2801 1700 IPSEC VPN ISSUES
Current set up is static static.
due to changes in the ISP we lose static electricity on the 1700. If I configure dynamic DNS behind the 1700s could I use a FULL domain name in isakmp crypo policy?
(i.e.) ISAKMP crypto key
and then in the map Card
defined by peers
transform-Set
the 1700 is an ISDN connection alternative is ranging from T1 to 2 X the cost and buy a plane ticket and a WIC... Yes you can, you can use the different sequence for both cryptographic cards numbers. Place the first static then the dynamic. Concerning Farrukh Tags: Cisco Security How to administrate SRP547W via IPSec VPN? Hello I have a SRP547Ws network connected with VPN IPSec site-to-site. But I can't access the page of loging remote administrator of the SRP547s via the VPN. Y at - it a setting or a method I should use? I looked at the parameters of remote administration, but this seems to be rather the IPSec VPN for their administration through the WAN interface Thank you Hi Michael, It is a known issue with the current version. It will be fixed with the release next deadline next month. Kind regards Andy I have ASA version 9.2 (2) 4 - model 5515 I need to configure IPSEC VPN site-to-site. Can anyone share with me the example of ASA 9.2 CLI for IPSEC VPN configuration? Congratulations to find a solution to your problem. Thank you for posting on the Board to indicate that the issue is resolved and to share the solution. This can help other readers in the forum. HTH Rick UC500 and IPsec VPN client - disconnects Just throw a question out there. Users use the same VPN profile, but with names of single user and passwords. Here are some of the CPU configs for VPN clients local RAUTHEN AAA authentication login Crypto isakmp USER01_PROF profile crypto ISAKMP policy 1 I enabled debugging Here are some of the things that I see on him debugs 581504: 16:59:12.805 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): purge the node-1455244451 581518: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): peer does not paranoid KeepAlive. 581519: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): removal of State of SA reason 'Order BY user' (R) QM_IDLE (post 201.195.231.162)
I opened a case with TAC on this and they do not understand what is the cause. For them, it looks like a bug without papers. And their recommendation is to reboot, upgrade or try configuring L2TP for remote users. Thank you JP JP,
An update of IOS is worth it, even if him debugs seems to indicate that there is a problem with the client. If possible, I always suggest test with another client to see if it is unique to the Cisco VPN Client on Win7. Regarding the limit of 20 tunnel, it is very probably the number of IPsec security associations. If you issue a 'show crypto eli', this example displays the number of Sessions that are currently active IPSec. HTH, Frank IPSec vpn cisco asa and acs 5.1 We have configured authentication ipsec vpn cisco asa acs 5.1: Here is the config in cisco vpn 5580: standard access list acltest allow 10.10.30.0 255.255.255.0 RADIUS protocol AAA-server Gserver AAA-server host 10.1.8.10 Gserver (inside) Cisco key AAA-server host 10.1.8.11 Gserver (inside) Cisco key internal group gpTest strategy gpTest group policy attributes Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified value of Split-tunnel-network-list acltest type tunnel-group test remote access tunnel-group test general attributes address localpool pool Group Policy - by default-gpTest authentication-server-group LOCAL Gserver authorization-server-group Gserver accounting-server-group Gserver IPSec-attributes of tunnel-group test pre-shared-key cisco123 GBA, we config user group: VPN users. all VPN users in this group. ACS can visit his political profile: If the user in the 'VPN users' group, access ACS. When we connect from a VPN Client to the server, all users connect to success. When you see the parser in ACS journal, each user success connect also get error: 22040 wrong password or invalid shared secret (pls see picture to attach it) the system still works, but I don't know why, we get the error log. Thanks for any help you can provide! Duyen Hello Duyen, I think I've narrowed the issue. When remote access VPN using RADIUS authentication we must keep in mind that authentication and authorization are included on the same package. Depending on your configuration, the ACS is defined as a server RADIUS (Gserver Protocol radius aaa server) and becomes the VPN Tunnel authenticated and 'authorized' on this server group: authentication-server-group LOCAL Gserver authorization-server-group Gserver As noted above, the RADIUS of request/response includes authentication and authorization on the same package. This seems to be a problem of incorrect configuration that we should not set up the 'permission' in the Tunnel of the group. Please remove the authorization under the Tunnel of Group: No authorization-server-group Gserver Please test the connection again and check the logs of the ACS. At this point there are only sucessful newspaper reported on the side of the ACS. Is 'Permission-server-group' LDAP permission when authenticating to a LDAP server so to retrieve the attributes of permission on the server. RAY doesn't have the command as explained above. I hope this helps. Kind regards. Hi all I am trying to add remote Cisco switches to our Analyzer from Solarwinds network performance and I'm unable to see the community strings of switches behind our Firewall ASA across L2L IPSEC vpn tunnels. First of all, I can ping and see all the traffic behind the firewall. Configuration manager (NCM) works fine, it can download and download configs of the remote switches. It's just the SNMP which does not seem to talk. Here are the lines of configuration of the remote switches: SNMP-server community * RO SNMP-server community * RW This configuration works fine on the other our network switches that are not accessible via a VPN tunnel. Y at - it another line I need to add that pointing to the server from SolarWinds SNMP traffic? When I try to add the switch to Solarwinds, he sees the IP perfectly but once I added community strings RO and RW it performs a test fails every time and will not let me continue to add the device. Any help would be GREATLY appreciated! Thank you! Matt Exit to Windows firewall and check the Antivirus on Solarwinds as well. This may be the origin of the problem (a working time or does not not once). Another possibility (can be), if you have all IPS inline and inspect traffic, this could cause the issue. Check to see if any program/device in the path is kinetically limiting ICMP/SNMP packets #of. What version of NPM? THX MS IPsec VPN Client - aggressive mode Hi all I just got got off the phone with the customer who underwent a check sweep of security from a third-party vendor. One of the vulnerebilities mentioned in the report is this: I know that only the IPsec VPN client using aggressive mode to negotiate Phase I. So my question is how to convince my customer to continue to use the IPsec VPN? Is this what can I do to reduce the risk of the use of this type of access remotely. In addition, am I saw the same problem, if I use SSL based VPN Client? Kind regards Marty Hello Ikev1 HUB in aggressive mode sends his PSK hash in the second package as well as its public DH value. It is indeed a weakness of slope Protocol. To be able to act on this, U will be on the path to capture this stream in order to the brute force of the hash [which is not obvious - but not impossible. This issue is seriously attenuated by activating XAUTH [authentication]. Xauth happens after the DH, so under encryption. Assuming that the strong password policy is in use, it is so very very very difficult to find the right combination of username/password. Ikev2 is much safer in this respect and this is the right way. See you soon,. Olivier Hello I have a Cisco 2801 with flash: c2801-advipservicesk9 - mz.124 - 16.bin where I use to make IPSEC VPN. My problem is when I make a connection with a client, if my VPN is not traffic, tunnels are closed. If a receipt or send all traffic, the tunnel to get up again. For example: status of DST CBC State conn-id slot 200.10.10.1 201.201.10.10 QM_IDLE 998 ASSETS 0 If don't have the traffic, this tunnel is closed and after opening another tunnel where going to 999 example conn id. This behaviour is normal? There is a form that my tunnel ever close? I activated the parameters below: tcp KeepAlive-component snap-in service a tcp-KeepAlive-quick service ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10 periodicals But the tunnel closing if one is not the traffic. Thank you very much! Hello If you use ipsec vpn eazy Server profile, then you can set this under profile ipsec as follows security association idle time 86400 value If you use a dynamic to the eazy vpn, the server map same order must be paid in respect of the dynamic map Harish. AnyConnect 3.0 supports IPSec VPN for remote access? Hello world I've read about Cisco AnyConnect 3.0 issues that it supports IPSec VPN for remote access: I downloaded and installed the Client AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client 3.0.0629, but I'm not able to get the IPSec VPN works. Also, it has no option to use the previous of Cisco IPSec VPN client PCF files. Can someone point me in the right direction to get IPSec VPN AnyConnect 3.0 work? Thank you in advance! Hello Takes AnyConnect support IPSEC from version 3.0, but only in combination with IKEv2. There is no option to use a CPF file with it and the config should be pushed through a profile Anyconnect. More information on this: You should also change the ASA config so that it accepts negotiations IKE v2: http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/vpn_ike.html#wp1144572 Kind regards Nicolas Hello I just upgraded to macOS Sierra and built-in Cisco IPsec VPN no longer works. When you try to connect, I get a "cannot validate the certificate of the server. "Check your settings and try to reconnect" error message. I use Cisco ASA with self-signed certificates and everything worked fine with previous versions of OS X. Please help me, I need my VPN Thx a lot I am having the same problem with StrongSwan and help cert signed with the channel to complete certificates included in the pkcs12 file imported to the keychain. It was working properly in El Capitan, but now broken in the Sierra. Hi guys,. Tried to set up an ipsec VPN LAN - LAN between my WRV200 and WRVS4400N my companion. Filled all the relevant config... simple... but still nothing. They don't seem to connect. We are both on ADSL and using IP address by DNS. Routers are in the log file and try to establish the connection. Tried all the setting, both routers are configured the same. STILL NO JOY! Can anyone help, before having to migrate to a netgear or something nasty! Sorry forgot to mention, using an AM200 modem in Bridge mode. It my router DHCP address direct WAN instead of NAT. The two systems are fixed the same where routers have outside the WAN address. The modem is transparent. I guess that NAT traversal in not required in that State. Hello First I must admit that I am not very versed in Cisco equipment or in general IPSEC connections so my apologies if I'm doing something really good obviously stupid, but I checked through any kind of things that I could find on the internet on the configuration of IPSEC VPN. The setup I have is an asa 5520 (o/s 8.2) firewall which, for now, is connected to a temporary connection beautiful style home broadband for testing purposes. The netopia router is configured to allow ipsec passthrough and redirect 62515 UDP, TCP 10000, 4500 UDP, UDP 500 ports in the asa 5520. I'm trying to connein out of a laptop with disabled windows firewall and vpn cisco 5.0.02.0090 client version. I ran several attempts through the ipsec configuration wizard options. most of the time that nothing comes in the newspaper to show that a connection was attempted, but there is a way I can set up product options the following on the firewall log: 4. Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:29 | 713903 | Group = VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, error: cannot delete PeerTblEntry 5: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:29 | 713902 | Group = VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, drop table homologous counterpart does not, no match! 6. Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:21 | 713905 | Group VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, P1 = relay msg sent to AM WSF 3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:21 | 713201 | Group = VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, double-Phase 1 detected package. Retransmit the last packet. 6. Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:16 | 713905 | Group VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, P1 = relay msg sent to AM WSF 3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:16 | 713201 | Group = VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, double-Phase 1 detected package. Retransmit the last packet. 6. Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:11 | 713905 | Group VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, P1 = relay msg sent to AM WSF 3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:11 | 713201 | Group = VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, double-Phase 1 detected package. Retransmit the last packet. 3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1 3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1 3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1 3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1 3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1 3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1 3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1 3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1 3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1 3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1 6. Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 302015 | 86.44.x.x | 51905 | 192.168.0.27 | 500 | Built UDP inbound connection 7487 for Internet:86.44.x.x/51905 (86.44.x.x/51905) at identity:192.168.0.27/500 (192.168.0.27/500) and this, in the journal of customer: Cisco Systems VPN Client Version 5.0.02.0090 Copyright (C) 1998-2007 Cisco Systems, Inc.. All rights reserved. Customer type: Windows, Windows NT Running: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 24 13:54:08.250 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100002 Start the login process 25 13:54:08.265 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100004 Establish a secure connection 26 13:54:08.265 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100024
Attempt to connect with the server "213.94.x.x". 27 13:54:08.437 24/09/10 Sev = Info/6 IKE/0x6300003B Attempts to establish a connection with 213.94.x.x. 28 13:54:08.437 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013 SEND to > ISAKMP OAK AG (SA, KE, NO, ID, VID (Xauth), VID (dpd), VID (Frag), VID(Nat-T), VID (Unity)) at 213.94.x.x 29 13:54:08.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700008 IPSec driver started successfully 30 13:54:08.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014 Remove all keys 31 13:54:13.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000021 Retransmit the last package! 32 13:54:13.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013 SEND to > ISAKMP OAK AG (Retransmission) to 213.94.x.x 33 13:54:18.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000021 Retransmit the last package!
34 13:54:18.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013 SEND to > ISAKMP OAK AG (Retransmission) to 213.94.x.x 35 13:54:23.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000021 Retransmit the last package! 36 13:54:23.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013 SEND to > ISAKMP OAK AG (Retransmission) to 213.94.x.x 37 13:54:28.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000017 Marking of IKE SA delete (I_Cookie = 36C50ACCE984B0B0 R_Cookie = 0000000000000000) reason = DEL_REASON_PEER_NOT_RESPONDING 38 13:54:28.984 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE/0x6300004B IKE negotiation to throw HIS (I_Cookie = 36C50ACCE984B0B0 R_Cookie = 0000000000000000) reason = DEL_REASON_PEER_NOT_RESPONDING 39 13:54:28.984 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100014 Could not establish the Phase 1 SA with the server '213.94.x.x' due to the 'DEL_REASON_PEER_NOT_RESPONDING '. 40 13:54:28.984 24/09/10 Sev = Info/5 CM / 0 x 63100025 Initializing CVPNDrv 41 13:54:28.984 24/09/10 Sev = Info/6 CM / 0 x 63100046 Set indicator established tunnel to register to 0. 42 13:54:28.984 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000001 Signal received IKE to complete the VPN connection 43 13:54:29.187 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014 Remove all keys 44 13:54:29.187 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014 Remove all keys 45 13:54:29.187 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014 Remove all keys 46 13:54:29.187 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC/0x6370000A IPSec driver successfully stopped I have connectivity full http from the internet to a machine inside the asa 5520 so I think that the static routing and NAT'ing should be ok, but I am pleased to provide you with all the details. Can you see what I'm doing wrong? Thank you Sam Pls add the following policy: crypto ISAKMP policy 10 preshared authentication the Encryption md5 hash Group 2 You can also run debug on the ASA: debugging cry isa debugging ipsec cry and retrieve debug output after trying to connect. IPSec vpn - no selected proposal Hello: I am facing a problem in the configuration of the ipsec vpn on my 7200 router. It's a site to customer topology as shown below. The request from my pc, R2' isa crypto log: R2 #debug crypto isakmp * 6 April 22:41:59.931: ISAKMP: (0): treatment ITS payload. Message ID = 0
* 22:42:00.035 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): removal of reason HIS State "Policy of ITS phase 1 not accepted" (R) MM_NO_STATE (post 66.66.66.52)
* 22:42:00.059 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): removal of reason HIS State "Policy of ITS phase 1 not accepted" (R) MM_NO_STATE (post 66.66.66.52) * 22:42:00.087 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): removal of HIS right State 'No reason' (R) MM_NO_STATE (post 66.66.66.52)
* 22:42:00.895 6 April: ISAKMP (0): received 66.66.66.52 packet 500 Global 500 (R) sport dport MM_NO_STATE And when I capture on my pc, I got: I don't know why, waiting for you helps nicely, thank you very much! I think that what is wrong is your combination of your group of encryption, hashing and dh, try changing your sha instead of md5 hash table. Routing access to Internet through an IPSec VPN Tunnel Hello I installed a VPN IPSec tunnel for a friend's business. At his desk at home, I installed a Cisco SA520 and at it is remote from the site I have a Cisco RVS4000. The IPSec VPN tunnel works very well. The remote site, it can hit all of its workstations and peripheral. I configured the RVS4000 working in router mode as opposed to the bridge. In the Home Office subnet is 192.168.1.0/24 while the subnet to the remote site is 192.168.2.0/24. The SA520 is configured as Internet gateway for the headquarters to 192.168.1.1. The remote desktop has a gateway 192.168.2.1. I need to configure the remote site so that all Internet traffic will be routed via the Home Office. I have to make sure that whatever it is plugged into the Ethernet on the RVS4000 port will have its Internet traffic routed through the Internet connection on the SA520. Currently I can ping any device on the headquarters of the remote desktop, but I can't ping anything beyond the gateway (192.168.1.1) in the Home Office. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Hi William, the rvs4000 does not support the tunnel or esp transfer wild-card. SA520 and Question IPSec VPN RVS4000 Hello I installed an IPSec VPN for one of my friends for his company. At its principal office, I installed a Cisco SA520 and he uses to connect devices such as the iPhone and iPad via the IPSec VPN. He uses this fact because he travels abroad a lot and he has problems with services such as Skype is blocked in some countries. This configuration works very well. It also has a Cisco RVS4000, which he would like to install at his place of business to the Mexico. He would like the RVS4000 VPN configuration to the SA520 in his office. The SA520 in his office has a static IP address. The RVS4000 to the Mexico does not work. Is it possible to Setup IPSec VPN between a SA520 with a static IP and RVS4000 address that does not have a static IP address? If so, examples of configuration would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! Hi William, simply sign up for a dyndns account or similar service, the RVS4000 configuration will be the same, instead of the IP, you'd be using the dyndns name. -Tom Battery on T500 - unusual problem - not in the forum I have laptop T500 with a battery 6 cells. For some reason, the battery does not charge. The battery on the screen light blinks all the time. I changed the battery but the problem persists, and so I think that it is not the battery. I also checked wi Reader of CD-R/DVD-ROM (IDE) of K LITE-ON COMBO SOHC 4836 opens not (mechanical) I can't use the original CD-R/DVD-ROM drive, because he that is no longer open tray drawer. It's a mechanical problem, I've tried several times unsuccessfully to fixation. It's my only optical drive, and I can't find an IDE drive to replace, because Hi all In my program, there is 1 HorizontalFieldManager and 2 AbsoluteFieldManager Now, I add 2 AFM of HFM and it looks like this __ ___ __ ___ __ __ | AFB1 | AFM2 | ---------------------------- the problem is when I add a buttonField, ButtonFi I get this message every time that restarting the computer starts, is there a solution or do I restore windows Windows 7 64-bit. Bill How can I change a 'Album' back to a 'folder '? How can I change a 'Album' back to a 'folder '?Similar Questions
I have a UC560 running uc500-advipservicesk9 - mz.151 - 2.T2 site HQ. Remote users, about 8 of them, attempt to connect via IPsec VPN (v5.0.07.0440) HQ clients to access files, etc.. The behavior I see is 5 users to connect successfully, but only 5. As soon as more users trying to connect, they have either:
Configuration group customer crypto isakmp USER01
key *.
DNS 192.168.0.110
pool USER01_POOL
ACL USER01_ACL
permission of AAA local RAUTHOR network authenticated by FIS
match of group identity USER01
list of authentication of client RAUTHEN
RAUTHOR of ISAKMP authorization list.
client configuration address respond
BA 3des
md5 hash
preshared authentication
Group 2
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
BA aes
preshared authentication
Group 2
lifetime 28800
crypto ISAKMP policy 100
BA aes
preshared authentication
Group 2
life 3600
crypto ISAKMP policy 1000
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
Debug crypto ISAKMP
Debug crypto ipsec
604899: 16:41:13.333 Aug 21: ISAKMP: (2073): HASH payload processing. Message ID = 284724149
604900: 16:41:13.333 Aug 21: ISAKMP: (2073): treatment protocol NOTIFY DPD/R_U_THERE 1
0, message ID SPI = 284724149, a = 0x8E7C6E68
604901: 16:41:13.333 Aug 21: ISAKMP: (2073): error suppression node 284724149 FALSE reason 'informational (en) State 1.
604902: 16:41:13.333 Aug 21: ISAKMP: (2073): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_INFO_NOTIFY
604903: 16:41:13.333 Aug 21: ISAKMP: (2073): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_P1_COMPLETE
581505: 16:59:12.805 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): purge the node 840814618
581506: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP (2147): received 201.195.231.162 packet dport 4500 sport 37897 Global (R) QM_IDLE
581507: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: node set 801982813 to QM_IDLE
581508: 20 August 16:59:13.933: ISAKMP: (2147): HASH payload processing. Message ID = 801982813
581509: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: receives the payload type 18
581510: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): treatment remove with load useful reason
581511: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): remove the doi = 0
581512: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): remove Protocol id = 1
581513: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): remove spi_size = 16
581514: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): remove the spis num = 1
581515: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): delete_reason = 2
581516: 20 August 16:59:13.933: ISAKMP: (2147): load DELETE_WITH_REASON, processing of message ID = 801982813, reason: DELETE_BY_USER_COMMAND
581517: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): peer does not paranoid KeepAlive.
581520: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): error suppression node 801982813 FALSE reason 'informational (en) State 1.
581521: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: node set-878597687 to QM_IDLE
581522: 20 August 16:59:13.937: ISAKMP: (2147): lot of 201.195.231.162 sending peer_port my_port 4500 37897 (R) QM_IDLE
581523: 16:59:13.937 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
581524: 16:59:13.937 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): purge the node-878597687
581525: 16:59:13.937 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_DEL
581526: 16:59:13.937 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_DEST_SA
Crypto ISAKMP debug is on
R2 #.
R2 #.
R2 #.
* 22:41:59.871 6 April: ISAKMP (0): received 66.66.66.52 packet dport 500 sport 500 SA NEW Global (N)
* 22:41:59.879 6 April: ISAKMP: created a struct peer 66.66.66.52, peer port 500
* 22:41:59.879 6 April: ISAKMP: new created position = 0x67E98D84 peer_handle = 0 x 80000002
* 22:41:59.883 6 April: ISAKMP: lock struct 0x67E98D84, refcount 1 to peer crypto_isakmp_process_block
* 22:41:59.887 6 April: ISAKMP: 500 local port, remote port 500
* 22:41:59.891 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): insert his with his 67E5DCD8 = success
* 22:41:59.911 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
* 22:41:59.911 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_READY = IKE_R_MM1
* 6 April 22:41:59.935: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:41:59.939: ISAKMP: (0): IKE frag vendor processing id payload
* 6 April 22:41:59.939: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:41:59.943: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 69
* 22:41:59.947 6 April: ISAKMP (0): provider ID is NAT - T RFC 3947
* 6 April 22:41:59.947: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:41:59.951: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 123
* 6 April 22:41:59.955: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is NAT - T v2
* 6 April 22:41:59.959: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:41:59.959: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 194
* 6 April 22:41:59.963: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:41:59.967: ISAKM
R2 #P: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 241
* 6 April 22:41:59.971: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:41:59.971: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 184
* 6 April 22:41:59.975: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:41:59.979: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 134
* 22:41:59.983 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 66.66.66.52
* 6 April 22:41:59.987: ISAKMP: (0): pre-shared key local found
* 22:41:59.987 6 April: ISAKMP: analysis of the profiles for xauth...
* 22:41:59.991 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): audit ISAKMP transform 1 against the policy of priority 10
* 22:41:59.995 6 April: ISAKMP: AES - CBC encryption
* 22:41:59.995 6 April: ISAKMP: keylength 256
* 22:41:59.999 6 April: ISAKMP: SHA hash
* 22:41:59.999 6 April: ISAKMP: unknown group of DH 20
* 22:41:59.999 6 April: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth
* 22:42:00.003 6 April: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
* 22:42:00.003 6 April: ISAKMP:
R2 # life expectancy (IPV) 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 x 70 0x80
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): free encryption algorithm does not match policy.
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): audit ISAKMP transform 2 against the policy of priority 10
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: AES - CBC encryption
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: keylength 128
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: SHA hash
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: Diffie-Hellman group unknown 19
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: life (IPV) 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 x 70 0x80
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): free encryption algorithm does not match policy.
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): audit ISAKMP transform 3 against the policy of priority 10
R2 #r 6 22:42:00.011: ISAKMP: AES - CBC encryption
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: keylength 256
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: SHA hash
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: Diffie-Hellman group 14 unknown
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: life (IPV) 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 x 70 0x80
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): free encryption algorithm does not match policy.
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): audit ISAKMP transform 4 against the policy of priority 10
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: 3DES-CBC encryption
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: SHA hash
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: Diffie-Hellman group 14 unknown
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: life (IPV) 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 x 70 0x80
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): offered hash algorithm is
R2 # does not match policy.
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): audit ISAKMP transform against the policy of priority 10 5
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: 3DES-CBC encryption
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: SHA hash
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: group by default 2
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
* 22:42:00.015 6 April: ISAKMP: life (IPV) 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 x 70 0x80
* 22:42:00.019 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): offered hash algorithm does not match policy.
* 22:42:00.023 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 0
* 22:42:00.023 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): no offer is accepted!
* 6 April 22:42:00.027: ISAKMP: (0): phase 1 SA policy is not acceptable! (local 180.180.0.130 remote 66.66.66.52)
* 22:42:00.027 6 April: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 1 of 5: construct_fail_ag_init
* 6 April 22:42:00.027: ISAKMP: (0): has no
R2 #construct AG information message.
* 6 April 22:42:00.027: ISAKMP: (0): lot of 66.66.66.52 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (R) MM_NO_STATE
* 22:42:00.027 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
* 22:42:00.031 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): the peer is not paranoid KeepAlive.
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): IKE frag vendor processing id payload
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 69
* 22:42:00.039 6 April: ISAKMP (0): provider ID is NAT - T RFC 3947
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 123
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is NAT - T v2
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0)
R2 #: load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 194
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 241
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 184
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 134
* 22:42:00.039 6 April: ISAKMP (0): action of WSF returned the error: 2
* 22:42:00.039 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
* 22:42:00.039 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM1 = IKE_R_MM1
* 22:42:00.059 6 April: ISAKMP: unlock counterpart struct 0x67E98D84 for isadb_m
R2 #ark_sa_deleted (), count 0
* 22:42:00.067 6 April: ISAKMP: delete peer node by peer_reap for 66.66.66.52: 67E98D84
* 22:42:00.071 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_DEL
* 22:42:00.075 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM1 = IKE_DEST_SA
* 22:42:00.087 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_ERROR
* 22:42:00.087 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_DEST_SA = IKE_DEST_SA
* 22:42:02.911 6 April: ISAKMP (0): received 66.66.66.52 packet 500 Global 500 (R) sport dport MM_NO_STATE
R2 #.
* 22:43:00.087 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): serving SA., his is 67E5DCD8, delme is 67E5DCD8
R2 #.
Please mark replied messages usefulMaybe you are looking for