Intel VGT vlan tagging

Similar Questions

• Windows 7/vista and VLAN Tagging (802. 1 q) on VMWare Workstation 7?

  Hello

  It is possible to activate the tagging VLAN in a virtual machine running Windows 7/Vista on VMWare WorkSation 7?

  I have which must be executed in a VLAN from diferent VM. In my case I use 802. 1 q in a bridged interface.

  Thank you

  Pato

  Perhaps.  If you configure your client to use a virtual Intel e1000 NETWORK card, then you could install the Intel NIC drivers within your comments... I think that the drivers Intel supports VLANS.  But I have not tested it myself.

• PowerConnect 5448, how all the trunk of physical ports and allow all the VLAN tags to pass transparently

  I would like to achieve such a goal, do all acts of switch ports 5448 as 'trunk', that is, just as an entry-level switch. Yes, I want all the tags VLAN through seamlessly.

  Let me explain more clearly. If

  • With MAC1 PC1 is connected to switch port 1 (port 1) in short, PC2 with MAC2 is connected to port 2.
  • PC1 sends a packet with vlanid = 30 ethernet VLAN tag,.

  I want the ethernet packet must be SENT to port 2 without modification, i.e. 2 PC will receive the package with exactly the same byte packets that PC1 sends.

  Currently, I want to configure all ports from the switch to act like this, but how to do this? Can someone tell me the more concise CLI commands to achieve? Alternatively, it is possible via the web interface?

  I must again complain the poor manual, which talks about this concept and this notion over and over again (both of ambiguous statements that the author of manual does not), BUT doesn't explain them not at the level of the content of the packages, so I'm totally at a loss.

  I tried the web interface. Simply together port 1 and 2 for access mode or general mode does not work.

  Please help me. Thank you in advance.

  Thank you, Josh, you begin to point me in the right direction.

  Now, I know just affecting a Trunk port, or general mode is NOT sufficient.  I have to give what kind of package VLAN (i.e. what VLAN ID) are allowed to pass through.

  To do this assignment, I have to take 2 steps. say first of all, the database "vlan" to recognize a VLAN ID in the world, then say that some specific port is allowed to pass through with this VLAN ID specific packages.

  Thus, in order to pass packets VLAN with VLAN ID 18-25 no modified (marked packets in packages marked on) g7 to the g8 to port port, I have to do:

  Console # config
  Console (config) # vlan database
  Console(config-VLAN) # vlan 18-25
  Console(config-VLAN) # exit

  Console (config) # interface ethernet g7
  Console # switchport general mode
  Console # switchport General allowed vlan add the tag of 18-25

  and again for the g8. And if I want to 48 ports to act like that, I have to write this kind of order 48 times right? All the shortcuts?

  Some useful links for me: http://hasanmansur.com/2012/10/14/powerconnect-switchport-modes/

• RV Support VLAN Tagging on WAN Port?

  Hello

  I would like to know if RV Series Router can support VLAN tagging on the port WAN himself? I need this cause my ISP using these methods to connect to the router/modem to the end user.

  Thank you.

  -----

  Kind regards

  Danny

  Please visit RV315W.

• VLAN tagging on VIC 1225

  Hi community

  We are currently developing a standalone Server, installed c240 with a vic1225 (connected to a pair of vpc 5500 nexus).

  We have bare metal windows 2008 R2 os installed and active nic teaming ((802.3ad) with the enictool.)

  Now we want to Setup vlan tag NICs in windows, but there is no way to do...

  This is usually possible in windows 2008 Server?

  THX in advance for advice.

  Hello

  ENIC pilot for W2K8 does not support feature of 1 q VLAN dot.

  With W2K12, the grouping of the characteristic marking windows native driver.

  Alternative options are

  (1) implement adapter FEX

  (2) If you plan to run Hyper-V on the host, it can mark the VLAN.

  (3) implement individual vNIC for each VIRTUAL LAN and configure the host of active transmission load balancing / active. In addition, configure links on the individual switch ports allowing to the VLAN needed and have them not as a port-channel / vPC

  I recommend you to upgrade the firmware and drivers to the latest version to eliminate known issues.

  Padma

• VLAN Tagging (VST) and VLAN native on the same vswitch

  I'm trying to figure out if its possible to put running the VLAN tagging for a vswitch if our virtual machines are currently in the vlan 1 (vlan native) on our cisco switches. I don't know why it's set up this way, but change is not an option at this time.

  Ultimately what I'm trying to accomplish is setting up a group of servers that differ on one VLAN, but under the same vswitch. I'm assuming that VST is what I need, but I don't know if I can simply specify how vlan 1 as the vlan 1 is not marked on cisco switches and my understanding is that VST requires to carry a label.

  Your help is greatly appreciated.

  NuRD.

  With the vSwitch connected to a trunk on the physical switch port, create the port groups and you need only configure the ID then VLAN for the port groups that do not use of VLAN native. See for example http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1004074

  André

• Several Vlan tagging to vswitch

  Hi I have abt 20 vm in an ESX 4.0 each with different vlan and all the virtual machine cannot see each other what would be a better approach for this configuration. create a virtual switch for each computer virtual but with different vlan tagging assign each? (virtual switch 20 sense) or use pvlan a better option for this I only got 2 physical cables connected to this esx carrying all the traffic 20 vlan. Or any other recommendation?

  Thanks for any info

  sounds odd humm maybe these articles can help you:

  http://communities.VMware.com/docs/doc-4861

  http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalID=1004887

  Alex

• VLAN tagging without trade?

  Is it possible to VLAN tag a port vSwitch without using a GROUP of ports using PowerCLI?  Similar to how would tag a port on a physical switch.

  OK, you use dvSwitches!

  I understand now what you want to achieve, even if with the help of exchanges has more advantages then the VLAN ID only.

  Of course, that this can be accomplished by using PowerCLI too.

  Try something like this:

  $dvSwitchName = "dvSwitch0"
  $dvPortId = "100"
  $VLAN = 220
  
  $portSpec = New-Object VMware.Vim.DVPortConfigSpec
  $portSpec.operation = "edit"
  $portSpec.key = $dvPortId
  $portSpec.setting = New-Object VMware.Vim.VMwareDVSPortSetting
  $portSpec.setting.vlan = New-Object VMware.Vim.VmwareDistributedVirtualSwitchVlanIdSpec
  $portSpec.setting.vlan.inherited = $false
  $portSpec.setting.vlan.vlanId = $VLAN
  
  $dvSwitch = Get-View -ViewType 'VmwareDistributedVirtualSwitch' -Filter @{'Name'=$dvSwitchName}
  $dvSwitch.ReconfigureDVPort_Task($portSpec)
  

• Configuration of VLAN Tagging

  I'm pretty new to VSphere, go to the install/configure in November class but had a consultant come do a show dog & Pony and he said we could do VLAN tagging to allow all our VLAN's communicate via a single distributed switch connected to a physical switch port 1. I can't get to work - can I get some advice on what I'm wrong? Attached screenshot - any help is appreciated

  Yes - 8 trade and assign each of them a single VLAN and then give them your virtual machines the portgroup appropriate.

• VLAN Tag vlan vs unidentified

  I am running Dell Power Connect 5548 and 5524 in an arrangement of battery on 3 floors.

  I have a question on the Middle floor by which DHCP addresses are not to be issued to clients in vlan 90

  See below

  GFLOOR

  interface gigabitethernet1/0/48
  channel-group mode 1 on
  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 40,50,70,80,90 tag
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 1 unidentified

  interface gigabitethernet2/0/48
  channel-group mode 1 on
  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 40,50,70,80,90 tag
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 1 unidentified
  !
  Interface Port - Channel 1
  Description LAG_TO_TOP_FLOOR
  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 40,50,70,80,90 tag
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 1 unidentified

  1FLOOR

  interface gigabitethernet1/0/48
  channel-group mode 1 on
  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 40,50,70,80 tag
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 1.90 untagged

  interface gigabitethernet2/0/48
  channel-group mode 1 on
  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 40,50,70,80 tag
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 1.90 untagged

  interface gigabitethernet3/0/24
  switchport access vlan 50
  Interface Port - Channel 1
  Description LAG_TO_TOP_FLOOR
  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 40,50,70,80 tag
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 1.90 untagged

  I just need to tap 1Floor interfaces or should I take 90 off unmarked first, then add to marked subsequently

  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 40,50,70,80,90 tag
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 1 unidentified

  Thank you

  ANDY

  If that's the difference and the other works and the other is not then I suggest matching the configs on the floors.

  Is there a reason why, the floors are set up differently?

• PowerConnect 2824: Can't access web management using VLAN TAG 1?

  Let's say I have port 20, which is a member with LABEL of VLAN 1, 10 and 20.

  If I try to access web management to help interface VLAN 1 TAG, it is not accessible.  However, if I remove the tag VLAN (and the default PVID value of 1), then it works fine.

  Is this a known limit?

  In addition, change the management VLAN on my 2824?  (what I read, it is not possible)

  You're right about the two statements.  The Web GUI is accessible only through the untagged VLAN 1 and it is not possible to change the management VLAN on the 2800 Series switches.  On the other upper level switches, you can use the ip address command vlan xx to move the management VLAN in the VLAN specified in the statement.

  I hope this helps.

• ISA550W with multi SSID (each having separate DHCP and VLAN tag)?

  ISA550W can do the following (in order):

  (1) first group interfaces physical and Wi - Fi SSID (s) set

  (2) then assign with DHCP (ip or subnet)

  (3) then add a tag VLAN interfaces and SSID (s) wireless

  (4) repeat 1 to 3 for the remainging and SSID (s) wireless interfaces to create the following diagram:

  

  (1) I believe that could transform these ports in ports of junction. That said, I'll normally in the ports themselves through networking, change them to the Trunk ports and add the appropriate VLAN. Please keep in mind that as a general rule which present you to a Trunk port is another switch. Then you EF the VLAN appropriate to each switch coelio that attach a device such as a workstation. There are some devices that do not support be connected to a Trunk port, like the OnPlus of Cisco device however.

  (2) think SSID that only access ports. Because you could never connect a device that would support Trunking wireless, you can apply only 1 VLAN by SSID wireless-> basic settings.

  (3) because the SSID cannot be interconnection. See #2 above for configuring the VLANS on SSID.

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

• Removal of VLAN Tag on SG300.

  Hi all, tried searching but I am unable to find a specific answer to my question.

  I'm testing some equipment at the present time, the basic configuration is a software tester on laptop connects via ethernet on Board of our HAD. Some data must pass through our ESE and reach a second device. Tagged data flows from the laptop to the ESA. I have two switches SG300-10 which is given to me.

  These tests require test data to be S - tag only; 802.1ad 0x88A8 Ethertype with my choice of VID (100). There is no C - Tag (0 x 8100), unusual, I know! However my second device cannot manage the VLAN, so I need to remove the label.

  Previous test required only the C - tag data, and I managed to remove the labels quite easily by connecting the DUT for the switch port 10, second device with port 10 bridge interface and tagged VLAN 100 the value member and port 9 and 10 port access VLAN 100 interface.

  I tried different combinations of setting port 10 customer/general/trunk interfaces but were unable to remove the tags out of port 9. I was able to capture the images desired on port 9 straight, but they are of course marked. I'm working on the presumption that the SG300 can remove S - Tags on output.

  The device to port 9 has need of answering queries ARP with a specific MAC address and the response on the same VLAN, which would switch to add to the ARP response. I don't know if this is possible, but perhaps I could replace this device with the second switch if it would respond to ARP on one VLAN only S-Tag.

  I would appreciate any pointers that everyone has!

  An access port on the SG300 facing the marked port of the remote site has to accomplish this. Handling tag always happens generally during penetration.

• With the help of VLANS and VLAN Tagging is not working / no connection

  Hello

  I m trying to configure a VLAN between some virtual machines on ESX host 3.

  I want to do this way:

  http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US & cmd = displayKC & externalId = 1004074

  I got 1 dedicated NETWORK adapter to each ESX host that is connected to a dvSwitch in which I configured a portgroup

  with VLAN ID 2121. I have configured each virtual machine to use this network.

  When I put the virtual machines on a single host, they are able to communicate.

  When they are placed on different hosts they are (if the VIRTUAL LAN is enabled on portgroup) not able to communicate.

  So I m assuming it must be a problem in the config NIC on the ESX host or switch.

  I m using a HP2910AL on which I activated mode trunk for each port that is connected to a NETWORK card with

  the dvSwitch/Portgroup I try to use for the vlan. In the hp switch, I have a default VLAN with ID 1 where

  the Ports are marked not signposted. I install a second VLAN on the switch with ID 2121 in which I scored

  This tag ports.

  Is there something else to do - perhaps side ESX host?

  I tried changing the settings as "forged transmission-> allow ' on portgroup and I found other things

  in the web, but always without success.

  Kind regards

  Patrick

  Were you referred to this guide? :

  http://CDN.ProCurve.com/training/manuals/2910-ATG-Feb09-2-VLAN.PDF

  "show vlan ports" would be my next check to make sure that you have connected to your ESXi host 3 ports in the vlan 2121.

  As Duncan has said if you have a VLAN ID on the portgroup in the vSwitch and you have the port on the pSwitch as trunk not acess and VLAN ID is allowed on the trunk port pSwitch you should be ok.  Just to clarify the trunk is 802. 1 q No 802.3ad.

  The reverse is not VLAN ID on the portgroup vSwitch, use coelio on pSwitch with VLAN ID.  Limited pSwitch port to a VLAN, this may be ok for you?

• VLAN Tagging

  Hello

  Starting with a very simple configuration, but still it would like to have your input to ensure that it is correct. I want to connect the vmnic0 in a trunk on a cisco switch port.

  Currently, I have 2 VM connected to vSwitch0 that I wish they were on separate VLANS.

  How do I would put vmnic0 at the other end of the trunk (thus forming a trunk link)?

  For each computer virtual is simply the event of award of the VLAN respective in the VM network adapter - network connection setting (network Label :) in properties?

  I want to form a link between the physical cisco switch trunk and with the vSwitch0 vmnic0 manage all the VLANS for the virtual machine and segmentation/security so the traffic.

  Thank you

  ... Yes the port connected to the switch has its active status and VLAN 5

  With the Group of ports configured with VLAN ID 5, you need to set the port of Cisco "mode trunk" and ensure that VLAN5 is authorized and it is not the value by defect/native VALN.

  Well, what I mean by "If the subnet IP for the management network is available in 5 VLAN", is that if you separate the traffic in VLANs, you must ensure that systems (IP addresses) that are connected to these VLANS are accessible from other VLANs, if necessary.

  André