SRI-WAAS with two routers

Similar Questions

• Problem setting up Port Forwarding with two routers.

  I can't set up by Linksys RT31P2 and routers port forwarding WRT160Nv3.

  My setup is Webstar Modem = RT31P2 = WRT160N = Mac OS 10.6.5. (No configurable modem and ISP do not prevent port forwarding. It comes with two Linksys routers).

  I had a Monty Python-going around with the support of Cisco cat; and follow up with telephone assistance in which the agent knew nothing about port forwarding and his supervisor expressed the view that it was not possible with two routers. Sigh.

  If anyone can help me with step by step specific and simple instructions to configure routers. I know that the basic procedures. I'm not clear, what exactly changes on routers.

  I read that portforward.com has to say and it does not work so I must be misunderstanding something.

  The ip address of my computer is 192.168.1.103.  Are the last three digits of this speech concluded the two routers in the area on the port forwarding page? What other changes should be done what router?

  I know the port numbers that I use are OK because I can implement successfully if I connect to one or other of the routers (but not both), and my software of p2p shows port are open.

  Any help and suggestions most welcome.

  If you set up as I have suggested that you have only a single LAN that will be using in your addresses * 192.168.15 case. So in your case:

  1. change the address LAN IP of 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.15.2 WRT.
  2 disable the DHCP server.
  3. connect the LAN of the WRT port to port LAN of the RT.

  That's all. Disable the DHCP server will not affect whatever it is that you're connected LAN - LAN and DHCP server on the RT is still operational.

  After the change, previously the WRT computers may require a reboot to get a new address 192.168.15. *.

  Your computer to which you are transferring must have an IP static and not dynamic (or variable). Check the current IP information on this computer. It must have an IP address like 192.168.15.103, mask 255.255.255.0, gateway 192.168.15.1 subnet and DNS 192.168.15.1 server or maybe two other IP addresses instead. Note DNS servers if you do not 192.168.15.1.

  Then configure a static IP address on the computer. Use something like 192.168.15.10, 255.255.255.0 gateway 192.168.15.1 and the DNS servers you found before.

  After this implement 192.168.15.10 port forwarding.

• With two routers wrt320n wireless bridge

  Dear reader,

  I want to bridge two routers too extend my network onbuildings on my compound. I I drew of how it should be. 'Bedrade' means 'wired', "Brug" means "bridge" and "draadloos" means "wireless" its all Dutch.

  Thankgs in advance

  

  Regarding accurate features 3rd party firmware that we need to ask in the forums of 3rd party firmware. I think that dd - wrt and tomato two add configuration options to configure a WRT as wireless bridge. You would operate a WRT in the normal way (i.e. you don't need 3rd party firmware on that one) and the other as the bridge that connects to the first.

• SRI-WAAS and AppNav

  Hi all

  Situation is the following. I have 2 routers x 4351-AX with the SSD upgrades and memory etc. Let's finish MPLS and other internet DMVPN or similar and both with RSR-WAAS configured.

  Is there an argument to have these set up a stand-alone WAAS devices or should they be in a cluster of AppNav? There are advantages and disadvantages to each method here?

  As Akamai Connect running on just the unit facing internet, does that mean it shouldn't be part of a cluster of AppNav?

  Thanks in advance.

  You should have configured cluster AppNav SRI-WAAS part. You can not have WCCP on the single Appnav SRI-WAAS interception.

  The new WAAS codes may work with Akamai to connect.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/enterprise-networks/in...

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/app_ntwk_services/WAAS/WAAS/V551/No...

• E1000 - two routers come... 1 network leaves...

  Yes, he stole from Thunderdome, but he's not going to my question. I have 2 e1000s and bring them all to two internet are relatively simple. What is not so simple, for me, is to see these two places (each router & computers) as a major network, I can do the little file sharing. Two routers are connected via a CAT5 cable long enough. However, I will use different operating systems with them (Liunx, Windows, OS x, Android, XBox360, etc.) and I need them all see each other at both ends. I want them to leave with a nice, clean for the first router 192.168.1.1 and ask the second associated as 192.168.1.2 (using MAC address... reservations IF possible). I guess that the installer on the second router will have to be done manually and the DHCP should 'probably' be disabled so the first router can assign all IP # s. problem is, I'm not on my period on the manual configuration of the second router. I have tried setting up and had this message on the IP address of the router in router subnet 1 s 2. The last time I did any 'real' network has more than ten years and I'm rusty on all this. Basically I have not sat down and read the books involving all this because that, even if I am amazing on learning by example, I have a bit of a learning issue with books... she sucks and I am one of those who simply cannot get certain techno-jargon to stay in my brain, unless someone it simplifies a bit. Can someone point me in the right direction to sorta? PS - until I get all these answers to 'use the search engine', I already did. But a search engine can be one of two things, useful or useless depending on the person knowing the right words to use (and I obviously didn't). Again, it is a problem for me in some cases. If someone knows the answer, I'll be very grateful and I'll be more than happy to say 'thank you '. If you don't know the answer, just be an adult and leave that would be.

  1. follow the number 1.  LAN - LAN

  http://www6.nohold.NET/Cisco2/UKP.aspx?VW=1&articleid=3733

  2. in addition, I click on the Security tab of the secondary router and uncheck "filter anonymous internet requests".  You will probably have to do it, but for some reason, I have to do this on an older linksys operate between main router and router secondary file share.

  The above configuration is that I use and I have no problem sharing files between computers.

• Connecting two routers WRT54G2 to extend the signal

  I have available two routers wireless broadband Linksys G (WRT54G2), given to me by a family member. We use one of the routers by itself for some time, but have no adequate signal throughout our House. I decided it would be easier to design the floor plan of the House for you to see his situation compared with the rest of the House on the walls that do not. We have the HughesNet satellite internet which is on the roof just about the location of the modem and router at the bottom right of the image.

  What do you think would be the best location of the main router? I read it would be more centrally located, because the signal travels horizontally and vertically. I just bought a 100' Ethernet cable being the only one that we had what the HughesNet Installer provided us with which is about 4'. I initially thought I would be the cable from main router to the basement where the second router is placed since the signal there is about 1 in 3 bars on my iPhone. The signal on the floor in the ranges of the main room (room at the top in the middle of the image) of 3-5 off 5 bars on my laptop.

  I wanted to just put a post sooner rather than later to see what your views were on the location of the main router and I have to increase the signal.

  Let me know if you have any questions to a better response.

  I have updated the firmware on the main router.

  

  If you want to configure the router as an access point 2 then the connection will be LAN to LAN which means the LAN port of the router port main o the 2nd router's LAN... But before you connect to the main router.

  You should first connect the 2nd router to your laptop, go to the configuration page. Configure wireless settings it is firstly, ethier you set up another name and password is all up to you. Then change the IP address to a number of 192.168.1.x(any fera l'affaire) and disable DHCP... then after that connect to the main router.

• connecting two routers, different ISP

  I have a BEFSR41 on Charter broadband, to 20 MB, and a WRT54GL connected to AT & T DSL at 1.5 MB.  I would like the AT & T DSL to be my "rescue" if my broadband fails; but here they are on the same network, so that I can connect as and share resources.  Is it possible to do this with my current gear?  I don't want to slow down broadband connections and would love to be able to choose which network, if necessary.  (Is this bridge?)

  It is not possible. Those are mainstream devices and do not support failover router. The best you can do is to configure two routers to work independently with their internet connection. That power to one of them. If you need pass, you have to rewire and switch on the other router. I think that there is no other alternative...

• Two routers on the same network wireless?

  Last night I bought a WRT160N, to replace my old WRT54G. The 160N is now in my room, connected to a cable modem. The 160N ethernet ports, I have a cable that goes from my room, through my attic and comes out in my living room. In my living room, I'm willing to hang the cable that comes from my 160N to my WRT54G. Then ports ethernet on my WRT54G, I want to connect my Playstation 3 and Xbox 360. I have this connected physically this way, but the PS3 does not connect to the internet through this wired connection. (Have not tried the Xbox 360)

  Basically, I'm eager to share the connection from my wall between my PS3 and the Xbox 360 so that they both have wired connections. Also, I would like to know if I can have both routers broadcast wireless on the same channel, so they appear as two wireless networks. Is this possible?

  Looks like you will get almost everything on your wish list.  You can have two wireless routers, and they can both diffuse.  Normally, you would use the same SSID for both routers, but different channels.  Your wireless computer automatically selects the channel harder, so you can "roam" between two routers.  However, this "roaming" is not as good as with cell phones, then you should only "roam" when your wireless connection is idle (i.e. not an active download).

  See my post on this topic for more information on the configuration of your system:

  http://forums.Linksys.com/Linksys/board/message?board.ID=Wireless_Routers&message.ID=108928

• Need to "bind" the two routers

  Hi guys, I need advice here.

  I just bought a new TV and a new DVD which can access the Internet for interactive stuff. But for this, I need a key specific wireless by the manufacturer or a LAN connection. I don't want to buy the key wireless, but I want to use the LAN connections (TV 1) and 1 for the DVD. Unfortunaly, I don't want a cable everywhere in my house just to tie these new devices to the Internet.

  Since I have two wireless routers, I wondered if I could 'Wireless' bind my routers to save cable. All the 'ordinary' stuff will still be connected to my main router.

  Here is what I intend to do:
  Connect my modem to my main router (WRT610N v2).
  Wireless connect my secondary router (WRT54G v3) to my main router (WRT610N v2). [this is where I need help]
  Connect both TV and DVD by wire to my secondary router.

  I hope you can help me with this...

  Thank you guys!

  Sorry, you can not connect two routers wireless with Linksys firmware.  You must use a wire to two routers in cascade.  However, it is 3rd firmware in party that will allow, DD - WRT.  Search the Web and see if it will work for you.

• Two routers connected, but no Internet on the router downstream

  Hi, I followed the instructions in the FAQ for routers chaining daisy with only partial success.  I have a WRT54GS V6 router configured as my gateway.  The downstream router is a BEFSR41 v4.  Both have the latest firmware.

  I have visibility on the full network of machines, but the PC connected to the router downstream has no access to the internet.  PC connected to the router upstream did.

  I tried to exchange the two routers and reconfiguration, but only once the PC connected to the router upstream has access to the internet.

  Current configuration:

  Gateway - router WRT54GS

  Router IP: 192.168.1.1

  From IP ADDR: 192.168.1.100

  DHCP server: enabled

  Downstream BEFSR41 router.

  Router IP: 192.168.1.2

  DHCP server: disabled

  Any help is appreciate

  Thank you

  On a computer that has no internet open a command prompt window and type "ipconfig/all". After the output full in your next post.

  When you connect the computer to the other router must internet?

• SRI-WAAS, Manager of plant by the name of "No.-HOSTNAME".

  Hello!

  Im trying to record 4 ISR-WAAS to a manager of the plant, but every time I run the installation procedure, the first SRI-WAAS record well, but with the host name NON-HOSTNAME; and the next SRI WAAS also. For this reason, I got an error message that there is another device with this hostname and I can't change it! ...

  Already try the command hostname inside the console of the SRI-WAAS, but does not work... I also tried to change the host name in the Central Manager, but I can't find the way.

  Any advice?

  Thanks in advance.

  captura_de_pantalla_de_2016-08-28_17-57 - 59.png

  

  Hello

  Looks like you're having Bug CSCuu23859.

  The SRI-WAAS release notes say that this problem has been fixed in the software v5.5.5 (according to the screenshot you run v5.5.1)

  BugSearch CSCuu23859

  SRI-WAAS release notes

  Best regards

  Andreas

• ASA balancing to two routers

  Hi all

  Is there anyway that I can balance workloads on both routers.

  I have an ASA with two attached routers each router has two instances of HSRP runs on each with its own IP address, each router is the main for one of the instances of HSRP. If there was no ASA in the way that I would set DHCP to browse through all of the functions of server through another hey presto (of sort) load balancing. However, I can't do what the ASA has only a single internal IP address. Routers treat natting because they are on different IP ranges on different Internet service providers.

  I can't use GLBP as the external IP evolution would break VPN RDP and SMTP connections.

  Is it possible that I can make the road ASA based on the source IP address, or any other means to separate the traffic between two routers?

  Thanks in advance,

  Scott

  You cannot route based on ip source with only firewall with router possiable by ACB

  You can give each of them point to router deffrent with metric deffrent from the static routes

  in this case, it will make the topology as active standby, which is not good in your case

  but you can use sub interfaces on your case make the ASA NRTIs each subinterface in deffrent subnet and deffrent security level

  and let each subinterface use deffrent hsrp instance

  or there is another way

  IF you are not using VPN on your ASA you can reach in the context of multiple

  in the context of several you're going to separate your firewall virtually

  so if you have two VLAN in your network (two subnets deffrent)

  then each subnet use almost deffrent firewall

  goona u divide the internal interface to two subinterfaces

  and you can use a shred of interface between the context outside or separate for two subinterfaces

  and assign these interface for each context

  If you go to each context as firewall deffrent

  and you can use the HSRP deffrent on each context instance

  but the multiple context, you can use VPN on the firewall

  Use the following method *.

  The OTHER WAY THAT ALSO I have SUGIST YOU to TRY, this IS THE Transparent firewall

  in the case your firewall works in L2 mode

  so you can use routers in HSRP IPS AS there is no firewall in the path

  which i thnk useful for you case also

  in transperant mode the way to defaultgate for your customer will be the hsrp IP because the firewall will not have everything except IPs management

  the useres will also be in the same IP subnet as the gateway in your case HSRP VIP

  and also, you can control the security of the network through the firewall normally

  try this way and let me know

  See the following link for the configuration

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a008089f467.shtml

  Please, note useful

• ASA with two internet connections

  Hello

  I want to connect an ASA with two ISPS for internet traffic, one for the VPN S2S, there is a router VPN dedicatet on the second link.

  In case of failure of the first link, the second must be enabled.

  route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.20.20.1 1 track 1route backup 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.20.30.1 254
  
  route backup 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.20.30.1
  
  Is this configuration working?? 

  Hello

  You need to configure the 'als' monitor configuration to monitor some destination on the main IP address ISP for the ASA whether the connection works. Probably an IP address on the public network.

  SLA 1 monitor

  type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho outside interface

  NUM-packages

  timeout

  frequency

  SLA monitor Appendix 1 point of life to always start-time now

  You will also need a configuration related to 'track' of the order

  track 1 rtr 1 accessibility

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.20.20.1 track 1

  Backup route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.20.30.1 254

  The above combined with the routes you mention should be enough about the delivery. Naturally for each remote VPN L2L network you will always need a specific static route on the SAA to the backup ISP device.

  Also you must naturally maintain the translations on the SAA. Seems that your ISP links have in mind a separate device that contains public IP addresses. So am I right in assuming you pass all traffic from the LAN links for links to PSI via the ASA without any type of NAT, and leave these routers from the private to the public NAT?

  -Jouni

• IPsec VPN between two routers - mode ESP Transport and Tunnel mode

  Hi experts,

  I have this question about the Transport mode and Tunnel mode for awhile.

  Based on my understanding of 'Transport' mode is not possible because you always original "internal" private in the IP headers or IP addresses. They are always different as public IP on interfaces enabled with Crypto Card addresses. When encapsulated in the VPN tunnel, the internal IP addresses must be included or the remote VPN router won't know where to forward the packet.

  To test, I built a simple GNS3 with three routers laboratory. R1 and R3 are configured as VPN routers and the R2 must simulate Internet.

  My configs are also very basic. The R2 is routing between 1.1.1.0/24 and 2.2.2.0/24. It is defined as the gateway of R1 and R3.

  R1:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 100
  BA aes
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  ISAKMP crypto key 123456 address 2.2.2.2
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP_null null esp esp-sha-hmac
  !
  10 map ipsec-isakmp crypto map
  defined peer 2.2.2.2
  transformation-ESP_null game
  match address VPN

  !

  list of IP - VPN access scope
  ip permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255
  !

  R3:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 100
  BA aes
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  ISAKMP crypto key 123456 address 1.1.1.2
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP_null null esp esp-sha-hmac
  !
  10 map ipsec-isakmp crypto map
  defined peer 1.1.1.2
  transformation-ESP_null game
  match address VPN

  !

  list of IP - VPN access scope
  Licensing ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  I configured transform-"null" value, while it will not encrypt the traffic.

  Then I tried the two 'transport' mode and mode "tunnel". I ping a host in the internal network of the R1 to another host in the internal network of the R3. I also tried 'telnet'. I also captured packets and carefully compared in both modes.

  Packets encapsulated in exactly the same way!

  It's just SPI + sequence No. + + padding

  I will attach my screenshots here for you guys to analyze it. I would be grateful for any explanation. I confused maybe just when it comes to the NAT...

  I guess my next step is to check if the two modes to make the difference when the GRE is used.

  Thank you

  Difan

  Hi Difan,

  As you point out the mode of transport is not always applicable (i.e. applicable if IP source and destination is equal to corresnpoding proxy IDs).

  A typical scenario in this mode of transport is used:

  -Encryption between two hosts

  -GRE tunnels

  -L2TP over IPsec

  Even if you set "transport mode" this does not mean that it will be used. IOS routers and I blieve also ASA will perform backup even if the mode of transport is configured but does not apply in tunnel mode.

  I can take a look at your traces to sniff, but all first can you please check if you transport mode on your ipsec security associations? "See the crypto ipsec his" exit you will show the tunnel or transport mode.

  HTH,

  Marcin

• Is it possible to have two routers on the cable line (T1?)?

  Question?

  is it possible to have two routers on the cable line (T1?)? First router was provided by the cable operator and runs @ standard speed(802.11?), while the router I want to add is a netgear product that will perform @ 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz. is it possible to do this without interfere or affect with speed of cable of the router?

  Thank you

  Rooster

  Question?

  is it possible to have two routers on the cable line (T1?)? First router was provided by the cable operator and runs @ standard speed(802.11?), while the router I want to add is a netgear product that will perform @ 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz. is it possible to do this without interfere or affect with speed of cable of the router?

  Thank you

  Rooster

  What is the router of society provided separate cable from your cable modem? If so then why not just use the Netgear router instead of the provided ISP router?

  If it is a combination cable modem/router device and you want to run the Netgear router as a wireless access point then only...

  Here is a FAQ that will help you in this...

  http://www.dslreports.com/FAQ/11233

  Basically would be configured with a LAN IP in the same range as the IP address you get from the existing cable modem/router Netgear, Netgear is connected directly on the LAN cable port existing via a LAN port modem/router, Netgear DHCP server is disabled and that you configure the single wireless SSID, type of encryption (that is to say.) WPA2 is the best and do not use WEP) and a strong key. Here is an example...

  http://sdrv.Ms/LrESP6

  When you configure the Netgear I recommend that you connect to it with an Ethernet cable if you screw up the wireless and the DHCP part you can find and recover.