WS-C3750G-48PS-S
I want to test 48 ports of 3750 past at the same time, is there a command to test these port without using a single-port Cat5 cable?
To test the physical ports you need something trendy, snack, it is damage to the pins on the interface.
Tags: Cisco Support
Similar Questions
-
Hi all
I have a cisco model c3750G-24TS - S switch.
My switch is not able to boot itself.
I'm in switch: mode.
When I flash fire of dir: command then it shows
switch: dir flash:
Unable to startCrashinfo files have been created.Switch: Real flash:Directory of flash: /.2 - rwx 11494274c3750-ipbase9 - mz.122 - 53.SE2.bin 3 dwrx 896crashinfo_ext 4 - rwx 1048multiple-fs 6 dwrx 6464crashinfo Tell me how to remove the full flash.Also I tried to delete/force/recursive flash: / crashinfoCannot delete % (is a directory)switch: remove/force flash: / crashinfo
Are you sure you want to remove ' / force ' (y/n)? There
File ' / force ' not cancelled - no such device
Are you sure you want to remove "flash: / crashinfo" (y/n)? There
File "flash: / crashinfo" not cancelled - is a directoryI tried to do everything.but no luck.Kindly advice me.2 - rwx 11494274
c3750-ipbase9 - mz.122 - 53.SE2.bin Console in the switch and restart. After all the startup process.
In my view, that the IOS file is damaged or is not complete.
-
Dear Bro
I'm working on the Cisco SMB partner. I'm not clear about PoE + on this Cisco.
Incidentally kindly please give me what port number that support PoE + Switch Cisco 220 - 48 p.
Better compliance
Chan
The data sheet States:
Switches are supported 802.3af and 802.3at standard pre Cisco (legacy) PoE on port 1 to port 4 with a maximum power of 30W per port; switches are supported 802.3af and standard pre Cisco (legacy) PoE on other RJ-45 ports with a maximum power of 15.4 W per port
This applies to all models compatible PoE; the maximum number of PoE ports feeds simultaneously is determined by the total budget of PoE for the switch and the requirement of the real power of the devices of PD
The total power available for PoE switch is as follows:
Model name
Dedicated to PoE power
Number of Ports that support the PoE
SF220 - 24 P
180 W
24
SF220 - 48P
375 W
48
SG220 - 26
180 W
24
SG220 - 50 P
375 W
Poe + is also called 802.3at
-
rrack mounting brackets for Cisco switch SF300 - 48P?
Does anyone know how to get grid mounting brackets for switch Cisco SF300 - 48P?
You might be able to get them through the support of Cisco. Check this thread: https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11201291/sf-300-series-rack-m...
-
The groups C3750G and object based ACL
Hi all
East of the groups of objects based ACL Supportepar C3750G switches? I found nothing on the web site of Cisco on this subject.
Hi All,
Is Object Groups based ACLs supported on C3750G switches? I could not find anything on the Cisco web site about this.
Hello
Check out the link on the subject below Group ACL, it is supported with 12.4 (20) T realease but I do not think that it is supported with cisco 3750G switch series, what I see navigator in cisco. Hope Uncle helps!
So useful note valauble post
Ganesh.H
-
SF200 48P... Need some advice
Hello and thank you for reading my post.
I currently have a small network that looks like this... SMC cable modem (with static IP) > RVO16 > connected to some computers and printers > 4 port linksys switch > connect multiple PCs and POS.
What A location.
I have another place that looks like this... Cable modem (dynamic IP) > RVO82 > connected to computers, printers and the POS.
What location B.
The locations are connected by a tunnel that is used daily and intensively.
Here are the changes that will happen at A location, I have purchased ip phones and we'll be adding several new computers, printers. all to be connected to the new SF200 48P I bought. It was mainly for ip phones and the POE ports, but looks like it should work well for the whole of the network.
Should I be setting up small VLANs to say each office which will consist of one IP address and telephone, computer and printer..., there will be about 8-10 like this.
I want to keep offices and connected places and maintain security at a good level. I need quality of Service for ip phones.
Not really sure if I should use the RVO16.
Also wondered if maybe the RV180W-A-K9-NA would be a good choice instead of the RVO16 because it also has VPN.
I intend to update location B with a new switch, IP phones, computers and printers as well. (next year as cost is the factor of this year)
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Thank you
Steve
Hi Steve, the RV016 supports multiple subnets and VLANS based left only.
The RV180 much better address this traffic because it supports the 802. 1 q VLAN.
-Tom
Please evaluate the useful messages -
Small businesses-ESW-520-48P-K9
I need to decide on a few things about this switch before recommending this option to my client. I have the following questions that I need expert advice.
Questions
1.) this switch supports POE 15.4 on all 48 10/100 ports (ESW-520-48P-K9). The total nominal power of this switch is only 370W and if it divided with 48 ports, each port can drive only 7W. So therefore the confusion.
2.) / * style Definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name: "Table Normal" "; mso-knew-rowband-size: 0; mso-knew-colband-size: 0; mso-style - noshow:yes; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-style-parent:" ";" mso-padding-alt: 0 to 5.4pt 0 to 5.4pt; mso-para-margin: 0; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; do-size: 10.0pt; do-family: "Times New Roman", "serif" ;} "} The series may be monitored and managed using Ciscoworks LMS ESW?
3.) MGBSX1 is compatible with GLC-SX-MM
Thank you.
I need to decide on few things regarding this switch before recommending this switch to my customer. I have the following questions that i need some expert advice.
Questions
1.) Does this switch support POE 15.4W on all 48 10/100 ports (ESW-520-48P-K9). The total power rating of this switch is only 370W and if this divided with 48 ports, each port can only drive 7W. So thus the confusion.
2.) Can the ESW Series be Monitored and Managed using Ciscoworks LMS?
3.) Is MGBSX1 compatible with GLC-SX-MM
Thanks.
Hello
Please see the attached document for your queries!
Hope to help!
Ganesh.H
Don't forget to note the useful message
-
I'm not able to implement a roadmap for an interface VLAN on this three switch layer.
Switch:
WS-C3750G-12 S
IOS:
C3750-ipservicesk9 - mz.122 - 53.SE2
Route map Config:
access-list 151 allow the host ip 10.1.0.11 everything
!
TEST allowed 10 route map
corresponds to the IP 151
set ip jump following x.x.x.x (Public IP)
Used command.
interface VLAN2
IP route-matches of TEST strategies
I also do a show run all | I have the interface Vlan 2 and there is no config hidden for this too. Does not support this version of IOS.
I suspect it's because your other switches in the stack are not 3750-12s switch?
3750-12s switch running the model of aggregation by default but all other 3750 s cannot run office model.
Then on the master can try this-
"sdm prefer routing Office."
and then charge again.
Jon
-
Pass a license Base of LAN IP based on a battery of WS-C3750X-48P-L
Hello
I have two switches WS-C3750X-48P-L with LAN licenses stacked. I want to upgrade the license on each of the LAN Base to Base of IP.
Me am .lic files from Cisco partner and stored in flash:
Flash #dir shan2021:
Directory of flash: /.442 - rwx 13260 April 1, 2011 13:48:20 + 02:00 config.text
443 - rwx 1936 1 March 1993 02:53:30 + 01:00 vlan.dat
444 - rwx 1152 1 March 1993 03:01:55 + 01:00 FD01503Z1C5_20110330204317053.lic
445 - rwx 1152 1 March 1993 03:08:14 + 01:00 FD01503R0WU_20110330204634394.lic
447 - rwx 1909 1st April 2011 13:48:20 + 02:00 private - config.text
drwx 2 512 1 March 1993 01:16:57 + 01:00 c3750e-universalk9 - mz.122 - 53.SE2
448 - rwx 3096 1 April 2011 13:48:20 + 02:00 multiple-fstotal 57671680 bytes (40040448 bytes free)
shan2021 #.Tried to upgrade with orders
shan2021 #license install flash: FD01503Z1C5_20110330204317053.lic
Installation of licenses from "flash: FD01503Z1C5_20110330204317053.lic.
% Error: installation failed. UDI WS - C3750X - 48 P - L:FD01503Z1C5 on the license does not correspond to any device
0/1 licenses have been installed correctly
0/1 licenses were existing licenses
1/1 licences have been impossible to installshan2021 #.
shan2021 #license install flash: FD01503R0WU_20110330204634394.lic
Installation of licenses from "flash: FD01503R0WU_20110330204634394.lic.
% Error: installation failed. UDI WS - C3750X - 48 P - L:FD01503R0WU on the license does not correspond to any device
0/1 licenses have been installed correctly
0/1 licenses were existing licenses
1/1 licences have been impossible to installshan2021 #.
But it does not work. The IDUs seems to be correct:
shan2021 #sho license udi
SN UDI device # PID
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* 1 FDO1503Z1C5 WS-C3750X-48P-L WS-C3750X-48 P - L:FDO1503Z1C5
2 FDO1503R0WU WS-C3750X-48P-L WS-C3750X-48 P - L:FDO1503R0WUshan2021 #.
Guessed that maybe because they are stacked the process does not work, so was by restarting the other and tried to update the license on the first during the restart of the second, but it doesn't work anymore.
I did not have physiqueet access to the switches, so can not try to remove the battery cables.
Nobody knows, including at - it a special order to upgrade the license in which case the basis of LAN 3750 X switches are stacked?
I know that the upgrade on a standalone switch works fine, I tried on another.
According to me, the .lic files are okay, looked at them and they seem to be wrong.
Here's the full sho VER
shan2021 #sho worm
Cisco IOS software, software of C3750E (C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2 (53) SE2, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc3)
Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Updated Thursday, April 21, 10 05:11 by prod_rel_team
Image text-base: 0 x 00003000, database: 0 x 02400000ROM: Bootstrap program is C3750E boot loader
BOOTLDR: C3750E Boot Loader (C3750X-HBOOT-M), Version 12.2 (53r) SE1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)shan2021 running time is 3 hours, 53 minutes
System to regain the power ROM
System restarted at 10:51:37 CEST Friday, April 1, 2011
System image file is "flash:/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-53.SE2/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-53.SE2.bin".This product contains cryptographic features and is under the United States
States and local laws governing the import, export, transfer and
use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply
third party approval to import, export, distribute or use encryption.
Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for
compliance with U.S. laws and local countries. By using this product you
agree to comply with the regulations and laws in force. If you are unable
to satisfy the United States and local laws, return the product.A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products to:
http://www.Cisco.com/WWL/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html you need assistance, please contact us by mail at
[email protected] / * / Level: lanbase
License type: Permanent
Then reload license level: lanbaseIf
License
WS-C3750X processor - 48P (PowerPC405) Cisco (revision A0) with 262144 K bytes of memory.
Card processor ID FDO1503Z1C5
Last reset of tension
2 virtual Ethernet interfaces
1 interface FastEthernet
104 gigabit Ethernet interfaces
4 ten interfaces Ethernet Gigabit
Password recovery mechanism is activated.512K bytes of memory simulated by flash not volatile configuration.
Basic Ethernet MAC address: C8:9 C: C of C to D: 5 1:7:00
Motherboard set number: 12553-73-04
Motherboard serial number: FDO15040UGP
Revision number of the model: A0
Motherboard revision number: A0
Model number: WS-C3750X-48P-L
Daughter numbered card: 800-32727-01
Daughterboard serial number: FDO15040SQM
System serial number: FDO1503Z1C5
Top Assembly part number: 800-31324-01
Top of page revision number of the Assembly: A0
Version ID: V01
CLEI Code number: COMJZ00ARA
Revision number of hardware consulting: 0x02SW Version SW Image model switch ports
------ ----- ----- ---------- ----------
* 1 WS-C3750X - 48 54P 12.2 SE2 (53) C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M
2 54 WS-C3750X - 48P 12.2 SE2 (53) C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-MSwitch 02
---------
Switch Uptime: 1 hour, 1 minute
Basic Ethernet MAC address: C8:9 C: D: 3 1: 39:80
Motherboard set number: 12553-73-04
Motherboard serial number: FDO15032371
Revision number of the model: A0
Motherboard revision number: A0
Model number: WS-C3750X-48P-L
Daughter numbered card: 800-32727-01
Daughterboard serial number: FDO1503153L
System serial number: FDO1503R0WU
Top of page Assembly part number: 800-31324-01
Top of page revision number of the Assembly: A0
Version ID: V01
CLEI Code number: COMJZ00ARA
License level: lanbase
License type: Permanent
Next time you restart level license: lanbaseConfiguration register is 0xF
shan2021 #.
shan2021 license #sho all the
License store: storage of main license
J:: function 0: lanbase Version: 1.0
License type: Permanent
The license status: Active, in use
License priority: medium
Number of licenses: not countedLicense store: Evaluation License storage
J:: function 0: ipservices Version: 1.0
License type: assessment
The license status: active, don't use, not accept EULA
The total period of assessment: 8 weeks 4 days
Assessment period left: 8 weeks 4 days
Priority of license: no
Number of licenses: not countedshan2021 #.
Need IP Base to add no-3750 X switch and also because of the power of the battery.
Assume that perhaps there is a specific license to add to a stack, something like command
switch to flash: FD01503Z1C5_20110330204317053.lic install 1 license
but have not found such a.Thank you much for the help.
Vlad
Hi Vlad,
Make sure that the correct UID of each device, including upper and lower case letters are used to generate the license key, otherwise it won't work.
Alternatively, you can generate yourself the keys by clicking on this link and loogin with your CCO account
https://Tools.Cisco.com/swift/licensing/RegistrationServlet
HTH
Reza
-
802. 1 x has no authentication with WS-C3750G-24 t
Hello
I've already implemented a lab including 1 x 2950-24 switch, 2 x 3750-24 t in the mode of stacking and 2 x MS domain controller with AD 2008 and NPS active (domain level 2008) servers. I use NPS as a Radius server. I'm testing the 802 framework. 1 x in both scenarios.
1. I use as a customer laptop domain with Windows XP SP3 with the integrated 802. 1 x MS begging. As authenticator use as authentication servers and 2950 switch, I use the two NPS integrated in MS DCs. everything works well as I predicted with basic configuration of Cisco & Microsoft guidelines.
2. I use as customer laptop domain with Windows XP SP3 with integrated 802. 1 x MS "supplicant" (the same as before). As authenticator, I use the pile of 3750 Switch and as authentication servers, I use the two NPS integrated into DCs MS (same as before). I configured the supplicant for authentication of the user or machine in both scenarios. However the customer never pass the authentication in the second. I unplug and plug the pleading even in the switch 2950 and the authentication is completed successfully. Back to the stack of 3750 authentication failure and the computer laptop network access in the configured Vlan Auth Failed. I tried several unsuccessful configuration changes. I don't understand why this is happening to you. I did a few debugs and I send them a long with a partial switch basic configuration 3750 battery.
If someone could check it out and offer something, it would be appreciated!
Thank you in advance!
Hello
interface or system jumbo mtu on your switch seems to be the value of 9000 bytes:
15:50:11.822 6 March: RADIUS: Framed-MTU [12] 6 9000
Try to include the Framed-MTU attribute (settings > attributes RADIUS > Standard > Add...) in your NPS policy and set the value of 1500.
Kind regards
Josef
-
N2000 and N3000 stacking cables
Hello
I have a small question.
0, 5 m, stacking of cables (N2000 and N3000 series) enough to connect the switches that are 2 RU independently of each other?
The plan is to have two panels of brewing between switches (24 p, 48p 2x24p, 48p, switch panel, switch panel,... and so on) and I'm not sure if 0, 5 m battery cables will be sufficient or do I go with cables of 1 m... on the pictures it looks like connectors are long enough and I'm not sure if 0.5 refers to the length of cable length of connectors witch included or not.
Kind regards
Jakub
Jakub
If the switches you are trying to stack are only 2RU apart, then all the support cables should work, including 0.5 m. With the help of a cable management system, stacking more cables such as 3 m can allow routing around the patch panel ports.
B
-
U2413, calibration solution Ultrasharp fails to connect to display via the USB port
Dell U2413 SN: CN-0YCM0F-72872-48P-A81L REV A01 August 2014
Try to run the ultrasharp Dell V1.5.3 on this monitor calibration solution, however, the software stops and displays "please connect the screen to your computer via a USB cable." I click the OK button after you have checked that the USB port on the computer is connected to the USB connection screen, but ultimately, this message appears:
"Could not establish a connection to the screen. Please make sure that the USB cable is connected and try again. »Has tried this on two different computers, running Windows Pro 8.1. One was connected to the monitor cable HDMI to DVI (Thinkpad 10 via docking station), the other using the provided Dell Display Port printer for (Tablet Thinkpad X 230) mini display port cable.
The USB ports on computers were connected the Dell supplied USB 3 cable to the monitor. Also tried this on a single computer by using a USB 2 port and a USB cable with the same result. The USB connections on the monitor seems to work ok when you plug a flash drive or the i1 Display Pro. Also, did a reset Monitor USB and verified that Windows has seen additional generic hubs when the USB Monitor is connected to the computer. There are 4 additional hubs when you use additional 2 usb hubs and USB 3 cable when using the USB 2 cable. In addition, power cycled the monitor several times (as recommended in the version that is known for this problem) without success.
Before the attempt to make the calibration:
A factory reset on the monitor.
Ran the monitor self test and SUBMISSION. No problem found.
Monitor purchased from Dell November 2014Same result with V1.5.7
Any suggestions? Where should I go from here?
I had success in the U2413 of profiling. I pulled out an old workhorse, a Thinkpad T43
under Windows XP. Then installed the ultrasharp Dell V1.5.3 calibration solution and all
updates available from Microsoft, but no other software - nothing of the Dell-supplied with
the monitor. Used the DVI - connection DVI and USB 3 cable supplied with the monitor. The
software Profiler has worked well with this configuration. When the program first took to the "Start
Screen measure"(where the problem occurs already noted) Windows (message status bar)
has reported that he accessed software Realtek 3.0. So I focused on research at the Realtek
software on other systems.On the Thinkpad 10. There were two 1. "Realtek Card Reader" and 2. «Realtek USB 2.0 Card Reader» I have
removed both and reinstalled the software Realtek for Dell monitor CD. Insert an SD card and
a USB in the monitor and both were seen by Windows Explorer. There was also a Realtek USB
3.0 card reader to showing in Manager devices under USB controllers. Using the connections between the T10 to monitor previously described the Profiler software, then ran normally.X 230 - I removed the "Realtek Card Reader" (V6.2.9600.30168) software and tried to start the
Software Profiler and it does not at the same point as before. Then I installed the Realtek USB 2.0
Software for the Dell card reader. However, there was still no Realtek USB 3.0 card reader
display in the Manager of devices under USB controllers. Software Profiler is not like before. I then
inserted an SD card in the monitor and the "Realtek USB Card Reader 3.0" appeared in the device
Manager. Software Profiler, then ran normally.So now my two systems Windows 8.1 software profiling will not work if the 'Realtek USB 3.0 Card '.
Reader"is not listed in Device Manager. To do this the software must be installed (for example
starting from the Dell CD) AND an SD card must be inserted into the SD slot on the monitor. Remove the SD card
Card and the device disappears and profiling software will not run. Insert an SD card and the
Software Profiler works normally.How can I get the "Realtek USB 3.0 card reader ' to automatically load before running the Profiler software?
-
Redirect WCCP and Performance hit on 3750
Maybe it's more of a "resizing" qtn more than anything else.
Yesterday, I activated wccp redirect on a stack of distribution has collapsed/3750 of base, in an office with 150users. WAI is model 612.
As soon as the configuration of the redirect has been applied, I found the network slowing significantly and received an event alert CPU of NEM, reports that CPU on 3750 stack exceeds the set threshold (65%). Put the threshold on the one hand, the cli is terribly slow and so I removed immediately redirect to the relevant interfaces. He bought the network back to normal in terms of performance.
Is this a calibration problem or maybe a bad configuration or something else...?
WAE:
EDGE-WAE-01 #show worm
Cisco Wide Area Application Services (WAAS) software
Copyright (c) 1999-2009 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cisco Wide Area Application Services Software Release 4.1.3 (build b55 April 18, 2009)
Version: oe612 - 4.1.3.5500:13:45 compiled April 18, 2009 by cnbuild
System has been restarted on Tue Apr 27 04:30:10 2010.
The system was 6 hours, 21 minutes, 0 seconds.EDGE-WAE-01 #show inv
PID: WAE-612-K9 VID: 0 SN: KQLLZBL
EDGE-WAE-01 #sh worm
Cisco Wide Area Application Services (WAAS) software
Copyright (c) 1999-2009 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cisco Wide Area Application Services Software Release 4.1.3 (build b55 April 18, 2009)
Version: oe612 - 4.1.3.5500:13:45 compiled April 18, 2009 by cnbuild
System has been restarted on Tue Apr 27 04:30:10 2010.
The system was 6 hours, 31 minutes, 8 seconds.EDGE-WAE-01 # poster run | WCCP Inc.
WCCP router-list of the 1 10.10.50.1
WCCP promiscuity of tcp router-list-num 1 l2-redirect
WCCP version 2
!
evacuation-method interception-method wccp negotiated return!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3750:
edge-cre-01 #show sdm prefer
The current model is "routing Office" model.
The chosen model optimizes resources in
the switch to sustain this level of features for
8 routed interfaces and 1024 VLANS.!
processor of WS-C3750G-24TS-1U (PowerPC405) Cisco (revision F0) with K 131072 bytes of memory.
512K bytes of memory simulated by flash not volatile configuration.
SW Version SW Image model switch ports
------ ----- ----- ---------- ----------
* WS-C3750G-24TS-1U 12.2 1 28 (50) SE3 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
2 28 WS-C3750G-24TS-1U 12.2 SE3 (50) C3750-IPSERVICESK9-MSwitch 02
---------------Switch availability: 3 days, 4 hours, 39 minutes
Configuration register is 0xF
edge-cre-01 # poster run | WCCP Inc.
61 TN-WAAS-OUT list redirect IP WCCP
62 TN-WAAS-IN redirect-list IP WCCP!
edge-cre-01 #show run | start the standard TN-WAAS-OUT ip access list
Standard TN-WAAS-OUT of access list IP
10.10.10.0 permit 0.0.1.255
permit 10.10.25.0 0.0.0.255
!
TN-WAAS-IN extended IP access list
permit tcp 10.20.0.0 0.1.255.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.1.255
permit tcp 10.20.0.0 0.1.255.255 10.10.25.0 0.0.0.255
permit tcp 10.128.16.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.1.255Here is a list of best practices to follow to do forwarding of wccp on hardware platforms such as the 3750. I found it in the link below.
http://www.Cisco.com/Web/services/news/ts_newsletter/tech/ChalkTalk/archives/200806.html
The following best practices should be applied to the implementation of WCCP on a hardware platform:
- L2 transfer
- Assignment of mask
- Interception of incoming traffic
- No ' exclude ip wccp redirect in.
Your configuration "output method negotiated return of interception-method wccp" will appeal to a WCCP GRE tunnel to create of the 3750 to CAI. All traffic will be then be redirected a software based on this configuration line.
"Game of negotiated return as the method of evacuation. With this specification, the Cisco WAE uses GRE to return traffic redirected to the router intercepting. Note: in this case, WCCP negotiated WCCP GRE return method. »
I'd stick to best practices that Zach has described in the link at the beginning of this post. It's a very well written on the WCCP redirect article.
Concerning
-
Command switchport mode access
Hello
I was curious about the switchport mode access command and its interoperability with the switchport command in vlan voice.
If I set up a switchport with the switchport mode access commmand, which will make it impossible for the switchport create a trunk special cases with the IP phone? Even if I set up switchport vlan speech?
And if so, the port should be configured as switchport mode dynamic auto? Or desirable?
Thank you, Pat
Pat, you can configure a port as an access port, add the configuration of vlan voice and connect a phone and another device. The trunk will form. With the "vlan voice" Cisco obscures the fact that forms a trunk. I don't necessarily agree with this strategy, and it wasn't always in this way. I remember configuration of phones on a 3500XL and ports have been configured in trunks.
You made me think, so I issued a few commands on a WS-C3560V2-48PS-S running IOS 12.2 (58) SE2 who has 12 phones connected on it.
Here is the config for a port that has a connected phone:
Switch #sho int f0/2nd round
Building configuration...
Current configuration: 475 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0/2
switchport access vlan 11
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk vlan 11 native
switchport trunk allowed vlan 2, 10-19
switchport mode access
switchport nonegotiate
switchport voice vlan 12
SRR-queue bandwidth share 1 30 35 5
priority queue
MLS qos trust device cisco-phone
MLS qos trust cos
Auto qos voip cisco-phone
No auto mdix
spanning tree portfast
service-policy input AUTOQOS-SRND4-CISCOPHONE-POLICY
end
If I show the status of the trunk for an individual port that IOS recognizes that the port with the attached telephone is actually a trunk:
Switch #sho int f0/2 trunk
VLAN Mode Encapsulation native port State
FA0/2 off 802. 1 q non-gaine 11
Port VLAN allowed on trunk
FA0/2, 11-12
Port VLAN authorized and active in the field of management
FA0/2, 11-12
VLAN port extending on transmission State and no tree pruned
FA0/2, 11-12
However if I do a "sho int trunk" to display all the ports on the switch IOS trunk does not include telephone ports in the output.
Trunk switch #sho int
VLAN Mode Encapsulation native port State
FA0/45 on 802. 1 q 12 trunking
FA0/46 / 802. 1 q 12 trunking
Gi0/1 on 802. 1 q sheath 11
Gi0/2 of 802. 1 q sheath 11
Port VLAN allowed on trunk
FA0/45 2: 10-19
FA0/46 2: 10-19
Gi0/1, 2, 10-19
Gi0/2, 2, 10-19
Port VLAN authorized and active in the field of management
FA0/45 13, 16-2, 11-17
FA0/46 13, 16-2, 11-17
Gi0/1, 2, 11-13, 16-17
Gi0/2 13, 16-2, 11-17
VLAN port extending on transmission State and no tree pruned
FA0/45 13, 16-2, 11-17
FA0/46 13, 16-2, 11-17
Gi0/1, 2, 11-13, 16-17
Gi0/2 13, 16-2, 11-17
So firstly IOS says "Yes, it is a trunk" and on the other hand it is said ' Nope, no trunks here! So notice that 'spanning-tree portfast' is configured on f0/2, no 'portfast spanning-tree trunk. PortFast is still active on this port.
Switch #sho span int f0/2 selection
VLAN0011 enabled
VLAN0012 enabled
Conversely on 45 port, we have a VG-224 connected and it is configured with "switchport mode trunk" and "trunk spanning-tree portfast '. If I change than just "spanning-tree portfast' we see this:
Switch #sho span int f0/45 selection
VLAN0002 disabled
VLAN0011 disabled
VLAN0012 disabled
VLAN0013 disabled
VLAN0016 disabled
VLAN0017 disabled
Cisco has confused the issue here. I would prefer if we called a trunk, a trunk, but for some reason, they do not.
See you soon,.
-Jeff
---
Posted by Jeff Davis of the Cisco support community App WebUser
-
Should DWDM SFP - log messages - I worry
Jul 21 18:52:36 UTC: % SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: item in gi1/1/4: high power warning Rx; Running value:-5,5 dBm, threshold value:-9,0 dBm.
21 July 19:02:36 UTC: % SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: item in gi1/1/4: high power warning Rx; Running value:-5,5 dBm, threshold value:-9,0 dBm.
21 Jul 19:12:37 UTC: % SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: item in gi1/1/4: high power warning Rx; Running value:-5,5 dBm, threshold value:-9,0 dBm.
NB: platform:
WS-C3750X - 48P 12.2 (55) SE1
-5.5 dB receive the power is outside the target of operation receive range,-9 at-28dBm, GE DWDM SFP. Although it will not damage the FPS, you may experience an increase in bit errors. You can install a 10dB Attenuator (or attenuated patchcord) at the end of receiver to bring the optics to be supplied in the operating parameters of the DWDM SFP.
Maybe you are looking for
-
get rid of "Firefox prevented this loading page."
I'm going to a URL and until I see what I see, I have to click "allow".
-
I NEED ASSISTANCE WITH MY APPLE FOR MY ICLOUD COORDINATION ID ID
I got a new iPhone5, and in some sort the iCloud username was set to an old my friends e-mail account that is different from my current ID. Apple ICloud I sign again, but I do not know the password. I tried to reset the password with the old email a
-
I checked the properties of Microsoft Office 7 Ultimate and it seems to me that the single play button is enabled. My permissions of the user are writing & and I'm supposed to have administrator rights.I don't know if I should try to reinstall or wha
-
Original title: log on failure Whenever I get the administrative password to say update Java, of he always says "connection failed: unknown username or bad password". I know with more certainty that the password is correct. Any help here? Sorry if th
-
Graphics card for Photoshop CC, CC of Lightroom for photo editing and retouching
HelloI would like to ask what is a graphics card great for CC in Photoshop, Lightroom CC and other programs for photo editing and retouching? My Budget is for on nVIDIA GTX950. Should I go with nVIDIA, or perhaps choose the competition? Y at - it a b