MXP to F 9.0.2 F 5.0 upgrade

Similar Questions

• What are the abbreviations 'MXP' and 'FXP' position?

  What are the abbreviations 'MXP' and 'FXP' position? I understand they are a representation of the quality of the registration with respect to the data by a single image. But I can't find anywhere what the abbreviations mean. Thank you.

  I don't think that the actual letters have a specific word attached or as an abbreviation.  They ae a few letters.

  Memory capacity	MXP (approx. 24 Mbps)	FXP (approx. 17Mbps)	XP +. (approx. 12 Mbps)	SP (approx. 7Mbps)	LP (approx. 5 Mbps)
  64GB	5 hours 55 min.	8 hours 20 min.	11 hours 30 min.	19 hours 10 min.	24 hours 30 min.

  I think that in the beginning LP was to play along, but I don't know about you.

• Does anyone know why an edge 95 MXP will call himself?

  I have an Edge 95 MXP and call himself all the time... the call is a SIP call of [email protected] / * /a call of 64K and the IP address. I don't have the power off because it's in the ceiling.  The unit is also recorded as a 3rd party endpoint call Manager 10.5... The unit can make calls at our other fine video devices. I had to set the unit to auto-answer, so it does not sound at all times.

  Usually, it is because your getting analyzed by applications such as SIPVicous tent identify opportunities for exploitation of circuits on UDP SIP PSTN.

  In general, this risk is mitigated by closing the firewall ports for the endpoint or by making a few changes to its configuration.  On a codec of series C, EX, SX, MX running TC software that is easy, but I do not know the equivalent commands (if there is) for a codec MXP.  However, you should be able to block the scans that cause this by closing the port UDP 5060 if the codec is open on your firewall.  If she goes by a gatekeeper as a VCS server you could disable UDP, I do not know CUCM.

  This has been asked several times, do a search in the forums for "100 @" found the following results, although they all have to do with a series C or VCS codec, but it's all the same question.  The unit is publicly accessible via the internet, it's just a matter of closing or adjustment of the endpoint configuration or call control server.

  lot-Calls-Numbers-100-and-101-looks-Self-Calls

  strange-appeal-loop-c40

  Cisco-VCS-Alarm-Call-License-Limit-Reached

  C20-phantom-appellants

• The upgrade of MXP via TMS

  Having a problem to upgrade MXP BOF software Version F8.2 to F9.02 through TMS 12.6.2 (we have 200 + upgrade)

  Reports of TMS 100% successful even, but the systems are not upgraded.

  I tried the re-boot after upgrade, no different

  Update the endpoint works Web Interface ok.

  Any ideas?

  Philippe

  I had this problem myself.

  In my case, it was due to a corrupt firmware image.  Manager software TMS showed that firmware was on the server; the problem is that the file was corrupt and much smaller that it should have been.  Upgrades using this inevitably failed file - even if reported as successful MSD!

  Take a look on your server in your software repository location (most often

  C:\Program Files\TANDBERG\TMS\wwwTMS\Public\data\SOFTWARE) and see if the file looks suspiciously small (or something else).  You can manually copy the file to that location.

• Tandberg 6000 MXP video call Source missing

  Hello, I have have a 6000 MXP running F9.3.1 and has been for awhile now.  It was recently discovered that the video source of the call is not the camera that we want displayed.  When I checked the list of options, only some of the available entries were actually there.  Video 1, PC, VNC and current are there, but not video 2.

  I want 2 video as source video of my call, and I am quite sure, it has been defined in this way in the past, or have heard about earlier.  I have down graded to F9.3, but has not made a difference.  I confirmed that this source of start-up and snap shot source all have the right options.

  After checking several other systems MXP running F9.3.1, I see that they are also not the same thing.  Is there anything I can do to call video Source using Video 2?

  Darren

  Hmm interesting. The MXP for F9 Administrator's guide at least shows that it is possible to define,

  but I also see that it only supports some sources:

  

  also through the

  xConfiguration CallVideoSource?

  * xConfiguration h CallVideoSource:<0>

  The source presentation or start working for all:

  

  Have you tried what happens if you set the main power source and the source of startup to video2/aux and restart, and make a call.

  Maybe someone else has another idea, if no, and you have a service contract, you might think of filing a

  case of TAC. In any case keep us updated if you find a solution outside this thread.

  Please remember useful frequency responses and identify useful or correct answers.

• The MXP 95 edge Firmware update

  Recently, I came in an operation using a Tandberg Edge 95 legacy. The firmware of the device, from what I can tell has never been updated. It is currently running F6.0. I downloaded the F9.0.2 package but I am not familiar with this procedure. Can someone help or direct me to a site of insturctional on the updating of this device?

  upgrade is covered in this document - page 141

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/Telepresence/endpoint/MXP-series/F9/administration_guide/mxp_series_administrator_guide_f90_excl-full-menu-structure.PDF

  You also need a release F9 key.

• Integration of TANDBERG 1700 MXP configuration with CUCM (h.323/SIP)

  I tried to configure a CUCM with TANDBERG 1700 MXP 8.5 and I could not, if someone has already done and help me with this number SIP or H323.

  Thanks in advance

  Hello

  Mxp units can be saved on cucm as endpoints (base) of third parties.

  Please find the steps to enter mxp.

  The sip on mxp as uri and sip proxy address settings.

  1. sip mode: on

  2 SIP Uri: [email protected] / * / of cucm for example: [email protected]/ * /.

  3 server discovery: manual

  4. server address: ip address of cucm.

  5 server Type: cisco

  6. transport: whether auto snack but who do not work, change to udp.

  7 TLs: off

  8: authentication sip username: user you created on cucm eg 9011 or amlesh

  9 password: use the same password configured when creating user 9011 or amlesh

  CUCM config:

  1. Select the basic profile of third party.

  2. Add the mac address of endpoint mxp.

  3. Select the appropriate sip, phone etc models profile.

  4. under user digest and owner user id select the same user, for example: 9011 or amlesh

  5. save the configuration and assign DN even that we used in the uri on mxp sip settings.

  6. also associate device mxp the user using the association on cucm devices pane.

  Please let me know if that work for you. I tried this in my lab and works.

  Thank you

  Amlesh

• Distance of the compatibility of MXP for the EX series

  HY guys,.

  I would like to ask something about the compatibility of the remote in the 1700 MXP for Ex90.

  can be used TRC4 distance EX 90? because I got the replacement of equipment for MXP1700 with EX90, but there is no touch screen remote control for EX pack.

  Thank you & Gbu,

  Better subject.

  Nanda

  Hi, thanks for the thanks.

  I had a 1700 at some point as well. If you liked that, you'll love the EX90! :-)

  Especially with the touchpad, you won't miss the remote anymore, but at least for now he

  could be a workaround, please check that you use TC6, I think TC4/5 might not work with the remote control.

  Be sure to check the documentation:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps11327/products_user_guide_list.html

  Nanda, if you can evaluate the responses we made (using the stars below each assignment), and then assign the thred responded if it is.

  How to: useful frequency responses and identify useful or correct answers.

• Tandberg 8000 mxp compatiable with sx 20?

  I use Tandberg 8000 mxp w / s/w ver 2.5, now I want to buy 1 new cisco sx 20, do I need to uggrade

  the tandberg first, or they can work without doing anything.

  You really need to upgrade this MXP as latest version is F9.3.x

  See this post for how to get a free upgrade from Cisco:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/3971210#3971210

  However, please note you can not move from 2.5 to 9 at once, see this post for the recommended upgrade path:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/3774853#3774853

  /Jens

  Please note the answers and score the questions as "answered" as appropriate.

• Gel-presentation SX20 to MXP endpoints

  We have a problem where a codec SX20 in presenter view showing a slide of that presentation freezes as the slides is advanced on 7 1700 MXP endpoints.  The other end points do not see the presentation in advance.  it freezes right on their end.  Devices are saved on a server of VCS control and we have an old legacy MCU, MPS200.  The MPS200 could be the bottleneck?

  We have a new Cisco 5300 MCU, that we're converting.  I would like any advice or thoughts related to this.

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

  Of course, members may be a problem. If you have the 53xx so, try it.

  The SPM is a very old style of MCU and still there's always the interop issues.

• Replacement of 6000 MXP Integrator with unique display. C40 SX20 vs?

  I have to make a quick decision and my CISCO sales representative is MIA :(

  We have a bunch of 6000 s MXP (package ingegrator), I would like to replace. They are simple installations with a single monitor on a roll integer grid.

  with output to the screen and a camera is there any point to spend the extra money for a C40 vs getting a SX20? From a point of view video capability they look pretty well. C40 more things gets me in the back, but it is a pretty simple setup.

  Just looking for what people here could do?

  Thank you!

  Although C40 and SX20 are two different solutions for videoconferencing from Cisco, an integrator (c40) and other is fast setting solution (SX20).

  The SX20 Quick Set is designed to provide multi-party and Conference video to high definition with the flexibility to adapt to various configurations - all at a value price and size of the room.

  C40 is for Integrator supports for integration with 3 party like crestron devices, mixers.

  two take in charge the premium 1080 p solution.

  both are excellent solutions and are mind blowing in the feature and the feature as compare to the MXP series.

  You can't go wrong with either.

• Phone type Edge 95 MXP found in CM8.6

  Hi all

  I try to add new phone device in the handler calls 8.6

  However, I can't find the type of phone Edge 95 MXP.

  I need to download any firmware, or choose another type of similar phone?

  Thank you

  Sam

  Hi Sam,

  Unfortunately MXP endpoints are still not supported for registering for the CUCM. Support is available for the series C and Ex-material of the series right now. You can see the release notes of the MXP software for updates in the future.

  Kind regards

  Saint André

• Tanderg edge 95 MXP I need something else?

  We have this device used to indicate the following legend "cannot receive or make calls. Network option is not installed. Loking bandwith installation option"for options, I found the next:

  Table 3. Order information

  Product name reference compliance model number

  Cisco TelePresence edge 95 MXP CTS-EDGE95-K9 TTC7-14

  Comes with: Edge MXP codec, bandwidth of the ISDN/2 Mbps IP 512 Kbps, natural presenter package, MultiSite, Cisco

  Telepresence PrecisionHDMC camera 720 p, 1 microphone, remote control

  The video Standard Options - choose a

  CTS-NTSC for Edge MXP CTS-NTSC

  For Edge MXP CTS-PAL PAL option

  First, this problem is related to the licences?... Can anyone guide to me to find out what this option (in the case that was the problem)?...

  Thank you very much

  Hi Ing,

  There seems to be some contractual problems, you need to prosecute TAC for the reason of the integrity and security of data.

  may be that it will be not supported by the current state however there are still have alternatives.

  I can give you an overview.

  This device is not showing any contract and could not find any customer order number, probably you can anticipate that you would have the documents of purchase for this device.

  You can join the account manager for your company that manages the update of contracts like this

  as the now he gets that one associate who is the product key and is installed to make edge 95

  no other option generated

  as I do not have the SO or PO number can not verify if there was another option purchased,

  You can reach the center of sales cisco for any purchase of additional keys, or your accounts team

  Thank you

  Ravi Kr.

• Differences and versions of firmware Tandberg 880 MXP

  Hello

  I'm a bit confused about the differences of the Tandberg 880 MXP device firmware.

  My camera shows itself on the webGUI what follows:

  Software version:

  E5.3 PAL

  When I check the Cisco site, https://tools.cisco.com/SWIFT/LicensingUI/Quickstart#, I see for my device:

  Dispatched current SW SW
  B4.3 B4.3

  Also when I check the key to Version shipped on the page of Cisco, it does not match the Option key pressed in the webGUI on the device.

  Is any other firmware available for this device? I've heard of some issues of security vulnerability / like this:

  If you're upgrading to F8 or below, you can contact TAC and steer them to the Security Council, with it, you can get the MXP F9.3.1 software for free without needing a service contract.

  Thank you

  Maarten

  If it is running E5.3PAL, then it is likely, that this is one of the old 880 s classic and not the MXP.

  The latest version of the software E-series is E5.3 that you're already running.

  Wayne
  --
  Remember the frequency responses and mark your question as answered as appropriate.

• End of sale (EoS) / end of life (EoL) information on Cisco TelePresence system 1700 MXP

  I have a question about the EoL (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collaboration-endpoints/eos-eol-po...) policy and the announcement of EoS/EoL Cisco TelePresence system 1700 MXP (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/collaboration-endpoints...).

  According to the policy of the EoL, paragraph 4 ter, "after the first year and for the operating system SW - if available - we will offer bug fixes, versions of maintenance, workarounds or patches for a period of 4 years for operating system software."  Therefore, it is 5 years after the Date of the EoS, which could make the OS support close on 28/02/2017 EoL products.  I'm one to believe that a product and its applicable operating system are good as long as the company provides patches for bugs/flaws.

  My question is about the migration of the product suggestions.  The suggestion is to "migrate to the Cisco EX Series (the EX60 or solution EX90) telepresence system."  However, when the announcement of EoS/EoL EX60 inspection, the "SW maintenance communicated End Date of: HW, SW OS ' 06 07, 2016.  Note that it is not the end of Maintenance SW verbiage in 1700 MXP EoS/EoL announcement.  I'm under the assumption that the new product within OS support only one model exceeded?  Why anyone would follow the suggested migration if I get fewer months support OS than an older model?  Should I go out of date on the announcement of the EoS/EoL, or use the 5-year rule as shown in the end of life policy.

  If I am interpreting this wrong, please do not hesitate to correct me.  I am trying to understand the explicit verbiage in the end of life and ads EoS/EoL policy.

  As the 1700 MXP announcement was published in 2011, at that time, the EX60/90 was a legitimate substitute. However years later, endpoints EX Series are now EOS, you should look at alternatives for the EX series instead.

  The announcement of the EOS/EOL indicates a date of end of software support, you should go there. The reason that ad 1700 MXP does not list one could be that the date of assumption of the software had already spent or they simply don't have the list at the time. Looking at the latest version of the software for the 1700 MXP, it's F9.3.3 in 2014, I highly doubt, there will be another, but you never know given that other points of MXP endpoints that are not past their published end date of software support.