3548 stacking ports... Fiber?

I noticed, under system, advanced settings, General settings, there is an entry of stackable port with the ability to select the copper Ports or fiber.

35xx switches can now use fiber for stacking ports?

Someone at - it tested?

An excerpt from the user for the 3500 model switch Guide.

The front includes number of ports RJ-45 24 1-24. The top row of ports is marked with odd numbers 1-23, and the bottom row of ports is marked with the numbers 2 to 24. In addition, the façade also contains ports G3 - G4, which are copper ports and ports G1 - G2 which are fibers. G3 - G4 ports can be used as ports for stacking or used to transfer a standalone network traffic.

I can spend some time looking into this.  At the moment it does not look like that is possible. I will update the post with all possible information that I can find.

Tags: Dell Switches

Similar Questions

  • Aggregate bandwidth of Sg500 two stacking using two stacking ports?

    Is the 2 Gbps of bandwidth when you use two stacking ports to connect the two switches?

    Two if you want that quick failover. Otherwise, a failure of the link will lead members of the dislocation pile. For the SG500, they go on S3 and S4. On SG500X, they go on S1 and S2.

  • stack of sg500x - you can LAG stacking ports?

    I have 2 questions to stack with the sg500x switch.  We have 3 of them.

    #1 question - can we stack LAG two ports together, in order to increase the bandwidth of 20gbps cell?  I would like the width of band increased, and you can LAG the regular ports of 10G together but the manual and the admin interface user does not appear to support two connections cumulation between two switches.

    question #2 - the manual says that you can configure all ports 10 4 regular ports or stacking according to the needs.  However, after digging a bit it seems that maybe it's a mistake in the documentation.  Elsewhere in the documentation, he mentions that by defining the configuration of the 'standalone' cell 2 stacking ports will be automatically retrieved as non-standard stacking ports.  Which explains how to get all the 4 configured as regular ports, but how do I set all 4 ports as stacking ports?  Of course, it does not matter with my setup if I can not LAG two ports stacking together.  My hope was to have 2 10 ports to each of the other 2 switches each switch.  Like this:

    Switch A S1 S2 & <->switch B S1 & S2

    Switch A S3 S4 & <->Switch C S1 & S2

    switch B S3 S4 & <->Switch C S3 & S4

    Hello Robert,.

    1. Unfortunately you can not DRAG stacking ports. The other port will be closed and act as a backup.

    2. I'll double check the documentation on this one, however, I can tell you that only a set of 10 G ports can be used as ports of the battery. As you mentioned, on its own, you can get back them for regular use.

    Could I offer as a suggestion - if you are really ready to get the link of 20G, you could set all switches to standalone and use several shifts between them. This would add extra work that each switch should now be configured individually, but it would allow you to complete your design.

  • SNMP for stack Ports on Dell 6248? (xg1... 4)

    I have 5 x 6248 stack in a ring... I can see the counters of Point of battery through the web INTERFACE.  I use munin to graphics system attributes, and it finds all the regular ethernet ports on each device, but not ports of the battery.

    A snmpwalk example will show, for example:

    IF - MIB:ifDescr.47 = STRING: unit: 1 location: Port 0: 47 Gigabit - level
    IF - MIB:ifDescr.48 = STRING: unit: 1 location: Port 0: 48 Gigabit - level
    IF - MIB:ifDescr.49 = STRING: unit: 1 location: Port 0: 49 10 G - level
    IF - MIB:ifDescr.50 = STRING: unit: 1 location: Port 0: 50 10 G - level
    IF - MIB:ifDescr.51 = STRING: unit: 1 location: Port 0: 51 10 G - level
    IF - MIB:ifDescr.52 = STRING: unit: 1 location: Port 0: 52 10 G - level
    IF - MIB:ifDescr.53 = STRING: unit: 2 Slot: Port 0: 1 Gigabit - level
    IF - MIB:ifDescr.54 = STRING: unit: 2 Slot: Port 0: 2 Gigabit - level

    These 10G are the optical ports at the front of the switch, but I can't find anything for my friends in the back of the switch.  I'd like to think the ifDescr soar "Slot: 1"... tips on how to find the correct OID?

    Thank you

    -danny

    You can try the following traps:

    agentInventoryStackPortTotalErrors.1.3.6.1.4.1.674.10895.5000.2.6132.1.1.13.7.2.1.10

    agentInventoryStackPortErrorRate.1.3.6.1.4.1.674.10895.5000.2.6132.1.1.13.7.2.1.9

    agentInventoryStackPortDataRate.1.3.6.1.4.1.674.10895.5000.2.6132.1.1.13.7.2.1.8

    The categories look the same as the list of counters.

  • Reference Dell 6248P - Port fiber

    Hello

    I am trying to connect to port 1/xg1 (fiber Slot) on my Dell 6248P switch SFP 1 G and it's not working.

    Is that the port takes in charge only 10G?

    Thank you.

    Hello

    1/xg1 ports are 10G only. The front ports support SFP 1 G. The front ports are ports combo for 45-48 in order to use copper or fiber port, but not both.

  • PowerConnect 3548 - change port access mode?

    I'm having a problem with our 3548 P PowerConnect switches.  I guess it's just a procedure, I'm not aware, so I hope I can get help.

    It was necessary to temporarily move several ports to general mode to add access to a VLAN individual.  Right now, I would like to remove this VLAN and only have ports of the switch in question on VLAN 1.  I get a (not unexpected) error when trying to add ports to VLAN 1 (because it is not created by the user, the default VLAN), I tried to simply remove the VLAN ports and switch back them to General.  When I do, I get the following message:

    EXX port: Port does not belong to VLAN PVID as not tagged.

    What command sequence should I return the ports to access the mode and just make sure they're on the VLAN 1?  I guess I should do something about port traffic to not tagged or delete the PVID before returning to the access mode.

    I think I fixed the problem.  If I set the VLAN existing as non-tagged, i.e.:

    "switchport vlan allowed general access Add VLAN unidentified".

    This removes the image of marking and allows me to go back to access the mode on the switchport.   Yet to get used to the command structure; Thank you for putting up with my questions.

  • stack a 3548 PowerConnect and 3524

    HII
    I am setting up a test lab to the office and found 2 switches PowerConnect (a 3524 & a 3548)
    I know he can do stack by ports G3/G4, but I can't make it work... hope someone can enlighten me. ~

    Here is what I have tried/fact:
    Connect the right port 3548 G3 network cable to port 3524 G4. Reloaded units.
    Assign address to 3548, connect to the console but under battery management, shows a single unit... Also infront (battery ID) LED does not glow.
    Thought I might need to close the loop cumulation? Thus, even tried to connect a cable of 3548 G4 to G3 3524. But also does not work.

    I'm their connection wrongly?

    Thank you very much in advance! ~

    This is a race to the bottom of the stack of switches.

    CAT5e or Cat6 RJ45 cables must be used for the ports of stacking due to the necessary flow for traffic between the battery units. Standard CAT5 can lead to communication errors.

    These steps must be done one at a time until all members of the battery are powered and their battery ID are selected. Performing a unit steps at a time will allow enough time to select the ID of the stack for each unit. However, the entire stack must be wired using the stacking ports before feeding devices.

    The process of selection of ID unit is as follows:

    1. turn power switch AC power.

    Power, the number of LED set (corresponding to the unit ID) previously saved begins to Flash. The LED flashes for 15 seconds. During this period, select a specific ID of the battery by pressing the battery identification button until the ID stack appropriate light.

    2 selection process - to advance the ID LED stacking number, continue to press the button for the identification of the battery. 6 LED flashing, press the button cell ID translates the device that is configured as a stand-alone. Press the button battery ID displays the ID of the battery 1. Unit 1 and unit 2 are compatible master units.

    3. end process selection - cabin ID selection process is completed when the flashing period of 15 seconds has transpired. The battery ID button becomes unresponsive and the unit ID is set to the ID of the LED flashes at the end of the period.

    Keep us updated,.

    Thank you

  • PowerConnect 6248 stacking using the front SFP Ports

    I am trying to stack two Dell Powerconnect 6248 switches. Currently they are chained together, but I modules fibre for the front sfp ports. Theoretically, I should be able to stack them. But when I try:

    stack 1/g45 #stack - port console (config-battery)

    Could not set the front panel stacking mode.

    Any ideas? Thank you!

    The PCT6200 requires a stack of modules installed in Bay 1 (XG1 XG2) at the rear of the switch. The stacking module uses CX4/Infiniband type stacking spacers.

    Stacking of front port / user is not supported

  • Looking at getting a second GS752TSB and have questions about stacking.

    Hi all

    I am looking at possible obtain a second switch of GS752tsb and tells me that it can withstand stacking and 10 GB/s. The documentation mentions that the stacking SFP port provides 2 band widths. 5 g. So the question is to achieve the stacking of 10G speeds requires to use 4-port SFP and have as aggregated links?

    2 ports on the GS752TS (B) can be configured for stacking (ports 51 and 52). When it is configured in the stacking mode, battery operated 2.5Gbps ports full-duplex. With 2 port on a switch in battery mode, is whence the bandwidth stacking 10 Gbps (each port battery 2.5Gbps in both directions).

  • Stacking multiple switches N1548

    Hello

    I bought 4 of the N1500 series network switches.

    After following the instructions in the "getting started" manual, I turned the switches one at a time, but they are all together as unit 1. Instead of 1, 2, 3, 4.

    I sorted descending with the top highest mac address. When I turn on the top switch, immediately becomes 'group 1', I wait 3 minutes and then turn on the second switch, but it also becomes the master of battery (unit 1) instead of "unit 2".

    I can confirm the following:

    1. stack ports have been configured in pairs. TE1/0/3 is configured with Te1/0/4.

    2. I have checked cables several times agenda and are OK

    3. I use transition 10Gig twinax copper for stacking

    Any suggestions please?

    Thank you very much

    It is well that they are all on the same firmware. I asked the status of the interface, is that as soon as they are in battery mode, they should show that "unpin". Here is a screenshot of what it should look like after completing orders on the stack.

    http://Dell.to/1MUU84H

  • Stacking of the misfortunes with switches N1548

    I can't stack my new switches to N1548. I changed the status on two Fibre ports on each of the two switches to 'stack' by using "stack stack-port 1/0/3 tengigabitethernet" and added the command "Start Auto-setting day - sw" on both. The command 'See the switch port battery' shows te1/0/3 and 4 on both switches as a "stack." Both switches power off and inserted Dell sfp 1 GB single tranceivers te1/0/3 of that and te1/0/4 on the other. Restarted a switch and inserted a single rider. Started the second switch and no link on the switch or light, or no message to the console.

    What Miss me?

    Yes, this is what it looks like, this is so that there is enough bandwidth. They work with transceivers to 1 GB Ethernet mode but not stack mode.

  • Adding to connect 6224 replacement for stacking

    Hello

    We just had a power connect 6224 replaced under warranty.

    -J' removed the stacking of the faulty switch module and installed in the new switch.

    -Power switch replacement and active stacking ports

    -Saved config, power off

    -Attached to the other switch in the stack with stacking cables

    -Powering new switch

    -Master restarted

    -Circuit breaker is backup and running normally, however the Member switch shows "code incompatibility?

    I tried to turn off the Member, remove the Member from the stack, and then restore power (I can not reset the master only outside the hours). But I still get the same code shift.

    Any suggestions?

    Looks like the firmware is not the same. Use the command > view version, to see what firmware the switches are on. The replacement switch must be on the same firmware as the pile. If they do not match, now may be a good time to get them all to date.

    http://Dell.to/1M7ulmk

    Tell us what you find.

  • Battery M8024-k (pair) M3048 (pair) battery gal, VLAN and port groups?

    Hi all

    I'm getting more confused by the minute.  I have a pair of M8024-k blade switches in a M1000e enclosure, outside, I have a pair of N3048 switches.

    I think I have the job of stacking on the M8024-k, but I found a configuration guide for Simple mode that says take port 17-20 outside the Group of ports on the pair aggregation and leave the stack ports and internally in the PA Group.  When I do that they remain outside the group, if I do it in the CLI or the GUI.

    Does anyone have a configuration guide that shows how I can pair trunk the 2 together and allow 4 VLAN that I keep coming without access to blade servers inside?  What I get out of simple mode on the M8024-k to achieve?

    Any help gratefully received.

    The best source of information is going to be the user guides.

    www.Dell.com/.../manuals

    www.Dell.com/.../manuals

    I would wear the 8024-k off simple mode.

    Console# not simple mode

    On two batteries, you will need to aggregate 4 ports together.  Here is an example to place a port in an aggregation group.

    Console (config) # interface gigabitethernet 0/1/5

    Console (Config-if-1/0/5) # channel-group mode 1 (active / Auto)

    Once the ports are in a channel-group 1, we can then configure the channel group to perform for several VLANs.

    Console (config) # interface port-channel 1

    trunk mode console (config-if-po1) #switchport

    #switchport console (config-if-po1) trunk allowed vlan add 2-150

    This is done, you should have connectivity.

    Keep us informed.

  • Newbe to fiber / suggestion Hardware

    I am an administrator of a network of small fiber optic, it consist of 90 computer, some with 1 GB and a few 100 MB fiber. Currently we have 6 AT8016 switches (16-port 100 MB fiber) and we want to replace it with 4 24-port fiber GB switches.

    Doze, someone at - it recommendations of Cisco switches, I can use it.

    Svein salvation,

    I'm trying to understand your condition.

    You need a switch with 24 ports Fibre with 10 GB interface (fibre)?

    If this is the case, you can you a number of choices:

    1 WS-C3560E-12SD has, as in the previous post, 2 X 2 10 Gb and FPS 12 x 1 GB ports.

    2 4928-10GE offers 28 ports of wire-speed Gigabit Ethernet ports (SFP) and two wire-speed 10 Gigabit Ethernet (X 2 optical) fiber.

    3 WS-3560E-12D has 12 X 2 10 GB ports. A 2 X using TwinGig adapter converting two SFP Gigabit Ethernet to 10 Gigabit Ethernet X 2 Interface Interfaces.

    Cisco Catalyst 4928 10 Gigabit Ethernet switch

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps6021/ps9903/data_sheet_c78_494757.html

    Switches Cisco Catalyst 3560-E series

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps7078/product_data_sheet0900aecd805bac22.html

    The next place is to get a chassis 4500 or 6500 (including overtime) and get the GBIC/SFP cards. Don't know if you want to go this route, because it is not solvent.

    I hope this helps.

  • Auto-negotiation in fiber

    Hi all

    I came across this doubt recently, while I was assigned to a "Revamping" for a network inherited project.

    As part of a temporary installation, we are required to connect two switches:

    A. 2950 switch with port MTRJ fiber types.

    B. 2960 S series with Gigabit Ethernet Ports with GLC-SX-MM modules in them.

    The underlying fiber is multi-mode.

    If my request is:

    If these switches would work if linked together?

    It's

    [Port MTRJ 2950 (10/100)] <-------------------------------------->[Port gig of 2960 with glc-sx-mm (100/10/100)]

    I understand that it is an uplink 10/100 and 10/100/100. It will in this case auto-negotiation ports fiber?

    Is there an incompatibility in the functioning of the wavelength of these two ports? (Sorry, if that, a silly question, but I'm new on this!)

    Thanks in advance!

     from fibre ports don't autonegotiate?

    You want to say "single" speed?  Or 100 or 1000?

    It is the standard of optical fiber.  Cisco did not rule.

    The only way for you to go either 100Mbps/1000/10 - / 40 - / 100Gbps depends on what optical fiber module, you want to use.

Maybe you are looking for