VLAN Trunking

Similar Questions

• VLAN Trunking between 6248 and 2848

  Hello

  I have a Powerconnect 6248 switch connected to a 2848 and I try to get a VLAN on the 2848.

  VLAN working and properly receive DHCP addresses, traffic lanes and DNS runs on the 6248.

  The Protocol DHCP, DNS server is connected to port 1 on the 6248.

  When I create a Trunk port on 3 the 6248 Port, allow all VLANS through it, creating a trunk on port 1 of the 2848 on VLAN10 and try to plug in devices inside, they can see all other devices connected to the L3 switch.

  The two switches are running the latest firmware and the L3 on his own works as expected. I can't get any kind of circuits working at L2, tried with normal cable and crossover switch.

  Here is the config of the L3 6248. Switch 2848 L2 has a blank canvas with 10 VLANS created on ports 1,2,3,4 with port 1 as the trunk port installation.

  Any ideas pleeease? Anyone? It drives me crazy.

  ************************

  <sub>! Current configuration:
  ! Description of the system "Powerconnect 6248, 3.2.0.7, VxWorks 6.5.
  ! Version of the software system 3.2.0.7
  ! Passage mode is configured as disabled
  !
  Configure
  database of VLAN
  VLAN 10,20,30
  VLAN 10 1 routing
  VLAN 20 2 routing
  VLAN 30 3 routing
  
  output
  battery
  1 2 Member
  output
  the IP 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
  field of IP domain name
  name-server IP 192.168.1.10
  IP routing
  interface vlan 10
  Routing
  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
  output
  interface vlan 20
  Routing
  address 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0
  IP helper-address is 192.168.1.10
  output
  interface vlan 30
  Routing
  192.168.30.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
  IP helper-address is 192.168.1.10
  output
  level password user name 'administrator' encrypted 15 5f4dcc3b5aa765d61d8327deb882cf99
  l2relay DHCP
  DHCP l2relay vlan 10-90
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g1
  switchport mode general
  pvid switchport General 10
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 10,20,30
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g2
  switchport mode general
  pvid switchport General 10
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 10
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g3
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 10.20
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g4
  switchport mode general
  pvid switchport General 10
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 10
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g5
  switchport mode general
  pvid switchport General 10
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 10
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g6
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 20
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 20
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g7
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 20
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 20
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g8
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 20
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 20
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g9
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 30
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 30
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g10
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 30
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 30
  output</sub>

  After turning off spanning tree on the 2848, all works now.

  VLAN, trunking everything.

  Thanks for the help! :)

  I hope that if someone else can use what it took me ages to develop. I plugged on Netgear switches etc and they seem to work.

  The issue was going on between the dell 6248 and 2848, Spanning tree is enabled on the default 2848. If I was going to the Netgear via the 6248, then at the 2848 switches worked.

  My config on the l3 also works very well if someone would use :)

• Cisco SLM224G VLAN Trunk Help! -&gt; Problem solved!

  Hi, I have a few difficulties of implementation of the switch, I can't understand how to configure the network for VLANs created port. I have configured under management of VLANS, VLAN 10 and 20, I asigned ports e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6 with 10 PVID and e7, e8, e9, e10, e11, e12 with 20 PVID and the rest to defaul 1 PVID, frame SD = All + infiltration on filtering. Under port to VLAN-> VLAN10-> ports e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6 Tagged + e24 tag (I want this to be the trunk) and the tag VLAN20-> e7, e8, e9, e10, e11, e12 Tagged + e24. Theats all that I set up according to the SLM_Admin_Guide.pdf and I have connected the e24 (trunk port) to a Pf meaning Server (the server is configured with the same VLAN ID as on the switch), please someone tell me how to set up the trunk? I know that there is no option in the Port settings to define 'Access' or 'Trunk'... until this means? that the SLM224G does not support the VLAN Trunk? I saw some screenshots with the Linksys SLM224G and he had 'Access' or 'Trunk' setting... and Cisco does NOT work.  Help!

  Hello

  Interesting, I see two different GUIs in your screen capture, it looks like two different computers. :-)

  But the big brother of the SLM, the series SRW and I am about what follows to the SRW series, because I do not have a SLM in front of me, I had put;

  Step 1. the port settings interface return, leaving the PVID to 1 then do scroll down and save the option.

  Step 2.  On this "ports setting photo GUI, you have, I would put the switch ports to shared resources in mode Trunk. If the port must not be tagged in the VLAN 1 only, then I leave the setting the port mode 'access '.

  (Access mode allows a port belong only to one VLAN no marked only).

  (shared mode allows the switch port belong to several VLANs marked, but still unmarked in one vlan only usually the vlan by default)

  Step 3.  So I goto the "Vlan to the port' tab, Tagged for ports beloning to vlan 10 then do scroll down and save the option."

  step 4   So I goto the "Vlan to the port' tab, Tagged for ports beloning to vlan 20 then do scroll down and save the option."

  By default vlan1 in most SRW series brother would then be not identified on all ports and vlan10 and vlan 20 could be labelled on the appropriate ports.

• Start a Discussion on vSphere / VLAN Trunking in ESXi

  This is my first post to this community of VMware, so please bear with me if I'm missing something simple. I went to a discussion to ask this question under vSphere, but for some reason that I'm not able. I chose to follow the community of vSphere, but for some reason it is grey when I try to choose to start a discussion. Thoughts and guidance?

  The real question, I would like to ask on vSphere is how to configure trunking VLAN on a single host (no vCenter) using the vswitch standard. I find a lot of links like this one http://www.rustyhann.com/ESXi-06-Create-vLAN.pdf that describe the process of setting up a trunk on the switch port, then assign a VLAN ID to the ports on the ESXi host groups. When I change the switch to a trunk port, I lose conductivity to the host, so I can manage it is no longer. In addition, on the host, I see no VLAN ID and I don't see any configuration which leads me to believe that the switch is inform the host (thru VLAN Trunking Protocol or any other means) which have the VLAN. I might be able to answer this question for my part, I can bypass the first issue. Thoughts and guidance?

  Thank you. Best.

  Hello

  You are on the appropriate tab, just type 100 or 200 should you able to type value. Check out the screenshots below.

  

  

  

  

  

• Problem of BladeCenter ESX Server Vlan trunking

  VLAN for the ESX BladeCenter server problem

  ESX, Bladecenter, VLAN

  Hello

  The bladecenter was initially setup by a company and only allows me

  create a VM from Vlan 2. The problem is that I'm out of intellectual property that

  VLAN and I wanted the ability to use another address space for the

  VM I have already created a new vlan 20.

  This is the current configuration of the switch.  Everything I have added to these configurations to before was sw trunk allowed vlan add 20

  Switch CISCO 4500

  Interface Port - Channel 1

  switchport

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  !

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet5/39

  Description Port Trunk BLADECENTER-sw2-p17

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  channel-group mode 1 on

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet6/2

  Truck BLADECENTER-sw2-p17 Port Description

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  channel-group mode 1 on

  !

  Config - sw1 Bladecenter switch

  VLAN 2

  Server

  VLAN 3

  WAN

  VLAN 20

  Server2

  Interface Port - Channel 1

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  interface GigabitEthernet0/17

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  Cisco-switch macro description

  channel-group mode 1 on

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/18

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  Cisco-switch macro description

  channel-group mode 1 on

  Blade switchport where the host is contained

  interface GigabitEthernet0/9

  Description blade9

  switchport vlan trunk native 2

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 2.20

  switchport mode trunk.

  The host ESX IP is in Vlan 2

  End result is that I can't use any VLANS in this new range.  There is no Vlan ID or installation marking.

  Thanks in advance.

  Grand...

  Don't forget to assign points for correct or helpful answers

• 802 1 q VLAN Trunking pilot

  Hello

  Refer to VMware ESX Server 3 802. 1 q VLAN Solutions (http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx3_vlan_wp.pdf), the marking of comments of the VM mode (VGT), the document said about 802. 1 q VLAN trunking pilot use for the virtual machine. Can we know what it is and where to download?

  Kind regards

  Teeravee Sirinapasawasdee

  Never done it myself. Maybe this will help you

  http://www.lanarchitect.NET/articles/VLANTrunking/implementation/

• N3048 vlan trunk band guaranteed bandwidth

  Hello

  Ive got 2 batteries of n3048 which will be connected by a link of fiber shds 1 Gbps, there are several local networks virtual on each stack and some of them I want trunk on the binding fiber.

  an of vlan is for a balanced load diversely routed internet connection, there is a router on each site with 100 Mbps bandwidth, but also firewalls at each site that will be in the same vlan.

  I don't want no internet to run slow because something is hogging the bandwidth on the shds, so the question is how can I guarantee 100 Mbps of traffic for vlan 10 through the shds with us other traffic crossing of vlan?

  I have install other powerconnect switches and switches cisco with trunking VLANs between switches but I've ever done where I need to ensure a slice of bandwidth with QOS?

  I'd appreciate any help or advice to achieve this

  Thank you very much

  Hi Daniel,.

  Sorry for the late reply its been a bit choppy on other projects so just had time to test this out.

  Here's what I ended up using in the config:

  Console (config) # class - match-all card VLAN_10_MATCH
  Console (config-WCPA) # match vlan 10

  Console (config) # VLAN_10_MARK policy-map on
  class console(config-Policy-classmap) # VLAN_10_MATCH
  Console(config-Policy-classmap) # brand cos 5

  Console (config) # int item in gi1/0/48
  Console (Config-if-X/Y/Z) # classofservice trust dot1p
  Console (Config-if-X/Y/Z) # classofservice dot1p-mapping 5 3
  Console (Config-if-X/Y/Z) # cos - min - bandwidth tail 0 0 10 0 0 0 0
  Console (Config-if-X/Y/Z) # cos - queue strict
  Console (Config-if-X/Y/Z) # - political service on VLAN_10_MARK

  I applied the same configuration for the trunk on two piles of switch port
  

  Thanks for your help in pointing me in the right direction

  I used jperf on 2 laptops in VLAN 10, 1 in each switch then your laptop on the other switch into a vlan with jperf mode server and 3 computers, send traffic using jperf him around the trunk and which seems to work well. ive tried run qos traffic vlan first and then maxing the bandwidth through the traffic trunk vlan qos not and then vice versa with traffic vlan qos to a already maxxed bandwidth through the trunk and he still gave him its bandwidth of 100 Mbps in both scenarios.

   

  concerning
  

• Aggregation of links and VLAN Trunking

  I configured 2 switches with aggregates of connection between them.  Access ports are part of VLAN 10, but no longer communicate through the NEWLY created GAL.  LAG only pass a single VLAN or is there something that I am missing in the LAG config?

  After creating the LAG you must then configure the LAG entering the port-channel interface and put to general/Trunk mode. Updated general/trunk mode allows multiple VLANs on the connection.

  Example:

  Console (config) # interface port-channel 1

  mode console # switchport general

  Console # switchport General allowed vlan add 2,3,4,5 tag

• Vlan trunk between switches traffic encryption

  Hello

  Can someone guide me to some documents and other resources on how to encrypt the traffic between 2 switches. The switchces will be connected with fiber and use the marking dot-1 q. And I wan't to encrypt all traffic to shared resources.

  I was thinking about L2TP, but I have not found a good description on how to implement this. I have two 3750 switches, I thought I could use.

  Thank you for any input,

  Kind regards

  Paul Mathiesen

  mnemonic

  Norway

  Hello

  Thanks for the reply. I had a look at effect and it seems good. I would have liked to use something P2P but also limit the amount of MAC addresses on the "wire". But let me first give you an understanding of the task:

  We have two sites, linked by fiber, and we want to create a trunk VLAN everywhere and to expand the broadcast domains to you another site.

  The carrier FOOL, has a limitation on the number of MAC addresses, they allow the service to fiber, 100.

  We also encrypt the datatraversing this connectivity.

  MACsec wuold work 100% exept the source and dstination MAC addresses are still sent (at least according to https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:LEf2qOmYZyYJ:www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2011/bn-hutchison-macsec-sample-packets-0511.pdf+&hl=en&gl=za&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgmAHXpDOY0RBAE-Rv1HDpu_C_gkeSPN4cv6NGgyP0M1aXVu0UqzCfxo8t_P41ep6J37k4OLKnjfp1M9hoTDHxY22WGz2h7yB7YRLyPvRUbGS8TICzvEMlG92xqbhy6RWFugmnj&sig=AHIEtbTfu0LQIJejdYidE6yzq4lpPifxjQ
  )

  And who tempt me to eat in the limit of MAC 100.

  Ridiculous I know, but we are looking for an out-of-the-norm plan...

  Thank you

• SG200 SG200 VLAN Trunk does not

  I have 2 switches SG200-8 and I'm trying to cross the two switches of trunking VLAN, I configured IG1 article on both switches as a port trunk with native VLAN1 and VLAN2 tag.  VLAN 1 and 2 exist on both switches.

  Traffic on VLAN 1 passes without problem, but traffic on VLAN2 does not at all.  I confirmed that changing the trunk to tagged VLAN1 and VLAN2 native allows traffic then on VLAN2 flow through the switch but not so traffic on VLAN1.

  I also tried this as a SHIFT and a general port with the same results, everyone knows about this problem?

  Hi Ultrique01,

  I thank very you much for all the tests. This isn't very common hardware problem, but we might need to consider specifically your switches.

  At this point I suggest you to contact our Small Business Support Center and open the ticket:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/Web/TSD-Cisco-small-business-suppor...

  Kind regards

  Aleksandra

• 1252 config several VLAN trunking on ethernet not

  Hi all I am new to these forums, but have read some posts on configurations for an AP from 1252 to switch 2950.

  I have several VLANS andmultiple SSID configuration on my ap.  The switch knows the VLANS on the access point

  I think that in the config.

  When I put the 2950 in trunk mode on the port, the ap is conencted too, I can see no longer the access point. And none of my ssid / VLAN traffic through the stem net ether to the switch.  I think I have a problem with the config of the ap specifically either in the British Virgin Islands (do not understand this virtual port) or in bridge groups. (Never worked with foredeck groups.)

  The AP is in stand-alone mode.

  Here is my config on the side of the ap.

  interface Dot11Radio0

  no ip address

  no ip route cache

  !

  the cipher mode vlan 300 encryption tkip aes - ccm

  !

  broadcasting-key vlan 300 change 600 members-notice change in capacity

  !

  !

  SSID 101

  !

  SSID 300

  !

  countermeasure tkip duration of maintaining 120

  gain of antenna 0

  Base-1 speed, 0 2.0 5.5 11.0 6.0 12.0 9.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0 m0. M1. M2. M3. M4. M5. M6. M7. M8. M9. M10. M11. M12. M13. M14. M15.

  root of station-role

  Bridge-Group 1

  Bridge-Group 1 block-unknown-source

  No source of bridge-Group 1-learning

  unicast bridge-Group 1-floods

  Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people

  !

  interface Dot11Radio0.100

  encapsulation dot1Q 100

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 100

  100 block-unknown-source bridge-group

  No source of bridge-group 100-learning

  No bridge group 100 unicast-flooding

  Bridge-group 100 covering people with reduced mobility

  !

  interface Dot11Radio0.300

  encapsulation dot1Q 300

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 255

  Bridge-group subscriber-loop-control 255

  Bridge-group 255 block-unknown-source

  No source of bridge-group 255-learning

  No bridge group 255 unicast-flooding

  Bridge-group 255 covering people with reduced mobility

  !

  interface Dot11Radio1

  no ip address

  no ip route cache

  !

  the cipher mode vlan 300 encryption tkip aes - ccm

  !

  broadcasting-key vlan 300 change 600 members-notice change in capacity

  !

  !

  SSID 101

  !

  SSID 300

  !

  countermeasure tkip duration of maintaining 120

  gain of antenna 0

  DFS block 3 Strip

  Speed - Basic6.0 9.0 12.0 18.0 36.0 24.0 48.0 54.0 m0. M1. M2. M3. M4. M5. M6. M7. M8. M9. M10. M11. M12. M13. M14. M15.

  channel SFR

  root of station-role

  !

  interface Dot11Radio1.100

  encapsulation dot1Q 100

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 100

  100 block-unknown-source bridge-group

  No source of bridge-group 100-learning

  No bridge group 100 unicast-flooding

  !

  interface Dot11Radio1.300

  encapsulation dot1Q 300

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 255

  Bridge-group subscriber-loop-control 255

  Bridge-group 255 block-unknown-source

  No source of bridge-group 255-learning

  No bridge group 255 unicast-flooding

  Bridge-group 255 covering people with reduced mobility

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0

  no ip address

  no ip route cache

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0.51

  51 native encapsulation dot1Q

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-Group 1

  No source of bridge-Group 1-learning

  Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0.100

  encapsulation dot1Q 100

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 100

  No source of bridge-group 100-learning

  Bridge-group 100 covering people with reduced mobility

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0.300

  encapsulation dot1Q 300

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 255

  No source of bridge-group 255-learning

  Bridge-group 255 covering people with reduced mobility

  !

  interface BVI1

  IP 10.131.10.70 255.255.255.0

  no ip route cache

  !

  51 of VLAN is what I'm trying to trunk more.  VLAN 100 is my networks vlan normal almost everything at the moment.  And my attempt to secure traffic wireless to a new vlan Vlan 300 more course on my local network.

  VLAN 51 has no ip address range

  IP VLAN 100 range is 10.131.10.0

  10.131.11.0 between 300 VLAN

  The routing goes to my switch 3750 core / router, but the access point is conencted to a 2950 namely shared resources to my layer distribution on a stack of 2975.  Once again the vlan 300 works on the 2975 stack and will pull dhcp if it is enabled.  Have not tried this on the 2950 yet, but I suspect it will also work based on the setting of the trunk on the s950 battery of 2975.

  In any case, I want to be able to do is have multiple VLANs configured on the AP (from most secure to least guarantee based on the capabilities of the equipment) and that traffic vlan tag go to my 3750 possibly for other guidelines.

  Here, any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you for taking the time to read this.

  Sincerely,

  Kevin Pulford

  Systems administrator

  Harmon city, Inc.

  Yes, remove the vlan 51 can tell vlan 100 is the native, and there will be a link to bridge - Group 1.  Then change the switch port to vlan 100 native.  You should then be able to reach the access point via telnet/GUI.

  orders will be:

  config t

  No int dot11radio0.51

  No int dot11radio1.51

  No int g0.51

  int dot11radio0.100

  100 native encapsulation dot1q

  int dot11radio1.100

  100 native encapsulation dot1q

  int g0.100

  encapsulation dot1q 100 natively.

  To be sure, save reboot and wr mem.

• VLAN Trunking on vSS

  Hello

  I need trunk VLAN on vs.

  Say there are three VLAN 10,20 and 30.

  I am able to create the trunk on switch uplink physical, but not able to find out if how it should be done on vs.

  Kind regards

  Sushil

  To configure the VLAN Tagging, you can define a VLAN on a PortGroup.

  Let's say you want to have VM1 in VLAN 10, VM2 in VLAN 20 and VM3 in VLAN3.

  Then, you can create 3 exchanges each with different VLAN as screenshot below

  

  Connect to each appropriate virtual with PortGroup computer.

  There is not something like "switchport mode trunk" in vSwitch, simply configure a VLAN ID in the PortGroup.

  See this KB: VMware KB: VMware KB: example configuration of the virtual switch VLAN tagging (VST Mode)

• VLAN Trunking, Link Aggregation Teaming e

  Hello to all,

  avrei need some delucidazione in merito ad una configurazione di vsphere tipo di.

  VI spiego in brief:

  2 vSphere host (host a host B e) con Nic 4 x host

  1 Swicth (by manage Vlan [LAN, WAN, DMZ, vMotion, FT, iSCSI, etc...])

  UNA configurazione base pensavo di implementare e configurazione di che a vSwicth0 con 4 Nic teamwork by every host.

  1 configurated it grouping schede di 4, sul mio spend devo configurare Illinois Link Aggregation o mi not serve? (Su Che HP e called trunk mi pare) in terms static pole e Unico supportato da vmware. IO ho noticed no configurando sullo switch funziona tutto e nulla che to provo a uno dei 2 cavi dictionary alla volta no capacity it marked.

  In più is configurated the vlan lato vmware e lato switch it tutto funziona a meraviglia.

  Ho cercato della menus in merito e mi sono imbattuto knew menus che strategies come collegare una a nodo con ESX 2 schede di rete grouping known uno switch HP 1820 - 24G switch trunk spiega di configurare lato Dove he terms static e change policy Exceptions led on the way teamwork based on hashing IP!

  Ho seguito guida (penso alla lettera!) my con mi ritrovo a problema e cioè che non raggiungo più he nodo ESX... create Reed is raggiungo all the macchine all'interno delle vlan!

  Part menus seguita indicarmi could be wrong something particular? Qual'e un'approccio by una configurazione del genere?

  Grazie!

  Ciao,.

  He port group management che ESXi default crea sommergibili durante ha UN override sulle di teaming dello switch che lo contains rules, pertanto is configuri ip hash sullo switch devi premurarti di farlo Reed dichiaratamente anche sul port group, altrimenti lo lost cosi come indichi! By Miss instradamento e momentaneamente entrare ESXi stacca chest he oppure altre tre at door

  By the configurazione, funziona tutto anche senza trunk perch it grouping nativo port id che fa e agli switch, solo devi overlooks VMware verificare che gli convenctions delle tabelle di ARP siano veloci, o nel caso di più presenti, che sia abilitato switch it quick dello tree covering weight, my con i modelli HP come he tuo o superiore usually queste cose funziona nativamente.

  Ciao,.

  Luca.

• VMotion traffic isolation, vlan trunking

  We have 2 full length M910 blade servers sitting in the dell blade enclosure. Installed esxi 5.0 on the two blades and joined them to the cluster.

  Each server blade full length a 8 network cards.  2 ports double aboard the card NETWORK and 2-port Ethernet mezzanine card.  All are connected to the internal cisco switch 3130 installed on the module e/s A1, A2, B1 and B2. all the internal switches are stacked together by the network team. and there is a link to internal switch (uplink) and an external switch (ports) that are on the vlan 137

  All the ports that are connected to the esxi host are configured as trunk on the switches of internal physical cisco blade by the network team. in our total case 16 ports (8 cards x 2 servers) are fixed to the internal trunk on cisco switch and there is internal cisco switch uplink and our external switch (located on vlan 137)

  On esxi5.0, we set up a big flat switch affecting all physical network cards to Vswitch 0.
  Please refer page for groups of ports configured.
  
  To isolate the vmotion traffic, we have configured tag (150) vlan different for vmotion. but vmotion does not work. Unable to ping of vmotion ips with each other.  But if I change brand VLAN to 137. vmkping works on the other and work of vmotion.

  If I change brand VLAN other than 137 to any group of ports (for example, management or virtual machine), I'm losing connection to the corresponding port group.

  
  I think that missing configure something on the blade switches internal cisco (3130). Please advise on what needs to be configured. I know that kind of why trunking is required. If you could explain the exact purpose of why the necessary circuits for esx would be great.

  What is advised to configure a virtual switch, such as a large flat switch or multiple switches
  Assigning to each switch port group. recommended configuration to enable balancing the increased load of incoming and outgoing and fail over.  detailed explanation would be really useful for non admins networks

  I will try to describe one of the possible configurations.

  First some facts/support:

  • 2 ESXi hosts
  • 4 blade switches
  • 1 external switch
  • 8 NICs in each server Blade (2 NICs for each of the switches)
  • vmnic0 and vmnic4 are connected to two different switches
  • different subnets / VLAN for vMotion (100), management (101) and VM networks (102,...)
  • all VLANS represent them different IP subnets

  Virtual network configuration:

  • 2 vSwitches: 1 for management, 1 for VM networks and vMotion
  • vSwitch0 for management and vMotion (vmnic0 + vmnic4)
    --> Management ports (VLAN 101) Group: vmnic0 (active), vmnic4 (at rest)
    -> vMotion Port Group: (VLAN 100): vmnic4 (active), vmnic0 (at rest)
  • vSwitch1: VM networks (vmnic1.. 3 + vmnic5...) 7)
    -> VM 1 (VLAN 101) port group
    -> Port VM 2 (VLAN 102) group
    -> ...

  Blade switches:

  • all the VLANS configured in the virtual network are present
  • all ports of downlink to the ESXi hosts are configured to trunk mode, all the VLANS allowed
  • at least 2 uplinks and the external switch configured as a trunk, EtherChannel (LACP)
  • ports of rising and descending liaison (on each of the switches) are a group of track link state

  External switch:

  • all the VLANS configured in the virtual network are present
  • four channels of Port/EtherChannels (LACP), one to each switch blade

  You can configure the VLANS on switches separately or by VTP. In any case, all the VLANS should be present on the switches of. If you need to route traffic between some VLANs, you must either set up a router on your network, or - in the case where the switches support and are properly authorized - configure routing ip (Inter VLAN routing).

  André

• VLAN Trunking ESXi with blade HP c7000 and Juniper EX3200

  Hi, I'm quite new in VMWare field, because recently my company is going to launch a public cloud in Malaysia, his will combine several technologies, so I guess I have no choice but to go and study all materials and related software. My background is system and network, I understood the concept and success raising (EX3200) switch with port is lucky trunking with id vlan native 48, where my other vlan is 45-47. However later on, I will consider how I need to activate multiple markup in ESXi, I found this VST it one that I seek, I created VLANs inside the vSwitch. Then I change my machines in vlan respectively (label to change card). Then I change connect it outside (adapter for vMotion and multi-service, call Management Network default console) to vlan 48, however, when I change, my blade appear to be isolated from others. I remove id vlan, or put as 4095, then it works again, but the machine all connect them my VLAN (45-47) can not ping to the outside, please help me in this...

  Yes do not activate the switch with VLAN, vlan 48 which is native on the trunk port create a portgroup of vmware on the vswitch who has network you cards connected to the switch but leave the tag of vlan empty this will be then in the vlan default of the switch, and then create three more vmware exchanges one for each vlan and this time make sure you enter the id vlan.

  then provide that the routing has been implemented each vm will be able to talk to each other (if there are now firewalls to stop).