cRIO cpu load

Similar Questions

• cRIO CPU % Total load drift up to...

  My project has a cRIO 9074 in hybrid mode (an analog card is under the FPGA target, all others are the analytical engine).

  The cRIO is a central control to 3 modbus slaves (palette function ModbusTCP block [i.e. not the server of e/s]). And is a 1 system SCADA via Ethernet/IP slave.

  One of the slaves is a HMI XP (not the product NOR) which is the DB SQL base data record. How to get the plot shown. Weather I have deploy dynamically or "run as a startup" in the space of 4 hours, rails and the CPU % total load creeps upward. Finally, the HMI loses comms with the cRIO and stops the recording of data.

  I have a feeling that the culprit is the component call loops of the total cpu load - but to confirm, I'll need to add it to the Modbus data to be connected.

  The application has many parallel loops timed and non-timed, some for the comms ModbusTCP, others for any other logical - including a state machine in line waiting. For four hours, the state machine is static - i.e. no transition and the size of the data, as well as the frequency polled ModbusTCP and Ethernet/IP data is also static. I do it without programmatic changes to data between the cRIO and the outside world.

  In addition, no recording on the disc of cRIO. On an error, I can post a message on the console. (I'll check on that).

  If this was your problem, how would you debug?

  

  by EITHER:

  I used the System Profiler tool snapshot schedule about every hour. Smoking gun pointing to 2 live. They took more in addition to performing, means that only he excecuton totalled 6.5ms (immediately after deployment) and 24.4 ms after about 4 hours - and it drifted upward as the "worst offender" according to capture instant profler. In this vi I was using the function "get the queue" - without a queue of output associated.

  I wired the reference of the queue for these screws. And up to 3 hours and my load CPU % is now in place.

• Ghostery addon causes 100% CPU load on a carrot for a few seconds for each hyperlink that you clicked.

  For many months now and with several versions of Firefox and firefox profiles, turning the Ghostery add-on causes each hyperlink clicked to have 2 second break. In the Task Manager, I see 25% cpu usage, which equals 100% of CPU on my Quad Core cpu load.

  If I disable Ghostery and restart Firefox, all problems disappear. So I have either the choice between a slow browser, or privacy-enabled navigation. Both are unacceptable.

  I can't find anyone with this problem; is it me?

  I did not use of Ghostery but I guess it could be the preload page and inspect and possibly break URLS to protect you before posting. Maybe if you set the settings so that it does less, allows you to balance the objectives of performance and privacy?

  I noticed this on their support site today: https://getsatisfaction.com/ghostery/topics/your_script_becomes_unresponsive_raising_hell_with_firefox

• Satellite L50 - B fan works even if the CPU load is very low

  I recently bought a Satellite L50 - B and I made a Windows 10 updated. The problem is that the fan works even if the CPU load is very low and the noise bothers me a lot.
  I ordered the video card driver and the system tells methat driver is updated to the latest version.
  I don't know what I can do to change this sad situation.
  Please, please, could you help me solve the problem?
  Thank you very much for your support and understanding.
  I await your quick response.
  Thank you.
  Giovanni Spina

  What CPU temp? Probably overheating?
  Try to replace the thermal interface on the CPU. ;-)

• Satellite P300-212 - system causes the periodic high CPU load

  Windows Vista Edition Home Premium (OEM) on the Toshiba Satellite P300-212

  Even on a system Windows freshly installed (from recovery DVDs), the system process (PID 4, NT Kernel & System) causes on a regular basis (every five minutes) a CPU load high for a few seconds, during which the system hangs, not even the mouse pointer can be moved.
  Sysinternals Process Explorer identifies the thread of high load as "ntkrnlpa.exe! ExfTryAcquirePushLockShared + 0 x 15 2 "with the thread ID 20 or 24.

  Does anyone have an explanation for this behavior or a solution to the problem?

  Hey,.

  If you have installed Windows recovery disk Toshiba but still high CPU usage? Hmm that's strange because this image is tested by Toshiba

  Have you installed or uninstalled any software or tools?
  I uninstall the current antivirus and disable some start up programs you n t need in msconfig. Usually, this should work.

• In the latest version of Skype's huge CPU load

  I have installed Skype on 2 different PC running Windows (freshly installed) 8. When using Skype in combination with Chrome CPU load goes up to 100% of all the minutes or more for a few seconds. It's really irritating and my not-so-rare configuration tells me that more people should have this huge problem.

  The only way to stop this behavior must close Skype. I read the topics (from 2012 and 2013) on how you can disable interaction web browser in the Skype settings, but it does not work (or more).

  Development of Skype in recent years is just tragic

  As of October 15, 2014, with the last update of Skype these amazing huge bugs seem to have been fixed after many, many months (years?). After you install the update and change nothing else on my system, Skype seems fine now. No freezes, no more huge processor and the burden of memory, leaks memory is no longer. Amazing that it took so long to get it, but hey, Microsoft can't complain now that it works.

• COM Bluetooth port 90-100% CPU load

  I ' am running a PC application via a COM port normal, nothing complicated 38 kbaud. The CPU load is about 4%.
  Then I try to do without this thread, that oops the CPU rises to 96% of the load.

  I use a different computer manufacturers with Toshiba stack and module internal BT. Win XP SP2. Yes I have updated to the last stack of Toshiba.

  The same problem on my second computer (since it is a dual core I get 50% CPU) also with Toshiba stack.

  If use an external RS232 Bluetooth adapter everythings works fine at 4% of CPU load. I have however to connect a USB Bluetooth, same problem 96% CPU adapter.

  I'm doing something obviously wrong?

  / B

  Each laptop manufacturer typically feature test prior to the distribution of laptops. Have you tried to know what say the support from the manufacturer of this problem?

  I use for Toshiba laptop and BT works well and something like that doesn't happen to me.

• BT stack file TosBTMng.Exe generates 100% of CPU load

  I am also facing the problem that the Toshiba Bluetooth Manager (TosBtMng.exe) very often starts a loop and causes a 100% CPU load.

  This has happened with older versions of the Toshiba Bluetooth stack and the current version (5.1.0.12).

  The affected system is a Tecra S1, BT-Modul and Windows XP SP2.

  BT battery installation went well and the laptop starts succesfull while BT is enabled. I also checked for hidden COM-Ports and other tips in this forum, without success.

  Blocking seems to occur at different times. Sometimes just after are restarted, by clicking on the tray icon of BT with the right button of the mouse. Then the context menu is shown all too the white box, no entries. He can also try to connect to a device already associated. If I kill the process with the Task Manager, I can restart and he continues to work for a while.

  As found in another thread here, I enabled the registration of the API of the Bluetooth Manager and found the following when connecting with the Nokia PC Suite for my mobile phone:

  Call the 00042519 21:55:05 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042520 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042521 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BtCreateCOMM2: InitCOMPort = COM6, CreateCOMPort = COM23
  00042522 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall: send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000036 (54)
  00042523 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
  00042524 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000028 (40)
  00042525 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
  00042526 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetLocalInfo()
  00042527 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BtGetLocalInfo2: entry Paramers / pLocalBtDeviceInfo = 00D9FE8C, plStatus = 00D9FE84
  00042528 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall: send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00001000 (4096), Size = 00000030 (48)
  00042529 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
  00042530 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00001000 (4096), Size = 0000003F (63)
  00042531 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
  00042532 21:56:17 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetRemoteDeviceList2()

  A new COM port is created successfully (COM23) and a few seconds later the CPU of TosBtMng load goes up to 100%, but no API calls are made. And if you wait long enough the phone are connected and data can be transferred. However, very slowly.

  Probably because of the high CPU load a next port COM (COM24) will be created some time later and this process is then repeated once again:

  00042740 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
  00042741 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008007 (32775), Size = 00000041 (65)
  00042742 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
  Call the 00042743 21:56:47 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042744 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042745 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BtCreateCOMM2: InitCOMPort = COM6, CreateCOMPort = COM24
  00042746 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall: send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000036 (54)
  00042747 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
  00042748 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000028 (40)
  00042749 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
  00042750 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetCOMMInfoList2()
  Call the 00042751 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042752 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  Call the 00042753 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042754 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  Call the 00042755 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042756 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  Call the 00042757 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042758 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  Call the 00042759 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042760 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042761 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetLocalInfo()
  00042762 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetLocalInfo()

  Maybe this allows to locate the origin of the problem CPU load of the Bluetooth Manager.

  Thank you
  Gerhard

  How your com port configuration look like?
  Please compare with the DeviceManager screenshot from the following Web site:
  http://APS2.toshiba-tro.de/Bluetooth/?page=FAQ/bluetoothnotworking

• RT FIFO results in 100% of cpu load?

  Hello

  I am trying to replace some RT-FIFO queues on a target of cRIO9074 (via LV2011), which should be fairly easy because the API is very similar for both:

  

  This example VI works for sure: the lower loop puts an I32 in the FIFO every 100ms, the upper loop must wait before trying to read a new element of the "timeout" (the value 50ms) FIFO. For this example the upper loop should run (roughly) 2 - 3 times for each iteration of the lower loop because of 50ms timeout.

  The problem I have is: it shows 100% cpu load and I don't understand why he says:

  

  Where this example VI does not burn 100% cpu load? The RTFIFORead question just the current state of the FIFO?

  Have you checked whether a time-out to > 100ms also creates 100% CPU load?

  Please note that create the FIFO provides the configuration of reading and writing for the vote against blocking. See Help for more information.

  Norbert

• VI causes CPU load after several days of running

  Hello

  I have a strange problem. I have craeted a control test VI bench and it runs on five computers, five test of control systems. All PCs have almost the same hardware, same card mother, same processor, etc.

  Normally the CPU load is around 50% when I run the VI, but to a PC, CPU load goes up to 85% after several days (maybe a week) market continues and the PC is almost tied up - VI execution becomes very slow (10 times slower) and the mouse moves only very slowly.

  I have first thought that the PC has a problem, but the problem disappears as soon as I stop and restart the VI!

  I don't even have to put an end to LabVIEW - only my VI and then all is well again.

  The problem does not occur in the other four PC, but I can't say for sure.

  The Task Manager indicates that LabVIEW causes CPU - use swap file load is small.

  Is it possible to analyse the causes of high CPU load?

  I use LabVIEW 7.1 Professional

  Operating system: Win XP (SP 2 or 3 that I can't remember)

  P.S. I have no loops without waiting-functions.

  johanneshoer wrote:

  ...

  the PC where the problem is occurring only 2 x 512 GB RAM, others have 2 x 1 GB. Maybe I have the upgrade of RAM would be my first action...

  ...

  Assuming that it's a typo problem, is you have run out of memory physics and are returning to the virtual (which is 1000 X) slower than real memory.

  Christian has nailed.

  Ben

• Strange behavior of "RT Get CPU Loads.vi"; first call lasts a very long time!

  I spent a considerable time of debugging a new application, after that we decided to migrate to the new architecture. When a more common coding errors where eliminated, the application started running smoothly for short periods before suddenly freezing until the moment where the connection to the target RT has been lost.

  I finally understood as a Subvi, which returns the data to the system (use of memory, the cpu load, etc.) lasted if long run than the queue to feed this consumer loop filled with tasks causing eventually the memory fills. I have done some testing of the Subvi separately and noticed that "CPU Get RT Loads.vi" takes forever to run the first time, it is called after a target restart and then quickly runs during subsequent calls.

  Is this known behaviour? Other ways to solve this, except 'RT Get CPU Loads.vi' call during initialization?

  The VI has an entry "session in? If she uses the system of screw configuration, he may have to create a session on the first call you can do outside of your loop. If not and you have installed system configuration tool, you can try to use the nodes property to get the CPU - in more recent versions of RT, I think that the function you are using is obsolete.

  Can you post a snippet of your code / the VI?

• SG - 500 - OID SNMP to lower the CPU load?

  Hello

  I have several SG500 (autonomous and stacked). How can I get the CPU via SNMP load? Who knows the correct SNMP OID to lower the CPU load?

  In the MIB that are provided for download one was not able to find the correct OID.

  Hello

  There are three OID for the CPU usage:

  CPU utilization for 5 seconds	. 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.6.1.101.1.7.0
  CPU utilization for 1 minutes	. 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.6.1.101.1.8.0
  CPU utilization for 5 minutes	. 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.6.1.101.1.9.0

  This came a note of junk, I got in an email, so I don't know exactly where this information is originally.

  Let me know if it works for you,

  Christopher Ebert - Network Support Engineer

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

  * Please note the useful messages *.

• [MSD] High CPU load of Java

  Hello

  One of my colleagues has a problem with the CPU load high caused by the process of java under the wrapper, it uses the latest version of TMS 13.2.2 with TMSPE, the server running Server 2008 R2 Enterprise, 4 GB RAM, 64-bit java (9) was last updated was applied, to no avail.

  The process of java on my TMS system runs at 0.54% avg, the only difference I see is the amount of RAM, its user base is tiny (80 users).

  Any suggestions on what he can try to diagnose the problem?

  

  Hi you use findme?

  You can check if the address of the video template is the same as the address of device model?

  In the diagnostics of tmspe can also see if the importation of the aircraft has a work «»
  Circle on it as his performs a constant import?

  If you do not use findme, disable it on tms tmspe settings and restart the tmspe service. The cpu is now stable?

  / Magnus

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

• 100% high CPU load and memory usage

  Hi all

  My company bought a new appliance IPS 4510 and after initial installation, I see that the CPU load and memory is 100%. The device is not in a production network. Is this normal or there is a hardware problem? Enjoy a Counselor about it.

  Concerning

  Christine

  Hi Damien,.

  It is actually normal behavior for an IPS sensor.

  To measure the actual load of an IPS sensor, you will want to monitor the "percentage load treatment" of the analytical engine that processes all inspection processing for the sensor.

  You can view these statistics by using the command 'display the scan statistics-engine '.

  Also, the sensor running version 7.0000 E4 5,0000 E4 (or later version), you can check the load percentage value Inspection displayed by the command "Display inspection-load" in its place.

  Hope that answers your query.

  Cyril Shankar

• Network - high CPU load problem

  Hello

  I've updated the 2.6.24 kernel 2.6.26 (under Debian Lenny 64 bit) on the host computer. And I have a problem with the network communication.

  I have 2 Virtual PC (Windows) on the host Linux (Debian 64 bit). Each virtual PC to fill only one network adapter.

  I have VMware Server 2 for 64-bit, my PC has Intel Quad Core and ethernet card 4 on the card mother Gigabyte EP45-DQ6.

  When virtual PC start communicate via network - load cpu in virtual card pc go to 40-50 percent, after the stop communicates on the NIC - cpu load to go from 1 to 4%.

  CPU host increase load when virtual pc communicate too.

  My linux use r8169 for ehernet adapter.

  What is the problem?

  Thank you for your response.

  Soory for my English.

  Reduce the numer vCPU one per guest. If you have a multiprocessor/kernel HAL, you will need to change this, but give it a try without changing that, first of all.

  AWo

  VCP 3 & 4

  Author @ vmwire.net

  \[:o]===\[o:]

  = You want to have this ad as a ringtone on your mobile phone? =

  = Send 'Assignment' to 911 for only $999999,99! =