ASA VPN missing routes

Similar Questions

• ASA - IOS VPN dynamic routing

  I saw the docs that show how to configure ASA-ASA VPN share OSPF routes and for IOS to IOS OSPF sharing routes. Is it possible to get the ASA to IOS device?

  I'm supposed to put in place a DMVPN through some remote sites, and there is an ASA one of the sites. The EIGRP routes are expected to be shared across the DMVPN (I suppose could go to OSPF if necessary). My plan for the site of the SAA was to set up a VPN site-to-site regular with the DMVPN hub and redistribute OSPF and EIGRP routes in the other, so the rays can talk to the ASA branch by the hub.

  Is it possible, or I have to use static routes to and from the network of the ASA?

  Xavier,

  In the road map you must place a match statement corresponding prefixes/subnets that you would like to advertise in EIGRP.

  About the ASA, normally you have not to, but I don't see a problem with the addition of statements of IPP in crypto card (normally).

  With regard to orders. I always refer people to self-help ;-)

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps10591/products_product_indices_list.html

  more precisely:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/MCL/allreleasemcl/all_book.html

  Docs IPP:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/sec_secure_connectivity/configuration/guide/sec_rev_rte_inject_ps10592_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html

  Redistribution of EIGRP:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS-XML/iOS/iproute_eigrp/configuration/15-1mt/Configuring_EIGRP.html#GUID-1D5F3B6E-B89A-497A-BBC4-98C4A4E21CE7

  In any case take step by step, start by checking what the situation will be when you insert routes into the routing on the hub by RRI table. Then, if necessary, redistribute static routes in EIGRP.

  Marcin

• VPN between ASA and cisco router [phase2 question]

  Hi all

  I have a problem with IPSEC VPN between ASA and cisco router

  I think that there is a problem in the phase 2

  Can you please guide me where could be the problem.
  I suspect questions ACL on the router, but I cannot fix. ACL on the router is specified below

  Looking forward for your help

  Phase 1 is like that

  Cisco_router #sh crypto isakmp his

  IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association
  status of DST CBC State conn-id slot
  78.x.x.41 87.x.x.4 QM_IDLE 2006 0 ACTIVE

  and ASA

  ASA # sh crypto isakmp his

  ITS enabled: 1
  Generate a new key SA: 0 (a tunnel report Active 1 and 1 to generate a new key during the generate a new key)
  Total SA IKE: 1

  1 peer IKE: 78.x.x.41
  Type: L2L role: initiator
  Generate a new key: no State: MM_ACTIVE

  Phase 2 on SAA

  ASA # sh crypto ipsec his
  Interface: Outside
  Tag crypto map: Outside_map, seq num: 20, local addr: 87.x.x.4

  Outside_cryptomap_20 ip 172.19.209.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 172.
  19.194.0 255.255.255.0
  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.209.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.194.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  current_peer: 78.x.x.41

  #pkts program: 8813, #pkts encrypt: 8813, #pkts digest: 8813
  #pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts check: 0
  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
  #pkts uncompressed: 8813, model of #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0
  #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0

  local crypto endpt. : 87.x.x.4, remote Start crypto. : 78.x.x.41

  Path mtu 1500, fresh ipsec generals 58, media, mtu 1500
  current outbound SPI: C96393AB

  SAS of the esp on arrival:
  SPI: 0x3E9D820B (1050509835)
  transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac no
  running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel}
  slot: 0, id_conn: 7, crypto-card: Outside_map
  calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (4275000/3025)
  Size IV: 8 bytes
  support for replay detection: Y
  outgoing esp sas:
  SPI: 0xC96393AB (3378746283)
  transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac no
  running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel}
  slot: 0, id_conn: 7, crypto-card: Outside_map
  calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (4274994/3023)
  Size IV: 8 bytes
  support for replay detection: Y

  Phase 2 on cisco router

  protégé of the vrf: (none)
  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.209.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.194.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  current_peer 87.x.x.4 port 500
  LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},
  #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0
  #pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts check: 0
  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
  #pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0
  #pkts not unpacked: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
  Errors #send 0, #recv 0 errors

  local crypto endpt. : 78.x.x.41, remote Start crypto. : 87.x.x.4
  Path mtu 1452, ip mtu 1452, ip mtu BID Dialer0
  current outbound SPI: 0x0 (0)

  SAS of the esp on arrival:

  the arrival ah sas:

  SAS of the CFP on arrival:

  outgoing esp sas:

  outgoing ah sas:

  outgoing CFP sas:

  protégé of the vrf: (none)
  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.194.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.209.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  current_peer 87.x.x.4 port 500
  LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},
  #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0
  #pkts decaps: 8947, #pkts decrypt: 8947, #pkts check: 8947
  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
  #pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0
  #pkts not unpacked: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
  Errors #send 0, #recv 0 errors

  local crypto endpt. : 78.x.x.41, remote Start crypto. : 87.x.x.4
  Path mtu 1452, ip mtu 1452, ip mtu BID Dialer0
  current outbound SPI: 0x3E9D820B (1050509835)

  SAS of the esp on arrival:
  SPI: 0xC96393AB (3378746283)
  transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac.
  running parameters = {Tunnel}
  Conn ID: 29, flow_id: Motorola SEC 1.0:29, card crypto: mycryptomap
  calendar of his: service life remaining (k/s) key: (4393981/1196)
  Size IV: 8 bytes
  support for replay detection: Y
  Status: ACTIVE

  the arrival ah sas:

  SAS of the CFP on arrival:

  outgoing esp sas:
  SPI: 0x3E9D820B (1050509835)
  transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac.
  running parameters = {Tunnel}
  Conn ID: 30, flow_id: Motorola SEC 1.0:30, card crypto: mycryptomap
  calendar of his: service life remaining (k/s) key: (4394007/1196)
  Size IV: 8 bytes
  support for replay detection: Y
  Status: ACTIVE

  outgoing ah sas:

  outgoing CFP sas:

  VPN configuration is less in cisco router

  access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 connect
  access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect
  access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 connect
  access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect
  access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 connect
  access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect

  access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 connect
  access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect
  access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 connect
  access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect
  access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 connect
  access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect

  sheep allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 105

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac mytransformset

  mycryptomap 100 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
  the value of 87.x.x.4 peer
  Set transform-set mytransformset
  match address 101

  crypto ISAKMP policy 100
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  ISAKMP crypto key xxx2011 address 87.x.x.4

  Your permit for 105 ACL statement should be down is changed to match because it is the most general ACL.

  You currently have:

  Extend the 105 IP access list
  5 permit ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 (18585 matches)
  10 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 connect
  30 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 connect
  50 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 connect

  It should be:

  Extend the 105 IP access list
  10 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 connect
  30 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 connect
  50 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 connect

  IP 172.19.194.0 allow 60 0.0.0.255 (18585 matches)

  To remove it and add it to the bottom:

  105 extended IP access list

  not 5

  IP 172.19.194.0 allow 60 0.0.0.255 any

  Then ' delete ip nat trans. "

  and it should work now.

• ASA VPN with Fortgate

  Hello people!

  I still have the problem with VPN... Laughing out loud

  I have to create a new VPN site to site between ASA 5510 (8.42 IOS) and Fortgate, but something is very strange, Don t VPN came and I see in the debug crypto 10 ikev1 the newspaper to follow:

  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Cfg 1 group would be: Group 2

  But if I ask the other peer to change in Group 2, the msg in the SAA is:

  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Group 2 GCF: Group 1

  Fortgate is possible to activate the two specific groups of VPN 1 and 2, and I would ask the other peer left this way and the ASA show:

  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Group 2 GCF: Group 1
  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Cfg 1 group would be: Group 2

  The show isakmp his:

  9 counterpart IKE: 179.124.32.181
  Type: user role: answering machine
  Generate a new key: no State: MM_WAIT_MSG3

  I have delete and creat VPN 3 x and the same error occurs.

  Everyone has seen this kind of problem?

  Is it using Fortigate version 5 by chance?

  I saw Cisco ASA VPN problems repeatedly with this code Fortigate, but above all it has been a problem of Phase 2 and defining KB life maximally on the side of the ASA has solved it... However this seems not to be your problem here.

  The first thing in your config I see you have PFS enabled - have you insured it is located on the side of Fortinet or tried to turn it off on the side of Cisco to see if it happens?

  Be stuck at MM_WAIT_MSG3 means that you sent your return policy, but then you have not received the third package in the ISAKMP riding so either the Fortigate is unhappy with something or there's a routing problem (however unlikely given that you have already had communication)

  Try on the side of the ASA:

  debug crypto isakmp 7

  You can also confrm your external interface is 'outside1 '? You can see this "see intellectual property."

• Device behind a Firewall other, ASA VPN

  I have a client who wants to put their VPN / behind the ASA ASA main connected to the Internet.  Both devices have an inside leg for the internal network, but the ASA VPN connects directly to the Internet ASA.

  Topology:

  Outisde FW: Internet transfer Procedure > ASA/FW > leg DMZ to ASA/VPN

  ASA VPN: Outside the L3 Interface interface DMZ of ASA/FW link

  On the outside NAT FW I would be the external address of the VPN / ASA outside the public IP address is available and I have a rule that allows all IP from outside to outside the private IP VPN.  Inside = 192.168.254.1 outside = public IP address.

  Configured on the VPN / ASA, ASA standard SSL Remote Access.

  When I hit the NAT public IP address, nothing happens.  I've run packet - trace on the FW outside, and everything seems good.

  Someone at - it a sampling plan / config for a similar topology?     Internet > ASA/FW > dmz-leg > ASA/VPN

  Thanks in advance,
  Bob

  Can share you your NAT and routing configuration? Of these two ASAs

• ASA-6-110003: routing could not locate the next hop

  Hello

  I have a problem with our ASA firewall. I have a firewall that's inside, outside and DMZ interface. I have VPN clients that connect correctly and can access the internal network. However, for profiles that I have configured to connect via VPN to the DMZ network fails with the following messages.

  ASA-6-110003: routing could not locate the next hop

  &

  ASA-6-302014: disassembly of the TCP connection... No contiguity valid

  I have connections in the DMZ, but aren't VPN via internal and external interfaces without problem.

  The routing table has a route to this network and I have a nat in place - I'm quite puzzled by the present.

  Thank you

  Ed

  Hello Ed,

  Well, Nat seems good but you can do the following for me please:

  network of the DMZ_subnet object

  10.1.213.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

  network of the VPN_Subnet object

  subnet 255.255.x.x x.x.x.x

  public static DMZ_subnet DMZ_subnet destination NAT source (dmz - 2 outside) public static VPN_Subnet VPN_Subnet

  Kind regards

  Julio

• New ASA/VPN configuration

  So, I am looking to add one of my spare 5510 firewall to my secondary network as a vpn connection.

  All I want this new ASA to do is handle my site anyconnect VPN connections.  I'm pretty new to ASAs if any help would be great.  I know how to create a new access VPN on my ASA and I added a NAT for my inside and outside traffic to my new Pool of IP VPN.

  My question is, since it's only for the VPN and I want all my current internal traffic to continue to the asa 5510 existing routing, do I have to enter the ACL to my new single AAS of VPN?  ACLs are used for VPN traffic and do I need them to traffic the route via VPN?

  I'll put up inside interface of connection to one of my main Cisco switches and the outside interface connects to my DMZ switch on the new ASA only VPN.

  Thank you

  I don't know if I am how you connect to the external interface of single ASA VPN. Normally, in this type of installation, we would see the ASA VPN "in parallel" with the perimeter firewall.

  You mention the DMZ switch that threw me a little. If you are in France through your main firewall and go to single ASA VPN via the DMZ then Yes you will need to allow several open ports (protocol 50, udp/500, tcp/443 among others) and may have to do some other techniques (NAT - T, etc.) depending on the type of remote you are implementing. That's why we rarely see this configuration used - it adds a good dose of complexity without significant benefit.

  When the old facility is used, you need to switch internal to know to route traffic to the pool VPN through the only ASA VPN inside the interface. A static route is more often used, although you can use OSPF or EIGRP if you wanted to.

  Should generally not be any access list that VPN traffic around the Bank access lists incoming interface. Back to remote clients traffic is coming from inside and out through (and is usually part of anestablished connection) so no access list is necessary inside.

• The IPSec VPN and routing

  Hello

  I was polishing my PSAB on since I am currently in a job where I can't touch a lot of this stuff.  By a laboratory set up a site to IPSec VPN between two routers IOS.

  For example:

  https://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps9422/products_configuration_example09186a0080ba1d0a.shtml

  The routers must specify how to route to the protected network.  Although I guess they could just use a default route to 172.17.1.2 as well.

  for example IP road 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 172.17.1.2

  172.17.1.2 won't have the slightest clue as to how to route for 10.10.10.0

  Even in an example with a tunnel between the ASA and the router IOS ASA failed to indicate a direct route to the subnet protected from 10.20.10.0, but it must still have a default route configuration. (https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a0080a9a7a3.shtml#CLI)

  So it is basically saying, to reach the protected subnet to resolve the next hop on a device that has no idea where this subnet is anyway.  Shouldn't all the peer IP-based routing, and not on a subnet that routers between the two should have no idea they exist?

  The main hypothesis that I have here is that the protected subnets are not accessible unless the VPN tunnel is up.  Most of my experience of the VPN site-to-site is with PIX / ASA, and I've never had to specify a route towards the protected subnet (for example 172.16.228.0).  I guess he just used his default gateway that has an Internet IP belonging to the ISP.  However the ISP has no idea where is 172.16.228.0.

  Edit: I found a thread, do not report with Cisco but IPSec in general, this seems to be the question in case I don't have a lot of sense:

  http://comments.Gmane.org/Gmane.OS.OpenBSD.misc/192986

  He still does not seem logical to me.  If I have a tunnel linking the two class C networks by internet, the only routers having knowledge of these networks are the two counterparts.  Why a course should be (static, dynamic, default etc,) which seems to send traffic to a device that do not know where is the class C networks?  Although I have to take in my example with the 172.17.228.0 my ASA was not actually sends out packets to my ISP gateway with 172.17.228.0 in them.

  The purpose of the trail is * not * to send traffic to your next jump. You are right that the next hop router has no idea what to do with this package. This way is important for the local operation. The router must find the interface of output for the package. 'S done it with the road to the next-hop-router. If you remember that the road to your peer IPSec, your router must do a recursive search routing. After the outging interface is found, traffic is sent to this interface, the card encryption on this interface jumps and protects your traffic that is routed to your IPSec peer.

  --
  Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
  http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni

• ASA VPN - how much IP address?

  If anyone can help on this configuration of the DMZ?  This is taken from the book. If the firewall of the ASA has a public IP (209.165.201.225) on the external interface, then on my router? This means that I need 3 public ip address? ISP-(adsl with public ip) [b] ROUTER [/ b] (fa0/0 209.165.201.226)---(outside=209.165.201.225)[b]ASA5505[/b](inside=192.168.1.1) the router route providing the PUBLIC ip address of the ASA outside intellectual property (how one translation)? I know by ASA will need a translation of outside DMZ and with an access list to allow traffic. Right now, my company only has a public IP address.  How can I make this work? Thank you!.

  Hello

  If you have a public IP address unique usable, you can have this IP address on the router (internet gateway) and have a segment between the router and ASA.

  By port forwarding, you can have incoming traffic sent to the ASA by the router (such as VPNS, for example).

  The ASA will not need a public IP address that is configured on the external interface as long as the device with the public IP (router) can redirect traffic to private IP assigned to the WAN of the ASA interface.

  Hope that makes sense.

  Federico.

• ASA VPN - allow user based on LDAP Group

  Hello friends

  I have create a configuration to allow connection based on LDAP Group.

  I m not specialize in the firewall and I tried to follow the links above, but both seem old, commanded several is not available.

  http://www.tunnelsup.com/Cisco-ASA-VPN-authorize-user-based-on-LDAP-group

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-NEX...

  Anyone know how I can do?

  Thank you

  Marcio

  I like to use the Protocol DAP (dynamic access policies) to control this.  Follow this guide:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/7691/ASA-8X-dynamic-access-policies-DAP-deployment-guide

• Assign the static IP address by ISE, ASA VPN clients

  We will integrate the remote access ASA VPN service with a new 1.2 ISE.

  Authentication is performed in Active directory. After authentication, can address assigned to a specific user of VPN by ISE IP?

  This means that the same VPN user will always get the same IP address. Thank you.

  Daniel,

  You can override the IETF-RADIUS-Framed-IP-Address in the authorization policy.

  However if I may make a suggestion:

  Unless you have only a handful of users to do so, it may be appropriate to assign the address of ISE pool or perform the mapping of LDAP attributes on ASA itself.

  In the latter case, the IP addresses are kept on the server as LDAP attributes and ASA will map the IP address. You don't want to keep address IP DB in several places.

  M.

• Cisco SG300 / ASA 5505 intervlan routing problem

  Dear all

  I have a problem with the configuration correctly sg300 layer 3 behind the ASA 5505 switch (incl. license more security)

  The configuration is the following:

  CISCO SG300 is configured as a layer 3 switch

  VLAN native 1: 192.168.1.254, default route ip address (inside interface ASA 192.168.1.1)

  VLAN defined additional switch

  VLAN 100 with 192.168.100.0/24, default gateway 192.168.100.254

  VLAN 110 with 192.168.110.0/24, default gateway 192.168.110.254

  VLAN 120 with 172.16.0.0/16, default gateway 172.16.10.254

  Of the VLANS (100,110,120) different, I am able to connect to all devices on the other VIRTUAL local networks (with the exception of Native VLAN 1; is not the ping requests)

  From the switch cli I can ping my firewall (192.168.1.1) and all the other gateways of VLANs and vlan (VLAN1, 100, 110, 120) devices

  Asa cli I can only ping my switch (192.168.1.254) port, but no other devices in other VLAN

  My question is this. What should I change or installation in the switch configuration or asa so that other VLANs to access the Internet through the ASA. I will not use the ASA as intervlan routing device, because the switch does this for me

  I tried to change the asa int e0/1 in trunkport (uplink port switch also), to enable all the VLANS, but as soon as I do that, I can not ping 192.168.1.254 ASA cli more.

  Any help is greatly appreciated

  Concerning

  Edwin

  Hi Edwin, because the switch is layer 3, the only necessary behavior is to ensure that default gateways to the computer are set on the SVI interface connection to the switch to make sure that the switch is transfer traffic wished to the ASA.

  The configuration between the ASA and the switch must stay true by dot1q, such as the vlan all other, unidentified native VLAN tagged.

  Also, if I'm not wrong, on the SAA you must set the security level of the port to 100.

  -Tom
  Please evaluate the useful messages

• ASDM conc (ASA) VPN access

  I have the script like this:

  an ASA, which is the FW, TR making static NAT from the public to the private IP and private IP address add is add conc (another ASA) VPN. I am accessing these devices via the VPN client and I get the address IP of VPN pool set on VPN conc. VPN conc. is in a DMZ VLAN, but it also has connection to the local network segment. Purposes of mgmt, I connect to this VPN through SSH conc via a switch in the local network segment. To use the http access, I have to be on one of the servers that are in the local network segment. Since then, when I set up the VPN connection, I'm sure VPN conc., what can do to access http directly from my PC?

  This sets up on the conc VPN:

  management-access inside
  
  After that you should be able to use ASDM over the VPN tunnel, by connecting to its inside ip address.
  hth
  
      Herbert
  
      (note, I assume the name of the interface connected to the LAN is named "inside", if not adapt at will )

• ASA VPN positive = SSL VPN?

  Hello

  I have a pair of FO, I need to exchange an ASA5520 who owns a license of VPN over 750

  Can I use an ASA5520 with ASA5500-SSL-750 instead

  Regards Tony

  Yes, it is always available on order. Part number: ASA5520-VPN-PL =

  In addition, this more ASA VPN would be much much cheaper than the SSL VPN license.

  Thank you

  Kiran

• PIX 501 and VPN Linksys router (WRV200)

  I inherited a work where we have a Cisco PIX 501 firewall to a single site and Linksys WRV200 Router VPN on two other

  sites. Asked me to connect these routers Linksys firewall PIX via the VPN.

  According to me, the Linksys vpn routers can only connect via IPSec VPN, I'm looking for help on the configuration of the PIX 501 for the linksys to connect with the following, if possible.

  Key exchange method: Auto (IKE)

  Encryption: Auto, 3DES, AES128, AES192, AES256

  Authentication: MD5

  Pre Shared Key: xxx

  PFS: Enabled

  Life ISAKMP key: 28800

  Life of key IPSec: 3600

  The pix, I installed MDP and I tried to use the VPN wizard without result.

  I chose the following settings when you make the VPN Wizard:

  Type of VPN: remote VPN access

  Interface: outside

  Type of Client VPN device used: Cisco VPN Client

  (can choose customer of Cisco VPN 3000, MS Windows Client by using the client MS Windows using L2TP, PPTP)

  VPN clients group

  Name of Group: RabyEstates

  Pre Shared Key: rabytest

  Scope of the Client authentication: disabled

  Address pool

  Name of the cluster: VPN - LAN

  Starter course: 192.168.2.200

  End of row: 192.168.2.250

  Domain DNS/WINS/by default: no

  IKE policy

  Encryption: 3DES

  Authentication: MD5

  Diffie-Hellman group: Group 2 (1024 bits)

  Transform set

  Encryption: 3DES

  Authentication: MD5

  I have attached the log of the VPN Linksys router VPN.

  This is the first time that I have ever worked with PIX so I'm still trying to figure the thing to, but I'm confident with the CCNA level network.

  Thanks for your help!

  Hello

  Everything looks fine for me, try to have a computer in every network and ping between them. Check the newspapers/debug and fix them.

  Let me know.

  See you soon,.

  Daniel