Integration with Lync 2013 SX20

Hi, we can integrate a stand-alone end SX20 point with Lync 2013 to make video calls point to point between SX20 and Lync client? VCS control is required between Lync and SX20?  Can anyone help me with any document or on this link?

No, at this point, a SX20 cannot communicate directly with Lync.

You will need a VCS running at least version X8.1 of the software.

The VCS and the Lync Deployment Guide may be of interest to you: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/telepresence/infrastructure/vcs/config_guide/X8-1/Cisco-VCS-Microsoft-Lync-Deployment-Guide-X8-1.pdf

Wayne
--
Remember the frequency responses and mark your question as answered as appropriate.

Tags: Cisco Support

Similar Questions

  • integration of lync 2013 with cisco vcs - c

    Hello

    I found a lot of documentation on integrating to Lync 2010 with VCS - C, but can't find much on the integration of Lync 2013.  Could someone shine some light on this for me?
    Thank you!

    Hi, David,.

    It would be preferable that you contacted Cisco re: integration

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/thread/2181356

    Cisco PDF

    Or try to repost your question to the TechNet Forum

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/ocsinterop/thread/319f9e94-f7ec-4c6e-994C-f5412e345e2e

  • Sending Adobe in Acrobat XI Std - integration with Outlook 2013

    I recently updated a user of Office 2007-2013 of the Office.  The installation for Office 2013 was a new installation (not a real upgrade).  Before the upgrade, the user is able to use the send Adobe Acrobat Standard XI (11.0.10) feature to send documents to multiple recipients without the need to type all the email addresses in.  After the upgrade, the function to use Adobe send in Acrobat XI seems to have disappeared, forcing the user the journal through the browser, but you must type the e-mail address for each recipient.  As you can guess, it is a very painful process, especially considering how it worked like a charm for her before the upgrade.

    Y at - it a function or an add-on that should be applied to Outlook 2013 and Acrobat XI integrate?

    I don't know why Send does not work from Acrobat, but given that you use Outlook 2013, you can try our plugin-Outlook https://www.acrobat.com/en_us/landing/adobesend-outlook-plugin.html

  • Replacement of 6000 MXP Integrator with unique display. C40 SX20 vs?

    I have to make a quick decision and my CISCO sales representative is MIA :(

    We have a bunch of 6000 s MXP (package ingegrator), I would like to replace. They are simple installations with a single monitor on a roll integer grid.

    with output to the screen and a camera is there any point to spend the extra money for a C40 vs getting a SX20? From a point of view video capability they look pretty well. C40 more things gets me in the back, but it is a pretty simple setup.

    Just looking for what people here could do?

    Thank you!

    Although C40 and SX20 are two different solutions for videoconferencing from Cisco, an integrator (c40) and other is fast setting solution (SX20).

    The SX20 Quick Set is designed to provide multi-party and Conference video to high definition with the flexibility to adapt to various configurations - all at a value price and size of the room.

    C40 is for Integrator supports for integration with 3 party like crestron devices, mixers.

    two take in charge the premium 1080 p solution.

    both are excellent solutions and are mind blowing in the feature and the feature as compare to the MXP series.

    You can't go wrong with either.

  • Integration of Lync with VCS - key Option mandatory?

    We implement integration with VCS on x7.2 lync.  Using B2BUA with lync 2010.  Everything works internally with lync configuration, we are only having trouble with lync external participants come and we border routers in the mix.  Direct pools are set up under the name of trust.  We have turned on the highway of the tower.  The calls started from inward of Lync.  VCS sees calls says it is connected, but the appeal does not and then falls normal call clearing.

    My thought for the failure, is that the OCS Collaboration option key has not been added.  But I can't tell in the deployment guide, if this key is necessary only if the encryption is in progress.

    The other area that we now have on the border routers is if The Edge server and the firewall that the Edge transport server may move multimedia traffic through can then reconfigure to allow RTP over UDP and RTP over TCP to pass.

    Can you confirm if the key of the SCO is a requirement for Lync which crosses the highway?  And are there other areas which we recommend why calls set entirely outdoors.

    Hi Kim,

    the SCO cooperation improved option key is necessary for this scenario of appeal, stated at pages 13 and 53 in the Lync to X7.2 deployment guide:

    Calls on a Microsoft Edge server require the VCS have installed improved OCS Collaboration option key because this key allows the ICE to be used for media connectivity

    You are also right that you will need to allow RTP UDP traffic to and from your Edge transport server, as the TURN server on VCS Highway currently does not support the RTP over TCP. If this isn't the case, ice connectivity check between the B2BUA and the Lync client and server Edge fails, which in turn causes to disconnect.

    Hope this helps,

    Andreas

  • Lync 2013 VDI Plugin does not work in Windows 8 with view Horizon 5.4

    Hi all

    I start this new thread as it appears by getting the Lync 2013 VDI Plugin works in Windows 8 is going to be different from that of Windows 7 SP1 and Windows 2008 R2.   The original on Windows 7 and Lync thread is posted here: http://communities.vmware.com/thread/446960?tstart=0

    Here's what I tested and I can determine:

    PC/computer laptop/point of customer #1 endpoint (Client light 10Zig):

    Windows 7 SP1 32-bit

    No installed Office

    Lync VDI 32-bit plugin

    View of the horizon 5.4

    PC/computer laptop/point of customer #2 endpoint (desktop PC):

    64-bit Windows 8

    2013 32-bit Office installed, but the Lync 2013 desktop client is NOT installed

    Lync VDI 32-bit plugin

    View of the horizon 5.4

    VM:

    64-bit Windows 8

    Office 2013 32 bit installed

    Horizon Feature Pack 2 is installed

    Audio redirection works, but the web camera does not have to be picked up.  Its a HD LifeCam Microsoft and is supported by Lync 2010/2013.  I checked the VDI connects to the virtual computer and it seems the plugin Lync VDI successfully syncs.  However, I'm never invited to re - enter my credentials of Lync as I do Windows 7/2008 R2.  In addition, I don't see the 'two PC with the green check mark' in the lower right corner of Lync.  Who should be present after a successful synchronization of Lync VDI.  In fact, there no icons in the lower right corner at all.

    After some further reading, I decided to download and install Skype through shop Windows.  Also, it does not recognize my camera.  In my opinion, the Feature Pack is perhaps the issue here, but I don't know how to dig one more away.  TonyHuynh201110141, any ideas?

    I had a co-worker for his Mac with the new client View 3 trial and Lync VDI works as expected.  I tried again on my side and noticed that it takes exactly 5 minutes to make me a successful pairing.  I remove the Lync VDI plugin, then reinstall to see if that makes a difference.  At least I know that two important data points:

    1 Lync VDI still works

    2. the issue was on only my endpoint device.

    I will update the thread once I know more.

  • Acano server 1.9 error of handshake with Lync/S4B

    I recently deployed a new VM Acano server running v1.93 and with customer connection problems S4B/Lync 2013, a "error on incoming connection X 104 handshake' I finished the in and outgoing peers in Acano that support dialing calls as well as the Lync to Acano static route. My company did deploy a new CA/PKI server so the server that provided the cert for Lync is different than on my new virtual machine, but not sure that is the cause of the problem. On the DNS entry I did not specifically ask a record if it matters at all. I see hit calls the Acano bridge. Any help or advice is greatly appreciated.

    I'll make sure Acano and S4B servers can trust and validate each and other certificates?  Communication protocol errors are usually due to certificate issues, because S4B is based on the TLS protocol.

  • Bad_Pool_Header BSOD on several PC randomly after installing Lync 2013

    We just deployed Microsoft Lync 2013 in our Organization.  In fact, we have about 18 machines Windows XP left so they Lync 2010, but on 100 machines Win 7 with 2013.

    Since this installation, there were a few random BSODS multiple computers and they are usually BAD_POOL_HEADER and it refers to two files, ntoskrnl.exe, and win32k.sys.
    That they come from different machines, it cannot be the corruption of the local memory.  If it's a particular machine I would exchange the RAM, but it is not that.
    Windows 7 Pro 64-bit machines.  Office 2010 32-bit.  The last change is Lync 2013 15.0.4517.1004 MSO 15.0.4517.1005 32-bit.  Before deploying Lync 2013, I did have one of these reports.
    The BSOD is random.  Not necessarily the same PC every day.  Maybe 3 or 4 BSOD's a day from different people.  But you really try to determine what is happening here until things get worse.  Also, we run Vipre Antivirus Business.  It is configured to exclude *. OST files, just to help the stability of Outlook 2010 for those who use laptop computers in cached mode.
    Any idea?  I've been collecting dump files.
    Thank you!
    MODULE_NAME: nt
    FAULTING_MODULE: fffff80002a4a000 nt
    DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 5147d9c6
    BUGCHECK_STR: 0x19_20
    POOL_ADDRESS: fffff900c093e000
    CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 1
    DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: VISTA_DRIVER_FAULT
    CURRENT_IRQL: 0
    LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from fffff80002bf2cae to fffff80002abfc00
    STACK_TEXT:
    fffff880 '0920cdb8 fffff800' 02bf2cae: 00000000'00000019 00000000'00000020 fffff900 'c093e000 fffff900' c093e840: nt + 0x75c00
    fffff880 '0920cdc0 00000000' 00000019: 00000000 00000020' fffff900 'c093e000 fffff900' c093e840 00000000'25840000: nt + 0x1a8cae
    fffff880'0920cdc8 00000000 00000020': fffff900 'c093e000 fffff900' 00000000'25840000 00000000'00000000: 0 x 19 c093e840
    fffff880 '0920cdd0 fffff900' c093e000: fffff900 'c093e840 00000000'25840000 00000000'00000000 fffff900' c093e840: 0x20
    fffff880 '0920cdd8 fffff900' c093e840: 00000000'25840000 00000000'00000000 fffff900 'c093e840 fffff880' 0920cf20: 0xfffff900'c093e000
    "fffff880 '0920cde0 00000000' 25840000: 00000000 ' fffff900 00000000 'c093e840 fffff880' 0920cf20 fffff880 ' 0920cf10: 0xfffff900'c093e840
    fffff880'0920cde8 00000000' 00000000: fffff900 ' c093e840 fffff880 '0920cf20 fffff880' 0920cf10 fffff800 ' 02ac8d32: 0 x 25840000
    STACK_COMMAND: kb
    FOLLOWUP_IP:
    NT + c 75 00
    fffff800'02abfc00 48894c 2408 mov qword ptr [rsp + 8], rcx
    SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 0
    SYMBOL_NAME: nt + c 75 00
    FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner
    Nom_image: ntoskrnl.exe
    BUCKET_ID: WRONG_SYMBOLS
    Follow-up: MachineOwner

    It seems that the PC that had the problem had a fntcache.dat of different size, so if that were the case, hopefully regenerating the fntcache.dat will fix the problem.

  • SX 20 integration with VCS

    Hello

    Is it possible to integrate 20 SX with VCS.

    Because our customer want to integrate with their MS Lync TP, so found that VCS can do this job. Then please suggest...

    Here also to point out that we are planing to use the public IP address for SX 20 to receive incoming calls from the public IP address, as it will be integrated with ISDN gateway.

    Details of the product for this solution:

    VCS

    SX 20

    TP ISDN Gateway

    Thanks in advance...

    Kind regards

    Daniele

    Yes, its possible, check this.

  • Lync 2013, what is the solution

    To date, Lync 2013 is compatible in some way?

    If a customer makes a migration from 2010 to 2013, runs out of service?

    How long Cisco solve this problem? Hello and thank you all

    One step could be to say to your customers to complain to the 'provider' they always change

    things for the worse, I don't see a real reason why they had to remove h.263. And if they change things why

    they should not be able to support a standard way of h.264...

    We tried at least with the customer of 2013 and which works with the advanced media gateway.

    It will depend on what hardware you have in your network.

    As it comes to the topic future ware, you couldn't get a straight answer here in the Forum.

    I recommend you talk to your Cisco contact to get some information under the NDA.

  • VCS & integration of Lync

    Hi all

    I have question for integration of lync. For example;

    I have a domain for vcs to cisco that is named vcsc.vc.abc.com in vc.abc.com.

    and I have another domain for lync, abc.com.

    Can I use my a vcs also gateway lync with the same name?

    I did the configuration of lync side according to the document and all certificates.

    I tried a vcs as a gateway to lync

    Finally, I have some errors in the VCS status page

    VCS is alive but LYNC gives errors for me which is unknown failure.

    Any thoughts?

    Kind regards

    Hello

    According to the VCS-Lync deployment guide:

    Be careful when you design your deployment that you do not have multiple gateways by field of Lync, is more than a field of Lync by gateway. There is a walkway VCS (or cluster) in one area of Lync. It is possible to configure several areas Lync, as long as you have an independent gateway serving each. You cannot configure several Lync areas with only one gateway Lync VCS serving all the. You should avoid to configure multiple gateways to serve a single domain of Lync. With this deployment, calls for a video endpoint to a different video endpoint that is called through its area of Lync will get routed via Lync, rather than directly through the collaboration infrastructure. Duo video, end camera control and possibly encryption and the video quality, users could lose.

    HTH

    Manish

  • View of the Horizon from VMware and Microsoft Lync 2013

    Hello

    I am currently working on a VMware View Horizon project and the cap of the great exhibition is Microsoft Lync 2013. I had the matching between the vdi Lync plugin and the Lync client in the virtual office to work. During the process of matching the right icon indicates the attempt of local loading audio or video devices. When I connect a USB headset it detects and when I perform a test call, I hear only noise and not a good tone. Can I use only Lync support audio or video devices or it can be any USB device? I also mentioned the details of the current configuration of VMware View Horizon.

    Overview of VMware View: version 5.2.0 - 987719

    VMware composer: version 5.2.0 - 983460

    VMware View Client: version 5.3.0 - 1042023

    Virtual desktop: Windows 7 SP1

    Computer based mobile operating system: Windows 7 SP1

    Lync Server: version 2013

    Access virtual office: Sonicwall NetExtender


    Please see the following guide:

    The ABC's of deployment VMware Horizon discovered 5.2 with Microsoft Lync 2013 | Blog of Computing VMware for the end user - VMware Articles

    You should also be aware of the following:

    http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalID=2064266

    http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalID=2045726

  • Integration with 50G

    Hello!

    Well, when I tried to compute the definite integral of | Sin x | I received the message cannot find the signin [0, 2 ft].

    I went in RPN mode, and this error persists. I then used [RS] [ENTER] to get the numeric result, and after awhile, I got the correct answer 4. But I can't get the answer simplely by clicking [EVAL].

    I also tried to calculate the antiderivative, and the correct answer returned Calculator -cos (x) * sign (sin (x)). I was wondering why the calculator produces an error when they apply for an accurate result (not digital, without .).

    Jack

    confirming the latest set of equations:

    EVAL would be = - 1

    and -> limit X PI - 0 = 1

    and the limit X-> PI = cannot determine.

    So, there's a singularity...

    Unfortunately, because of the resolution of the screen of 50 G, when the resulting equation for the indefinite integral is drawn, clear breaks in the plot IP and 2 * PI are not 100% clear.

    However, the subsequent calculations confirm that they exist.

    This is what has been shown that when the original integral from 0 to 2PI of | Sin (x) | is calculated,

    It is clear that the 50G automatically sets ON RIGOUREUX, even if it is not enabled in the (likely due to the function absolute value in the equation) indicators.

    THE rigorous is perfectly reasonably expect when the EXACT mode is selected with a function of absolute value.

    now for a pencil and paper method:

    | Sin (x) | is sin(x) from 0 to PI

    | Sin (x) | is - sin (x) IP to 2PI

    so...

    integral from 0 to 2PI of | Sin (x) | can also be expressed in

    integral from 0 to PI of Sin (x)

    +

    integral of the AP to 2PI of-sin (x)

    in EXACT MODE (strict mode setting is more questions)

    When EVAL would be = 4.

    I can refer you to a message done previously by Bernard Parisse (one of the developers of CASE).   Bernard said that the CASE cannot intercept all EXACT integration singularities (but it report some).

    Regarding the digital approximation method (help-> NUM) to get the result... I can't offer no answer as to the reason that the singularity is resolved.

    I've never seen a single post indicating what type of digital approximation algorithms are used for approximate integration with the 50G.  Of course, the digital approximation algorithms are distinguished by exact calculations.

    Finally, FYI, here is another good example of the use of 50G with an integral and having to use a bit of paper and pencil methodology (in this case, the method of cauchy principal value) to solve the 50G of the singularity.

    /T5/calculators/50g-numerical-integration-with-singularities/m-p/5678169#M11440

  • Is there a work around to show the Site identity button when the integration with facebook like/send etc. It disappears when it comes to the page, it's because of the iframe can be done if anything.

    Is there a work around to show the Site identity button when the integration with facebook like/send etc. It disappears when it comes to the page, it's because of the iframe

    What can be done if anything.

    Pages that use "mixed content" (parts of the use of the HTTP page and some use HTTPS) are not secure against tampering, they will not display the site identity button. To resolve this problem, make sure that external resources you are incorporation are available over HTTPS and you use HTTPS to nest them.

    For example, to iframe widgets like the Facebook 'Like' buttons, make sure that your iframe use src = "https://192.168.1.20 /...". »

    See also discussion here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3587021/facebook-like-button-breaks-https-ssl

  • Printer driver crashes when printing with Office 2013/8 64-bit Windows

    Printer: HP Color LaserJet CM1312nfi

    Printer driver: V5.1 (to date, downloaded from the HP support Web site) or generic V5.6

    OS: Windows 8 Professional 64-bit

    When I try to print an Excel document with Excel 2013 and V5.1 printer driver, the program freezes and must end with the Task Manager. This always occurs with the same document, but not with all the documents. Program also crashes when opening the preview before printing to the same document.

    The same document prints fine with V5.6 generic print driver and with the driver supplied with Windows 8.

    The same document prints fine with the driver version 5.1 on Windows 7 and Office 2010. The combination of Windows 7/Office 2013 has not been tested. Windows 8/Office 2010 combination has also not been tested.

    When I try to print an empty document with the word 2013 and the generic printer V5.6, the program driver crashes and must end with the Task Manager.

    My conclusion is that the HP printer drivers have a problem with Windows 8 or office 2013 or a combination of both.

    The printer driver supplied with Windows 8 and is installed automatically is useful as a temporary workaround, but it lacks some options, e.g. manual duplex.

    Upon request, I am ready to send the Excel document by e-mail for verification of the problem.

    For any help or suggestion will be appreciated.

    Thanks in advance,

    ULI

    It worked!  Thank you very much.

    Where others have difficulties to find the offending setting, here's another way to track him down.

    -> control Panel-> devices and printers-> (select printer-> right mouse)-> printer properties-> settings-> tab Installable Options (bottom)-> Printer Status Notification-> change on 'off '.

    Thank you!!

Maybe you are looking for