ISAKMP for vpn

Similar Questions

• Two links one for VPN Site to Site and another for internet on the same router configuration

  Hi all

  I have 2 internet links an ADSL and lease terminated on the same router. I need to configure ADSL for VPN site-to-site of HO and internet leased line dedicated for all users.

  my site IP subnet is 10.10.100.0/24 and HO subnet is 10.1.0.0/24.   Please find attached Config and advice it will be OK and works fine

  Thanks in advance...

  Mikael

  Hello

  For me, it looks like it has configured the route correctly;

  ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 fastethernet4 -> for all traffic to the internet.

  Road 10.1.0.0 ip 255.255.255.0 Dialer1 -> for vpn traffic to HO.
  

  The public_IP_HO must be defined according to the map of encryption using the set by the peers command.

  I want to add is on the isakmp policy hash attribute, you can choose between sha/md5 or whatever available on your device. Make sure that the isakmp policy to match political isakmp of your HO.

  The other thing is the acl for the internet. You may want to consider replacing the deny statement if you want to deny traffic only to your jar currently it is said to deny all traffic 10.10.100.0 10.0.0.0 network, not to the 10.1.0.0 HO (network).

  HTH,

• I forgot the password for VPN record how I opened

  First I have to buy the phone add password for VPN and I forgot how I fix this

  You can try to perform a repair of the system as it will be your phone factory reset or below, try to perform a factory reset, but in order to achieve a system repair

  Turn off your phone and unplug the PC (Hold to increase the volume and power for 10 seconds)
  Start PC Companion and select the area of support then updated my phone/Tablet then blue fix my phone/Tablet and follow the instructions on the screen - when you are prompted, always connect your phone off press and hold volume or back button - this should begin the process of repair or reformatting

  If you use Windows 8/8.1 or a 64-bit operating system and then adjust the settings for PC Companion and run in compatibility mode and choose Windows 7 or XP

• ASA - several IPS for VPN

  I'll put up Anyconnect to replace our customers of Cisco IPsec VPN, since it is end of life. A part of the process is to get an SSL certificate and a FULL domain name to use for this. I've got that and it is applied to the ASA very well. Now we don't get these warnings to the subject it is not not sure and such.

  The problem is that we use a non-standard port for the SSL VPN from 443 is already sent to an internal device. I have unused public addresses to the external interface of the ASA, but I don't know how I could use them. I would like to have a different IP address for SSL VPN, so I don't have to mess with the port forward that is currently in place. I read on proxy arp, but that looks like it could be a problem. I could have someone connect another cable to a different interface on the ASA (5512-X) and assign this static interface I want for the VPN, but I'm not sure it will work well. We have connections VPN site to site in place as well. Can I have the ASA listening on two different interfaces at the same time?

  Recap:

  IP 1 - address primary NAT, Site at tunnels put end here, some Cisco IPsec VPN terminate customer

  IP 2 - want to have all customers of Anyconnect connect here, to migrate all legacy Cissco IPsec clients until they are all over Anyconnect.

  Key is that I can not stop listening on IP 1 for site-to-site connections.

  Thoughts?

  Thank you!

  On the SAA, you cannot use the additional IPS for VPN.

  If tcp/443 is already used for an external server, then I would reconfigure the DNS entry for it to use the second IP address that must be sent to the internal server. You can then use the IP interface of the ASA for AnyConnect.

• ASA for vpn only

  Hello

  I would like to configure the ASA for vpn only. By default, ASA allows traffic from the interface of high security to low security interface. I want to stop it. Is it possible to do without resorting to access lists.

  Thank you

  John

  Define interfaces for the same level of security and make sure that you do not have same-security-traffic permits inter-interface enabled.
  

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807fc191.shtml

  Hope that helps.

• Can the NAT of ASA configuration for vpn local pool

  We have a group of tunnel remote ipsec, clients address pool use 172.18.33.0/24 which setup from command "ip local pool. The remote cliens must use full ipsec tunnel.

  Because of IP overlap or route number, we would like to NAT this local basin of 172.18.33.0 to 192.168.3.0 subnet when vpn users access certain servers or subnet via external interface of the ASA.  I have nat mapping address command from an interface to another interface of Armi. The pool local vpn is not behind any physical interface of the ASA. My question is can ASA policy NAT configuration for vpn local pool.  If so, how to set up this NAT.

  Thank you

  Haiying

  Elijah,

  NAT_VPNClients ip 172.18.33.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0

  public static 192.168.33.0 (external, outside) - NAT_VPNClients access list

  The above configuration will be NAT 172.18.33.0/24 to 192.168.33.0/24 when you go to 10.1.1.0/24 (assuming that 10.1.1.0/24 is your subnet of servers).

  To allow the ASA to redirect rewritten traffic the same interface in which he receive, you must also order:

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  Federico.

• Policy NAT for VPN L2L

  Summary:

  We strive to establish a two-way VPN L2L tunnel with a partner. VPN traffic is one-to-many towards our partner, and our partner they need of a many-to-one to us (they need to access a host on our network). In addition, our partner has many VPN, so they force us to use a separate NAT with two private hosts addresses, one for each direction of the tunnel.

  My initial configuration of the tunnel on my grown up side of Phase 1, but not IPSec. Partner ran debug that revealed that my host did not address NAT'd in the NAT policy. We use an ASA5520, ver 7.0.

  Here is the config:

  # #List of OUR guests

  the OURHosts object-group network

  network-host 192.168.x.y object

  # Hosts PARTNER #List

  the PARTNERHosts object-group network

  network-host 10.2.a.b object

  ###ACL for NAT

  # Many - to - many outgoing

  access-list extended NAT2 allowed ip object-group OURHosts-group of objects PARTNERHosts

  # One - to - many incoming

  VIH3 list extended access permit ip host 192.168.c.d PARTNERHosts object-group

  # #NAT

  NAT (INSIDE) 2-list of access NAT2

  NAT (OUTSIDE) 2 172.20.n.0

  NAT (INSIDE) 3 access-list VIH3

  NAT (OUTSIDE) 3 172.20.n.1

  # #ACL for VPN

  access list permits extended VPN ip object-group objects PARTNERHosts OURHosts-group

  access allowed extended VPN ip host 192.168.c.d PARTNERHosts object-group list

  # #Tunnel

  tunnel-group type ipsec-l2l

  card <#>crypto is the VPN address

  card crypto <#>the value transform-set VPN

  card <#>crypto defined peer

  I realize that the ACL for the VPN should read:

  access allowed extended VPN ip host 172.20.n.0 PARTNERHosts object-group list

  access allowed extended VPN ip host 172.20.n.1 PARTNERHosts object-group list

  .. . If the NAT was working properly, but when this ACL is used, Phase 1 is not even negotiating, so I know the NAT is never translated.

  What am I missing to NAT guests for 172.20 addresses host trying to access their internal addresses via the VPN?

  Thanks in advance.

  Patrick

  Here is the order of operations for NAT on the firewall:

  1 nat 0-list of access (free from nat)

  2. match the existing xlates

  3. match the static controls

  a. static NAT with no access list

  b. static PAT with no access list

  4. match orders nat

  a. nat [id] access-list (first match)

  b. nat [id] [address] [mask] (best match)

  i. If the ID is 0, create an xlate identity

  II. use global pool for dynamic NAT

  III. use global dynamic pool for PAT

  If you can try

  (1) a static NAT with an access list that will have priority on instruction of dynamic NAT

  (2) as you can see on 4A it uses first match with NAT and access list so theoretically Exchange autour should do the trick.

  I don't see any negative consequences? -Well Yes, you could lose all connectivity. I don't think that will happen, but I can't promise if you do absolutely not this after-hours.

  Jon

• How to open the manual mini port for vpn connection in win7?

  How to open the manual mini port for vpn connection in win7?

  Hi Andrew,

  Your question of Windows 7 is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It would be better suited to the TechNet community.

  Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the support you want.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/w7itpronetworking/threads

• AAA for VPN - Kerberos, LDAP or an NT domain?

  All,

  After that a small return on what you think is the best method for AAA authentication for VPN clients when authenticating against a Windows domain for remote access?

  I have always used "NT Domain" because it seems to correspond roughly to the NT Auth I used to use on the old hubs. However, I (finally) decided to take a look at the Kerberos and LDAP, since they must have been added for a reason...

  Far as I can tell LDAP adds the ability to search a little more finely (basic DN) AD, but that's all. Am I missing something? Are there more reason to use LDAP or Kerberos domain auth?

  What is more reliable? That you guys use?

  See you soon!

  Either it is reliable, you can map users in different group policies or apply different DAP political, based on their belonging to a group. If you are basic authentication, then your method is still the best way to go.

  Thank you

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• Traffic permitted only one-way for VPN-connected computers

  Hello

  I currently have an ASA 5505.  I put up as a remote SSL VPN access. My computers can connect to the VPN very well.  They just cannot access the internal network (192.168.250.0).  They cannot ping the inside interface of the ASA, nor any of the machines.  It seems that all traffic is blocked for them.  The strange thing is that when someone is connected to the VPN, I can ping this ASA VPN connection machine and other machines inside the LAN.  It seems that the traffic allows only one way.  I messed up with ACL with nothing doesn't.  Any suggestions please?

  Pool DHCP-192.168.250.20 - 50--> for LAN

  Pool VPN: 192.168.250.100 and 192.168.250.101

  Outside interface to get the modem DHCP

  The inside interface: 192.168.1.1

  Courses Running Config:

  : Saved

  :

  ASA Version 8.2 (5)

  !

  hostname HardmanASA

  activate the password # encrypted

  passwd # encrypted

  names of

  !

  interface Ethernet0/0

  switchport access vlan 20

  !

  interface Ethernet0/1

  switchport access vlan 10

  !

  interface Ethernet0/2

  switchport access vlan 10

  !

  interface Ethernet0/3

  Shutdown

  !

  interface Ethernet0/4

  Shutdown

  !

  interface Ethernet0/5

  Shutdown

  !

  interface Ethernet0/6

  Shutdown

  !

  interface Ethernet0/7

  switchport access vlan 10

  !

  interface Vlan1

  No nameif

  no level of security

  no ip address

  !

  interface Vlan10

  nameif inside

  security-level 100

  IP 192.168.250.1 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface Vlan20

  nameif outside

  security-level 0

  IP address dhcp setroute

  !

  passive FTP mode

  DNS lookup field inside

  DNS domain-lookup outside

  pager lines 24

  Within 1500 MTU

  Outside 1500 MTU

  mask 192.168.250.100 - 192.168.250.101 255.255.255.0 IP local pool VPN_Pool

  ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1

  don't allow no asdm history

  ARP timeout 14400

  Global interface 10 (external)

  NAT (inside) 10 192.168.250.0 255.255.255.0

  Timeout xlate 03:00

  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02

  Sunrpc timeout 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 mgcp from 01:00 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00

  Sip timeout 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00 sip - disconnect 0:02:00

  Timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute

  timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00

  Floating conn timeout 0:00:00

  dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy

  the ssh LOCAL console AAA authentication

  Enable http server

  http 192.168.250.0 255.255.255.0 inside

  No snmp server location

  No snmp Server contact

  Server enable SNMP traps snmp authentication linkup, linkdown cold start

  life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800

  Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association

  Telnet timeout 5

  SSH 192.168.250.0 255.255.255.0 inside

  SSH timeout 5

  SSH version 2

  Console timeout 0

  dhcpd dns 8.8.8.8

  !

  dhcpd address 192.168.250.20 - 192.168.250.50 inside

  dhcpd allow inside

  !

  a basic threat threat detection

  Statistics-list of access threat detection

  no statistical threat detection tcp-interception

  WebVPN

  allow outside

  SVC disk0:/anyconnect-win-2.5.2014-k9.pkg 1 image

  SVC disk0:/anyconnect-macosx-i386-2.5.2014-k9.pkg 2 image

  Picture disk0:/anyconnect-linux-2.5.2014-k9.pkg 3 SVC

  enable SVC

  tunnel-group-list activate

  attributes of Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy

  value of server DNS 8.8.8.8

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec svc webvpn

  tunnel-group AnyConnect type remote access

  tunnel-group AnyConnect General attributes

  address pool VPN_Pool

  tunnel-group AnyConnect webvpn-attributes

  enable AnyConnect group-alias

  !

  class-map inspection_default

  match default-inspection-traffic

  !

  !

  type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map

  parameters

  maximum message length automatic of customer

  message-length maximum 512

  Policy-map global_policy

  class inspection_default

  inspect the preset_dns_map dns

  inspect the ftp

  inspect h323 h225

  inspect the h323 ras

  Review the ip options

  inspect the netbios

  inspect the rsh

  inspect the rtsp

  inspect the skinny

  inspect esmtp

  inspect sqlnet

  inspect sunrpc

  inspect the tftp

  inspect the sip

  inspect xdmcp

  !

  global service-policy global_policy

  context of prompt hostname

  no remote anonymous reporting call

  call-home

  Profile of CiscoTAC-1

  no active account

  http https://tools.cisco.com/its/service/oddce/services/DDCEService destination address

  email address of destination [email protected] / * /

  destination-mode http transport

  Subscribe to alert-group diagnosis

  Subscribe to alert-group environment

  Subscribe to alert-group monthly periodic inventory

  monthly periodicals to subscribe to alert-group configuration

  daily periodic subscribe to alert-group telemetry

  Cryptochecksum:30fadff4b400e42e73e17167828e046f

  : end

  Hello

  No worries

  As we change the config I would do as well as possible.

  First, it is strongly recommended to use a different range of IP addresses for VPN clients and the internal network

  No VPN_Pool 192.168.250.100 - 192.168.250.101 255.255.255.0 ip local pool mask

  mask 192.168.251.100 - 192.168.251.101 255.255.255.0 IP local pool VPN_Pool

  NAT_0 ip 192.168.250.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.251.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access NAT_0

  Then give it a try and it work note this post hehe

• Limit bandwidth for VPN users

  Hi guys,.

  I use ASA Version 8.2 (1), I want to limit vpn users to use less bandwidth of my Interlink to access something on the inside of the network

  example: source vpn pool

  Destn: inside the network

  Please let me know how to achieve this with QOS config.

  Hello

  Probably the best would be to match groups of tunnel.

  class-map TG1-best-effort 

  match tunnel-group Tunnel-Group-1 

  match flow ip destination-address 

  Then this traffic in police policy-map and apply the service policy to the external interface (since you want to traffic police from your home). You can also use the pool for vpn access lists.

  For more details, please see:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/configuration/guide/QoS.html

• EasyVPN for VPN phones?

  Can I use a router 2911 like EasyVPN server for VPN phones or EasyVPN is only for the router-to-router VPN?

  EasyVPN server can stop sessions IPSec client.  I know not at all with native features of IPSec Cisco phones. There is version phone Cisco AnyConnect SSL VPN support including a 2911 can be dismissed to support.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/customer/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/Admin/Configuration/Guide/cmevpn.html#wp1019169

  Todd

• What is the function of the IOS minimum set required for VPN site-to-site software?

  Hi guys,.

  I have a Cisco 1841 router to do a VPN site-to site. I would like to know what is the function of the IOS minimum set required for VPN site-to-site software?

  Thanks in advance.

  Hi Ja,

  Advanced security or more should do it. The version of the IOS, you can try later 12.4 T which is c1841-advsecurityk9 - mz.124 - 24.T5.bin, in which case you don't want to go to 15.1 still.

  I hope this helps.

  Raga

• Unique password on SAA for VPN access

  Hello

  It is posibble create a unique password on SAA for VPN access?

  I googled a bit and found a few solutions with unique servers from other suppliers.

  I wonder if this is possible without additional hardware/software.

  Hello

  you will need to integrate the VPN with the RSA. they will give you once the configuration of the password tokenized soft or hard token.

  Outside of RSA, there is no other choice I guess.

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards

  Anisha.

  P.S.: Please mark this message as answered if you feel that your query is resolved. Note the useful messages.

• Dynamic routing for VPN Failover L2L

  Hello

  Can someone offer me some advice on this please?

  I have attached a simple diagram of our EXTENSIVE referral network.

  Overview

  • The firewall is ASA 5510 running 8.4 (9)
  • Basic to the Headquarters network uses OSPF
  • On ASA static routes are redistributed into OSPF
  • On ASA for VPN static routes are redistributed into OSPF with 130 metric so redistributed BGP routes are preferred
  • Basic network has a static route to 10.0.0.0/8 to Corporate WAN, which is redistributed into OSPF
  • Branch Office WAN uses BGP - routes are redistributed into OSPF
  • The branch routers using VRRP for redundancy of the IP for the default gateway of local customers.
  • Branch router main past off VRRP IP to router backup when the WAN interface is down
  • BO backup router (. 253) contains only a default route to the internet
  • In normal operation, the traffic to and from BO uses Local Branch Office WAN
  • If local BO WAN link fails, traffic to and from the BO uses IPSec VPN via public Internet

  I try to configure dynamic routing on our network for when a branch switches to the IPsec VPN. What I want to happen (not sure if it is possible) is for the ASA announce the subnet to the remote end of the VPN in OSPF to Headquarters.

  I managed to get this working using IPP, but for some reason any VPN stay up all the time when we are not in a failover scenario. This causes the ASA added the table as a static route is the remote subnet in it and do not use the announced route of OSPF from the core network. This prevents the BO customers access to the Internet. If I remove the IPP on the VPN setting, ASA learns the route to the subnet via the WAN BO - resumes normal operation.

  I have configured the metric of the static routes that get redistributed into OSPF by ASA superior to 110. This is so that the routes redistributed by the WAN BO OSPF BGP, are preferred. The idea being that when the WAN link is again available, the routing changes automatically and the site fails to WAN BO.

  I guess what I need to know is; This design is feasible, and if so where I'm going wrong?

  Thank you

  Paul

  Hi Paul,.

  your ASA maintains the tunnel alive only because this path exists on ASA.  This is why you must use IP - SLA on ASA to push network taffic "10.10.10.0/24" based on the echo response, using the ALS-intellectual property

  Please look at the example below, in the example below shows that the traffic flows through the tunnel, only if the ASA cannot reach the 10.10.10.0/24 network via the internal network of HQ.

  This configuration illuminate ASA.

  Route inside 10.10.10.0 255.255.2550 10.0.0.2 track 10

  (assuming 10.0.0.2 ip peering from inside the ip address of the router to HO)

  Route outside 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 254

  (value of 254 is a more expensive route to go via IPSec tunnel and x = the bridge by default-ISP)

  ALS 99 monitor

  type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 10.10.10.254 inside interface

  NUM-package of 3

  frequency 10

  Annex monitor SLA 99 life never start-time now

  track 10 rtr 99 accessibility

  Let me know, if this can help.

  Thank you

  Rizwan James