig to convert the CARS database.

  Now, my question is can I run a single instance and RAC on the same server for different homes with different database ports?

  2. for these unique instance that runs on the server RAC 1 node, can I use the RAC database listener that runs from the House of the grid or I have to create another auditor?

  Thank you in advance and also let me know if I can use DBCA or rconfig when the only instance and rac database are on separate nodes.

  K

  Fix. And that's what I would normally do. In general, I would have just an ORACLE_HOME directory that can be used by the punctual and RAC databases at the same time.

  See you soon,.
  Brian

• All virtual machines running on ESXi 5.1 statement of Rx packet loss

  Can some of you please do me a favor? Find a virtual machine of yours running on ESXi 5.1, preferably 1117900 and let me know if you see a Rx packet loss in performance stats vCenter provides. Each single VM in my environment records packet loss. Virtual machines running on ESXi 5.0 are not related that at all. This also isn't a problem at the level of the host that there is no loss of package noted it.

  This is a known bug-

  http://KB.VMware.com/kb/2052917

• Virtual machine has 8 virtual processors, but the host only supports 4... ?

  Hello

  My setup is a VSphere cluster with 4 guests each with:

  E5450 3.00 Ghz Dual Xeon Quad & 32 GB of Ram.

  I run a number of virtual machines, mainly Windows 2003 Server Enterprise. Most of them is running on 2 or 4 virtual processors.

  I tried to create a new virtual machine with virtual cpu 6 or 8 and 16 GB of ram. When I tried to turn on the virtual machine, I got the message below:

  Virtual machine has 8 virtual processors, but the host supports only 4. The number of virtual processors can be limited by the OS, etc...

  Now, I checked my licenses and they are for each host that I have:

  Company of VSphere 4. 1-6 cores per processor. 2 cpu by assigned host.

  Thus, it cannot be a problem with the license...

  Any ideas?

  Hello and welcome to the forums.

  The Enterprise Plus edition is required for vSMP 8 channels.  You can check in the vSphere editions comparison.  The Enterprise edition will be limited to 4 vCPUs.

  The 6 cores per processor refers to the ESX host itself and directly relate to the SMP virtual machine.

  Good luck!

• Virtual machines, run extremely slow when the console is consulted 2 virtual machines Windows Server 2008 64-bit, Windows Server 2003 32-bit, 2 VMWare for virtual machine

  I'm in a difficult situtaition here.  I am the daily contact with a new client.  My linux guy, who is also my boss who is very busy, asked me to do some research trying to find answers for what's not on this server. We have a dual Quad Core 2.5 Ghz Lenovo server with 10 GB of ram.  2 500 GB hard drives are Raid 1.  We run Virtual Server VMWare 2 on a Debian with Gnome installation as a user interface for the side of things Linux.  Grub is the boot loader. There are two virtual machines running on the server.  The one machine that serves as a domain controller is a Windows SBS 2008 Server 64 bit, and the secondary machine has no responsibility domain.  The second machine is a Windows Server 2003 32-bit.  the 10 GB of ram 6 GB is allocated to the SBS server and 4 GB to the 2003 server.

  The problem I am running into is that everything is so slow, especially if I connect remotely to do any sort of administration on the network.  Some examples of issues I've noticed is that as soon as I log on the server via Remote Desktop SBS console management Windows Server spike to 80-95% CPU usage and it will not stop unless I close the management console.  Another instance is that if I open Backup Exec 12.5 on the SBS server it will kill the speed of the processor as well.  Long story short, there are a lot of machine to do what we need to do, but something is not configured right and non of us know what it is.  Another point to note is that the server has been in production for about 3 weeks, and the server seemed to have locked up just twice.  My professional guess is that over time, some chose thing is eating causing the crash of the memory.

  Sorry I do not have much technical insight on this topic, but this is the best I have to offer.  Any questions you all have, I'll ask my people and see if I can answer, but I could really use your help here.

  Thank you in advance,

  Heath

  2 things:

  1 you really need hard drives more than 2 in a RAID 1 for proper performance under load. More disks the better. Although I don't think that's what your problem is, he'll probably be the problem Next you will do.

  2. I don't know exactly where the configuration file is on your box of Debian for VMware Server, but you should consider adding the following options in the configuration file (on windows, it's the vmware 'config.ini'):

  prefvmx.minVmMemPct = "100".

  MemTrimRate = 0

  sched.mem.pshare.Enable = "FALSE".

  mainMem.useNamedFile = "FALSE".

  If you do some research, you can read about what these options (the largest is the memory page sharing - it should only be left on if you have a bunch of similar virtual machines running on the same box, that you don't have.) I honestly know why this is on by default, he kills the CPU when virtual machines are running different operating systems). These are the options that I now use standard in VMware Server deployments, with huge performance increases after you have added the. Just give a try.

  Edit: Also make sure that you have installed in your virtual machines VMware tools.

  Dimitri Rodis

  Integrita Systems LLC

  http://www.integritasystems.com

• If I create a WinPE 2.0 distribution (Syslinux or PXElinux) which will take place on one of the machines running 'something Microsoft' what are the implications of license?

  The WinPE Licensing implications

  Hello

  I have a number of customers with machines that are fully licensed with XP, XPe or Vista.
  Each of these clients have a device that we have created, piloted by drivers custom within the OS.  The operating system will sometimes funny (corruption, etc.) causing the device to not function.
  I decided to create a diagnostic utility to check whether the fault is in the operating system, driver or device.  Because the fault could be deep in the operating system, the only way I can see to do is through WinPE
  I searched the net, but can do not seem to arrive at an acceptable legitimate answer... So here's my question.
  If I create a WinPE 2.0 distribution, either for CD, USB or chain loaded from Linux (Syslinux or PXElinux) which will take place on one of the machines running 'something Microsoft' what are the implications of license? Is it legal?
  Operating system licenses are not owned by us, but our customers if we do not have mass of licensing agreements or something like that.
  The plan is to create a unique distribution and add drivers to it that we encounter different machines.  I know it's frowned upon to speak Hirens on a MS site, but something similar to that (I won't use Hirens because I want that it is completely legitimate)
  I called him to the reading of the license with WAIK, but can do not seem to find anything about this.
  Thank you

  Hello

  This is not a question of normal consumption. I suggest you to contact our Legal Department for legal terms Express. http://www.Microsoft.com/about/legal/en/us/default.aspx

  I also suggest that you send your query in TechNet and check.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/operationsmanagergeneral/threads

• When I start the machine, continuous hard drive work for almost 1/2 hour, meanwhile if I open a program, the machine runs very slowly. Help solve the problem please

  I have wndow XP Home edition service pack 3 installed on my lap top. When I start the computer the hard drive continues to work for almost 1/2 hour; Meanwhile, if I open IE, or any program, the machine runs very slowly and I just can not open the program up until the drive hard light is off. Please help solve the problem

  How much RAM you have on your system? (Right click on "My Computer"-> properties)

  As a general rule, Windows XP does not work well if you have less than 1 GB or more of RAM.  What usually happens is that your RAM capacity is exceeded leading to overflow on virtual memory (the drive) to compensate for the need of RAM in the computer.  This causes your system to beat on your hard drive and slow down your system.

  If this is your problem, the options are to increase the RAM on your system or decrease the non-essential programs that launch at startup on your computer using a tool like Autoruns.

  HTH,
  JW

• How is it that some machines running windows vista, when the router is updated or changed, they show "limited or local only" when you reconnect then wireless.

  problems with wireless Vista "local only".

  How is it that some machines running windows vista, when the router is updated or changed, they show "limited or local only" when you then reconnect wireless... nothing else was changed on those computers and other devices can connect ok?

  Hello

  Each router is assigned to the specific address (called IP address or IP address). And each router maintains its own database (called as base of router) to follow the networking devices communicate with him. When the router is changed, the particular router is unable to detect the device, especially the network card to communicate with the computer.  Since he does not have details of the database of network devices, communicate with him.

  • You are able to access the Internet?

  Try the steps mentioned below and check:

  Method 1:

  Step 1: Enable or disable a network adapter and then check:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-CA/Windows-Vista/enable-or-disable-a-network-adapter

  Step 2: Run Network Diagnostic tool and check:

  Network connection issues: http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/troubleshoot-network-connection-problems

  Method 2: Wi - Fi and in Windows network connection issues:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/wired-and-wireless-network-connection-problems-in-Windows

  Reference links:

  Of network connectivity status incorrectly as 'Local' only on a Windows Server 2008 or Windows Vista-based: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/947041

  Setting up a wireless network: http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/setting-up-a-wireless-network

  Connection to wireless with Windows Vista: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb878035.aspx

  Hope it works.

• PowerEdge T610 maximum RAM with single processor

  Hello

  I would like to know is Server PowerEdge T610 capable of supporting some 196 (12x16Go) GB of RAM with Intel Single Xeon E5645 2.40 GHz processor?

  Thank you.

  Kind regards

  Stanley

  Not a chance.

  The T610 supports 192 GB ONLY with the populous processors AND the latest version of the BIOS.  The reason is that the memory controller is on the processor, so if you have only one populated, while half of the slots in the system memory can be used - six locations associated with the populous processor.  With a single processor, 96GB (6x16Go) is the maximum.  More old BIOS do not support 16 GB DIMMS, so remember to update the BIOS (and other firmware system) BEFORE the update to any configuration using 16 GB DIMMS.

• Extend a datastore in vCenter with virtual machines running

  We have expanded our Volume and unit number logic on our NetApp SATA VMStore from 2 TB to 4 TB, we now want to expand in vCenter, I'm ok to do this within office hours, while VMS are running on the data store?

  Going via configuration - storage - etc etc...

  It should be good. Off-peak hours are preferable, because you must make playback etc.

  This will not affect the virtual machine running inside.

  Unless there is a particular requirement, why not go with 2 TB Lun? I mean add another 2 TB logical unit number rather than add a measure?

• Impossible to reconnect to a virtual machine running

  Hello

  I removed decadent a virtual machine running in the inventory.

  The machine virtual is critical and cannot be stopped.

  When I try to browse the data store the option "add to the inventory" is grayed out.

  How can I reconnect it to the inventory?

  Thank you

  Boaz

  Alternatively, you can try to reboot the virtual machine in vCenter:

  1 vim - cmd vmsvc/getallvms

  2 vim - cmd vmsvc/reload xx
  (xx is the VMID provided by the first command)

• Virtual machine has 12 virtual processors, but the host only supports 8?

  Hi all I am using ESX 5.1 and have a machine Windows 2012 R2 Standard of virtual (vmx-09) comments that I'm moving to 8 processors to 12 processors.  But when I turn on the virtual machine after changing the UC 12 I get the error message

  "Virtual Machine has 12 virtual processors, but the host only supports 8. The number of virtual processors can be limited by the selected guest OS for the virtual machine or the granting of licenses for the host".

  Now, I know that 2012 R2 Standard Windows can handle 12 processors and I thought that ESX 5.1 could also, but I'm wrong?  This is the Standard of vSphere license 5.  Thank you!

  Hello

  vSphere 5.1 Standard license has a 8 vCPU per VM limit.

  Company = 32 vCPU

  Business + 64 vCPU

  You must upgrade to vSphere 5.5. This can be done with your vSphere license 5, as it is for all versions 5.X of vSphere and vCPU limit has been deleted in 5.5.

  So you can have as many vCPU per VM that your host has logical cores.

  Tim

• Virtual machine running on snapshot but there are no spanpshot on the Snapshot Manager.

  Hi all,

  After a backup with VMware Data Recovery failure (error-3960 cannot suspend virtual machine), I have a virtual machine running on snapshot (see attachment) but there is no snapshot on the Snapshot Manager. Is the command to "consolidate" (I have never used this feature) the solution?

  Thank you.

  Marco.

  OK let me explain.

  As the chain of snapshot is not displayed in snapshot Manager, you can correct this problem in two ways.

  1 engage the snapshot command line. If you are uncomfortable in the command line, follow this KB KB VMware: commit snapshots on ESXi host command line if you are not comfortable follow step 2.

  2. create a new snapshot for this virtual machine (this will create a chain of snapshot, and you can see the snapshot in the Snapshot Manager), once the snapshot is created successfully. You can remove the snapshot in the Snapshot Manager.

  Hope this is clear. Let me know if not

• "Error: failed to get the IP address of the destination virtual machine running the converter to assistance server." with a static IP address

  Hi all

  I'm trying to p2v linux 6.4. It fails with the following message is displayed:

  Error: Cannot get the IP address of the virtual destination machine running the converter assistance server.

  I have seen discussions on this message, but they all refer to dynamic IP address, taken from DHCP, as in my case, I use static IP address.

  In the meantime the p2v (which then breaks down...) I open console support machine and saw a message:

  
  

  eth0 is not a recognized interface.

  Can someone tell me what is happening?

  Hello

  I assume you are using converter 5.5. There is a new feature that allows the selection of the network card. However, it works well in the case of Linux P2V. If you have changed the type of adapter, use 'e1000' or 'auto' and try again.

  HTH

  Plamen